Cassadaga Spiritual Camp


CASSADAGA SPIRITUAL CAMP TIMELINE

1848 (January 6):  George P. Colby was born.

1875:  George Colby relocated to Florida.

1893:  The National Spiritualist Association (now the National Spiritualist Association of Churches) was established.

1893 (January):  George Colby announced in January 1893 that the National Spiritual and Liberal Association would soon meet at DeLeon Springs in Volusia County, Florida.

1894:  The Cassadaga Spiritualist Camp Meeting Association (CSCMA) incorporated.

1895:  George Colby deeded thirty-five acres of land to the CSCMA to make a Spiritualist Camp.

1895 (February 8):  The Association opened for its first season and one hundred people attended the three-day event held at Colby’s home.

1922:  The original Cassadaga hotel was constructed on the Association grounds.

1926:  The original Cassadaga Hotel burned down. Reconstruction began the following year and was completed in 1928.

1933:  The community trustees sold the Cassadaga Hotel to a non-member purchaser.

1933 (July 27):  George Colby died in Deland, Florida.

1991:  Cassadaga Spiritual Camp was placed on the National Register of Historic Places.

2019:  The 125th anniversary of the founding of Cassadaga took place.

FOUNDER/GROUP HISTORY

Cassadaga, Lily Dale, and Camp Chesterfield are three of the most significant remaining spiritual camps in the U.S. (Compton 2019). While there remain a number of other active  camps in the U.S., such as Camp Etna in rural Maine (Yechivi 2019), most have shuttered or operate seasonally (Leonard 2020). Cassadaga (a Seneca Indian tribal phrase meaning “rocks beneath the water”), which was established in 1894, is the oldest spiritual camp in the South. The name for the camp was taken from Lake Cassadaga where Lily Dale is located. It is often referred to as the “Psychic Capital of the World.” 2019 marked the 125th anniversary [Image at right] of the founding of Cassadaga. Despite the camp’s prominence, there are only a few comprehensive historical sources on Cassadaga (United States Department of the Interior 1991; Schaleman n.d.; Leonard 2020, 2017).

George P. Colby, [Image at right] the principal founder of Cassadaga, was born on January 6, 1848 (the same year that the Fox Sisters made spirit contact in Hydesville, New York, which started the Modern Spiritualist movement and eventual religion) to Baptists James Colby and Elminia (Lewis) Colby in Pike, New York (Colby 2020; Mimna 2017; Leonard 2020). When Colby was eight years-old, the family moved to Minnesota. Colby was baptized when he was twelve. As a young teenager, Colby apparently began to develop his psychic abilities. He soon became known in the area for healing and  clairvoyant powers. He had left the Baptist church by 1867 and had begun traveling and making a living through displays of his abilities during private readings and seances as well as public appearances. He frequently visited Lily Dale in New York, as well as other Spiritualist associations and camps. As an adult, Colby remained unmarried, but he did adopt several boys and supported their education. He enjoyed a measure of prosperity during his life, [Image at right] but also experienced prolonged illness and poverty toward the end of his life.

Colby reported that early in his development as a medium he received a message from his uncle’s spirit that he would one day establish a Spiritualist camp in the South. Seneca instructed Colby to visit T. D. Giddings in Wisconsin, and the pair then traveled together to Florida to establish a spiritualist center, with the location to be determined by a “Congress of Spirits.” Colby also had begun to suffer from ill health and was advised by a doctor to seek out a warmer climate in order to convalesce (Awtry 2014:44; Karcher and Hutchison 1980:67).

Colby and his traveling party arrived at Blue Springs in Volusia County on November 1 (Karcher and Hutchinson 1980:67-68). They report that during the evening Seneca appeared to the party with a vision of the future community.

Most of the party had never before that night experienced the manifestation of a spirit entity but George Colby, in his convincing way, explained the phenomena and gained the confidence of his companions. That night, Colby had a dream about Spiritualism—how it would someday be organized as a religion. In his dream, he saw a small community in Central Florida which consisted entirely of Spiritualists—a place where people would come from all over the country to learn about and experience Spiritualism.

Well prior to locating the actual Cassadaga camp site, in 1875 Colby had already begun homesteading land in Volusia County, which he pursued for twenty years. In 1880, Colby filed a homestead claim and was granted a 145-acre tract in 1884. After a charter was granted to the Cassadaga Spiritualist Camp Meeting Association in 1894, he deeded the thirty-five acres of land to the association in 1895. The association later was able to acquire additional acreage increasing its area to fifty-seven acres (Leonard 2020).

On February 8, 1895, the Association inaugural took place with 100 people in attendance for a three-day event that was held in Colby’s home. Once the Association was established, Colby became one of the resident mediums. As time went on, however, his health continued to decline, as did his financial fortunes. He died impoverished on July 27, 1933.

DOCTRINES/BELIEFS

Cassadaga subscribes to central tenets of Spiritualism (Cassadaga website n.d. “Who We Are”):

We believe in Infinite Intelligence.

We believe that the phenomena of nature, both physical and spiritual, are the expression of Infinite Intelligence.

We affirm that a correct understanding of such expression and living in accordance therewith constitute true religion.

We affirm that the existence and personal identity of the individual continue after the change called death.

We affirm that communication with the so-called dead is a fact, scientifically proven by the phenomena of Spiritualism

We believe that the highest morality is contained in the Golden Rule: “Whatsoever ye would that others should do unto you, do ye also unto them.”

We affirm the moral responsibility of the individual, and that he makes his own happiness or unhappiness as he obeys or disobeys Nature’s physical and spiritual laws.

We affirm that the doorway to reformation is never closed against any human soul, here or hereafter.

We affirm that the Precepts of Prophecy and Healing contained in the Bible are Divine attributes proven through Mediumship.

Spiritualism bases its claim to be scientific on the assertion that life is continuous; that is, everyone is a unique, eternal entity. Validation is found through mediums who receive and share information from the unseen spiritual realm. At the same time, Spiritualism is also a religion. It teaches that there is a God, who is the infinite intelligence and force that created the Natural Laws which govern the universe.

Cassadaga is careful not to assert exclusive validity for its beliefs and practices, noting thatSpiritual Healing does not deny that physicians and surgeons are necessary. We believe Spiritual Healing complements traditional as well as alternative medical practitioners and we cooperate with them at all times.” Further, Cassadaga acknowledges that self-healing may be an important part of the process. The medium channels “God’s healing energies” to the individual, even when the individual is not physically present in some cases (Cassadaga website n.d. “Who We Are”).

RITUALS/ACTIVITIES

The central rituals at Cassadaga are conducted by mediums and healers. A medium is understood to be “one who is capable of receiving communication from people who were once living on the earth and have passed into the spirit world. This communication from entities may be spontaneous or opened and comes in the form of seeing, hearing, smelling and sensing.” A healer is one who acts as a channel to convey God’s healing energies to others, whether for physical, emotional, mental or spiritual healing. This occurs through the laying on of hands.” (Cassadaga website n.d. “Mediums and Healers). Cassadaga underscores the authenticity of mediums and healers through its assertion that each must have a minimum of four years’ certification process (Cassadaga website “List of Mediums” n.d.). In addition to the spiritual power generated by individual mediums and healers, Cassadaga itself is understood to be a spiritual vortex created by the cumulation of psychic and spiritual activities within the community.

Several dozen mediums and healers are listed on the Cassadaga Camp website. [Image at right] Each provides a profile of their personal history, certification, services provided. In general, these profiles trace their medium and healing skills to a lifelong history of spiritual and psychic proclivities, transformative experiences, and professional training (See, Fernandez 2015). All mediums offering services within the camp are required to have certification, with the exception of the privately owned Cassadaga Hotel which provides its own mediums and healers.

The authenticity and power of healings and seances is buttressed by testimonials from clients. Williamson (2008), for example, reports

Once, he was in the temple’s seance room with seven people when money started falling from the air. Another time, a spirit holding a lighted candle followed him and five other people from the room.

“We have had the room get very cold and then real hot. We have also heard voices in the walls and people moving around,” he said. “It would take a long time to tell all the wonderful things that happen in that special room.”

“I have seen hands form of ectoplasm on the table next to mine and have had them touch me,” said Cassadaga medium Victor Vogenitz, 54, a veteran of hundreds of seances.

There are community services as well. On Sunday mornings there are services: an instructional services Spiritualism, a healing service, and a church service (hymns, a guided meditation healing, a lecture)

ORGANIZATION/LEADERSHIP

Cassadaga Spiritual Camp’s current legal status is an “unincorporated town;” it is located near DeLand, Florida (Basu 2020). The current camp was preceded by an attempt to establish a community organized by the National Spiritual and Liberal Association in nearby DeLeon Springs in January 1893. Dr. William Rowley is credited with founding the De Leon Springs site and naming it the National Spiritual and Liberal Association (NSALA). George P. Colby became its first President. Once the Camp had outgrown its property, Abbie Pettengill, Marion and Thomas Skidmore, and Emma Huff, all of the “City of Light” in New York (now the Lily Dale Assembly), were in full agreement with most of the membership to find it a new home. The Cassadaga community so much resembled the northern camp that the group of thirteen are credited with having incorporated the Southern Cassadaga Spiritualist Camp Meeting Association (SCSCMA) as a sister Camp to their northern camp (Leonard 2020).

In her book, Cassadaga:  Where Spirits Meet (2014:55), Marilyn Awtry identified George Colby as the founder of the actual geographic location of the camp, Cassadaga, and identified the following thirteen individuals as being the founders of the “Southern Cassadaga Spiritualist Camp Meeting Association:”

Thomas Skidmore (Lily Dale, New York); Marion Skidmore (Lily Dale, New York); Abby L. Pettengill (Cleveland, Ohio and Lily Dale, New York); Emma J. Huff (Lake Helen, Florida and Lily Dale, New York); Frank Bond (Deland, Florida); Harvey W. Richardson (East Aurora, New York); Adailla C. Jewett (Cleveland, Ohio); Jerry Robinson (Lookout Mountain, Tennessee); Mariette Cuscaden (Tampa, Florida); Soledad B. Sofford (Tarpon Springs, Florida); George W.Liston (Forest City, Florida); George Webster (Lake Helen, Florida); and Maria H. Webster (Lake Helen, Florida).

Although the first gathering at De Leon attracted 1,000 participants, the project ultimately failed when founder George Rowley could not raise sufficient funds to purchase the proposed camp property. At that point George Colby offered his property as an alternative. After the camp was established, Colby went on to become a resident medium. The board of directors almost immediately amended its charter to require that the association would own all real estate within the camp boundaries. Residents were offered ninety-nine year leases on lots, but ownership would remain with the Association.

The original vision of Cassadaga was as a center and national winter resort for Spiritualists. There were seances and speeches along with outdoor activities. The camp attracted around 100 people seasonally but had only a few dozen permanent residents. Still, the community ranked as the second largest nationally after the Lily Dale Community in New York. The community expanded rapidly between the late 1890s and the late 1920s. Nearly three dozen houses were constructed by 1915. The community added major non-residential buildings, such as a post office in 1910, Colby Memorial Temple in 1923, and the reconstructed Cassadaga Hotel in 1927. Throughout the camp’s history, of course the Spiritualist church [Image at right] has, symbolically at least, been the center of the community as the Cassadaga Spiritualist Camp is a religiously-based association (Leonard 2020).

ISSUES/CHALLENGES

Cassadaga Spiritual Camp has encountered three major issues during its history that have affected its survival and development: maintaining financial viability, controlling the emergence of unconnected businesses around the borders of the camp, and dealing with scandal and the skepticism about Spiritualism generally in the broader community.

Dating back to the early formation of Cassadaga, there have been financial problems. Indeed, the camp was initially established primarily as a result of George Colby’s initiatives and willingness to deed thirty-five acres of his land to create the new camp. While the camp did draw a number of resident mediums who attracted Spiritualist visitors, interest in Spiritualism gradually waned. A further blow to the community was the destruction of the Cassadaga Hotel by fire in late 1926. [Image at right] Although the hotel had been rebuilt by 1928, the fallout from the stock market crash in 1929 and the 1930s depression left the community with a serious financial burden. It was at this point that the community decided that it could no longer support the Cassadaga Hotel, which had been important in generating visitation. Despite vigorous debate,the members of the Association who considered the hotel a burden prevailed. In 1933, due to its inability to pay either its taxes or the debt owed to the bondholders, the Association sold the Cassadaga Hotel” [to a private party] (Schaleman n.d.). Although the community survived the depression years, “By the beginning of World War II development in Cassadaga had come to an end” (Schaleman n.d.).

A related problem for the community has been loss of control over its boundaries. Unlike most Spiritualist camps, which tend to be in gated, fenced communities with clearly marked borders, Cassadaga Spiritualist Camp properties are intermingled with non- association buildings, homes, and businesses. [Image at right] The buildings and enterprises that are associated directly and officially with the camp are clearly marked, but the intermingling compromises a clear community identity for non-residents (Leonard 2020).

The sale and loss of control over the Cassadaga Hotel was particularly significant in this regard. The hotel hired its own mediums and also permitted some New Age practitioners to operate in the hotel (Basu 2020). As Blaogh (2013) described this two-culture issue:

The New Agers use tarot cards and stick to the Cassadaga Hotel. A stone’s throw away is the religious organization maintains the traditional belief system that Colby established in the 1800s. That’s not to say the Cassadaga Hotel and its hired psychics don’t stay true to Spiritualism as religion, but they’re a bit more relaxed about it. Its like Episcopalians and Catholics.

In response to this tension, Cassadaga-certified mediums emphasize that they are “SCSCMA Certified” (Leonard 2020).

The community identity problem has been compounded by the growth of population and businesses just outside the border of Cassadaga’s fifty-seven acre camp. As the camp acknowledged on its website (Cassadaga website n.d. “Who We Are”):

Over the years, metaphysical stores and businesses have sprung up in Cassadaga around the perimeter of the 57-acre Camp. Although many of these businesses are owned by like-minded people, they are separate businesses and unaffiliated with the Camp.

Finally, there was the problem of scandal. Along with the growth and popularity of Spiritualism, a cottage industry of skeptics emerged whose mission was advanced by scandals within the ranks of Spiritualism’s mediums. In probably the most noteworthy case, a confrontation in Boston, Massachusetts in 1896 followed the mediums to Cassadaga. According to Guthrie (1998) the incident

involved two popular practitioners at the Camp–the materializing medium O. L. Concannon and his wife, Edella, a platform test medium. While the details surrounding the episode remain sketchy, according to one eyewitness, when Mr. Concannon performed a seance in Boston a member of the audience called him a phony.

Although the accuser produced no evidence of fraud, the episode tested the relationship with residents around the camp. However, external resident-camp relationships had generally been cordial, and the local press sought to distinguish between imposters and authentic Spiritualists. In one editorial published in the Volusia County Record, for example, a county resident wrote (Guthrie 1998):

We have as much respect for a person who is sincere in his spiritualistic ideas as have for those happy in the enjoyment of any other religious belief. Because fraud and impostors have crept into the teachings of Spiritualism it affords no argument to denounce all those who are enjoying the comforts and promises they sincerely find in its doctrine.

Another wrote that “There are too many sincere and earnest believers in the faith,” it said, “to have [Cassadaga’s] plans upset by the exposure of frauds such as Concannon” (Guthrie 1998). For its part the Cassadaga community responded by immediately strengthening its certification standards.

Cassadaga, Lily Dale, and Camp Chesterfield continue to be the three most significant remaining spiritual camps in the U.S. (Compton 2019). There has been a long-term decline in broad public interest in Spiritualism, although there are a number of churches in the Spiritualism tradition. Most camps shuttered or operated seasonally after the “Golden Age of Spiritualism” (circa 1880s-1920s) (Leonard 2020). Those that have survived have tended to experience a resurgence of interest after major wars (e,g., the U.S. Civil War, World War I, World War II, and even the Vietnam War) when there was heightened interest in contact with the dead. It seems likely that the original concept of a retreat for Spiritualists will no longer prove viable; instead,  the longer-term future of even the most resilient camps will rest on some combination of practitioner loyalty and tourism interest.

IMAGES

Image #1: Logo celebrating the 125th anniversary of the founding of Cassadaga.
Image #2: George P. Colby.
Image #3: Photograph of a medium at Cassadaga.
Image #4: The interior of the Spiritualist Church in Cassadaga.
Image #5: The original Cassadaga Hotel.
Image #6: The entrance to the Cassadaga community.

REFERENCES

Awtry, M. J. (2014) Cassadaga: Where Spirits Meet. Sanford, FL: Shen-Men Publishing.

Balogh, Christopher 2013. “Inside Cassadaga, the Psychic Capital of the World.” Vice, January 29. Accessed from https://www.vice.com/en/article/nn4g87/inside-cassadaga on 20 November 2020.

Basu, Moni. 2020. “In Search of Spirits in Cassadaga: A writer unlocks the truths of this mystical community, its energy healers and the supernatural.” Flamingo Magazine. Accessed from https://www.flamingomag.com/2020/10/30/in-search-of-spirits-in-cassadaga/ on 20 November 2020.

Cassadaga website. n.d. “List of Mediums.” Accessed from https://www.cassadaga.org/mediums.html on 5 December 2020.

Cassadaga website. n.d. “Mediums and Healers.” Accessed from https://www.cassadaga.org/mediums–healers.htmls on 5 December 2020.

Cassadaga website. n.d. “Who We Are.” Accessed from https://www.cassadaga.org/who-we-are.html on 5 December 2020.

“Colby, George P. (1848-1933) .” Encyclopedia of Occultism and Parapsychology. . Encyclopedia.com. (October 16, 2020). https://www.encyclopedia.com/science/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/colby-george-p-1848-1933

Compton, Natalie. 2019. “Interested in traveling to a spiritualist community? Here’s what you need to know.” Washington Post, October 29, 2019. Accessed from https://www.washingtonpost.com/travel/2019/10/29/interested-traveling-spiritualist-community-heres-what-you-need-know/ on 20 November 2020.

Fernandez, Alexia 2015. “Woman Certified As Medium At Cassadaga Spiritualist Camp.” Statewide, April 3. Accessed from https://www.wuft.org/news/2015/04/03/medium/ on 5 December 2020.

Guthrie, John. 1998. “Sweet Spirit of Harmony: Establishing a Spiritualist Community at Cassadaga, Florida, 1893-1933.” Florida Historical Quarterly 77:1-38.

Karcher, K. and Hutchison, J. (1980) This Way to Cassadaga. Sanford, FL:  John Hutchison Productions (Seminole Printing).

Leonard, Todd J. 2020 “A Contemporary Study of Cassadaga Spiritualist Camp:  Its Historical and Spiritual Legacy.”  Association for the Scientific Study of Religion 2020 Proceedings:  60-78.

Leonard, Todd J. 2017. “Camp Meetings and Spiritualism: A Report on the Status and Condition of Functioning Spiritualist Camps around America.” Association for the Scientific Study of Religion 2017 Proceedings:11-30

Mimna, Robin. 2017. “The True Spirit of Cassadaga.” Florida History, February 27. Accessed from https://medium.com/florida-history/the-mystery-and-spirit-of-cassadaga-8a0058b024b1 on 20 November 2020.

Schaleman, Harry. n.d. Casadaga: Just a Medium Place. Florida Virtual Library. Accessed from https://journals.flvc.org/flgeog/article/view/78709/76105 on 20 November 2020.

United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service. 1991. National Register of Historic Places Registration Form: Southern Cassadaga Spiritualist Camp Historic District. Accessed from https://npgallery.nps.gov/GetAsset/2fc1fca3-b02b-475e-90c1-e321209a1423 on 20 November 2020.

Williamson, Ronald. 2008. “Since 1923 in Cassadaga, the Seance Room has been where they call upon and talk to the dead.” Florida History Network. Accessed from http://www.floridahistorynetwork.com/in-cassadaga-the-seance-room-is-where-they-talk-to-the-dead.html on 5 December 2020

Williamson, Ronald. 2008. Volusia County’s West Side: Steamboats & Sandhills. Charleston, SC: The History Press.

Publication Date:
20 January 2021

 

 

Share

Ānandamayī Mā (Mā Ānandamayī)

 

ĀNANDAMAYĪ MĀ TIMELINE

1896 (April 30):  Nirmāla Sundari was born in Kheora, a very small village in Eastern Bengal, in present-day Bangladesh.

1909 (February):  Nirmāla Sundari was married to Shri Ramani Mohan Chakravarti (later called Bholanāth, a name for Śiva, by Nirmāla Sundari).

1918:  While Nirmāla Sundari was living in Bajitpur (now in Bangladesh), she undertook an intensive sādhanā (spiritual discipline).

1922 (August):  In Bajitpur, Nirmāla Sundari experienced self-dīkṣā (self-initiation) during the full moon.

1924:  Bholanāth and Nirmāla Sundari moved to Dhaka in Eastern Bengal (which is now the capital of Bangladesh), where she attracted devotees.

1925:  In Dhaka, she was named Ānandamayī Mā by Shri Jyotish Chandra Roy (known as Bhaiji).

1926:  The first ashram was built by devotees for Ānandamayī Mā in Dhaka near the Siddheshwari Kali Mandir (temple).

1950:  The Shree Shree Anandamayee Sangha (The Śrī Śrī Ānandamayī Community) was founded.

1982 (August 27):  Ānandamayī Mā “left her body” at the ashram of Kishenpur in Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.

BIOGRAPHY

Ānandamayī Mā was born on April 30, 1896 in the small village of Kheora in East India (on the current eastern border of Bangladesh), to poor Vaiṣṇava Brahmin parents. They named her Nirmāla Sundari, which means “immaculate beauty” or “purity.” Later the surnames of Hasi (smile) and Khusir (the joyous) were also given to her. According to her spiritual biographies, [Image at right] especially the writings of Professor Bithika Mukerji, Nirmāla Sundari proved from her childhood to be a detached child who had little interest in the surrounding environment, so much so that many thought that she was intellectually disabled.

At the age of thirteen, Nirmāla Sundari was married to the much older Ramani Mohan Chakravarti, and at eighteen, she went to live with her husband, whom she later called Bholanāth, one of Śiva’s names. Although she went through with marriage and is described as being the exemplary housewife, the couple actually never consummated their marriage and had no children. She therefore distanced herself from the traditional forms of marriage, [Image at right] going against the ideal of pativrata, the perfect Hindu woman vowed to her husband.

In 1918, Nirmāla and Bholanāth moved to Bajitpur in Eastern Bengal, where she undertook an intensive sādhanā (spiritual discipline). For six years, she is said to have practiced every type of sādhanā. Although she never received any spiritual teaching from a master yogi, she spontaneously was able to perform yogic postures and to perfect mudrās (symbolic or ritual gestures). She called this her “līlā of sādhanā” (līlā meaning play, game) for, as it has always been the same for her, there was nothing to accomplish spiritually. Thus did Ānandamayī Mā later affirm that her state had always been one of spiritual realization and that she never had past lives nor would she have future lives, as she stated:

I am what I was and what I shall be; I am whatever you conceive, think or say. But it is a supreme fact that this body has not come into being to reap the fruits of past karma. Why don’t you take it that this body is the material embodiment of all your thoughts and ideas. You all have wanted it and you have it now. So play with this doll for some time (Bhaiji 2004:6).

Gopinath Kaviraj, a Bengali pandit (Hindu scholar learned in Sanskrit scriptures, philosophy and religion), viewed Ānandamayī Mā similarly: “Samadhi or no Samadhi, She is where She always has been; She knows no change, no modification, no alteration” (Kaviraj and Vibhusana 1967:169). (Samādhi in Hinduism is a term that refers to intense immersion of consciousness in God/dess, the Ultimate. The word samādhi is also used to refer to the tomb of a saint or guru)

During this time, Nirmāla often fell into trances and was believed to be sick or possessed by spirits. Observing this strange behavior, her husband asked exorcists to cure his wife’s madness, but instead of treating her as mad, they eventually saw her as an incarnation of Devī, the Divine Mother. According to historian of religions June McDaniel, Ānandamayī Mā’s divine status is linked to these trancelike states, [Image at right] which are signs of spiritual ecstasy in Hinduism (McDaniel 1989:202). In South Asia, divine madness is seen as a kind of divine intoxication and is one of the criteria for being considered a saint (Kinsley 1974).

Nirmāla Sundari continued her sādhanā by entering a period of silence (mauna) for three years. On August 3, 1922, she eventually performed an initiation (dīkṣā) on herself, becoming at the same time disciple (śiṣya), teacher (guru), and divinity (iṣṭa). [Dīkṣā, or initiation, can be defined as the communication of an energy, of a vibration, of an influx to the initiated, or as the transmission of a spiritual influence that is said to be necessary with regard to the work of spiritual purification. This process of purification refers to the dissolution of the ego. Initiation generally involves the transmission and support of a mantra, whose function is to convey spiritual force (śakti).] In December 1922, Ānandamayī Mā’s husband asked to be initiated by her and by so doing became her first disciple. This practice of self-initiation continues to the present with some female gurus, revealing that personal experience and mystical states rather than succession or lineage frequently determines the recognition of female gurus (Pechilis 2012; Warrier 2005).

In 1924, Bholanāth and Nirmāla left for Dhaka in Eastern Bengal. (Dhaka is now the capital of Bangladesh.) It was during this period that the first disciples began to flock to Nirmāla Sundari, and it was also at Dhaka that one of her closest disciples known as Bhaiji gave her the name Ānandamayī Mā, which means “Mother Full of Bliss,” or “Mother Saturated with Joy.” Little by little, people began to hear about Ānandamayī Mā and her states of ecstasy, and came to meet her. Some saw her as an incarnation of the Divine Mother, a manifestation of the goddess Kālī, from which came the name “Human Kālī” that was given to her. Others envisaged Ānandamayī Mā as a being that had attained the state of perfect realization (Jīvanmukta, one who is liberated while living) and possessed extraordinary spiritual powers. Among the powers that she was credited with are those of clairvoyance and healing, the latter often being the basis of a saint’s reputation (Keyes 1982:2). Ānandamayī Mā, though, would never attribute these powers and miracles to herself, as she always spoke of the action of God.

At this time Ānandamayī Mā began to take less and less care of her body, and so needed others to look after her. She stated that she could not tell the difference between fire and water and that if others did not look after her body it would be destroyed. In 1926, at the age of thirty, Ānandamayī Mā also stopped eating with her own hands and was instead fed by Didi, one of her closest disciples, and other brahmacārinis (novice nuns).

In the late 1920s, Ānandamayī Mā began to take on the role of guru, or spiritual master, giving dīkṣā to a small circle of devotees, even as she still maintained throughout her life that she was not a guru. She affirmed: “Only God is the Guru. It is a sin to regard the Guru as a human being” (Desjardins 1982:190). The numbers of her devotees, mostly male in the beginning, continued to increase and in 1926 they built the Siddheshwari ashram (retreat center) for Ānandamayī Mā at Dhaka. Despite this, she did not stay at the ashram and began to make pilgrimages all over India, moving around until her death, like “a bird on the wing,” as she liked to call herself. Ānandamayī Mā did not give any indication of where she would be going or when she was going, nor did she ever specify if she would return. She would simply go to the nearest train station, often in the middle of the night, and would take the first departing train. She would follow what she called her kheyāla, or divine inspiration.

During her travels, she met people from all backgrounds. Kings, politicians, and prominent gurus and saints alike also prostrated themselves in front of her. [Image at right] Among these were Swami Shivananda Saraswati (1887–1963), the founder of the Divine Life Society, and the yogi Paramahansa Yogananda (1893–1952), as well as numerous politicians, including the President of the Republic of India, Dr. Rajendra Prasad (1884–1963), the Vice-President and philosopher Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan (1888–1975), and Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru (1889–1964). [Image at right] She also had several meetings with Mohandas Gandhi (1869–1948), who viewed her as his daughter.

On August 27, 1982, Ānandamayī Mā “left her body,” to use her devotees’ expression, at the ashram of Kishenpur, in Dehradun, Uttarakand state, 256 kilometers north of Delhi. A procession took place during the day from Dehradun to Kankhal, close to Haridwar on the Ganges River, where Ānandamayī Mā’s samādhi (tomb) is now located, [Image at right] and her body was interred following the rules specific to the Hindu burial of a great spiritual being. Indian dignitaries came to pay tribute to Ānandamayī Mā, including Prime Minister Indira Gandhi (1917–1984), daughter of Jawaharlal Nehru.

DEVOTEES

Ānandamayī Mā’s community of bhaktas (devotees) reflected considerable diversity. Diverse social classes and castes, and even different religions are represented. Still, the predominance of a certain type of devotee was nevertheless fairly apparent, as Ānandamayī Mā’s followers were, for the most part, Hindu, especially from Brahmin castes as she was born as a Brahmin. They were predominantly from Bengal, like she was.

Her devotees also mainly came from urban environments and belonged to the upper levels of society. In this community, it was not rare to meet rich families of industry or political personalities taking refuge at the feet of Ānandamayī Mā. It was so during her lifetime and remains the case today. It is also noteworthy that she counted among her disciples many powerful political figures, such as Kamala Nehru (1899–1936), the wife of Jawaharlal Nehru, and her daughter Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, as well as scholars like Gopinath Kaviraj (1887–1976). Ram Alexander, a disciple of Ānandamayī Mā, describes the rich and educated disciples thusly: “Often these were highly educated people who had to face serious social opprobrium, particularly as it was unheard of to receive such guidance from an uneducated village woman” (Atmananda 2000:23). It is evident that the presence of higher-class devotees, the wealthy and intellectual elites, played some role in the visibility of the worship of Ānandamayī Mā (Babb 1988:170).

Women also represented a large part of the community of devotees, and it seems that their number was greater than that of male devotees. Far from considering Ānandamayī Mā, the Supreme Goddess above all, as a source of empowerment or as a model for women, the presence of so many women devotees may be attributed to the fact that they could have more access to her body than men did (Hallstrom 1999).

There were also foreign devotees, although their numbers were far less than Indian devotees. Among the very close western disciples of Ānandamayī Mā was a Jewish doctor, Abraham Jacob Weintraub, a native of Metz, France and son of the main rabbi of that city. In 1950, he left France for Sri Lanka and India with the intention of staying only two months. Soon after his arrival, he met Ānandamayī Mā and decided to follow her. Later he became a monk (swami) in her organization, taking the name of Swami Vijayānanda (bliss of victory). Swami Vijayānanda never returned to France and spent nearly sixty years in India, including seventeen years as a hermit in the Himalaya mountains. Until his death on April 5, 2010 at the age of ninety-five, he welcomed westerners to Ānandamayī Mā’s ashram in Kankhal. Today Swami Vijayānanda is venerated at his grave in Père Lachaise, the historical cemetery of Paris, by a group of people who knew him or are attracted by his teaching. He serves as a bridge between East and West, as well as a central personage in the worship of Ānandamayī Mā.

DOCTRINES/BELIEFS 

Ānandamayī Mā embodied a great degree of universality in her doctrine. Individuals of many religious backgrounds and geographical origins were drawn to her. Her teaching suited each individual and could simply be summarized in her statements that the goal of life is the realization of one’s true nature, of oneness with God. In this regard, she spoke of the quest to know one’s true identity to escape from the world of death:

You study and you pass your exam; you earn money and you enjoy the use of it. But all this is in the realm of death in which you go on life after life, repeating the same thing over and over again. But there is also another path—the path of Immortality, which leads to the knowledge of what you are in reality (Atmananda 2000:41).

While being universal, her teaching nevertheless focused on the ancient Hindu tradition, the sanātana dharma (the eternal religion). Depending on the situation, she could refer to the nondualism of Advaita Vedānta formulated by the eighth-century monk-philosopher Śaṅkara (Shankara) based on the Upaniṣads (Vedānta, scriptures coming at the end of the Vedas); the qualified nondualism of Viśiṣṭādvaita Vedānta formulated by the theologian Rāmānuja (ca. 1077–1157) also based on the Upaniṣads; or the dualism (Dvaita) of bhakti. However, she gave precedence to the monist tradition of Advaita Vedānta. According to Ānandamayī Mā, the real source of suffering (duḥkha) lies in the false perception of duality. She affirmed that darśana, to see and be seen by the deity, the true revelation of the divine (ātmadarśana), is not possible as long as there exists an “I”—“You have not had real darshan as long as the ‘I’ persists” (Atmananda 2000:478).

Ānandamayī Mā expressed her adherence to the doctrine of nonduality in other ways, such as referring to herself in the third person. She often called herself “this body” (Bengali, ehi śarira) or “this little girl.” To someone who requested that she describe her own experience, she said: “It would imply that the experiencer has still remained. This cannot be so here” (Anandamayi Ma 2001:61). (She often referred to herself using the term “here.”)

During her many pilgrimages and wanderings, stressing nonduality, she insisted on her everlasting presence to her devotees: “Why do you say I am going away? I am your little child and am always with you” (Atmananda 2000:496). She also stated:

You may want to banish this body from your mind. But this body won’t leave you for a single day—it does not and never will leave your thought. Whoever has once been drawn to love this body will never succeed in wiping out its impression even despite hundreds of attempts. This body rests and shall remain in memory for all times (Ganguli 1983:170).

These statements reveal Ānandamayī Mā’s understanding regarding her omnipresence beyond time and space and beyond death (mṛtyu) and birth (jāti).

Although Advaita Vedānta was to remain a point of reference in her philosophy, Ānandamayī Mā actually moved beyond it.

“A state exists where the distinction between duality and non-duality has no place. . . . But where the Brahman [unconditioned consciousness] is, the One-without-a-second, nothing else can possibly exist. You separate duality from non-duality because you are identified with the body” (Anandamayi Ma 2001:123).

Ānandamayī Mā’s view, therefore, was an encompassing vision of life, this Ultimate Reality that she defined as Yā tā, which means, “It is that which it is.”

In this regard, Gopinath Kaviraj, her disciple, shows that advaitic thought, which holds that everything is one, is actually itself inexact, in the sense that even unity dissolves when the True One is revealed: “Everything is one, the one is everything. And even this statement is not exact, for the True One is there where the meaning of the Unity no longer exists” (Desjardins 1982:200). Ānandamayī Mā also referred to the idea of totality to express the necessity of moving past ideas of duality and nonduality: “You will have to rise beyond consciousness and unconsciousness. The revelation of That is what is wanted” (Anandamayi Ma 2001:132). Scholar of religion Raimon Panikkar suggests that the term “adualism” rather than “nondualism” be used in order to eliminate this conceptual opposition (Panikkar 1998).

RITUALS/PRACTICES

Ānandamayī Mā’s posthumous worship is viewed by devotees as a way to liberate themselves from ceaseless death and rebirth in the cycle of saṃsāra, as a path toward immortality. Expression of devotion to Ānandamayī Mā involves prayer, pilgrimage, and veneration of photos and other objects.

If one may always pray to Ānandamayī Mā, there are nevertheless certain moments of the year during which it is especially beneficial to pray to her. These are the great celebrations such as the anniversary of Ānandamayī Mā’s birth, Gurupūrṇimā, and the religious holiday Durgā Pūjā. These festivals are accompanied by other annual observances, such as Mahāśivarātri, the night celebrating Śiva’s cosmic dance; Holi, celebrating the defeat of evil by righteousness; and Rakṣabandhan, a vrata (vow) when sisters worship to protect their brothers; as well as participation in retreats such as the Samyam Saptah (concentrated meditation for seven days). It was so while Ānandamayī Mā was alive, and it is still the case today.

Pilgrimage is another ritual that devotees perform. Because of her great influence on all layers of Indian society, Ānandamayī Mā also represents one of the few Hindu female gurus to be worshiped in a cult at her tomb [Image at right] (samādhi), in spite of the fact that tombs of holy women are virtually nonexistent in India. With the exception of satīs (widows who reportedly burned themselves in their husband’s funeral pyres out of devotion to their husbands) worshipping a woman after her death is exceptional. However, because Ānandamayī Mā’s body was considered to be pure and sacred, she is being worshipped at her tomb in Kankhal. Her relics have become a site dedicated to the Divine Feminine, a kind of śaktipīṭha, seat of Śaktī (the Goddess and her power).

In addition, photos of Ānandamayī Mā also hold an essential place in her worship, [Image at right] whether among early or contemporary followers. Carried by devotees or placed in their homes, the pictures seem to reactivate the presence of Mā. More so even than her words or eyewitness accounts of her, photographs of Ānandamayī Mā are an essential way to mobilize new devotees. Another important element in her cult is worship by making offerings to images (mūrtis) of Ānandamayī Mā. A small number of western devotees, however, feel somewhat averse towards this type of devotional practice.

ORGANIZATION/LEADERSHIP

Ānandamayī Mā passed a large part of her life moving from sacred space to sacred space. To facilitate these movements, her [Image at right] devotees established ashrams all over India, especially in North India. There are today twenty-six ashrams, of which two are in Bangladesh. Although she never really wanted these ashrams, she nonetheless selected their locations. Far from being insignificant, her choice of ashram locations allows a vast network of sacred geography to become evident. This certainly had some influence on the development of the devotional movement focused on the worship of Ānandamayī Mā.

In 1950, the Shree Shree Anandamayee Sangha (the Śrī Śrī Ānandamayī Community) was established, making Ānandamayī Mā the first woman in India to be the head of such a large structured movement. Although today it is common for female gurus to found their own organizations and have their own ashrams, this institutionalization of the worship of a female guru was inconceivable before her time.

Within Ānandamayī Mā’s sangha traditional rules of purity prevailed and still do, such as the exclusion of menstruating women or the rules concerning pollution tied to the caste system. These are called jhuta or that which is dirty and inappropriate, and have for thousands of years been observed by the brahmanical orthodoxy, serving as a kind of preparation to mystical life. Ānandamayī Mā adopted this orthodoxy, contested by Sufism and Buddhism as well as by Tantric Hinduism, following a meeting she had with the pandit Kaviraj. In the beginning, she did not follow the purity rules, but there was increasing pressure on her to do so. Finally, one day, she said, “Whoever is coming today will decide.” Kaviraj arrived right after she made her statement and told her that rules of caste should be maintained in the Kālī Yuga, the age of decline in morality, to form a barrier against immorality. Though she opted for these rules, she was not attached to a particular system, as she always said, Jo Ho Jay, “Whatever has to happen, will happen.” Nevertheless, the non-observance of these rules of purity would have then constituted a major obstacle for orthodox Brahmins and would have prevented them from coming to Ānandamayī Mā (Lipsky 2005:58; Atmananda 2000:163).

In fact, Ānandamayī Mā did not really respect these rules of purity, allowing herself to transgress them openly. Her Austrian devotee Brahmacharini Atmananda reports what Ānandamayī Mā told her regarding these rules, “What are these rules to me? I have eaten the leavings of a dog” (Atmananda 2000:256). Her personal transgression of the rules of purity and impurity therefore appeared to be a way of affirming Ānandamayī Mā’s authority as spiritual leader, as she was the only person with the power to authorize the observation of these brahmanical rules within her community.

These strict brahmanical rules, however, weighed on the majority of westerners, who could feel excluded by virtue of their status as outcasts or mleccha (foreigners). They had to eat separately from high-caste Indians and be housed outside the ashram, so that Hindus, and especially brahmins, could avoid any polluting contact with them.

ISSUES/CHALLENGES

One of the major challenges related to Ānandamayī Mā and her worship is what would become of her movement after her death. The movement has been in decline since her departure and the death of her close monks. This diminishment seems to be significantly associated with the decline of its affiliated institution, the Shree Shree Anandamayee Sangha, originally founded to promote and safeguard Ānandamayī Mā’s teaching. As in the case of many other organizations founded by charismatic leaders, such as the SYDA Foundation or the International Society for Krishna Consciousness, this decline can mainly be seen through power struggles, such as the choice of a successor to direct the sangha or in the division of authority between lay people and monks. Thus, the death of the charismatic founding figure represents simultaneously a challenge of and to institutionalization (Miller 1991).

There also exist some tensions within Ānandamayī Mā’s community regarding the preservation of brahmanical rules. These rules, which were described as inhuman by Brahmacharini Atmananda, may have been originally a way to reinvigorate the Hindu tradition, the sanātana dharma. In today’s globalized world, however, with the economic and social transformations that India is experiencing, these rules constitute a major obstacle to the expansion of Ānandamayī Mā’s movement. The attachment to brahmanical rules of purity by a small number of devotees within the Shree Shree Anandamayee Sangha reflects, for a large number of Indian and western devotees, something that keeps potential devotees away.

Ānandamayī Mā’s sangha then is split between two factions. On the one hand, many want to enlarge her movement, notably to an international audience, which necessarily would require both letting go of the brahmanical rules concerned with maintaining the “purity” of the traditionally designated “pure” castes and a rupture with the tradition of the group’s charismatic founder, the object of their worship and devotion. On the other hand, some desire the preservation of brahmanical orthodoxy, which is ineluctably associated with exclusion and which hampers the organization’s expansion. Ānandamayī Mā’s sangha is located in the midst of this dilemma between “authenticity” and “dirtying,” between “atrophy” and “expansion.” The future of her movement seems dependent upon reconciling competing interests with the requirements of Indian modernity.

In conclusion, in her lifetime Ānandamayī Mā became arguably the most famous female religious leader in India, with hundreds of thousands of followers. Due to the extent of her influence and her death in 1982, Ānandamayī Mā is a noteworthy illustration of the posthumous worship of a female Hindu guru, with both devotees who knew her and others who did not.

Through her life, Ānandamayī Mā emerged as a figure of rupture who, by means of her devotees’ perception of her oneness with the divine, dictated the terms of her own sanctity and produced a certain dislocation from the typical gender role for the Indian housewife in several key ways. Her self-initiation and her role as a female guru, as well as her status of avatar (“descent,” an incarnation of God), as Goddess, in a patriarchal society, placed her outside of an established, male-dominated religious order (Cornille 2004:134). Her spiritual position independent of her husband and her refusal to adopt the traditional forms of marriage by following the ideal of pativrata were transgressive. Her reforms promoted women’s equality, such as her introduction of upanayana, the Vedic sacred thread rite of passage as initiation into the student stage of life for high caste women, qualifying them to study Sanskrit and the Vedic scriptures. Finally, the scope of her religious movement and her impressive network of ashrams was something unheard of at the time for an Indian woman. Despite her conservative tendencies in relation to certain aspects of Indian culture, especially with regard to her approval of arranged marriage and her non-condemnation of satī, this ambassador of Hinduism can paradoxically be recognized as a charismatic figure, who represents a radical change in the Hindu religious landscape in regard to women gurus.

Due to her far-reaching influence on Indian society, today Ānandamayī Mā is the object of worship at her tomb, a practice that is usually reserved for male gurus and just a few women, who are worshipped because of their connection with a male guru, for instance Sri Aurobindo (1872–1950) and The Mother (Mirra Blanche Rachel Alfassa (1878–1973). Ānandamayī Mā can thus be viewed as an iconic figure of female religious leadership, highlighting an innovative vision of holiness by revealing a new mode of veneration of female gurus, that of veneration of the teacher regarded as a living presence within her tomb.

Ānandamayī Mā, thus, represents a shift to female leadership in the world of Hindu gurudom, [Image at right] and her tomb, her samādhi, is a symbol of the affirmation of the Divine Feminine. With the growing acceptance of the role of guru for women, it is likely in the future that we will see a far more significant veneration of women gurus in their respective tombs emerge within the Hindu tradition. As such, the study of Ānandamayī Mā’s life and her postmortem worship represents a true milestone in the field of study of women in religions.

IMAGES

Image #1: Nirmāla Sundari at a young age.
Image #2: Nirmāla Sundari with her husband Shri Ramani Mohan Chakravarti (later called Bholanāth, a name for Śiva, by Nirmāla Sundari).
Image #3: Ānandamayī Mā.
Image #4: Ānandamayī Mā with Indira Gandhi and her father, Jawaharlal Nehru, first Prime Minister of India.
Image #5: Temple housing the samādhi (tomb) of Ānandamayī Mā in Kankhal, Uttarakand, India.
Image #6: Priest standing next to Ānandamayī Mā’s samādhi (tomb) as he performs āratī, waving of lights before her image (murtī).
Image #7: A murtī, an image or statue, of Ānandamayī Mā on an altar that also includes her photo, a framed print depicting her footprints, and pictures depicting other Hindu deities.
Image #8: Ānandamayī Mā.
Image #9: Ānandamayī Mā’s blessing

REFERENCES

Ānandamayī Mā. 2001. Words of Sri Anandamayi Ma. Translated by Atmananda. Kankhal: Shree Shree Anandamayee Sangha.

Atmananda. 2000. Death Must Die. A Western Woman’s Life-Long Spiritual Quest in India and Its Fulfillment through Her Guru, Shree Anandamayee Ma, edited by Ram Alexander. Varanasi: Indica Books.

Aymard, Orianne. 2014. When a Goddess Dies: Worshipping Mā Ānandamayī after Her Death. New York: Oxford University Press.

Babb, Lawrence A. 1988. “Sathya Sai Baba’s Saintly Play.” Pp. 168-86 in Saints and Virtues, edited by John Stratton Hawley. Berkeley: California University Press.

Bhaiji, ed. 2004. Mother as Revealed to Me. Kankhal: Shree Shree Anandamayee Sangha.

Cornille, Catherine. 2004. “Mother Meera, Avatar.” Pp. 129-47 in The Graceful Guru: Hindu Female Gurus in India and the United States, edited by Karen Pechilis. New York: Oxford University Press.

Desjardins, Arnaud. 1982. Ashrams. Grands maîtres de l’Inde. Paris: Albin Michel.

Ganguli, Anil. 1983. Anandamayi Ma: The Mother Bliss-incarnate. Calcutta: Eureka.

Hallstrom, Lisa L. 1999. Mother of Bliss: Ānandamayī Mā (1896-1982). New York: Oxford University Press.

Kaviraj, Gopinath, and Padma Vibhusana. 1967. “Mother Anandamayi.” In Mother as Seen by Her Devotees, edited by Gopinath Kaviraj. Varanasi: Shree Shree Anandamayee Sangha. Accessed from https://www.anandamayi.org/books/masbhd.htm on 10 January 2021.

Keyes, Charles F. 1982. “Charisma: From Social Life to Sacred Biography.” Pp. 1-22 in Charisma and Sacred Biography, edited by Michael A. Williams. Washington, D.C.: American Academy of Religion.

Kinsley, David. 1974. “‘Through the Looking Glass’: Divine Madness in the Hindu Religious Tradition.” History of Religions 13:270–305.

Lipsky, Alexander. 2005. Life and Teaching of Śrī Ānandamayī Mā. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

McDaniel, June. 1989. The Madness of the Saints. Ecstatic Religion in Bengal. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Miller, Timothy, ed. 1991. When Prophets Die: The Postcharismatic Fate of New Religious Movements. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Mukerji, Bithika. 2002. My Days with Sri Ma Anandamayi. Varanasi: Indica Books.

Mukerji, Bithika. 1998. Life and Teaching of Sri Ma Anandamayi (A Bird on the Wing). Delhi: Sri Satguru Publications.

Panikkar, Raimon. 1998. L’Expérience de Dieu. Paris: Albin Michel.

Pechilis, Karen. 2012. “The Female Guru: Guru, Gender, and the Path of Personal Experience.” Pp. 113-32 in The Guru in South Asia: New Interdisciplinary Perspectives, edited by Jacob Copeman and Aya Ikegame. New York: Routledge.         

Vijayananda, Swami. 1997. Un Français dans l’Himalaya: Itinéraire avec Mâ Ananda Môyî. Lyon: Terre du Ciel.

Warrier, Maya. 2005. Hindu Selves in a Modern World: Guru Faith in the Mata Amritanandamayi Mission. New York: Routledge Curzon.

Publication Date:
13 January 2021

Share

Arica


ARICA TIMELINE

1931 (July 24):  Oscar Ichazo was born in Roboré, Bolivia.

1937:  Ichazo suffered from violent cataleptic episodes which caused out-of-body experiences.

1943:  Ichazo assisted in the dissection of cadavers at a La Paz medical school.

1948-1950:  Ichazo was a student at University of La Paz and also studied in Peru.

1950:  Ichazo was appointed Director of Bolivia’s Library of Congress.

1950-1952:  Ichazo participated in a group in Buenos Aires studying various esoteric philosophies and consciousness-raising techniques, including Gurdjieff’s teachings.

1952-?1953:  Ichazo traveled to the Middle and Far East and studied yoga, Buddhism, Indian and Chinese philosophies, martial arts and Sufism.

1956:  Ichazo began teaching philosophy and spiritual disciplines in Chile to small groups.

1960:  Ichazo completed and began teaching in Chile what has come to be known as his “Integral Philosophy.” Teachings included particularly his theory of Protoanalysis, including the Enneagram of Personality, as well as his logic of Trialectics.

1968:  Ichazo founded the Institute of Gnosiology in Santiago, Chile and delivered lectures at the Institute of Applied Psychology in Santiago, Chile.

1970 (July 1):  Ichazo led fifty-seven students in a ten-month training program in Arica, Chile.

1970:  Chilean psychiatrist, Claudio Naranjo, left the Arica training early and began teaching Ichazo’s enneagram of personality to small groups.

1971 (December 31):  Ichazo organized a three-month training in the Essex House Hotel, New York City (New York One) and founded the Arica Institute at 24 West 57th Street, New York.

1972:  John Lilly published The Center of the Cyclone, which included his account of the training in Arica.

1972:  Arica began offering “40-Day” and “Advanced” Trainings in New York, San Francisco, Los Angeles, and London, as well as other cities in the United States, Canada, South America and Europe.

1973 (July):  Sam Keen’s interview with Ichazo appeared in Psychology Today.

1976:  The Human Process for Enlightenment and Freedom was published.

1981:  Ichazo left New York City and moved to Maui, Hawaii where he established the Oscar Ichazo Compay (later the Oscar Ichazo Foundation).

1982:  Between Metaphysics and Protoanalysis: A Theory for Analyzing the Human Psyche and Interviews with Oscar Ichazo was published.

1982:  Ichazo lectured at Metamorphosis Training in Maplecrest, New York.

1983:  Arica trainings began to be produced by the Oscar Ichazo Company and increasingly were designed to be conducted by individuals or small groups in home settings and at Reunions held in Maui, Hawaii (1990, 1995, 2000, 2010).

1986:  Letters to the School was published, which included charges of plagiarism directed at the spate of books beginning to appear on the enneagram of personality.

1989: Arica Institute files a lawsuit against Helen Palmer and Harper & Row Publishers for copyright infringement with regard to Palmer’s 1988 book, The Enneagram: Understanding Yourself and the Others in Your Life.

1991:  Ichazo wrote “Letter to the Transpersonal Community” explaining his account of the origins of the Enneagram of Personality and denying its links to Sufism and the teachings of Gurdjieff

1991:  Ichazo received the Award of Excellence from the Society of Writers of the United Nations.

1991-1992:  Arica Institute lost its lawsuit and its appeal as the court ruled “fair use” on behalf of Palmer.

1993:  Arica continued to present very few public trainings, instead offering a lengthy series of private, advanced trainings to a few hundred members. Ichazo’s written work after this point was generally accessible only to members of the Arica School.

2000:  Ichazo received the United Nations Society of Writers Award of Excellence.

2020:  The Four Killers of Humanity: The Ethical Solution to Our Existential Crisis was published and made available to the public.

2020 (March 26):  Ichazo died at his home in Maui, Hawaii.

FOUNDER/GROUP HISTORY

In 1969, following glowing reports from fellow seekers in South America, a group of fifty-seven or so Americans traveled to the desert of Arica, Chile for a ten-month period of study with the Bolivian mystic and philosopher, Oscar Ichazo. [Image at right] Many of these individuals were from the Esalen Institute in Big Sur, California, already a leading center of what has come to be called “the human potential movement.” As Dick Price, one of the founders of Esalen said at the time, “Arica cleared our bench” (Anderson 2004:227). The most notable of the participants in Ichazo’s program were the Chilean psychiatrist, Claudio Naranjo, and the neuro-scientist and dolphin researcher, John C. Lilly. Ichazo began teaching his theory and methods in 1956 to groups in South America, giving the first public presentation of his thought in 1968 to the Institute of Applied Psychology in Santiago, Chile, attended by Naranjo. While Naranjo and Lilly did not finish the ten-month training, they were impressed with Ichazo’s teachings and his ability to bring about higher states of consciousness in his students through many different practices and techniques culled from the world’s spiritual traditions but reconfigured and streamlined for contemporary western society. On their return from Chile, Ichazo and his students founded the Arica Institute in New York City and in 1971 offered a three-month training in Manhattan’s Essex House, guaranteeing enlightenment for a fee of $2,000.

Throughout the 1970s, thousands of people took Arica trainings and became members of the Arica School, modeled after ancient schools of human development in Greece, India and the Middle East. The Arica School still exists, although its membership is in the hundreds and it offers fewer public trainings than it did in its heyday. While Arica does not consider itself a religion, it is clearly religious and thus is often included in academic treatments of new or alternative religious movements. Indeed, Oscar Ichazo and the Arica School, largely through Naranjo and his students, sparked one of the largest developments within New Age spirituality in the last twenty years, the enneagram personality-type movement.

What is known of Ichazo’s history largely derives from his own personal accounts (Ichazo 1982b) or those of the Arica Institute (Arica website n.d.). He was born in Bolivia in 1931 and raised in Bolivia and Peru as a Roman Catholic, attending Jesuit schools. At an early age, Ichazo was afflicted with a physiological condition that at times caused him to undergo out-of-body experiences. In order to understand and control his condition, he underwent training in martial arts under a Japanese master and read widely in his uncle Julio’s vast library. He eventually studied medicine, psychology and philosophy at universities in Bolivia and Peru.

At the age of nineteen, Ichazo describes a meeting with “a remarkable man” who introduced him to a group of mystics in Buenos Aires, mostly European businessmen (Ichazo 1982b:7). Ichazo served as a kind of coffee boy to the group, which studied an eclectic mix of spiritual writings and methods, such as yoga, Kabbalah, Tarot, as well as the Gurdjieff work. (Ouspensky’s In Search of the Miraculous was translated into Spanish in 1952 and his student, Rodney Collin, published The Theory of Celestial Influence in Spanish in 1953.) The only individual of this group Ichazo mentions is Leo Costet de Mascheville (Jehel) who was the son of Albert Raymond Costet-Conde de Mascheville, the man who introduced Martinism to Latin America. It was Albert Costet who apparently founded the esoteric study group in Buenos Aries that Ichazo encountered. His son, Jehel, at one point the President of the Martinist Order of South America, eventually becomes known as Sevananda, and went on to establish one of the first yoga ashrams in Latin America (Simões 2018). Ichazo studied with this esoteric study group for several years, practicing different spiritual techniques and eventually, according to Ichazo, clarifying for them some of the philosophical teachings they were studying, especially the Enneagram. These men then enabled Ichazo to travel to the Middle and Far East where he studied yoga, qigong, I Ching, Buddhist meditation and Sufism. According to Naranjo, Ichazo was thought of as a Sufi teacher by those in the original Chile group, and it was intimated that Ichazo had made contact with the same esoteric school that Gurdjieff claimed to have contacted, the Sarmoung Brotherhood (Naranjo 1970). Ichazo has denied, however, that his teachings are derived in any way from Sufism or the teachings of Gurdjieff himself (Ichazo 1991).

When he returned to Latin America in the mid-1950s, Ichazo began teaching philosophy and spiritual techniques to small groups in Chile. During this time, he synthesized these teachings and created his own philosophical system, developing his theory of protoanalysis, an analysis of the human psyche from its lowest levels of consciousness to its highest, including his nine-fold Personality Typology based on the Enneagram, as well as a new logic for understanding the unity of existence, trialectics.

After teaching his own work to small groups, Ichazo gave lectures on protoanalysis to the Institute of Applied Psychology in Chile in 1968. He subsequently invited a group of Latin Americans to train with him in Arica, Chile and then invited a number of Americans to join the training group. This ten-month, intensive training is described in John Lilly’s The Center of the Cyclone (1972). This training was followed by a three-month training in New York at the Essex House hotel at which Ichazo boldly guaranteed enlightenment by the end of the program. At the conclusion of this training, the Arica Institute was established in New York with satellite centers in major U.S. cities and elsewhere. Arica attracted significant attention in the early seventies, eventually enrolling thousands of students throughout the decade, with not insignificant cultural impact. Alexandro Jodorowsky’s film, Holy Mountain (1973), an allegory of the quest for enlightenment, bears the influence of Ichazo, who trained Jodorowsky and central cast members for three months prior to filming.

Meanwhile, Naranjo, who left the training in Arica, introduced Ichazo’s enneagram personality theory to his own students in Berkeley, California. Naranjo developed his own version of this typology and taught it throughout the 1970s where it eventually made its way to the Jesuits and Catholic retreat centers. By the mid-1980s books began appearing on the “Enneagram of Personality” (see, for example, Beesing, et. al. 1984 and Palmer 1988). In 1982, his book Between Metaphysics and Protoanalysis: A Theory for Analyzing the Human Psyche and Interviews with Oscar Ichazo was published. [Image at right] Ichazo, who had published very little of his own work (1976, 1982a and 1982b), preferring to keep his teachings to members of his own esoteric school, did not take kindly to what he regarded as the plagiarizing and distorting of his ideas. This gave rise to the so-called “Enneagram Wars” (Goldberg 1993; See also Effross, 2003). Arica filed a lawsuit against Helen Palmer and Harper & Row after the publication of Palmer’s The Enneagram: Understanding Yourself and the Others in Your Life (1988). However, the court ruled against Arica in 1991, upheld in an appeal in 1992, maintaining that Palmer’s use of copyrighted Arica materials constituted “fair use.” The Arica School had a much smaller public presence for the next three decades with the formation of Oscar Ichazo Company in Hawaii and a shift in the teaching and practice toward individual home trainings. The nature of this work is largely unavailable to non-members of Arica. and members must sign non-disclosure agreements. The Arica website indicates that the new work is focused on the transcendental dimension leading to ultimate enlightenment or “theosis.” Indeed, after a period in the 1980s and 1990s, when the Arica work seemed to focus largely on what Ichazo described earlier as “symbol yoga” (similar to Vajrayana Buddhism with an emphasis on imagining oneself as a kind of Buddha or deity), recent years have brought the use of more Greek terminology. For example, in place of a Buddha, we are introduced to the “Divine Metatelos” as a name for a particular higher level of mind, and students are encouraged to participate in the One and the Good, suggesting a more western, Platonic character to the Arica School.

DOCTRINES/BELIEFS

Since material from the last thirty years or so is largely unavailable to the public, this summary restricts itself to the basic doctrines of the Arica School. Even so, it is difficult to summarize as robust a teaching as what Ichazo calls his “Integral Philosophy,” especially a teaching that has developed over fifty years and that includes so many different spiritual practices. Arica claims to demonstrate and practically achieve “the human process toward enlightenment and freedom,” the systematic “clarification of consciousness,” and, in general, the unification of science and mysticism. Ichazo is regarded variously by students as the Qutub (the Sufi notion of the Perfect Man who acts as the spiritual pole around which other spiritual teachers revolve), the Maitreya Buddha, or simply a philosophical sage and teacher. Similarly, the Arica theory and method has been presented as the next development of Buddhism or as a contemporary version of a philosophical school modeled on ancient Greek wisdom schools. In brief, Arica is a method and theory of human development that draws from philosophy, religion and contemporary psychology and biology to forge a system of thought and practice designed to lead to spiritual enlightenment. Early on, Sam Keen described Arica as “the nearest thing we now have to a university for altered states of consciousness” (Keen 1973, reprinted in Ichazo 1982:7). Ichazo (described as a mystic, scientist and philosopher) proposes to unify reason and mysticism in a theory of the human psyche known as “protoanalysis.” It is structured according to the symbol of the Enneagram, and a new logic of the whole known as “trialectics.” The successful application of the Arica theory and method, Ichazo maintains, in the form of successive “trainings,” will lead to the transcendence of ego-consciousness and the awakening of divine consciousness. This, in turn, will bring about a transformation of human society and the establishment of a unified humanity, referred to as “Humanity-One.” This will occur in a new global culture or “metasociety,” characterized by a shared understanding of human nature and its spiritual potential, and no longer divided by tribal or national or religious discord. The long-awaited global utopia or heavenly kingdom on earth is thus to be achieved not simply through the good will of men and women but by reason and practical effort as a critical mass of individuals make the quantum leap to a new level of spiritual maturity.

Ichazo’s theory of the human being, or protoanalysis, is based on what he calls the “Divine Human prototype,” something like the model or Platonic Form of the person (Ichazo 1976:75). Born in a state of unity with God and the world, each person in their essence is a perfect reflection or manifestation of the divine reality. At some point, however, we begin to slip away from this unity as a sense of separate individuality arises and the ego develops. Thus, there is a distinction between the human being’s essence (one’s true nature) and the human being’s ego or personality (the false deviation from one’s true nature). The ego, as the distorted image of the divine-human prototype, is made up of the illusory beliefs, feelings, desires, etc., that maintain our separateness from God and each other, and that perpetuates our suffering. It is only when the ego is reduced or eliminated that human beings can be restored to unity with God and one another in the state of blessedness or supreme happiness and fulfillment. (In later teachings, the ego becomes synonymous with the Relative Mind and the essence with the Absolute Mind. Suffering is eliminated when the Absolute Mind is separated from the Relative Mind and then re-integrated, the Relative Mind seen as a reflection or “shadow” of the Absolute Mind in the state known as the Ornamental Mind.)

Ichazo’s now well-known Enneagrammatic theory of personality describes the ways in which the ego manifests and the how it can be restored to its essential nature. In general, the enneagram serves to structure the Arica theory of the human being, and all things, since all things manifest themselves according to this pattern (See Ouspensky 1949:286-94). And so, Arica theory presents itself as a kind of nine-pointed cylinder [Image at right] that could be sliced up into individual enneagrams that build upon one other in hierarchical sequence (Ichazo 1982c). For example, while pure consciousness is the primary reality and precedes its material manifestation, in the human being it manifests as nine constituents: materiality or elements, systems, mentations, senses consciousness, mental perceptions, domains, feelings or discriminative mind, willing intention, and access base. The nine constituents are akin to the Buddhist notion of the Five Aggregates that constitute the illusory “self.” Fundamental to an understanding of the ego is awareness of the nine physiological systems: sexual, skeletal, digestive, protective, circulatory, expression, coordination, central nervous system, unity system. These systems in turn give rise to energy centers, like chakras, that manifest in the psyche as the instincts, functions and drives that constitute what Ichazo calls the “hypergnostic systems”: the sexual pole, the function of space, the conservation instinct, the function of time, the relations instinct, function of expression, the function of coordination, the adaptation instinct, the spiritual pole.

The most important of these systems are the three instincts. Each instinct innately asks a “living question” fundamental to survival: “How am I?” (Conservation Instinct), “With Whom am I?” (Relations Instinct), and “Where am I?” (Adaptation Instinct). Each instinct also gives rise to different kind of reason (empathetical, analogical and analytical), and a different ego entity: the historical ego that hold on to past hurts, the image ego that is concerned with how one presents oneself and is regarded by the others, and the practical ego that is focused on making one’s way in the world. As in Plato’s tri-partite model of the soul, these three ego entities will be at war with each other until inner balance is achieved, resulting in the natural ego or persona which acts as a “witness” capable of self-observation and eventually self-actualization and self-transcendence (Ichazo 1982a:79-80).

One of the principal tools for self-observation is the realization of one’s “fixation,” that is, at what point on the enneagram one’s development is fixated or stuck due to the “karma” one has accumulated in one’s life, typically as a result of traumas of early childhood. These fixations, similar to what Gurdjieff called one’s “chief feature,” are what has come to be known in popular culture as one’s “personality type” or “Enneagram type.” The nine fixations are related to the nine Domains of Consciousness that correspond to the nine systems. The fixations and their Domains are as follows:

Ego-Resentment (Over-Perfectionist) fixated in the Domain of Sentiments

Ego-Flattery (Over-Independent) fixated in the Domain of Health and Security

Ego-Go (Over-Efficient) fixated in the Domain of Creativity

Ego-Melancholy (Over-Reasoner) fixated in the Intellectual Domain

Ego-Stinginess (Over-Observer) fixated in the Domain of Social Interaction

Ego-Cowardice (Over-Adventurer) fixated in the Domain of Work and Activities

Ego-Planning (Over-Idealist) fixated in the Domain of Hierarchy and Authority

Ego-Vengeance (Over-Justice-maker) in the Domain of Laws and Morals

Ego-Indolence (Over-Nonconformist) in the Spiritual Domain

As in Aristotle’s virtue theory, each fixation habitually errs on one side of a dichotomy within a Domain of Consciousness. So, the Ego-Vengeance “personality type” (the Eighth), for example, tends to be either too strict or too unconstrained with oneself or others. This type is plagued by remorse for which one attempts to compensate or seek release by inflicting cruelty on oneself or others. The vice or “passion” at work here is excess, which may be overcome by “karma cleaning” (working through one’s past experiences to see how these tendencies developed) and cultivating the virtue of innocence. Meditating on the Holy Idea of Truth aids in the cultivation of the virtue and leads to a pacification of the psyche. And so on for the other fixations (See, Ichazo 1982b:13-17).

In another way of linking body and mind, Ichazo insists that thought is not a product simply of the brain or the central nervous system but the entire body (Ichazo 1982b:12-13). Dividing the body into twelve parts, Ichazo assigns each part with a particular cognitive function or mentation. So, the ears, for example, perceive the meaning or substance of things; the eyes see forms; the nose detects possibilities, etc. One way in which the ego distorts reality is through deviations in these mentations. A person might mistake possibilities for substance, for example, and understand what something is simply in terms of the thing’s possibilities. Just as knowledge of one’s fixation or personality type aids in self-observation and eventual freedom from the particular habits and tendencies that limit one’s development, so too does the awareness of these deviations help one to see how skewed patterns of thinking might perpetuate one’s subjectivity and consequent suffering.

And in yet another way of dividing things up, in recent years the Arica system has been organized in terms of Five Realms, each corresponding to five primary body cavities: the Vital Realm (pelvic cavity) the Physical Realm (abdominal cavity), the Emotional Realm (thoracic cavity), the Mental Realm (cranial cavity) and the Spiritual Realm (dorsal cavity). Each realm also corresponds to one of five basic elements: fire, earth, air, water and space. Given the connection to body cavities, physiological systems and natural elements, it is tempting to suggest a biological or materialistic basis for the Arica system. Yet, the teaching asserts that the body is an expression of consciousness and that, in fact, all is consciousness. At the root of each element and realm, for example, is a Divine Mind or Deity, each an aspect of the One Supreme Reality, God, understood primarily as Absolute Mind or infinite, eternal consciousness. Metaphysically, therefore, the philosophy of the Arica school is a version of Idealism, for consciousness is the fundamental reality. In this, it is most similar to the Yogacara or Consciousness-Only School of Buddhism, focusing on the way the subjective or Relative Mind constructs a false image of reality until it ceases and realizes at its base is the immovable, unchanging, adamantine Absolute Mind. It also bears a strong similarity to the Neo-Platonism of Plotinus with its insistence on the ultimate unity of all things in the One and the procession or manifestation of reality from Mind and Ideal Forms. But its version of idealistic monism is theistic, as seen in its credo or Declaration of Unity: “God is eternal, is in all of us, is in everything, is One without second.”

The emphasis in Arica theory on consciousness (its metaphysical primacy as well as the practical aim of clarifying and raising it) includes a map of the levels of consciousness. A main feature of John Lilly’s presentation of Arica theory in The Center of the Cyclone (1972) is an early version of the levels of consciousness which span, metaphorically from hell to heaven, that is, from the lowest levels of suffering in which one is as removed as possible from reality as it truly is, to the experience of reality as such, namely, oneness with the Absolute or union with God. Four levels of “satori” are described, corresponding to spiritual, intellectual, emotional and physical centers (like chakras) of the person, and numbered from three at the highest to twenty-four at the lowest (Lilly 1972:148-49). So, state twenty-four, the first level of satori or enlightenment, occurs when one is centered in the lower belly, like the t’ai chi or kung fu master, whose mind is silent and alert rather than distracted by the dream-like constant chattering in one’s head. This state of the pacified mind, “permanent 24,” in which one lives what is described as a “divine life,” is the level of consciousness the early trainings of Arica aimed to achieve. Above this level is state twelve, the opening of the higher emotional center, described as the “blissful state” in which experiences divine grace (baraka) or cosmic love, as well as a oneness with and love for all things. This state is one of extreme joy and high energy, leaving one unable to speak as one enters what Lilly calls the “happy idiot country,” a state highly desirable but rarely achieved. And so on up to further indescribable states of spiritual attainment. State forty-eight is a neutral state of normal waking consciousness in which one is capable of objective understanding using trialectical analysis. Below this are the negative states of increasing subjectivity and suffering. More recent presentations of the levels of consciousness eschew the numbered states of satori and propose nine lower levels of subjectivity which are the negative image of the nine higher levels of objective awareness.

Although Ichazo is most well-known for his Enneagrammatic theory of personality types, the foundation of his thought is his proposed new logic of trialectics. Trialectics is regarded as the logic of unity, a logic that bridges science and mysticism. By “science,” Ichazo means largely experiential or experimental observation leading to universal laws of nature. As such, it can be tested and verified, and this is what differentiates science from faith or religion, the other home to mysticism in world history. The aim of trialectics is to capture the “logos” that governs nature and, indeed, all that is, in a grand metaphysical manner; a way of thinking that grasps the way things are, the fundamental laws or principles or reality. It is mystical logic in its emphasis on unity: it is a way of thinking that overcomes dualisms. Traditional logic or dialectical thought is fundamentally dualistic. It is binary with its chief operators, true and false. In this it is machine-like with the digital “0 or 1” toggle-switch mentality of digital computers the best contemporary example. In recent years many of sensed the need for new way of thinking, for a new holistic logic to replace, or at least supplement, the dualistic and mechanistic rationality inherent in the Cartesian, Newtonian model of the universe. Trialectics is an attempt at giving expression to this new holistic logic (See Dell’Olio 2012).

The basis of trialectics is what might be called “triadic reasoning,” that is, the overcoming of duality by a third, mediating principle that unifies two opposing principles. According to Ichazo, this idea is actually quite old and may be found throughout the world’s wisdom traditions (Ichazo 1982a:74). Similar to Gurdjieff’s Law of Three, trialectics asserts that any phenomenon can be analyzed in terms of three factors: an active force, an attractive force and a third function that mediates the interaction of the two forces. In this way, trialectical logic sees the unity behind seemingly opposing forces; in a sense, its triadic reasoning attempts to capture the coincidence of opposites. Yet, trialectics is more than a method of reasoning that sees unity in opposition. As a metaphysical description of the world of phenomena, it is also an account of the laws of reality. Ichazo typically presents trialectics as bearing on the issue of “identity,” that is, of what is. As metaphysical propositions, the laws of trialectics go beyond triadic thinking per se to include basic principles describing way things are from the point of view of the whole, that is, from the perspective of the unity of reality.

The three laws of trialectics do for cycles what the three classical “laws of thought” of Aristotelian formal logic do for space and what the three laws of Hegelian-Marxian dialectical logic do for time. For Ichazo, formal logic describes a static world while dialectical logic captures a changing universe but in terms of conflict rather than cooperation. In this, formal logic reflects the mentality of the child while dialectical logic reflects the mentality of the adolescent. Similarly, formal logic reflects the ancient and medieval time periods of western culture, a time of slow change where the social order seemed fixed and stable with static hierarchies, while dialectical logic reflects modernity with its rapid pace of change, its political religious and intellectual revolutions, its class struggles, and its belief in progress and limitless expansion.

But as much as each logic captures its own time in thought, neither fully manifests the mature mind since neither thinks in terms of limits, and maturity, for Ichazo, comes with the recognition of limits (Ichazo 1982b:163). The mature person accepts what can and cannot be achieved, that there are limits to action, growth and development. So, the thinking inherent in the modern age, rooted in competition and win-loss scenarios, that sees endless growth and limitless resources, must give way to a new logic that describes change but within prescribed limits and stable patterns.

The laws of trialectics are as follows: (1) The law of mutation from one material manifestation point (MMP) to another MMP. This law states that the universe has pre-established laws and points in which change occurs within fixed patterns. The material manifestation of phenomena take place at “neutral points of retention of energy,” that is, MMPs. (2) The law of circulation. This law states that opposites are in a state of equilibrium where “inside everything is the seed of its apparent opposite.” Change is a harmonious process of circulation of energy rather than a conflictual war or struggle of antagonistic forces. (3) The law of attraction. This law states that things do not remain stable but more toward higher or lower MMPs on a fixed hierarchy of levels (Ichazo 1982a:75).

The law of mutation gives expression to a dynamic universe of energy forming stable but temporary patterns we experience as material objects or substances. As matter or energy transforms into new stable patterns, it does so, not gradually but in discontinuous jumps and at fixed points, both at that micro-level as water changes to ice at 0 degrees centigrade and changes to steam at 100 degrees centigrade, or at that macro-level, as in the “punctuated equilibrium” theory of evolution. More obvious examples in nature include the stages of any life-cycle, as in the egg that becomes a caterpillar then a chrysalis and then a butterfly. As in the case of the stages of human development from infancy to childhood to adolescence to adulthood, the transformation occurs in jumps at fixed manifestation points.

The process of change, as we have already seen, is described by Ichazo in terms of the triadic relationship between an active principle, an attractive principle and the function that unites them (Ichazo 1982a: 74). The simplest example of this triadic relationship is in the generation of life itself with the mother as attractive principle, the father as active principle and the love between the two as the function that results in the child. The active-attractive-function triad is also at work in the law of circulation. Rather than conceive of change in terms of contradictions in nature, change is conceived in terms of interdependence between active and attractive elements. Both elements contribute to each other and, through a process of attraction or love, join in unity. Seen from the perspective of unity, pace Heraclitus, night is attracted to day, not at war with it. The harmonious circulation of energy between the active and attractive principles maintains the equilibrium and unity of the process.

Attraction is also at work, of course, in the law of attraction. Rather than conceive of change occurring through the dialectical notion of “the negation of the negation,” the third law of trialectics posits a less destructive principle. The law of attraction states that “everything is attracted to expansion or contraction,” (Ichazo 1982a: 64) that is, everything is attracted to higher or lower levels of manifestation of energy or MMPs. Rather, than think of the seed as “negated” by the plant, the trialectical mode of thought thinks of the seed as attracted to becoming a plant. In trialectics, as in Dante’s vision of the universe, it is love that moves the moon and stars, not strife or conflict.

For Ichazo, the notion within trialectics of fixed points of change or MMPs has implications for psychological and spiritual growth. Just as there are levels of material manifestation, from cells to stars, there are levels of psychological or spiritual manifestation. From the madman to the Buddha, the stages of human development are pre-determined, as pre-determined as stages of water from fluid to vapor. Ichazo’s program of spiritual development is based on the existence of these stages or levels of self-realization, and it is because he believes he has the map of the entirety of the human process, in Arica he has produced a scientific approach to mysticism based on the new logic of trialectics.

RITUALS/PRACTICES

The primary vehicle for the transmission of Arica teachings have been residential group training programs. These trainings typically make use using a special high-protein diet, including a special drink known as “Dragon’s Milk,” a physical exercise regimen known as Psychocalisthenics, a special deep-tissue massage known as “Chua K’a,” a form of qigong known as kath generation (the lower belly is referred to as the kath center), and meditations which involve yantras and specific kinds of breathing. Beginning levels of study would focus on “karma cleaning” or the systematic review of one’s life experiences across the nine systems and domains, etc., to clarify issues and patterns that hold back one’s personal development and keep one from living a fully awakened life. This process of analyzing and freeing oneself of one’s ego, also known as ego-reduction, includes tools for self-observation. These inlcude knowing one’s “fixation” or personality types, developing “witness” consciousness, and eventually learning how to separate the Absolute Mind from the Relative Mind then re-integrating them in the Ornamental Mind of the enlightened individual. Other practices include chanting and singing, Sufi dancing (or Zhikr), theater exercises, and attending the lectures of Oscar Ichazo. The Line of the School Level trainings are arranged from beginning to advanced and are categorized in terms of the Five Realms (vital, emotional, social, mental, and spiritual), as well as a separate set of Transcendental State trainings. Individual, non-residential trainings are also offered in addition to the residential group trainings (See, “The Trainings” 2021).

ORGANIZATION/LEADERSHIP

Arica Institute [Image at right] is a non-profit organization run by a Board of Directors. Ichazo had not been a member of the Board since moving to Hawaii in 1981 when he formed the Oscar Ichazo Company, now the Oscar Ichazo Foundation, which is distinct from Arica Institute but has served as the source of new trainings and communications to the Arica School. The Arica School consists essentially of its dues-paying members, who also pay tuition for trainings, supporting the work of Ichazo. Ichazo was assisted primarily by his wife, Sarah Hodge Ichazo, and a small team in Hawaii. Since Ichazo’s recent death, the Arica School continues under the leadership of Sarah Ichazo.

ISSUES/CHALLENGES

From the beginning of the Arica School there seems to have been a tension between the need for it to be closed group (a secret or esoteric school) and its “mission” to save humanity and the planet by establishing “Humanity-One” or the metasociety. There has also been a tension between Ichazo as the supreme leader and teacher (guru?) and the idea that Arica is a democratic organization (“Arica is you”). After leaks of its teachings and practices early on by Claudio Naranjo led to the popularization of enneagram of personality and “the Enneagram Wars,” Arica became hyper-vigilant about copyrighting seemingly everything in its storehouse of concepts and techniques. But such a proprietary stance regarding its offerings runs against its stated aim of reaching as many people as possible and its being a force for the positive transformation of the culture as a whole. It also runs counter to aspirations of intellectual legitimacy for its theory and method since, as the court stated in Arica’s failed lawsuit against Helen Palmer, a purported factual discovery (such as the claim that there are nine distinct ego fixations) could not be protected under copyright laws.

Similarly, many students over the years, including some prominent early ones such as Naranjo, Lilly, and Dick Price of Esalen, have been turned off to what they regarded as the hierarchical, autocratic, dictatorial organization model of the school and the corresponding “group-think” of its membership. (Price’s experience of his participation in Arica is recounted in Kripal 2007:178-79). The authoritarian reputation of the school, along with the high cost of its trainings, has likely inhibited growth in its membership and influence.

The inability to produce in a timely manner a successful publication of the long-awaited complete Arica theory and method has also likely inhibited Arica’s influence, and no doubt was a factor in its challenges with others publishing material derived from its teachings. Ichazo’s own writings are often obtuse, and his lack of solid academic credentials has also likely made it difficult for them to gain wide acceptance.

One might also point to the seemingly interminable nature of Arica’s training program. The first residential training in New York City guaranteed enlightenment in three months, but for the next fifty years new trainings have rolled out promising ever higher attainments of enlightenment. A skeptical observer might wonder why a theory and method touted for its velocity in achieving enlightenment has taken so long to produce an enlightened student.

Ichazo himself has said that mystical schools such as Arica come into being for a period of time and for a specific mission (Ichazo 1982b:119). Perhaps Arica achieved its mission in first few years of its existence, helping to accelerate the raising of consciousness of modern Western society and assisting in opening it up to the significance of spiritual disciplines for personal and social transformation. Yet, Arica gave itself the lofty mission of transforming enough people to achieve a new level of humanity, a global metasociety where we recognize and realize our oneness, and where we avert the “four killers” of over-population, uncontrolled pollution, nuclear Armageddon or fallout, and the abuse and exploitation of natural resources. But since there has been no shortage of such disasters in recent decades, a case could be made that the Arica School has failed in its aim. After all, we seem further from the metasociety or a unified humanity than ever before. Still, perhaps this achievement is simply too high a bar to judge any spiritual teaching or school, not to mention most major world religions and philosophies which, in many if not most cases, share this noble, if ever elusive, aim.

IMAGES

Image #1: Oscar Ichazo in 1976.
Image #2: The cover of Interviews with Oscar Ichazo.
Image #3: The Enneagram. Image courtesy of Rob Fitzel. Accessed at http://www.fitzel.ca/enneagram/index.html.
Image #4: The Universal Logos, symbol of the Arica School.

REFERENCES

Anderson, Walter Truett. 2004 [1983]. The Upstart Spring: Esalen and the Human Potential Movement. Lincoln, NE: iUniverse.

Arica website. n.d. Accessed from www.arica.org on 5 January 2021.

Arica website. 2021. “The Trainings.” Accessed from https://www.arica.org/system/abttrain.cfm on 9 January 2021.

Beesing, Maria and Robert J. Nogosek and Patrick H. O’Leary. 1984. The Enneagram: A Journey of Self Discovery. Denville, NJ: Dimension Books.

Dell’Olio, Andrew J. 2012. “The Arica School: Towards a Logic of Unity?” Pp. 153-73 in Philosophical Explorations of New and Alternative Religious Movements, edited by Morgan Luck. Farnham: Ashgate.

Effros Walter A. 2003. “Owning Enlightenment: Proprietary Spirituality in the ‘New Age’ Marketplace.” Buffalo Law Review 5:483-678.

Goldberg, Michael J. 1993. “Inside the Enneagram Wars.” L.A. Weekly, October 15, 16-26.

Ichazo, Oscar. 1991. “Letter to Transpersonal Community.” Pp 87-117 in The Arican. New York: Arica Institute Press.

Ichazo, Oscar. 1982a. Between Metaphysics and Protoanalysis: A Theory for Analyzing the Human Psyche. New York: Arica Institute Press.

Ichazo, Oscar. 1982b. Interviews with Oscar Ichazo. New York: Arica Institute Press.

Ichazo, Oscar. 1982c. “Metamorphosis Lectures.” Maplecrest, NY (author’s personal notes).

Ichazo, Oscar. 1976. The Human Process for Enlightenment and Freedom. New York: Arica Institute Press.

Keen, Sam. 1973. “’We have no desire to strengthen the ego or make it happy.’ A Conversation with Oscar Ichazo.” Psychology Today, July. Reprinted in Interviews with Oscar Ichazo, pp. 3-24.

Kripal, Jeffrey J. 2007. Esalen: America and the Religion of No Religion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Lilly, John C. 1972. The Center of the Cyclone: An Autobiography of Inner Space. New York: Julian Press.

Naranjo, Claudio. 1970. “Report from Chile: Oscar Ichazo and the School.” Tiburon, CA: Big Sur Tapes.

Ouspensky, P.D. 1949. In Search of the Miraculous: Fragments of an Unknown Teaching. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

Palmer, Helen. 1988. The Enneagram. New York: Harper & Row.

Simões, Roberto Serafim. 2018. “Early Latin American Esoteric Yoga as a New Spirituality in the First Half of the Twentieth Century.” International Journal of Latin American Religions 2:290–314.

Publication Date:
10 January 2021

 

Share

Shashemene


SHASHEMENE TIMELINE

1948-1950:  Land was granted in Shashemene to the black people of the world (Ethiopian World Federation members).

1954:  The first Ethiopian World Federation (EWF) members from Montserrat settled on the Land Grant.

1955:  Mayme Richardson, Ethiopian World Federation international organizer, came to Jamaica to publicize the Land Grant and seek membership.

1964:  The first Rastafari Ethiopian World Federation member from the U.S. settled in Shashemene.

1965:  Jamaican Rastafari Noel Dyer walked from the U.K. to Ethiopia.

1968:  Jamaican Rastafari (Ethiopian World Federation members and non-members) arrived in small groups in Shashemene.

1970:  The Shashemene Land Grant was divided among twelve families.

1972:  The first settler from The Twelve Tribes of Israel settled in Shashemene.

1974:  The Ethiopian revolution brought a military junta to power.

1975:  All rural lands were nationalized, including the Shashemene Land Grant.

1986:  Land was granted back to eighteen families in Shashemene.

1992:  A celebration of Centenary of His Imperial Majesty Haile Selassie I (HIM) in Ethiopia took place and arrivals resumed.

2007:  A celebration of the Ethiopian millennium took place, and the number of arrivals and settlements in Ethiopia peaked.

2018:  The Rastafari in Ethiopia received resident identification credentials (foreign nationals of Ethiopian origin).

FOUNDER/GROUP HISTORY

Shashemene is the name of a southern market town in the Rift Valley in Ethiopia; it is situated 250km from capital city Addis Ababa. Today it is on the southernmost tip of the regional federal state of Oromia. This secondary town has witnessed steady growth since the 1950s and counted at least 150,000 inhabitants in 2020, many of whom were migrants from various regions in Ethiopia. Shashemene, however, is known worldwide because of several hundred Rastafari who “fulfilled prophecy” and live there. They settled on land granted by the Emperor of Ethiopia, Haile Selassie I, and they form a unique community of “returnees” to the African continent. As a consequence, the name Shashemene is often used, in Ethiopia and internationally, to designate this community and the symbolic centre of the Rastafari movement. It is sung as such by reggae artists, for example, Sydney Salmon’s Shashemene on my mind (Salmon 2000).

The Emperor of Ethiopia granted land in Shashemene to thank the “Black people of the world,” members of the Ethiopian World Federation (EWF), for their moral and financial support during the war with Italy (1935-1941). The EWF was founded in New York in 1937 by Ethiopian Melaku Beyan in order to sensitize public opinion and to centralize support for the cause of Ethiopia. As a token of appreciation five gashas of land, or 200 hectares, were granted to the members of the EWF. The oral tradition of the Rastafari movement gives 1948 as the year of the Land Grant, while archival research points to 1950. This land was in a rural environment in the 1960s, but it is now to be found within town limits and administration. It is known locally as “Jamaica sefer” or Jamaican neighbourhood.

For various reasons related to the political dynamics shaping the Back to Africa claims among the African diaspora in the Americas, settlement in Shashemene started slowly. It began with first settlers Helen and James Piper, [Image at right] Black Jews and Garveyites originally from Montserrat, arriving from the U.S. in Ethiopia in 1948, and in Shashemene in about 1954. They established their farm and a school, and developed social ties with surrounding Ethiopians. They were followed by a handful of African Americans of various denominations, including pharmacist Gladstone Robinson, the first Rastafari from the U.S. in 1964, and Baptist Rev. William Hillman from Georgia U.S. in 1965. Other African American and African Caribbean residents in Ethiopia were sporadic visitors, and the early Shashemene settlers did go occasionally to Addis Ababa, then a full day journey away.

The spectacular journey of Noel Dyer, a migrant Jamaican Rastafari who left the U.K. in 1964 and walked to Shashemene, illustrates the faith and the passion with which Rastafari have engaged with Ethiopia and Shashemene in particular. A couple years after the 1966 landmark state visit of Emperor Haile Selassie I [Image at right] in the Caribbean, groups of Rastafari from Jamaica started arriving in Shashemene. Some were members of the EWF while others were not. They were a couple family units, a few single sistren, and a majority of brethren, painters, builders, masons, carpenters and bakers. The Rastafari petitioned the Ethiopian Crown on various occasions and were granted support, mainly in terms of employment and access to land. In July 1970, the Shashemene Land Grant was divided nominally among twelve persons or households, while more people were arriving in the country, including the first members sent by the Twelve Tribes of Israel. This organization, an offshoot of the EWF with a distinctive theology, was founded in 1968 in Jamaica by Vernon Carrington (Prophet Gad). It focused on repatriation to Ethiopia, and it was closely associated with the growth of reggae music. In 1969, both the Prime minister of Jamaica, Hugh Shearer, and opposition leader, Michael Manley, visited Ethiopia, and Rastafari’s presence and culture were instrumentalized in view of the 1972 elections in Jamaica, eventually won by the socialist opposition.

The small but growing community living on the Shashemene Land Grant was harshly impacted by the revolution taking hold of Ethiopia and dethroning Haile Selassie I in September 1974. Despite coming from impoverished background in Jamaica, the Rastafari settlers were identified as beneficiaries of the Crown in Ethiopia, and as such were directly threatened by the violent change of regime. By March 1975, the military junta ruling Ethiopia (called the Derg) nationalised all rural land in the country, including the Shashemene Land Grant. The Pan African motive of this grant did not hold in front of social change in Ethiopia. Rastafari residents lost most of the land, secured only a few of their houses, and many decided to leave the country. Only a handful of young members from the Twelve Tribes of Israel arrived in the late 1970s. They survived in a context of civil war, curfew, and food ratio, with very few visitors, including Bob Marley in December 1978. Following various petitions to the government, some land in Shashemene was eventually granted in 1986 to eighteen families in order to ease their living conditions.

Following another change of regime in 1991, an international coalition of Rastafari organized in Ethiopia a three-week long celebration of the centenary of Haile Selassie’s birthday (1892). With Shashemene anew on the diasporic agenda, diasporic arrivals resumed with peaks in 2000 and in 2007, the millennium year in the Gregorian and in the Julian calendar (the latter in use in Ethiopia). A striking feature of these decades was the increasing diversity of the “returnees” to Shashemene, who did not come only from Jamaica, but from the many places where the Rastafari movement had bloomed. The EWF had been revitalized in the U.K. during the 1980s, and the Twelve Tribes of Israel had developed a dozen international branches. Thus, Rastafari from all the Caribbean islands, and from the Western metropolises (U.S., U.K., Canada) started arriving in Shashemene. In addition, two of the historic “houses” of Rastafari in Jamaica, The Theocratic Order of Nyahbinghi and the Ethiopia Africa Black International Congress (EABIC, also known as Bobo Ashanti), sent members to reside in Shashemene.

If Shashemene represents a form of enclave, [Image at right] it is one with porous social and spatial borders. With Rastafari of about fifteen nationalities and many Ethiopian-mixed households, it is a cosmopolitan community that entertains strong links with family members abroad and fellow Rastafari worldwide. The habitat of the neighbourhood is mixed, Rastafari and Ethiopians live in the same streets, and of course, the population of Ethiopians grows much faster than the pace of settlement by Rastafari. Rastafari in Shashemene do not represent a separate territory from their surrounding, they are tightly knit in the local fabric, that remains under the control of the Ethiopian administration and people.

DOCTRINES/BELIEFS

The first settlers on the Shashemene Land Grant were Black Jews from the U.S., and oral history has it that Black Muslims came as well in the late 1950s. One of the early settlers was a Baptist minister, from the U.S. as well. These various religious affiliations illustrate the oecumenical character of the EWF in its early days. This was a particularly striking character of the EWF in the U.S. and up to the late 1950s, until International Organizer Mayme Richardson came from New York to Jamaica in 1955 seeking to renew the membership of the EWF. By then, Jamaican Rastafari who had previously struggled to enter into the EWF were empowered and developed their own local branches of the EWF in Kingston. The first groups of Jamaican Rastafari to settle in Shashemene came from these branches. They were followed by members of The Twelve Tribes of Israel who still represent a numerical majority on the Shashemene Land Grant. Thereafter, Rastafari representing various “houses” (like The Theocratic Order of Nyahbinghi and the Ethiopia Africa Black International Congress) settled, as well as non-affiliated Rastafari.

Today, the Shashemene community is a Rastafari community, made up of various denominations and affiliations, therefore displaying a variety of doctrines and beliefs that reflect the international Rastafari movement. Still, all commit to hailing the King of Kings, Lord of Lords, Conquering Lion of Juda, Emperor Haile Selassie I; and they show deep love for Ethiopia as well as a strong claim to Redemption through Repatriation to Africa. Symbolically, they consider Africa as Zion (a Holy land where God resides), [Image at right] which stands in opposition to Western spaces, values and institutions called Babylon (a place of exile and depravation). More than any other community, Rastafari have a specific claim to Shashemene: land was granted by Haile Selassie I, their God and King, the central figure of their cosmology and worldview. As a result, they feel therefore particularly concerned and entitled to it.

RITUALS/PRACTICES

The Rastafari calendar is celebrated in Shashemene, and two dates in particular draw both local and international crowds to the community: July 23, the Earthday (birthday) of Emperor Haile Selassie I, and November 2, the Coronation of Emperor Haile Selassie I. Other significant dates include Empress Menen Asfaw Earthday (April 3), Marcus Garvey Earthday (August 17), as well as Ethiopian Christmas (January 7) or New Year (September 11). Some Rastafari, in particular the Bobo (EABIC), observe the Sabbath.

The main place of worship is the Nyahbinghi Tabernacle, [Image at right] a sacred circular space, where the drums of Rastafari are beaten, and the Fire Key lighted. Depending on the presence and engagement of residents, weekly or monthly ritual gatherings take place, in addition to the main celebrations of the Rastafari calendar. The Bobo hold their own ritual services, in the Bobo camp that had various locations in time.

Regular meetings, music and entertainment take place regularly in the Twelve Tribes of Israel HQ and in the EWF HQ. On specific occasions, like the July 23 celebration, the day could start with celebration in the Tabernacle and finish late in the night with a sound system or a reggae concert in the Twelve Tribes HQ. On that particular date, a motorcade was organized with drums, flags and families climbing in colourful trucks that would drive slowly from the neighbourhood to the centre of Shashemene town and back, thus displaying Rastafari’s presence and aesthetics to the wider Ethiopian population.

ORGANIZATION/LEADERSHIP

The formal representation of the Shashemene community has always been a matter of contention. Various factions of the EWF have long opposed each other, and while EWF has a historical legitimacy on the Land Grant, Twelve Tribes members have been a numerical majority since the 1970s. As of today, most dialogues and procedures vis-à-vis the Ethiopian local and national governments follow two channels, one through the EWF, which is now revitalized with a strong leadership, and the other one through the Twelve Tribes of Israel.

There are in addition a number of community associations. The oldest one is the Jamaica Rastafari Development Community (JRDC), which has functioned since the early 2000s. It brings together the various Rastafari houses in Shashemene, except the EWF, and runs a primary and secondary school. Other organizations were short-lived; but some are enduring, like Ancient of Days, that focuses on Elder’s care, and Positive Action Charity Organization, which runs the Yawenta School. Furthermore, a number of organizations abroad support local initiatives, like the Shashemene Foundation and IDOR in the U.S., Sick Be Nourished in the U.K., and Yawenta France, thus inscribing Shashemene both locally and in a wide diasporic space.

ISSUES/CHALLENGES

The Shashemene community faces a number of challenges. Some are internal challenges, related to the building of a community of people coming from various backgrounds and bound by faith and experience. [Image at right] Most challenges though are related to the Ethiopian environment: economic survival  and local social integration are major issues. Many returnees develop various businesses, and have valuable skills to implement, but cash and capital for investment are often hard to come by. Further, while job opportunities are scarce, the price of labour is always considerably under international standards. This community has survived a revolution (1974), civil war and a violent change of regime (1991). It never engaged actively in Ethiopian national politics, but it is often associated with the Ethiopian Crown, and as such it meets the animosity of Oromo nationalists who consider former Emperors Menelik and Haile Selassie as colonialists. Shashemene, as a major town of southern Oromia, sees recurrent eruptions of violence motivated by larger political and ethnic tensions. These outbursts of violence do not target the Rastafari community directly, but it remains a small and vulnerable community and an easy prey to arbitrary land spoliation and local practices of corruption.

The 2017 announcement by the Ethiopian government that the Rastafari living in Ethiopia would be granted formal rights to residence was implemented in the following couple of years, marking a major step in the legal integration of Rastafari residents in Ethiopia. For the Rastafari and their children, after decades without papers and without rights to either residence or access to Ethiopian citizenship, this formal recognition came with a sigh of relief. Despite this important gesture, the larger international picture of “returnees” from the old African Diaspora to Africa remains an unaddressed human rights issue. That issue is located at the core of the contemporary discussion of and struggle for reparations for slavery.

IMAGES

Image #1: Helen Piper, Gladstone Robinson, and James Piper in front of the Pipers’ house in Shashemene, ca. 1965. Private archives, G. Robinson.
Image #2: Emperor Haile Selassie I.
Image #3: Welcome sign at the entrance to the Shashemene town.
Image #4: Wall painting of a Rastaman in Ethiopian-inspired iconography.
Image #5: The Nyahbinghi Tabernacle in Shashemene.
Image #6: A Shashemene community gathering.

Community gathering in the tabernacle

REFERENCES**
** Unless otherwise noted, the content of this profile is drawn from Giulia Bonacci, Exodus! Heirs and Pioneers, Rastafari Return to Ethiopia, University of the West Indies Press (2015).

SUPPLEMENTARY RESOURCES

Aarons, David. 2020. “From Babylon to Ethiopia: Continuities and Variations of Utopianism in Rastafari Reggae Music.” Popular Music and Society. Accessed from https://doi.org/10.1080/03007766.2020.1795480 on 15 December 2020.

Bonacci, Giulia. 2018. “‘It Would Have Pleased the Great Spirit of Mr. Garvey’: Helen and James Piper and the Return to Ethiopia.” International Journal of African Historical Studies 5: 293–31.

Bonacci, Giulia. 2016. “The Return to Ethiopia of the Twelve Tribes of Israel.” New West Indian Guide 90:1–27.

Bonacci, Giulia. 2015. Exodus! Heirs and Pioneers, Rastafari Return to Ethiopia. Kingston, Jamaica: University of the West Indies Press.

Bonacci, Giulia. 2013. “The Ethiopian World Federation: A Pan-African Organization among the Rastafari in Jamaica.” Caribbean Quarterly 59:73–95.

Christian, Ijahnya. 2018. “No Migration, Repatriation. Spiritual visionings and political limitations of Rastafari repatriation.” Pp. 316-32 in Routledge Handbook of Postcolonial Politics, edited by Olivia U. Rutazibwa and Robbie Shilliam. London: Routledge.

Gomes, Shelene. 2018. “Counter-Narratives of Belonging: Rastafari in the Promised Land.” The Global South 12:112-28.

MacLeod, Erin. 2014. Visions of Zion: Ethiopians and Rastafari in the Search for the Promised Land. New York: New York University Press.

Niaah, Jahlani. 2012. “The Rastafari Presence in Ethiopia: A Contemporary Perspective.” Pp. 66-88 in Rastafari in the New Millennium, edited by Michael Barnett. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.

Salmon, Sydney. Shashemene on my mind. Accessed from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YdvnENC_u0E on 15 December 2020.

Publication Date:
19 December 2020

 

 

Share

International Association of Exorcists

 

INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EXORCISTS TIMELINE

1925 (1 May):  Gabriel Amorth was born in Modena, Italy.

1954:  Amorth was ordained a Roman Catholic priest.

1986 (June):  Father Gabriel Amorth became an official exorcist.

1991 (September 4):  The International Association of Exorcists was founded with Father Amorth as President.

1994:  The first official international conference of the association took place.

1999:  A new rite of exorcism published, replacing the 1614 rite 385 years later.

2000:  Father Amorth retired as President of the International Association of Exorcists and became its Honorary President for life.

2013:  The association, together with the Sacerdos Institute of the Pontifical Athenaeum Regina Apostolorum in Rome, began sponsoring week-long training courses for priests and lay people in the ministry of exorcism.

2014 (June 13):  The Congregation for Clergy approved the Statutes of the Association and conferred its legal status by recognizing it as a Private Association of Faithful under canon law.

2016 (September 16):  Father Amorth died of pulmonary complications at age ninety-one.

FOUNDER/GROUP HISTORY

The International Association of Exorcists (IAE), which is today led by Father Francesco Bamonte, was founded in Italy in 1991 by Father René Chenessau, exorcist of the diocese of Pontoise (Paris), and by Father Gabriel Amorth (1925-2016), [Image at right] a famous Roman exorcist of the Society of San Paolo, and member of the Pontifical Mariana International Academy (not by chance, since in the Christian tradition it is the Virgin Mary to whom God the Father gives the power to crush the serpent’s head with her feet, and it is to Mary that exorcists consecrate themselves).

Its origin lays in Chenessau’s and Amorth’s observation of their society in the 1980s, specifically that there was an increase of occult practices and in the numbers of the faithful who turned to an exorcist for help. They thought it necessary for them to create an international network composed of those who dealt with this phenomenon. The official founding date of the IAE was September 4, 1991, the date of the first meeting of the group of exorcists. By the year 2000, the association claimed to have 200 members (Collins 2009).

From their first meetings, the IAE exorcists realized the need to involve psychologists and psychiatrists in their activities. At the second official conference organized by IAE in 1993, seventy-nine exorcists participated. In 1994, the first official international conference was organized, and was conducted in several languages with simultaneous translation, with eighty-one participants. During the 2005 international conference, the participants were also received by Pope Benedict XVI (1927 – ). Among the activities promoted by the IAE since 2000 are the School for Exorcists, held for a few days a year, and various spiritual exercises for exorcists.

At the time of the association’s foundation, there were forty IAE members; in 2017 there were more than 500 (130 of whom are lay auxiliaries). Initially, almost all the members of the association were Italians, but today Italians comprise only a little over half of the members. Every two years, since 1994, the association organizes a large five-day international conference. The recent ones attracted more than 100 Italian priests and exorcists and about eighty foreign priests and exorcists. Auxiliaries (such as lay people belonging to prayer groups, psychologists, doctors, lawyers, pastoral workers) also attend, coming from all continents. In the odd years, however, an Italian national conference is organized. Given the increasing number of exorcists and hence the greater demand for training, in 2017, for the first time, the IAE also organized a Neo-exorcist Training Course that was held in Rome.

Each year since 2013, the IAE, together with the Sacerdos Institute of the Pontifical Athenaeum Regina Apostolorum in Rome, [Image at ritght]  has sponsored a week-long training course, providing a theoretical and practical base course for priests and lay people in the ministry of exorcism. During the first two academic years (2004–2005 and 2005–2006), the course lasted four months; since 2007, to meet ever increasing demands coming from various parts of the world, the course has become more focused and thus more intense, lasting only a week. It is interesting to note that in 2008 the training course, which had made the Pontifical Regina Apostolorum University known throughout the world, was suspended. The organizers requested a “sabbatical” year of reflection to reconsider the organization of the course, due to the tremendous international media impact that the course had had in its first year.

The fifth course, in 2010, anticipated the release of the film, The Rite, which occurred in early 2011 and almost coincided with the sixth course. This film, starring Anthony Hopkins, produced by New Line, and distributed by Warner Bros. It was inspired by the 2009 essay The Rite: The Making of a Modern Exorcist by journalist Matt Baglio (2009), who participated in one of the first courses at the Pontifical Athenaeum Regina Apostolorum. After the eleventh course, in 2016, the documentary film Liberami was produced by director Federica Di Giacomo, who took part in the tenth course by filming and interviewing some of the participants. In 2017, a discussion forum on these films was also held during the course.

DOCTRINES/BELIEFS

The association believes in the increased presence of the devil in our society and the deficiency of the Catholic Church to deal with these attacks. Its founders had experienced a time period when exorcisms were in sharp decline and even rare (Young 2016). The association was created to revitalise the practice of exorcism in the church, provide a support for exorcists to exchange perspectives and ideas, and train the new generation of professionals.

The Catholic ritual of exorcism is undertaken when people are understood to be affected and/or possessed by the devil. Father Gabrielle Amorth (2016:66–75) differentiates diabolical possession, which is rare, from diabolical vexation (physical or psychological attacks by a demon), obsession (disturbances or hallucinations initiated by a demon), and infestation (demonic disturbances inflicted on houses, objects or animals). He has claimed to have dealt with 50,000 cases, of which only eighty-four were, in his assessment, authentic.

Father Amorth claims that exorcism existed before Christianity and that it was known in “practically all ancient cultures” (Amorth 2016:97). He states that ancient magical rituals were simply the precursor to Christian rituals before they became “illuminated by the truth of Christ.” Making reference to the secularisation process, Father Amorth makes the claim that “[w]hen faith in God declines, idolatry and irrationality increases; man [sic] must then look elsewhere for answers to his [sic] meaningful questions” (2016:53).  He believes that this has led to an increase of practice in the occult, which has attracted the attention of the devil. However, at the time he wanted to create this association, he was concerned that exorcism was better organized by protestant groups. Indeed, in the 1999 translation of his best-selling book, Amorth (1999:15) admits to wanting to bring back an interest in exorcism, “which was found in times past among Catholics but is now found only among Protestants.” He confirms his claim later in his book by stating that

as in the study and dissemination of the Bible, Catholics are lagging behind some Protestant denominations. I will never tire of repeating this: rationalism and materialism have polluted a segment of theologians … (Amorth 1999:173).

His aim is thus to contribute to re-establishing the pastoral practice of exorcism in the Catholic Church (Amorth 1999:174). Acknowledging how difficult it is for someone in need to find an exorcist, he even advises people to go instead to a Catholic Charismatic Renewal group (Amorth 2016:100), a movement that developed in the U.S. that is influenced by Pentecostalism’s prayers of deliverance (1999:120). Amorth (1999:34) claims that “while possessions are still relatively rare today, we exorcists run into a great number of people who have been struck by the devil in health, jobs, or relationships.”

The full ritual of exorcism in Christianity is still regarded as the purview of the Catholic Church; however, Amorth is making reference to his Church’s inability to provide a ministry of deliverance (i.e. rituals to cleanse people of the presence of the devil even if not possessed). The significance, we read, of the increase in the number of professionals of exorcism is not necessarily that it allows for the wider provision of the Roman Ritual, but that it allows Catholicism to keep step with Protestantism in addressing a gap in the ministry that some Protestant groups appear to have filled. Amorth (1999) claims that the current ritual does not address those cases where people are affected by an evil influence; he also refers to the scarcity of exorcists in European nations other than Italy, and notes, almost with envy, that some Protestant denominations take the matter more seriously than does the Catholic Church. In his book, Amorth does not engage in any theological discussion with regards to their differences from the Catholic Church; instead, he writes very positively that ‘[t]hey investigate an occurrence, and when after their process of discernment, they find evidence of diabolical activity, they exorcize with an efficacy that many times I was able to witness personally’ (Amorth 1999:172). However, this exorcist does not accept the Charismatic distinction between simple and formal exorcism. He argues that exorcism should be limited to priests and that Charismatic “deliverance prayers” do not fit with exorcism. For him, exorcism is part of a sacramental Christian lifestyle (Collins 2009:172). On the other hand, Francis MacNutt, a highly educated Roman Catholic priest, advocates deliverance ministry as a form of minor exorcism that can be practised without reference to Church authorities. This priest claims that cases that require major exorcism are so rare that he has never encountered a single one (Collins 2009:56–57). However, a Belgian Archbishop, Leon-Joseph Suenens, refutes the Charismatics’ practice of deliverance as a type of “minor” exorcism and states that it is up to the Roman Catholic Church to formalize the guidelines for the practice of exorcism and deliverance (Collins 2009:.81). Fr Driscoll (2015:128) writes of Catholics wanting to drive demons out “in the same dramatic fashion as their Pentecostal counterparts” and emphasizes that prayer and the sacraments are the most adequate means to fight these demons. Driscoll even refers to deliverance as the Wild West of demon fighting (2015:181), and states that

the Catholic Church has no official deliverance doctrines, ministers, or rites. The deliverance concept, including its theology, procedures, and terminology, has been borrowed from Pentecostalism and/or invented by the deliverance professionals themselves. Prayer and the sacraments are the traditional Catholic means of fighting low-level demonic attacks (2015:141).

Around the time that Paul VI (1897-1978) got rid of the order of exorcists within the Catholic Church (Muchembled 2000), the Catholic Charismatic Renewal was developing, in the U.S. in 1967 and internationally in the 1970s (Csordas 2007). This is a movement that synthesizes elements of Catholicism and Pentecostalism. One of its leaders was Cardinal Leon Joseph Suenens, who wrote a book published by Pauline Editions in 1982, with a foreword by Cardinal Ratzinger. Amorth (1999:173) quotes a useful passage:

At the beginning, many Catholics tied to the renewal movement discovered the practice of deliverance among Christians of other traditions, belonging mainly to the Free Churches or Pentecostals. The books that they read, and still read, for the most part come from these denominations. Among their literature there is an enormous wealth of information on the devil and his acolytes, on witchcraft and its methodology, and so forth. In the Catholic Church, this field has been left almost fallow. Our directives for specific pastoral response are inadequate for our times.

Amorth (1999:186–87) then criticizes Cardinal Suenens for not regarding exorcism as a sacrament. In the quoted statement above we can see a strong link between renewed interest in exorcism and the importation of a deliverance ministry into the Catholic Church through the Catholic Charismatic Renewal, which has been a driving force to the creation of this association within Catholicism.

Father Amorth (2016:87) insists that anyone from any religion or non-religion can be attacked by demons but that exorcism and prayers of deliverance can only work for people who live in “God’s grace.” The former leading Italian Catholic exorcist is here making a claim about a practice of deliverance heavily promoted by Pentecostals.

With regards to Catholicism specifically, the push from people like Amorth is not necessarily to bring more priests into the Church, but to train more of the Church’s existing priests on how to expel the devil.

RITUALS/PRACTICES

According to Giuseppe Ferrari, one of the organizers of the training courses,

what characterizes this academic initiative is its multidisciplinary approach, in fact, the theme of exorcism is with dealt from various aspects: theological, canonical, anthropological, phenomenological, sociological, medical, pharmacological, psychological, legal, and criminological. This setting, which has proven its success, allows wide-ranging training, and is unique in the field of university education programmes.

In his opening speech to the course of 2017, Ferrari highlighted the danger posed by a new spiritual phenomenon, “spiritual Satanism,” which refers to presenting Satan as a good spirit and thus opening the door to the negative actions of the malignant one. He also asked attendees to reflect on the fact that “in the field of exorcism and of the liberation prayer, there is a growing need for thorough preparation to avoid practices not allowed by canon law.” According to Ferrari, one should note “the increase of certain ecclesiastical groups who, under the guidance of lay people, find themselves to make supplications for the precise purpose of obtaining liberation from the influx of demons;” in this regard, Ferrari quoted the letter to bishops on exorcism rules written by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (September 29, 1985) outlining some of the norms of canon law (Canon 1172). That letter  stated that no one could legitimately perform exorcisms on a possessed person if he or she had not obtained a special and formal license from the local bishop, that the lay faithful are not allowed to use the formula of exorcism against Satan and the rebellious angels, and that bishops are invited to be vigilant so that those who do not have the formal licence should not lead exorcism rites. It would thus seem clear that there is a need for the Church to keep in check a growing phenomenon that is otherwise likely to escape the control of the institution.

ORGANIZATION/LEADERSHIP

The Congregation for Clergy approved the Statutes of the Association and conferred its legal status on June 13, 2014  by recognizing IAE as a Private Association of Faithful under canon law. [Image at right]

Article 3 of the Statute describes the association’s objectives: a) to promote the first basic training and the subsequent ongoing training of exorcists; b) to encourage encounters between exorcists especially at the national and international level; c) to favor the inclusion of the ministry of the exorcist in the community dimension and in the ordinary pastoral care of the local church; d) to promote the right knowledge of this ministry among the people of God; e) to promote studies on exorcism in its various aspects; f) to promote collaboration with experts in medicine and psychiatry.

All these objectives highlight some problematic aspects related to the role of the exorcist which will be faced and addressed by the Association. From an institutional standpoint there is a need to give initial training to priests who intend to become exorcists in order to avoid magical experiments or even abuses of the practice of exorcism. There is the need for exorcists to network, to prevent them from becoming individual entrepreneurs, sometimes mistaken for magicians. It is necessary to make known the role of the exorcist within the communities in order to prevent the faithful who think they are possessed from resorting to rites of other religious confessions, such as those of the Pentecostals. There is also the cultural dimension, the need to give a foundation of “credibility,” reasonable if not rational, to the practice of exorcism and the beliefs that are connected. Finally, it is important to seek collaboration with doctors and psychiatrists in a search for legitimacy by science.

According to the Statute, those who can belong to the Association are the members (exorcists) and the aggregates. Exorcists must have received explicit permission from their bishop to be able to practice the rite of exorcism. The aggregates are the Catholic faithful, both priests and lay people, who help the exorcists in carrying out their ministry. In order to belong to the Association, the aggregates must make a written request to the central secretariat, attaching a letter of presentation written by the exorcist with whom they are collaborators.

 ISSUES/CHALLENGES                                                                                             

Some groups engaging in the fight against the devil were born at the margins of the Catholic Church. For example, the USEDEI, the International University of Specialized Sciences on Exorcism, Demonology and Eschatology, operates in Turin. The University, counting among its professors priests, bishops and lay professionals, regularly offers conferences and courses on various topics related to exorcism and possession. Among these are: “Exorcism practice,” “Angelology and demonology,” “Basic elements of physiology and human pathology for exorcizing healing practice;” “Exorcism in the history of religions and cultural anthropology;” “Agiography of saints in history: Exorcist saints and saints possessed;” “Modern forms of esotericism and relationships with alternative medicine;” “Mariology: Mary’s role in the battle against Satan;” “Eschatological themes: Hell, purgatory, paradise, limbo;” “Subliminal messages in mass media and music;” and “Psychosomatic spiritual disease: Causes and therapies with prayer for healing and liberation.”

The greatest challenge facing IAE may well be creating a sufficient base of trained exorcists. For more than twenty years, therefore, Italy has played a leading role in organizing and systematizing the Catholic fight against the devil. This is not only because the number of exorcists has substantially increased in this country, but also because several dioceses have officially opened special offices dedicated to receiving people who feel that they are possessed. A greater number of seminars are being held in order to prepare the exorcists for their mission, and almost always such initiatives receive considerable attention in local and national newspapers. In the diocese of Milan, one of the largest dioceses in the world, with more than 1,000 parishes and 5,000,000 inhabitants, the number of exorcists has more than doubled in the last ten years, increasing from four to ten priests engaged in such rituals. Since 2012, the diocese has opened an office with a dedicated telephone line through which every day a person is available to give direction to those who need to contact the nearest exorcist. Further, attendance at the Lombard Episcopal Conference, headed by the diocese of Milan, grew from eighteen exorcists in 2003 to thirty-two in 2016. The Episcopal Conference brings the exorcists of that region together every year, for a day in which they talk about the problems they have encountered and seek common solutions.

In the same way, the Bishops’ Conference of Triveneto, in the North-East of Italy where the city of Venice is located, is also being organized: the bishops in the last ten years have appointed at least one exorcist for each diocese. If at the beginning of the 2000s the exorcists in this ecclesiastical region were just over ten, recently the number has risen to almost fifty. Some dioceses (such as that of Verona, Padua, Vicenza, Trento) have several priests who are authorized by the bishop to celebrate the rite of exorcism.

As an exorcist we interviewed told us (Giordan and Possamai 2018), the greatest challenge for the future is to prepare “professionally” priests capable of carrying out this service because, according to his experience, the number of people seeking help is constantly increasing. And in addition to priests who can legitimately perform the rite of exorcism, there is also the need to train lay people, men and women, who assist the exorcist in the preparation of the rite as well as helping those affected by the “discomforts of the soul” in their daily life.

In addition to the professionalization process, the exorcists we interviewed also highlighted the need to structure the presence of exorcists in their locality. The objective is for the exorcists not to appear as something “extraordinary” but rather as an aspect of their “ordinary pastoral care in healthcare.” In this way, exorcists may assist people who are affected by physical illnesses in the same way as people who think they are being attacked by the devil.

IMAGES
Image #1: Father Gabriel Amorth.
Image #3: Pontifical Athenaeum Regina Apostolorum in Rome.
Image #3: The logo of the International Association of Exorcists.

REFERENCES

Amorth, Gabriel with Stefano Stimamiglio. 2016. An Exorcist Explains the Demonic. The Antics of Satan and His Army of Fallen Angels. Manchester, NH: Sophia Institute Press.

Amorth, Gabriel. 1999. An Exorcist Tells His Story. San Francisco: Ignatius.

Baglio, Matt. 2009. The Rite: The Making of a Modern Exorcist. London: Simon & Schuster.

Collins, James. 2009. Exorcism and Deliverance Ministry in the Twentieth Century. An Analysis of the Practice and Theology of Exorcism in Modern Western Christianity. Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock.

Csordas, Thomas. 2007. “Global Religion and the Re-enchantment of the World. The Case of the Catholic Charismatic Renewal.” Anthropological Theory 7:295–314.

Driscoll, Mike. 2015. Demons, Deliverance and Discernment. Separating Fact from Fiction about the Spirit World. El Cajon, CA: Catholic Answers Press.

Giordan, Giuseppe. and Adam Possamai. 2018. Sociology of Exorcism in Late Modernity. Basinkstoke: Palgrave McMillan.

Muchembled, Robert. 2000. Une histoire du diable XIIe-XXe siècle. Paris: Editions du Seuil.

Young, Francis. 2016. A History of Exorcism in Catholic Christianity. London: Palgrave.

Publication Date:
1 December 2020

Share

C3 Church

 

C3 CHURCH TIMELINE

1952 (May 21):  Phil Pringle was born in Masterton, New Zealand.

1971:  Phil had a vision of the devil circling him. Frightened, he called out, “Jesus!”

1971:  Phil and then-girlfriend Christine (known as a “Chris” within the movement) responded to an altar call at an Assembly of God Church in Sydenham, a suburb outside of Christchurch. They were born again.

1971 (August 8):  Phil and Chris were married.

1972:  While living in Oxford Terrace, New Zealand, a pastor from Sydney, Paul Collins, attended one of Phil and Chris’s house meetings. He made the comment, “Oh, we need something like this in Sydney,” thereby planting the seed of Phil’s vision that he would one day start a church in Sydney.

1973:  Pastor Dennis Barton was ousted from the Sydenham Assembly of God Church. Phil and Chris followed him to his new church in Christchurch, where they become Youth Leaders.

1978:  Phil received an invitation to preach in Madras, India. On his route back to New Zealand from South Asia, his plane landed in Sydney. He then heard a voice (which he interpreted as the voice of God) saying, “I want you to come to Sydney.”

1979:  In Lyttleton, New Zealand, Phil envisaged starting a church in Sydney that had an associated Arts and Bible College.

1980:  Phil and Chris moved from Lyttleton to Sydney to start Christian Centre Northside Church.

1980:  The church hosted its first service (an Easter Service) at Dee Why Surf Club in Oxford Falls. Only twelve people attended.

1984:  Oxford Falls Grammar School and C3 College were established.

2008:  At the “Here We Go” global conference held in Hawaii, Christian City Church announced that it would officially change its name to “C3 Church.”

2020:  C3 Church oversees 594 churches in sixty-four countries, and a global membership of more than 100,000.

FOUNDER/GROUP HISTORY

Phil Pringle was born on May 21, 1952 in Masterton, New Zealand to an upper-middle class family. When he was very young his mother passed away from brain cancer. Christine Pringle (known as “Chris” within the C3 movement) came from a lower-class background, and her father died when she was only an infant. The two first met as young kids growing up in Masterton, but it wasn’t until they both attended Wairarapa College, where they took the same English and History classes, that they became friends, and eventually, high school sweethearts. The two connected over their shared passion for art, music, and drama (Shin 2014). After high school Phil began working as a garbage-collector and attending Arts School, while Chris studied to become a Kindergarten teacher.

Coming of age in the 1960s, the couple were heavily involved in the New Zealand hippie movement; in their teens they grew their hair long, experimented with psychedelics, and studied Eastern philosophy and religion. According to Chris, at the time, “the only people we knew were clairvoyants or card readers” (Shin 2014). In 1971, while living together in Christchurch, Phil had a vision of the devil while in a semi-conscious state. In a panic, he woke up and cried out, “Jesus!” Deeply frightened, the couple said the Lord’s Prayer together. The next morning, they phoned a friend of theirs, Dorothy, for advice. Dorothy, who read tarot cards, recommended they visit a psychic society. However, Dorothy’s mother, May, who had just converted to Christianity three weeks earlier, overheard the conversation. May got the couple’s number from Dorothy and phoned them back, putting them in touch with an Assembly of God (Pentecostal) church. The following Sunday, Phil and Chris visited the church, which was located in Sydenham, a suburb outside of Christchurch, and led by a pastor named Dennis Barton. At the end of the service, the pastor invited all of the congregants to receive Jesus Christ. Both Phil and Chris walked to the front and were born again. Three weeks later, at the request of the church, the couple got married (Barclay 1987). [Image at right]

Under the direction of pastor Dennis Barton, Phil and Chris became Youth Leaders at the church. They also moved into a large house with other church members, holding prayer meetings on Monday nights that attracted between seventy to one hundred people. In 1972, a pastor from Sydney, Australia, Paul Collins, attended one of their house meetings. He made the comment, “Oh, we need something like this in Sydney.” Phil recalls this event as the moment God gave him the vision that he would one day lead a church in Sydney (Barclay 1987).

In 1973, pastor Dennis Barton was asked to step down as pastor and leave the church. This caused massive rifts within the congregation. Phil and Chris struggled with the decision over whether or not to leave. In the end, they followed Barton and helped him plant a new church in Christchurch (Barclay 1987).

Sometime after serving as an associate pastor with Barton in Christchurch, Phil felt a strong call to start a church in Sydney. He received an offer from pastor Paul Collins to serve with him at his congregation in Sydney. Phil convinced Chris to make the trip, confident that his vision would soon come to fruition. However, after only five months in Sydney, it became clear that this was not the right time. Having found little success in their new venture, the couple were forced to return to Christchurch. Phil fell into a deep depression. He decided to quite the ministry for good, and he took up a job as a postman (Pringle 2005:71).

While working as a postman, Phil’s desire to become a pastor gradually returned. He and Chris made the decision to move to Lyttleton, a suburb outside of Christchurch, to start their own church. They ran this church for three years. During this period, Phil allegedly received signs from God that he would one day plant a church in Sydney, as well as found a Christian College. In 1978, Phil received an invitation to preach at a crusade in Madras, India. On his return trip back to New Zealand, his plane stopped in Sydney. Upon landing, Phil heard what he interpreted as the voice of God say, “I want you to come to Sydney” (Barclay 1987).

Later that year, Phil and Chris put a deposit down on a home in Lyttleton. However, soon after placing the deposit, Phil regretted the decision, feeling strongly that he and Chris needed to make the trip to Sydney to plant a church. He convinced her to forfeit the deposit, and in 1980 they made the move to Sydney with their three children, Daniel, Rebekah, and Joseph. They were followed by Simon and Helen McIntyre, Alison Easterbrook, and Phil’s brother.

In 1980, Phil and Chris started Christian Centre Northside Church, which they took over from Paul Collins, who had moved to Hong Kong to do mission work. Their first service, an Easter Service, was held at the Dee Why Surf Club in Oxford Falls and had only twelve people in attendance. However, within four years, their church grew to four hundred members.

Throughout the 1980s, Phil spearheaded a number of church plants, first around Sydney, and then into other parts of Australia. Over this period, they renamed the church, “Christian City Church.” In 1984, Phil founded the Oxford Falls Grammar School as well as Christian City Church (now C3) College. In 2008, at the “Here We Go” global conference held in Hawaii, the church officially changed its name to “C3 Church.”

C3 Church has come a long way from its humble beginnings. While Oxford Falls still houses the church’s primary campus, C3 SYD Oxford Falls (which includes an arts and bible college, a grammar school, television studio, café, art gallery, and auditorium), one can find C3 Churches around the globe (on every continent except Antarctica). [Image at right] As of 2020, C3 Church Global boasts more than 500 churches in sixty-four countries (C3 Church Global 2020a).

Much of the success of the C3 movement is the result of Phil Pringle’s leadership skills and relentless entrepreneurialism. Since the movement’s beginnings, he has doggedly sought to expand the reach of C3 to the four corners of the earth, which he has accomplished by means of energetic preaching, impressive charisma, stoking intense missionary zeal, and harnessing the most up-to-date mass media technologies and marketing methods. Phil has long been a sought-after public speaker, both in religious and secular (business) contexts, speaking on topics as diverse as Christian faith, leadership, personal finances, and church planting. He regularly travels around the world to speak at conferences, [Image at right] preaching a combination of neo-Pentecostal and prosperity theology, which is highly tailored to appeal to contemporary late modern (and secular) sensibilities.

In many respects, Phil’s message resembles a kind of Christianized self-help, focused on empowering individuals to become prosperous leaders. However, his counter-cultural and artistic backgrounds also shape his teachings. For example, he places a sizeable emphasis in his talks on the themes of creativity, personal authenticity, and self-realization. Phil also hosts a television program, “Your Best Life with Phil Program,” which has appeared on ACC in Australia and TBN in Europe, and is today broadcast on YouTube. And in addition to speaking publicly, Phil has penned over seventeen books, which include: Moving in the Spirit (1994), Keys to Financial Excellence (2003), Faith: Moving the Heart and Hand of God (2005), Parable of the Dog (2014), and Leadership 101 (2018). Though none of his books have become international best-sellers they have nevertheless served to give substance and form to an overarching “C3 Culture.”

Chris Pringle has also played a significant role in spreading the reach of C3 Church. In the 1980s and 1990s, she was a singer in a Christian rock group. As co-leader of the movement, she regularly preaches at C3 conferences and events, and has from the start served as Senior Minister at the main church campus in Oxford Falls. And since 1998, Chris has led the Everywoman Gathering, an annual women-only C3 conference meant to empower and strengthen C3’s female community. In 2005, she published Jesse: Found In Heaven, which recounts her experience suffering a miscarriage, and how she grieved her unborn child.

As of this writing, Phil is the President of C3 Church Global, the President of the Oxford Falls Grammar School Board, and the President of C3 College. Moreover, Phil and Chris are presently the Senior Ministers of all of the C3 Churches in Sydney [Image at right] (though in November 2021 they plan to step down and become Pastor Emeritus (C3 Church Sydney 2020). Thus, while C3 Church may be an international movement, encompassing hundreds of churches around the world, Phil and Chris’s personal imprint are never difficult to detect.

DOCTRINES/BELIEFS

As of November 2020, the C3 Church Global website lists the Church’s core beliefs as follows:

There is one God: God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit.

In the deity of our Lord Jesus Christ the Son of God; we believe in His virgin birth, in His sinless life, in His miracles, in His victorious and atoning death, in His bodily resurrection, in His ascension to the right hand of the Father, His constant intercession and in His imminent return.

In the person and work of the Holy Spirit with His fruits and gifts available in the Church.

The Bible is the living word of God. It is infallible, authoritative and everlasting and is the foundation of all Christian doctrine.

In the existence of an evil spiritual being known as the devil.

In the spiritually lost condition of all people and the essential need for the new birth by faith in Jesus Christ.

In the baptism of the Holy Spirit as a gift available to believers subsequent to the new birth, with normal evidence of speaking in other tongues

In the sacraments of the Lords Supper and baptism by full immersion in water for all believers.

In the resurrection of both the saved and the lost, the one to everlasting life and the other to everlasting separation from God.

In the church being the body of Christ, and each member being an active part of a local church, fulfilling the Great Commission.

Marriage was instituted by God, ratified by Jesus, and is exclusively between a man and a woman. It is a picture of Christ and his church.

Sex is a gift from God for procreation and unity, and it is only appropriate within and designed for marriage. (C3 Church Global 2020b)

As this statement of beliefs makes clear, C3 Church falls squarely within the conservative evangelical camp inasmuch as it subscribes to traditional positions on doctrines, such as the virgin birth of Jesus Christ, the reality of miracles as reported in Scripture, and the imminent return of Christ. And in addition to theological conservatism, C3 Church likewise espouses social conservatism, viewing marriage as the exclusive remit of heterosexual couples, and same-sex sexual relations as sinful. However, C3 Church also clearly belongs to the “Pentecostal” family, stressing as Phil and Chris do, [Image at right] baptism in the Holy Spirit, glossolalia (speaking in tongues), the existence of spiritual warfare, and the promise of divine healing.

The Pentecostal aspects of Phil and Chris’s version of Christianity can be traced back to their conversion in an Assembly of God Church in Sydenham. However, it’s clear that, if the couple did ever subscribe to classical Pentecostalism (and this is doubtful), over the years they have increasingly deviated from it (for instance, C3 Church does not belong to the wider Pentecostal church network in Australia, the Australian Christian Churches (ACC)). In fact, C3 theology is best thought of as a synthesis of Pentecostal or Charismatic Christian motifs and ideas with the prosperity gospel.

The prosperity gospel has its principal roots in the nineteenth century religious movements, New Thought (sometimes called “mind-cure) and Christian Science, which, in one form or another, espoused a high anthropology, conceived of the inner self as itself divine, and championed a universal right to prosperity and physical healing (Coleman 2000: 47). Having said that said, twentieth-century prosperity preachers liberally blended these metaphysical religious traditions with secular modes of thought such as positive thinking, self-help, and positive psychology, a trend that is becoming increasingly common (Coleman 2000:127). In any case, the prosperity gospel stands firmly within the American tradition of rugged individualism and self-reliance.

According to historian Kate Bowler (2013) the prosperity gospel centres on four themes: faith, wealth, health, and victory (2013:7). Each of these themes is prominent in C3 theology. For instance, in Faith: Moving the Heart and Hand of God, [Image at right] Phil Pringle (2005) writes, “Faith is a time rebel. It travels through time into the future; it feels the experience of a yet future event. But it feels that event in the ‘now.’ Faith is not pretending that it’s there. It is not hoping that it’s there. It is not imagining that it’s there. Faith knows it’s there because it has the substance of the experience, or the thing, in itself. Faith is the substance of a ‘thing’; it feels the ‘thing’ existing within the heart right now. Because it exists inside me, I know that it exists” (2005:66).

What Phil is championing here is a form of “positive confession,” which refers to the idea that “words spoken ‘in faith’ are regarded as objectifications of reality” (Coleman 2000: 28). According to C3 theology, real faith is not passive but active, capable of manifesting things in the external world. Interestingly, in this way, C3’s prosperity message has striking resemblances to New Age Spirituality (Watts 2019).

Furthermore, the accumulation of wealth plays a pivotal role in C3 teachings. Not only are C3 members encouraged to become affluent, but wealth is generally considered a sign of divine blessing. In Keys to Financial Excellence [Image at right] Phil Pringle (2003) writes, “Those who spend copious amounts of time embracing the tenets and teachings of Scripture are going to inherit the same spirit and principles of success and abundance that accompanied the lives of the wealthy and accomplished men who wrote it” (2003:45). He adds, “the Lord wants to give us an overflowing abundance!” (2003:50). Of course, if God wants all faithful Christians to be rich, then it stands to reason that if someone is poor it is because they lack faith. And indeed, this idea is intimated, if not outright endorsed, in Phil’s writings (see for example, Pringle 2005:186) (see picture of book cover).

And as for the themes of health and victory, it is a basic tenet of C3 theology that to become prosperous is not only to be financially well-off, but also to have good health and a positive self-image. According to Phil (2005), “A poor self-image is not just a minor handicap in life. It is not just some extra baggage that is unpleasant to carry around. It is a serious problem for our lives in God.” Accordingly, he counsels changing our “self-loathing” into “self-love” (2005:151). Moreover, Phil Pringle’s conception of spiritual warfare is couched almost entirely in therapeutic terms: “The Devil is the one who wants to keep you feeling unworthy and undeserving” (2005:154). Thus, within C3 thought, a mentality of victory (which entails feeling good about oneself, having self-confidence, and being upbeat) is idealized, while a victim mentality is tacitly pathologized. Phil sums this up, “Faith is an attitude of victory within” (Pringle 2005:32).

While C3 Church may fall within the conservative Protestant camp in terms of its stated beliefs, it is quite evident that in terms of both style and substance, it has eagerly embraced the counter-cultural and therapeutic ethos of the 1960s. Anthropologist Simon Coleman (2000) refers to this as the “‘Californication’ of conservative Protestants,” which refers to the way certain religious conservatives “have accommodated to the anti-institutional, therapeutic, cultural preferences of the baby boomers” (2000:24). One stark example of this accommodation shows up in the ways Phil and Chris regularly proclaim that C3 is “not a religion,” so much as a “faith,” a rhetorical strategy which mirrors the claim to being “spiritual but not religious” that has become commonplace in late modern societies (Watts 2020). Indeed, it is in large part owing to the church’s accommodation to the expressive individualism that defines mainstream Western culture in the twenty-first century that C3 Church has been uniquely successful in attracting young “hipsters” who see the church as an innovative and rebellious way to “do church” (Watts 2020b).

RITUALS/PRACTICES

 While not all C3 churches can be considered megachurches proper (those with over two-thousand regular attendees), even the C3 campuses which have smaller congregations seek to recreate the aesthetic, style, and feel of the Oxford Falls campus. The reason for this is that C3 worship services have proven extremely effective at enabling the church to attract and convert members.

A critical factor in their success is the role of worship music. C3 Church has long marshalled the use of the most innovative sound equipment and performance technologies in order to give their Sunday services the feel of a contemporary rock concert [Image at right].

Moreover, at every C3 service one generally finds attractive young people (singers and instrumentalists) performing songs whose lyrics are projected on massive screens which hang at the back of the stage. They sing a combination of popular Christian worship music and music recorded and produced at C3 College. Indeed, the creation and dissemination of their original worship music has been pivotal to the church’s mission strategy (one can easily download C3 music on most streaming apps). However, the role of those onstage is not merely to perform for members in the audience, but also to “model the correct way to experience the presence of God” (Jennings 2008:163). Thus, from the moment one enters a C3 worship service, one is being trained in the art of “metakinesis,” a term which anthropologist Tanya Luhrmann (2004) uses to refer to the various ways individuals learn to identify and discern the presence of God in their subjective experiences (2004:522). It follows that the use of worship music in Sunday services plays a key role in creating a distinct auditory environment, which increases the likelihood that attendees will experience the presence of God (Wellman et al. 2014).

Another reason for C3’s success revolves around aesthetics. In order to attract newcomers, C3 church seeks to remove the potential barriers to cultural participation. So, instead of hymns, popular Christian music that closely resembles Top-40 radio is played; rather than taking place in old church buildings, services commonly take place in warehouses or amphitheatres; and rather than traditional vestments, a dressed-down hipster dress code is tacitly normalized. Indeed, C3 churches tend to resemble other common sites of leisure in modern societies, such as the mall, the sports arena, or the movie theatre (Maddox 2012:153). [Image at right]

Of course, in keeping with their neo-Pentecostal background, C3 Church leaders do practice supernatural healing, full immersion baptisms, and speaking in tongues, however, these practices are often shielded from the general public. That is, they tend only to take place at exclusive C3 services and conferences, where media is generally prohibited. Thus, the church goes to great lengths not to alienate those whose cultural sensibilities might align with the mainstream in late modern societies.

Finally, in evangelical fashion, C3 members are regularly encouraged, while away from church, to read their bibles daily, participate in C3 activities and events, socialize with other Christians, and closely monitor their emotions and experiences for evidence of both God and the Devil. In this way, C3 theology asks of its members to stringently discipline themselves in conformity with its message of personal empowerment and material prosperity.

ORGANIZATION/LEADERSHIP           

C3 Church Global, registered as a charity based out of Sydney, oversees the international church movement. C3 Church Global’s Board of Directors, headed by Phil Pringle, provides direction, vision, and goals for the movement at large. Under them sit the Regional Directors (all of whom are heterosexual married couples) who oversee the various C3 churches within a particular geographic region. These regions include Australia (with 106 churches), the Americas (with forty-six), Canada (with nineteen), East Africa (with eighty), Mena (with forty-six), East Asia (with three), Europe (with thirty-eight), South Asia (with eighty-four), South East Asia (with seventy-five), Southern Africa (with twenty-six), West Africa (with nine), and Pacific (with fifty-five) (C3 Global 2020c). Within specific regions, Church Oversees are tasked with providing structure and support to local pastors. And each C3 Church is headed by Senior Pastors, who are sometimes supported by Junior Pastors.

The overall coherence and consistency of the Church Movement is maintained through annual events and conferences, which draw C3 leadership and members from around the globe. The largest of these is the annual “Presence Conference,” [Image at right] held in a different location each year, which offers an opportunity for local C3 groups to hear their Senior Pastors preach in person, as well as an opportunity for leadership to announce new goals and directions for the movement.

At the same time, C3 College in Oxford Falls has long functioned as an incubator for aspiring C3 pastors; many who now hold leadership positions completed a degree at the college. At C3 College, students can take courses in biblical studies and theology, music, film, and media, both in person and online. [Image at right]

There is a strong focus on media communications and digital marketing within the movement. The church relies on the free labour of its creative-class members to produce and disseminate C3 Church publicity, and promote the “C3 brand” around the world. Indeed, consumers can purchase C3 merchandise and products online from the “C3 Store,” which now sells everything from apparel, to books, to digital courses on personal development, leadership, and a Masterclass on church planting. And in recent years, the church has even developed its own app, “C3 Church Global App,” which individuals can use to locate C3 Churches in their local cities and towns.

While C3 Church Global seems on the surface to be a highly decentralized operation, it nevertheless exhibits a striking degree of standardized features. Indeed, the church operates much like a transnational corporation inasmuch as it is led by entrepreneurial Senior Pastors who espouse a top-down management style and command “obedience to an organisational culture” (Maddox 2012:152). In this way, C3 Church squarely belongs to what J. B. Watson and Walter H. Scalen (2008) call “the church growth movement,” which they contend is defined by the following four principles: an emphasis on quantitative measures of success such as worship attendance and number of new converts; a focus on “contextualixation, that is, a church delivers its message within the context of the culture”; the application of modern marketing techniques; and the value of net-working with like-minded churches (2008:171).

Finally, given that C3 Church has risen to prominence during the very same years that the Welfare State in Australia has been steadily dismantled, a number of scholars argue that its success owes much to its elective affinities with neoliberal economic policies (Shanahan 2019).

ISSUES/CHALLENGES

Phil Pringle, and C3 Church more generally, have been widely criticized by other Christian leaders and groups for preaching a version of Christianity that they consider heretical, shallow, and corrupt. In fact, self-described ex-C3 members have setup a Christian watchdog website, “C3 Church Watch,” meant to bring attention to what they see as the church’s unbiblical teachings and dissuade others from joining the C3 movement. [Image at right]

Additionally, C3 Church has been forced to weather a number of public scandals in recent years. In 2017, a C3 pastor, Nicholas Dimitris, was found guilty of participating in a “straw borrower” scheme to defraud local banks (Weaver 2015). In 2017, Mosaic Defredes, a C3 pastor was convicted of a major piracy racket (Dunn and Sutton 2017). And another C3 pastor, Anthony Shalala, was allegedly paid $300,000 as compensation to leave the church following claims of sexual misconduct (Passi 2019).

Lastly, in 2019, the Australian television news program, A Current Affair, ran an exposé of the church. Showcasing negative testimonies from ex C3-members, along with footage of C3 events and an impromptu interview with Phil Pringle, [Image at right] the program took a critical stance on the church’s theology, funding practices, approach to mental illness, and views of same-sex relations (Passi 2019).

In response to the allegations, the church publicly denied any wrongdoing, and claimed that with respect to the issue of same-sex relations, “our approach is to embrace everyone and care for them on the basis of our overriding belief that our God is full of love and compassion for everybody, regardless of their personal circumstance or sexual orientation” (C3 Church Sydney 2019). The seeming conflict between the church’s official stance on same-sex relations (as represented in their official statement of beliefs) and public statements like this has become a heated source of controversy, especially in those cultural contexts where same-sex relations are generally considered unproblematic and entirely normal. For instance, C3 Toronto in Canada has been publicly criticized by an ex-member for deceiving her as regards their position on the issue of homosexuality (Garrison 2019).

It would seem, in turn, that there exists a real tension at the core of the movement insofar as it seeks to retain a commitment to traditional theological and social positions, while simultaneously accommodating to the latest cultural fads, embracing the most up-to-date forms of technology, and taking a strongly world-affirming stance. However, whether or not this tension will have negative consequences for the movement itself, only time will tell.

IMAGES

Image #1: Photograph of Phil and Chris Pringle at their wedding.
Image #2: The C3 Church logo.
Image #3: Photograph of Phil Pringle preaching.
Image #4: Photograph of Senior Ministers Phil and Chris Pringle.
Image #5: Photograph of Phil Pringle praying over parishioner.
Image #6: Cover of Faith: Moving the Heart and Hand of God.
Image #7: Cover of Keys to Financial Excellence.
Image #8: Musical performance at a C3 church service.
Image #9: C3 church in Calgary, Canada.
Image #10: The Presence Conference.
Image #11: Students participating in a class at C3 College.
Image #12: C3 Church Watch welbsite.
Image #13: Impromptu media interview with Phil Pringle.

REFERENCES

Barclay, John. 1987. Arise! The Story of Christian City Church. Sydney: Covenant Publishing.

Bowler, Kate. 2013. Blessed: A History of the American Prosperity Gospel. New York: Oxford University Press.

C3 Church Global. 2020a. “Home Page.” Accessed from https://c3churchglobal.com on 27 November 2020.

C3 Church Global. 2020b. “What We Believe.” C3 Church Global website. Accessed from https://c3churchglobal.com/what-we-believe/ on 27 November 2020.

C3 Church Global. 2020c. “This Is Us.” C3 Church Global website. Accessed from https://issuu.com/c3churchglobal/docs/this_is_us_-_c3_global on 27 November 2020.

C3 Church Sydney. 2019. “Media Response To A Current Affair.” C3SYD, December 5. Accessed from https://c3syd.church/media-response/ on 27 November 2020.

Coleman, Simon. 2000. The Globalisation of Charismatic Christianity: Spreading the Gospel of Prosperity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Dunn, Matt, and Candace Sutton. 2017. “Pastor Mosaic and his ‘disciple’ Allison masterminded Australia’s biggest piracy racket worth $21m.” News.com.au, March 21. Accessed from https://www.news.com.au/technology/online/hacking/pastor-mosaic-and-his-disciple-allison-masterminded-australias-biggest-piracy-racket-worth-21m/news-story/2b80939ce4e53ff17f304e68d23857ce on 27 November 2020.

Garrison, Alyssa. 2019. “I Fell For a ‘Progressive’ Church, and It Was a Mistake.” Flare.com, December 10. Accessed from https://www.flare.com/identity/c3-church-anti-gay/ on 27 November 2020.

Jennings, Mark. 2008. “‘Won’t you break free?’ An ethnography of music and the divine-human encounter at an Australian Pentecostal Church.” Culture and Religion 9:161-74.

Luhrmann, Tanya M. 2004. “Metakinesis: How God Becomes Intimate in Contemporary U.S. Christianity.” American Anthropologist 106:518-28.

Maddox, Marion. 2012. “‘In the Goofy parking lot’: growth churches as a novel religious form of late capitalism.” Social Compass 59:146-58.

Passi, Sacha. 2019. “Scott Morrison linked to controversial ‘miracles for money’ church.” A Current Affair. Accessed from https://9now.nine.com.au/a-current-affair/c3-church-scott-morrison-link-to-scandal-former-pastor/6579a36b-5a9e-462d-bcd4-ccae869081d1 on 27 November 2020.

Pringle, Phil. 2005. Faith: Moving the Heart and the Hand of God. New Kensington, PA: Whitaker House.

Pringle, Phil. 2003. Keys to Financial Excellence. New Kensington, PA: Whitaker House.

Shanahan, Mairead. 2019. “‘An Unstoppable Force for Good’?: How Neoliberal Governance Facilitated the Growth of Australian Suburban-Based Pentecostal Megachurches.” Religions 10:1-16.

Shin, Yong Tung. 2014. “Interview With the ‘Blonde Nana’: How Mr And Mrs Pringle Met.” City News, March 14. Accessed from https://www.citynews.sg/2014/03/14/interview-with-the-blonde-nana-how-mr-and-mrs-pringle-met/ on 27 November 2020.

Watson., J.B., and Walter H. Scalen. 2008. “‘Dining with the Devil’: The Unique Secularization of American Evangelical Churches.” International Sociological Review 83: 171-80.

Watts, Galen. 2019. “Religion, Science, and Disenchantment.” Zygon 54:1022-35.

Watts, Galen. 2020a. The religion of the heart: ‘Spirituality’ in late modernity.” American Journal of Cultural Sociology. Accessed from https://doi.org/10.1057/s41290-020-00106-x.

Watts, Galen. 2020b. “A hipster evangelical church is taking Toronto by storm,” CBC, July 8. Accessed from https://www.cbc.ca/documentaries/cbc-docs-pov/a-hipster-evangelical-church-is-taking-toronto-by-storm-1.5619110 on 27 November.

Weave, Emily. 2015. “Seven Falls conspirators to be sentenced June 2” Blue Ridge Now.com, April 23. Accessed from https://www.blueridgenow.com/news/20150423/seven-falls-conspirators-to-be-sentenced-june-2 on 27 November 2020.

Wellman, James K., Katie E. Corcoran, and Kate Stockly-Meyerdirk. 2014. “‘God Is Like a Drug…’: Explaining Interaction Ritual Chains in American Megachurches” Sociological Forum 29:650-72.

Publication Date:
30 November 2020

Share

Universal Medicine

 

UNIVERSAL MEDICINE TIMELINE

1964:  Serge Benhayon (Benhayon) was born in Uruguay.

1970:  Benhayon emigrated to Sydney, Australia with his parents where he attended school and developed a sporting career.

1990s (Early):  Benhayon moved with his wife Deborah and their children to Northern Rivers of New South Wales, Australia where he continued his career as a Tennis Coach.

1999:  Benhayon had a series of esoteric revelations communicating alternative healing modalities and began practising from his home in the Northern Rivers. Benhayon named his philosophy “Universal Medicine.”

2002:  Serge and Deborah Benhayon separated.

2003: Benhayon offered the first courses and training workshops in his methods.in Northern New South Wales, Australia.

2004:  A course called The Arcane School was challenged by lawyers from Lucis Trust; Benhayon ceased using this title.

2005:  Benhayon began offering workshops twice a year in Somerset, United Kingdom.

2006:  The Universal Medicine website established.

2007:  UniMed Publishing, Universal Medicine’s dedicated publishing enterprise, was established.

2008:  Benhayon offered the first five day live-in “Retreats in Vietnam and Australia.”

2010:  Benhayon married Miranda who had been a long-standing friend of the family.

2011:  Benhayon established The College of Universal Medicine, a charitable organisation.

2012-2013:  Esther Rockett created blogs dedicated to discrediting Universal Medicine.

2013:  Natalie Benhayon, Serge Benhayon’s daughter, launched her mobile App, Our Cycles and establishes a company, Esoteric Women’s Health.

2014:  Students of Universal Medicine launched a web blog called The Facts about Universal Medicine to counter negative claims being made in the media.

2016:  Benhayon made a formal accusation of defamation against Esther Rockett.

2018 (December):  The New South Wales Supreme Court found against Serge Benhayon.

2019:  The content of the Web Blog site called The Facts about Universal Medicine was removed.

2020 (May):  The Universal Medicine website seemed to have returned to an earlier iteration and appeared in process of redesign.

2020:  Under COVID19 restrictions, Benhayon was offering his teachings online instead of at face to face meetings.

FOUNDER/GROUP HISTORY

Serge Benhayon [Image at right] was born in Uruguay in 1964. He emigrated to Sydney, Australia in 1970 with his parents where he attended school and developed a sporting career. In the early 1990s, Benhayon moved with his wife Deborah and their children to Northern Rivers of New South Wales, Australia where he continued his career as a Tennis Coach.

Benhayon founded Universal Medicine in the Northern Rivers of New South Wales, Australia in 1999. He was inspired by esoteric revelations in which knowledge of new methods for alternative healing were communicated to him. Benhayon describes his experience in a manner similar to the ways others report revelations (See, Stark 1992). Names like “the Hierarchy” and “Sanat Kumara” were presented to him, which he later discovered in the works of theosophist Alice A. Bailey (1880-1949). He developed and began practising a repertoire of esoteric complementary and alternative healing practices. Benhayon’s background reveals familiarity with a variety of religious traditions and experience with complementary and alternative therapies (Coco 2020).

In his youth, Benhayon was exposed to an assortment of religious influences, though neither his parents nor his grandparents practiced religion. He remembers that his father, born of Moroccan Jewish and Catholic lineages, studied different religions (S. Benhayon 2017). Benhayon’s mother’s religious lineage was Russian Jew. During his schooling, Benhayon pursued an active interest in Church of England religious education, reading booklets on the Christian Gospels and attending church on his own terms. At school he excelled in athletics and later developed a career in professional tennis training. The growth of Universal Medicine (UM) is characterised by word of mouth networking, public demand, and later, by initiatives that were created and continue to be maintained by Benhayon family members and other dedicated associates.

Initially, Benhayon worked from his home, testing his healing techniques amongst friends and family. At the end of 2000-2001, he moved his practice to a hired room in a colleague’s practice. He eventually established the first UM Clinic in a refurbished old house in Goonellabah, [Image at right] Northern New South Wales. Serge and first wife Deborah separated in 2002 though Deborah continued to be involved with UM. By 2003-2004, he had ceased tennis coaching and was offering multi-level training workshops in his healing modalities at various public locations in the Northern Rivers. He also began conducting monthly meditation sessions based on the metaphysical worldview underpinning his healing methods (S. Benhayon 2017). A course called The Arcane School was offered briefly in 2004.

Benhayon named his religious vision “The Way of The Livingness” (TWL). [Image at right] Around the time he began voicing his esoteric impressions publicly, a friend handed him a compilation of writings by Alice Bailey (Bailey 1971). In Bailey’s writings, which Benhayon asserts that he has not read very closely, he encountered a worldview that resonated with his own revelatory insights. He maintains that his methods extend the esoteric goals of the Ageless Wisdom tradition by developing practical applications to guide people in their evolution (S. Benhayon 2018). In 2008, Universal Medicine ran the first of what were to become recurrent yearly five-day retreats, in Vietnam and Australia (Unimed Living 2014c). These retreats were later extended to the United Kingdom.

Many UM activities have been prompted by participants seeking avenues for sharing the UM worldview. Participants designed and launched the UM website in 2006. Volunteers also established UniMed Brisbane Pty Ltd, a clinic which began offering complementary and alternative healing therapies to the public in 2010. Benhayon established The College of Universal Medicine (CoUM) in 2011 as an organisational vehicle through which UM practitioners could offer services to the broader community. Benhayon opened the Hall of Ageless Wisdom, the main venue for delivering his teaching and training sessions, in Wollongbar, Northern New South Wales in 2016. This Hall is used for public gatherings where he delivers his esoteric teachings and engages participants in a variety of personal development programs. A significant expansion of TWL first offered in 2017 is The School of Initiation (TSOI), a course offering training in improving one’s grasp of esoteric principles and awareness of the energetic nature of reality. TWL teachings are supported by an ever-growing base of published books which are available through the UM web site. The title pages of Benhayon’s books indicate that they are authored by “Serge Benhayon and The Hierarchy.” The Hierarchy is understood as the tradition of evolved beings, the Masters, who have passed but whose wisdom is available to those like Benhayon himself who are able to receive it.

DOCTRINES/BELIEFS

Western esotericism originated in part from the works of theosophist Helena P. Blavatsky (1831–1891) (Hammer 2004). The “Way of the Livingness” teachings exhibit clear affinities with this tradition particularly in its iteration in the works of Alice A. Bailey (1880–1849). In its broad features, TWL embodies the key themes of western esotericism as identified by Hammer (2004). Tenets include the beliefs that: human souls originate from one original source of light and it is their evolutionary task to work toward returning to the pure original source; all forms of life are interconnected and thus the improvement of the individual’s energetic state contributes to their’s and other’s progress; types of energy permeate all living organisms, and; by means of understanding correspondences between types of energies on different planes of existence, human beings may work towards balancing the play of energetic fields in their minds and bodies, thereby promoting spiritual evolution.

“Esoteric” refers to invisible wisdom of the body which carries the knowledge of interconnectedness with all being. Benahayon proclaims that a “new soul-full light” was introduced to the world by Christ in 2000-2001 (S. Benhayon 2009:18). This new Christ consciousness, referred to as the “Second Coming,” infuses love energy into the world making possible an evolutionary change from oppositional to harmonious human relations. A catalogue of social problems including, “gender suppression, bullying, rape, paedophilia, the need for war, greed and hate” (S. Benhayon 2015:140) is frequently recounted in presentations. At the core of Benhayon’s message is the belief that individuals need to cultivate respectful relations, both internally within their own bodies and externally with others. While Benhayon and others have been able to source Ageless Wisdom and apply it in their lives, Benhayon observes that lay persons are not able to access it so readily. His healing methods and metaphysical teachings are designed to help people awake to this spiritual wisdom. Pertinent features of Benahyon’s worldview are the ways he interprets the concepts of gender, prana and intelligence, which are key to understanding the principles of his healing therapies and personal development courses.

Similar to the gender characteristics of new religious movements observed by McGuire (1994), Benhayon asserts that in modern society people are estranged from their essential natures. He teaches that women embody the sacred, but also that the godhead is both female and male, and, in reality, not gendered. Different and complementary energies are aligned with female and male bodies; the female essence is stillness and the male’s is movement. Femininity and masculinity are not understood as prescribing social roles but as qualities of energy in femaleness and maleness. Benhayon teaches that women should return to their sacred feminine energy and men must learn to relate to it. The emphasis is on people’s need to discover their true natures by balancing both feminine and masculine qualities. For Benhayon, it is the excess of masculine solar energy that is overly affecting human bodies in the form of harmful prana.

In Western culture, prana is commonly used singularly to refer to the life force but in Eastern doctrines, prāṇa is used in a variety of ways which reference a range of movements and inputs of various mental states and senses throughout the body (Blezer 1992). Following theosophical teachings, Bailey, whose writing has informed aspects of Benhayon’s system, incorporates these more extensive understandings of prana. In her view, while prana is necessary to the continuance of life, it may also inhibit an individual’s energetic evolution. Incarnational debris also contributes to a person’s pranic condition. In Benhayon’s canon, “discarnate beings” or “the lords of form” are the sources of evil energy that constitute harmful prana (S. Benhayon 2009:292) which invades the three lower chakras of the body. Thus affected, people are constrained by “false and misleading beliefs and impressions that lie hidden in the Mental and Physical Causal Bodies” (S. Benhayon 2006:16).

According to Bailey, what is known as “intelligence” is the accumulation of all sensory inputs from people’s experience and past lives (Bailey 1934, 1951). In Benhayon’s reasoning, what society calls “intelligence” is the assemblage of thought constructs, emotional sensations, and relational behaviour formed by excessive masculinist energy. This intelligence is an incomplete form of knowledge uninformed by the body’s and soul’s input. Women have been the ones to suffer most from the overemphasis of masculinist solar pranic energy, which manifests in cultural phenomena that objectify and sexualize their embodiment (S. Benhayon 2011:518). Consequently, Western science has been unsuccessful in solving humanity’s relational and health problems (S. Benhayon 2013b). A practitioner aspires to transcend these pranic influences and access their fiery soul energy by learning to recognise and deconstruct unhelpful feeling and thought patterns and heal those parts of the body where harmful prana has taken hold.

ORGANIZATION/LEADERSHIP

Universal Medicine’s primary activities are imparting its Ageless Wisdom beliefs, teaching and training in esoteric healing techniques, and supplying complementary healing services. While these philosophical and commercial facets of the movement are managed by different organisational entities, they are thoroughly intertwined in practice. UM’s stated religion, The Way of the Livingness, is not registered officially as a religion in Australia. The organisation has grown and spread its influence through networked entrepreneurial activities coordinated through the main UM web site which is available in five languages (Dutch, French, German, Spanish or English). It contains information about Serge Benhayon, the movement and the many products and services on offer. Events are advertised there, and one also registers and pays to attend UM programmes through the web site. Individuals driving UM’s activities are its founder and leader, Serge Benhayon, family members and people dedicated to the UM worldview, who are referred to collectively as The Student Body.

Benhayon personally delivers The Way of the Livingness sermons and training workshops. Expression and Presentation sessions devised by students are first perused by Benhayon to ensure that they accurately interpret and apply his teachings and are informed by the appropriate form of energy. At a Unimed weekend, sessions are individually advertised and priced, though TWL sermon is always free of charge. A person may choose to attend one or any combination of events.

Benhayon’s immediate family, partner Miranda, [Image at right] and children Simone, Michael, Curtis and Natalie also contribute to UM’s activities. Miranda manages the organisational aspects of the Goonellabah clinic, training workshops and public events. Simone, who lives in the United Kingdom, teaches and practices esoteric healing methods and is the main contact for Benhayon’s biannual visits to UM’s base in United Kingdom. Michael and Curtis possess mainstream qualifications in acupuncture and remedial massage respectively and have incorporated TWL principles and esoteric healing styles into their practices. They work at the Goonellabah Clinic as well as helping out at Unimed weekends and engaging in a range of other UM related activities.

Natalie is highly active at Unimed weekends and shares the stage with Benhayon during TSOI sessions, but she has also set up and led independent initiatives. She instituted Esoteric Women’s Health (EWH) as an organisational entity for her smartphone App called Our cycles, a technology which enables women to track their menstrual cycles. EWH evolved into a business with its own web site. It coordinates a wide range of “services, events and products that provide the opportunity to return to living in ways that allow women to honour their body and innate stillness whilst keeping up with their many commitments and demands” (N. Benhayon 2013a). The Girl to Woman Festival (in hiatus since 2019) is an initiative under the EWH umbrella (N. Benhayon 2019). Practitioners qualified in complementary healing therapies, as well as people who are experts in their fields, for instance law or education, partner alongside the Benhayons in offering services through EWH and the College of Universal Medicine.

The College of Universal Medicine is governed by a Board of Directors comprised of members of the student body (College of Universal Medicine 2020a). The College offers both free and fee-paying events including  “workshops, lectures, online courses, well-being days and community presentations” (College of Universal Medicine 2020b). Students also established Unimed Living, a large media and communication platform which brings together facets of UM teachings and applies them to all aspects of life. Information ranges from food recipes to workshops on anxiety for men (Unimed Living 2014b).

ISSUES/CHALLENGES

Benhayon’s movement faces several challenges: non-acceptance of the authenticity of his spiritual revelations, rejections of the movement’s claims to provide a legitimate complementary therapy to established medical practice and allegations of cult-like behaviour.

Benhayon understands himself to be the recipient of the messages from the ascended Masters in the line from Helena P. Blavatsky, Alice A Bailey to himself. Lucis Trust, the guardians of the Alice Bailey legacy reject suggestions that Benhayon is the one to come that some claim is predicted in Alice Bailey’s writings (S. Benhayon 2018). Benhayon is essentially accused of charlatanism in regard to his Ageless Wisdom teachings. UM healing practices also have been challenged, particularly in Australia where the New South Wales Supreme Court reports that Benhayon made “false claims” about his healing methods (New South Wales Caselaw 2019). Benhayon’s esoteric breast massage which is the focus of much media attention, has been examined by the Health Care Complaints Commission in Australia and the Australian Medical Registration Board. Neither of these authorities took action as they concluded that Benhayon’s breast massage techniques did not cause harm to patients (Dwyer 2013). The Therapeutic Goods Administration, the regulatory body responsible for the assessment and approval of therapeutic products in Australia, instructed UM to remove therapeutic claims from their promotion of herbal preparations and creams that UM had recommended for breast health.

The combination of Benhayon’s charismatic claims, his unorthodox healing practices, and abuse claims from some former members has created a situation in which UM has become a target of “cult-like organization” claims. For example, the jury in the New South Wales Supreme Court case mentioned above described UM as a “socially dangerous” and “socially harmful cult.” As a result of the Court’s decision against Benhayon, the cult label has been used in proceedings in cases such as divorce settlements, challenges to the dispersion of estates through wills, removal of people from workplaces and the breakup of relationships.

The range of controversies experienced by UM reflects topics typically experienced by other new religious movements (see Melton 2004). These are amplified by considerable negative media coverage in Australia and in other countries in which UM has established organizational centers. While UM participants have contested all allegations, with the ongoing negative media attention, the organization does face significant challenges in its quest for legitimacy and acceptance.

IMAGES

Image #1 Serge Benhayon.
Image #2: Universal Medicine: The Way of Livingness sign.
Image #3: The first UM Clinic in a refurbished old house in Goonellabah.
Image #4: Serge and Miranda Benhayon.

REFERENCES

Bailey, Alice A.. 1971. Ponder on this. London: Lucis Publishing Company.

Bailey, Alice A. 1934 [1951]. A treatise on white magic or The way of the disciple. New York: Lucis.Benhayon,

Benhayon, Natalie. 2019. “The Girl to Woman Festival.” Universal Medicine. Accessed from https://www.esotericwomenshealth.com/girl-to-woman-festival on 7 October 2020.

Benhayon, Natalie. 2013. “Esoteric Women’s Health.” Universal Medicine. Accessed from http://www.esotericwomenshealth.com/ on 30 September 2020.

Benhayon, Serge. 2020. “Welcome to Serge Banhayon TV.” Unimed Publishing. Accessed from https://sergebenhayon.tv/ on 6 October 2020.

Benhayon, Serge. 2020 [2000]. “The Way of The Livingness – Lectures 2020.” Unimed Publishing. Accessed from  https://study.universalmedicine.com.au/livingness/general on 6 October 2020.

Benhayon, Serge, 2000. “Healing therapies.” Unimed Publishing. Accessed from https://www.universalmedicine.com.au/services/healing-therapies on 7 October 2020.

Benhayon, Serge. 2015. Time: a treatise on energetic truth. Volume 1.Time, space and all of us. Goonelabah: UniMed Publishing.

Benhayon, Serge. 2013. An open letter to humanity. Goonellabah: UniMed Publishing.

Benhayon, Serge. 2011. Esoteric teachings and revelations. Goonellabah: Unimed Publishing.

Benhayon, Serge. 2009. The living sutras of the hierarchy: a treatise on energetic truth. Goonellabah: UniMed Publishing.

Benhayon, Serge. 2006. Universal Medicine presents Sacred Esoteric Healing: Advanced Level 4 . Goonellabah: UniMed Publishing.

Blezer, H. W. A. 1992. “Prana: aspects of theory and evidence for practice in late-Brahmanical and earlt-Upanisadic thought.” Pp. 20-49 In Ritual, state and history in South Asia: essays in honour of J. F Heesterman, edited by A. W. Van den Hoek, M. S. Kolf and M. S. Oort. Leiden, New York, Köln: E. J. Brill.

Coco, Angela. 2020. “The Way of The Livingness and Universal Medicine.” Nova Religio 24:55-76.

Coco, Angela. 2018. “Interview 4.” Edited by Angela Coco. Lismore, NSW: Southern Cross University.

Coco, Angela. 2018. “Interview 4” [Benhayon, Serge]. Edited by Angela Coco. Lismore, NSW: Southern Cross University.

Coco, Angela. 2017. Interview 3 [Benhayon, Serge]. Edited by Angela Coco. Lismore, NSW: Southern Cross University.

Coco, Angela. 2017. “Field Notes” [Natalie Benhayon]. Lismore: Southern Cross University.

Coco, Angela. 2015. “Field Notes.” Lismore: Southern Cross University.

College of Universal Medicine. 2020a. “Board.” College of Universal Medicine. Accessed from https://www.coum.org/about/board/ on 7 October.2020.

College of Universal Medicine. 2020b. “College of Universal Medicine – A charatible institution.” Universal Medicine. Accessed from https://www.coum.org/ on 16 October 2020.

Dwyer, John. 2012. “When ‘Healing Hands’ Start Grasping.” Australasian Science 34:44.

Hammer, Olav. 2004. Claiming knowledge: strategies of epistemology from Theosophy to the New Age. Leiden and Boston: Brill.

McGuire, Meredith B. 1994. “Gendered spirituality and quais-religious ritual.” Pp. 273-87 in Between the sacred and the secular: research and theory on quasi-religion, edited by Arthur L. Greil and Thomas Robbins. Greenwich, CT and London: JAI Press.

Melton, J. Gordon. 2004. “Perspective: Toward a Definition of “New Religion’.” Nova Religio: The Journal of Alternative and Emergent Religions 8:73-87.

New South Wales Supreme Court. 2019. Benhayon v. Rockett (No. 8) [2019] NSWSC 169. New South Wales Supreme Court. (Formal orders reflecting jury’s findings). Accessed from https://www.caselaw.nsw.gov.au/decision/5c772e44e4b0196eea404c09 on10 December 2020.

Stark, Rodney. 1992. “How sane people talk to the gods: a rational theory of revelations.” Pp. 9-34 in Innovation in religious traditions: essays in the interpretation of religious change, edited by Michael W. Williams, Collett Cox and Martin S. Jaffee. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Students of Universal Medicine. 2014a. “Universal Medicine.” Unimed Living. Accessed from https://www.unimedliving.com/serge-benhayon/uni-med/universal-medicine.html on 23 October 2020.

Students of Universal Medicine. 2014b. “The webcasting of Universal Medicine presentations.” Unimed Living. Accessed from https://www.unimedliving.com/serge-benhayon/uni-med/worldwide-webcast/the-webcasting-of-universal-medicine-presentations.html on 23 October 2020.

Unimed Living. 2014a. “About Serge Benhayon.” UniMed Living. Accessed from https://www.unimedliving.com/serge-benhayon/who-is-serge/about-serge-benhayon.html on 31 July 2020.

Unimed Living. 2014b. “Unimed Living.” Unimed Publishing. Accessed from https://www.unimedliving.com/ on 16 Ocotber 2020.

Unimed Living. 2014c. “UniMed Retreats.” Unimed Living. Accessed from https://www.unimedliving.com/serge-benhayon/uni-med/experiencing-universal-medicine/unimed-retreat.html on 5 October 2020.

Publication Date:
11 December 2020

Share

Shirdi Sai Baba


SHIRDI SAI BABA TIMELINE

1838:  According to Shri Sai Satcharita 10:43, Shirdi Sai Baba was born around the year 1838 (i.e., 1760 in the Shaka era).

1886:  Shirdi Sai Baba suffered an asthma attack and declared that he would enter a state of deep concentration, or samadhi. He rose from his death-like state three days later, as promised.

1892:  Shirdi Sai Baba miraculously lit lamps in his mosque with water instead of oil. Note that B.V. Narasimhaswami’s Life of Sai Baba holds that this event happened in 1892, while the Shri Sai Satcharita details this event without specifying its date.

1903:  G.D. Sahasrabuddhe, alias Das Ganu Maharaj, wrote Shri Santakathamrita, a Marathi hagiographical text in sixty-one chapters on various Hindu saints. Chapter fifty-seven of this work was the first written source about Shirdi Sai Baba.

1906:  G.D. Sahasrabuddhe (Das Ganu Maharaj) wrote Shri Bhaktililamrita, a Marathi hagiographical text in forty-five chapters on various Hindu saints. Chapters thirty-one, thirty-two, and thirty-three of this work focused on Shirdi Sai Baba.

1916:  G.R. Dabholkar, alias Hemadpant, retired from his position as a first-class magistrate, after which he began to write Shri Sai Satcharita, a Marathi hagiographic text generally considered to be the most authoritative source on Shirdi Sai Baba’s life.

1918 (October 15):  Shirdi Sai Baba died (or rather, attained full and final absorption into God (mahasamadhi)) in Shirdi on Vijayadashami (i.e., Dussehra). He was believed to be around eighty years old.

1918:  Shortly after Shirdi Sai Baba’s death, G.D. Sahasrabuddhe (Das Ganu Maharaj) wrote the 163-verse hymnody known as the Shri Sainatha Stavanamanjari.

1925:  G.D. Sahasrabuddhe (alias Das Ganu Maharaj) wrote Shri Bhaktisaramrita, a Marathi hagiographical text in sixty-tree chapters on various Hindu saints. Chapters fifty-two and fifty-three of this work focused on Shirdi Sai Baba, while Chapter twenty-six told the story of Venkusha, the enigmatic figure some identify as the guru of Sai Baba.

1922:  On the order of the Ahmednagar District Court, the Shri Saibaba Sansthan and Trust was formed to oversee the ritual activities and finances of the Sai Baba’s tomb in the Samadhi Mandir in Shirdi.

FOUNDER/GROUP HISTORY

Over the last century, Shirdi Sai Baba (d. 1918) has emerged as one of the most popular figures in the South Asian religious landscape. [Image at right] He lived between the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries in a dilapidated mosque in the small village of Shirdi on the frontier of the Ahmednagar District in the Bombay Presidency of British India. Especially in the last two decades of his life, Shirdi Sai Baba attained renown throughout the region for offering miraculous blessings that could address virtually any sort of crisis. Another aspect of his burgeoning popularity was his reputation as a saint, with practices that blended Hindu and Islamic traditions and teachings that emphasized the ultimate oneness of God.

The resident of Shirdi’s dilapidated mosque came to be known as “Sai Baba,” a name combining the idea of saintliness (the title, sai) with a fatherly sense of love and care for others (the informal term of address, baba). Scholars have argued that sai is a derivative of sa’ih, a Persian term for a Muslim “wanderer” (Rigopulous 1993:3; Warren 2004:35-36). Some hagiographers alternatively suggest that sai is related to the Sanskrit term swami, meaning “master” (Chaturvedi and Rahula 2000:38), or gloss sai as a contraction of sakshat ishwar, meaning “God made manifest” (Sharma 2012:1). Hagiographic literature also refers to Sai Baba interchangeably as an avatar, guru, and fakir, the latter being the term for a Muslim mendicant that Sai Baba occasionally used to describe himself. Hagiographic and academic literature alike refer to Sai Baba as a saint to denote his status as a charismatic religious figure.

Shirdi Sai Baba’s birth and earliest years are completely unknown, or rather, this is the position of G.R. Dabholkar’s voluminous Marathi poetic work Shri Sai Satcharita (1930). Dabholkar states in Satcharita 4:113, 115: “Baba’s birthplace, lineage, and the identity of his mother and father – no one knew anything about these matters… Having left his parents, loved ones, and all ties with others in the world, he manifested in Shirdi for the welfare of humanity.” The text, however, estimates that Sai Baba must have been around eighty years old when he died in 1918, thereby placing his birth around the year 1838 (See, Satcharita 10:43). An earlier hagiographic work, Das Ganu Maharaja’s Bhaktililamrita (1906), reports that Sai Baba once spoke enigmatically about his origins, saying that the world is his village and that Brahma and maya are his father and mother (See, Bhaktililamrita 31:20).

Much more additional information about the saint’s birth and earliest years come from the hagiographer B.V. Narasimhaswami (1874-1956), author of the four-volume text in English prose, Life of Sai Baba (1955-1969). This text, which seeks to introduce its subject to audiences across India, contains much of the same content presented in earlier hagiographic works, but it also draws from the author’s own ethnographic research and interviews with devotees who knew Sai Baba when the saint was alive. An example of this new information is the testimony of Mhalsapati, one of the first devotees of Sai Baba, who purportedly heard Sai Baba call himself a Brahmin from Pathri, a small town about 250 kilometers east of Shirdi. What results in Narasimhaswami’s Life of Sai Baba is a new theory about the saint’s hybridized upbringing: his birth to Brahmin parents; his short tenure in the care of an anonymous Muslim fakir (probably a Sufi, Narasimhaswami suggests); and his longer period of tutelage by a Brahmin guru named Venkusha. This marks an important hagiographic shift in the description of Shirdi Sai Baba: from “neither Hindu nor Muslim” in the Satcharita and other early Marathi works to the one in Life of Sai Baba who becomes “both Hindu and Muslim,” the epitome of Narasimhaswami’s hope for the harmonious future of religion in newly independent India (Loar 2018). This hybridized upbringing becomes further embellished through Sathya Sai Baba of Puttaparthi (1926-2011), the self-declared reincarnation of Shirdi’s mendicant. Through revelations given to his devotees, Sathya Sai Baba adds mythological elements to his predecessor’s origin, including the notion that the Hindu god Shiva promised to take birth as the son of the childless Brahmin couple named Ganga Bhavadiya and Devagiriamma (see more detail in Rigopoulos 1993:21-27). While elements of Narasimhaswami and Sathya Sai Baba’s interpretations of Shirdi Sai Baba occasionally appear in contemporary hagiographic texts and film, it should be noted that many devotees continue to hold Dabholkar’s Satcharita and its description of the saint’s unknown parentage as the most authoritative account on this period of his life. The Shri Saibaba Sansthan and Trust, which oversees the saint’s tomb in Shirdi, prioritizes information from Dabholkar’s Satcharita, too.

The various accounts of Shirdi Sai Baba’s birth and earliest years notwithstanding, there is relative consistency among hagiographic sources with regard to the major events in his life after arriving in Shirdi around the year 1858. This is the date assigned to his encounter with a Muslim man named Chand Patil, a village officer from Dhupkheda around 100 kilometers west of Shirdi. At the time, Patil was searching the countryside for his horse. He came across a young man dressed in the garb of a Muslim fakir, namely, a headscarf (topi) and long robe (kafni), sitting underneath a mango tree and smoking crushed tobacco in a chillum. Over conversation, the fakir told Patil exactly where to find the missing horse at a nearby rivulet. Further astonishing Patil was the fakir pulling a burning ember out of the ground with tongs and then hitting the ground with his walking stick to draw out water. Both of these miraculous actions were to assist the saint in smoking his chillum. Toward the end of their meeting, Patil invited the young saint to his village Dhupkheda and then to Shirdi, where Patil’s relatives were traveling for a wedding. Upon arrival in Shirdi, the young saint was seen by the caretaker of the village’s Khandoba temple, Mhalsapati, who called out, “Sai, please come” (ya sai). From this day onward, the Sai Baba of Shirdi took up residence in his namesake village.

Sai Baba spent his sixty-year tenure in Shirdi as a mendicant. Most of his time was spent in his mosque known as Dwarkamai, sitting in contemplation in front of its sacred fire (dhuni) and occasionally wandering the village. The residents of Shirdi initially kept their distance from the aloof saint until two demonstrations of miraculous power greatly increased his stature in the public’s eyes. The first major miracle occurred in 1886 when the saint suffered an asthma attack and declared that he would voluntarily enter into and return from a deathlike meditative state of samadhi in seventy-two hours. Some were convinced that Shirdi Sai Baba had actually died and moved to bury him, but the saint returned to life three days later, as promised. The second major miracle, which took place around 1892, was the miracle of lighting lamps in his mosque with water instead of oil. When Shirdi’s grocers lied about the availability of the oil that they had regularly given as alms, Sai Baba returned to his mosque and mixed water with a tiny amount of leftover oil, drank the mixture as a religious offering (See, Satcharita 5:109), and miraculously lit the mosque’s lamps. According to Das Ganu Maharaj, this event was the catalyst in the public’s perception of saint from a “madman” to “God on earth” (See, Bhaktalilamrita 31:35, 46).

These two miracles coincided with the introduction of two important individuals into the devotional community: N.G. Chandorkar and G.D. Sahasrabuddhe. Chandorkar, a district collector who met the saint in 1892, promoted the miracle-working saint among his many contacts throughout the colonial middle classes (e.g., clerks, police inspectors, solicitors, judges). His influence was so great that he has been called the “first and foremost of Baba’s apostles” and “Baba’s St. Paul” (Narasimhaswami 2004:249). Chandorkar convinced Sahasrabuddhe, a police constable with a great skill for writing religious poetry, to visit Shirdi around 1894. A series of close calls proved to Sahasrabuddhe that Shirdi Sai Baba was protecting him from certain harm. Resigning from the police force, Sahasrabuddhe felt that the saint was pushing him to a higher calling, namely, the writing of the lives of saints. He adopted the penname Das Ganu Maharaj and wrote Santakathamrita (1903), which featured a chapter that become the earliest written account of Sai Baba’s teachings. Additional hagiographic works followed, most notably Bhaktililamrita (1906) and Bhaktisaramrita (1926), as well as many works performed orally in his role as a talented kirtankar.

Another important devotee and hagiographer was Abdul, whose arrival in Shirdi in 1889 preceded Chandorkar and Sahasrabuddhe. Abdul was a close devotee of the saint and briefly in charge of his tomb before the establishment of the Shri Saibaba Sansthan and Trust in 1922. Abdul’s handwritten notebook containing the saint’s Sufi-inspired teachings is prominently featured in translation in Marianne Warren’s Unraveling the Enigma: Shirdi Sai Baba in the Light of Sufism, first published in 1999 and later as a revised edition in 2004. The notebook is a key piece of evidence in Warren’s argument that Sai Baba was actually a Sufi holy man and that his legacy underwent Hinduization through the medium of Hindu-authored hagiography following his death.

In the last two decades of Sai Baba’s life, many more people began to visit Shirdi, including one of Ahmednagar District’s deputy collectors and settlement officers H.V. Sathe (1904); the lawyer S.B. Dhumal from Nashik (1907); the sub-judge Tatyasaheb Noolkar from Pandharpur (1908); the prominent Bombay solicitor H.S. Dixit (1909); the Amravati lawyer and political activist G.S. Khaparde (1910); and the first-class magistrate and Satcharita author G.R. Dabholkar from Bandra (1910). In the 1930s, these individuals were interviewed by Narasimhaswami, who then published Devotees’ Experiences of Sri Sai Baba (1940) as a collection of seventy-nine first-person testimonies about the saint’s miracles and teachings. This work offers an important snapshot of Sai Baba according to devotees who knew the saint when he was alive, but it must be further contextualized by the fact that the voices are predominantly from well-educated, high-caste Hindu males from the colonial middle classes.

The growing regional popularity of Shirdi Sai Baba paralleled the increase in accounts of his miracles, many of which involved blessings to cure diseases or protect people from harm. For example, the thirteenth chapter of Dabholkar’s Satcharita reports instances where Sai Baba prescribed unconventional means to successfully treat various diseases: sitting near the saint in his mosque for pulmonary consumption; feeding a black dog near a Laskhmi temple for malarial fever; and eating a mixture of nuts and milk for diarrhea. The same chapter includes three short anecdotes on a similar theme: an ear infection cured with the words “Allah will make everything okay” (allah accha karega); loose motions cured by roasted peanuts blessed by the saint; and a longstanding case of colic cured by the saint’s blessing (ashirvad) cured. Narasimhaswami’s Devotees’ Experiences includes a great number of additional stories beyond what is covered in the voluminous Satcharita. The lawyer S.B. Dhumal recounts how he was saved from plague by following Sai Baba’s advice, even though it went against the notions of “common sense,” “medical opinion,” and “rules of prudence” (Narasimhawami 2008:31). Many such miracles, especially those involving healing, have recurrent themes, such as the transformation of a skeptical devotee’s disbelief into belief in Sai Baba and the demonstration of a saint’s power as superior to “modern” or “western” medical practices (Hardiman 2015; Loar 2016).

About one month before Shirdi Sai Baba’s death, the brick upon which he rested his head was accidentally broken by a devotee. The saint interpreted this event as the breaking of his karma and an omen of his passing. He died after a prolonged fever on the afternoon of October 15, 1918. This was Vijayadashami, also known as Dussehra, the final day of the Hindu festival of Navaratri. Following his death, a debate quickly emerged among Hindus and Muslims in Shirdi with regard to burial. Muslims wanted to bury the saint on open land, a custom common in the construction of a dargah for a Muslim saint. Hindus, however, maintained that Sai Baba wanted to be buried in a large building under construction by Bapusaheb Buti, a wealthy devotee from Nagpur (See, Satcharita 43:158). The revenue officer of nearby Kopergaon arranged for a vote between the two parties, and the majority favored his burial in Buti’s building, which became known as Shirdi Sai Baba’s Samadhi Mandir (Rigopoulos 1993:241). The saint’s Muslim devotee Abdul became the custodian of the new tomb until the establishment of the Shri Saibaba Sansthan and Trust in 1922.

DOCTRINES/BELIEFS

One of the central beliefs about Shirdi Sai Baba is that he represented religious unity, particularly between Hindu and Islamic traditions. The Satcharita states in several verses, notably 5:24, 7:13, and 10:119, that he was “neither Hindu nor Muslim.” Related to Sai Baba’s non-affiliation with a single tradition are his statements about the equality of Hindu and Islamic notions of God, an example of which is the non-difference between Ram and Rahim expressed in Satcharita 10:50. The third chapter of the Satcharita also showcases Sai Baba professing the equality of Brahmins and Pathans, that is, Hindus and Muslims, each of whom expresses the same spirit of devotional worship in different ways. It is also important to note that these statements of religious unity in the context of Sai Baba hagiography come predominantly from Hindu hagiographers. Consider Satcharita 23:4, in which the Hindu hagiographer Dabholkar balances Hindu interpretation with Sai Baba’s self-expression which uses Islamic vocabulary: “We may regard [Sai Baba] as an avatar because he has all of those characteristics. About himself, he used to say, “I am a servant in the service of God (Allah).”

According to most hagiographic texts, Shirdi Sai Baba was not one to give lengthy lectures on philosophy and doctrine, although a notable exception is Das Ganu’s Santakathamrita (1903) featuring the saint’s lengthy conversation with N.G. Chandorkar on brahmajnana, caitanya, and other topics within Vedanta. Instead, Sai Baba offered simple blessings to those who approached him with phrases like “God will make it alright” and “God is master” (allah malik). Today, the Hindi phrase closely associated with Shirdi Sai Baba is “the master of all is one,” or sab ka malik ek hai. Early Marathi hagiographies neither directly nor indirectly attribute these words to the saint nor use them to describe his teachings. Given this statement has become ubiquitous on posters, calendars, and other printed works bearing his image, one might suggest that these words derive from the saint’s mass-produced iconography. The type of religious unity exemplified in the phrase sab ka malik ek hai has been seen to appeal to Hindus as well as non-Hindus as a unifying force of moral good in contrast to exclusivist and nativist worldviews, such as Hindu nationalism (McLain 2011, 2012).

Devotees of Shirdi Sai Baba profoundly believe in his reputation as an efficacious miracle worker to whom anyone can easily turn. Hagiographic texts are full of testimonies to Sai Baba’s unfailing ability to help people with all sorts of problems, from diseases and life-threatening situations to material concerns, like jobs and money. As with many sacred figures in South Asian religious traditions, Shirdi Sai Baba is imminently accessible even after death. Narasimhaswami, for example, had a powerfully transformative experience at the saint’s tomb in Shirdi in 1936, after which he embarked on a career of sai prachar, or the mission of making Sai Baba known throughout India (McLain 2016b; Loar 2018). Contemporary hagiographic literature continues to report new miracles attributed to Shirdi Sai Baba helping people in need and curing various diseases either through his posthumous presence or the ritual use of the sacred ash (udi) obtained from the sacred fire (dhuni) in Sai Baba’s mosque in Shirdi (Chopra 2016). Miraculous events occasionally receive media coverage, such as the appearance of Shirdi Sai Baba’s face on the wall of a temple in Mississauga, Canada (Loar 2014).

Driving this belief in miracles are the eleven assurances that Shirdi Sai Baba purportedly made before his death in 1918. These assurances do not exist in codified form in the early Marathi hagiographies, but they seem to have coalesced out of exact or very similar entries in Narasimhaswami’s Charters and Sayings (1939), a compendium of more than 600 aphorisms and parables attributed to the saint. The following is a common English rendering of the eleven assurances (Rigopoulos 1993:376):

Whoever puts their feet on Shirdi soil, his sufferings will come to an end.

The wretched and miserable will rise to joy and happiness as soon as they climb the steps of my mosque.

I shall be ever active and vigorous even after leaving this earthly body.

My tomb shall bless and speak to the needs of my devotees.

I shall be active and vigorous even from the tomb.

My mortal remains will speak from the tomb.

I am ever living to help and guide all who come to me, who surrender to me, and who seek refuge in me.

If you look to me, I look to you.

If you cast your burden on me, I shall surely bear it.

If you seek my advice and help, it shall be given to you at once.

There shall be no want in the house of my devotee.

Slightly different versions of these assurances, whether in English or South Asian languages, also circulate in Shirdi Sai Baba devotion. (Image at right] For example, assurance number seven reads differently vis-à-vis the rendering above: bhajega jo mujh ko jis bhav mein paunga us ko main us bhav mein. The common English translation of this assurance, which is especially visible in online devotional spaces, is: “In whatever faith men worship me, even so do I render to them.” Throughout all of the assurances in whichever form and language, the main theme holds that Shirdi Sai Baba is an approachable and accessible spiritual resource. He serves as an open-access spiritual resource who wants to solve people’s problems and defines his work thusly in Narasimhaswami’s Charters and Sayings, #55: “My business is to give blessings.”

The Satcharita reports Shirdi Sai Baba’s prediction to return among his devotees as an eight-year-old child, but some devotees do not accept Sathya Sai Baba of Puttaparthi as the reincarnation of Shirdi’s mendicant. Sathya Sai Baba further understands his predecessor as a component of a triple avatar: Shirdi Sai as a form of Shiva, Sathya Sai as a form of Shiva together with Shakti, and Prema Sai, the forthcoming incarnation that will be Shakti alone (Srinivas 2008). One way that some devotees of Shirdi Sai Baba distinguish the two Sai Babas is the difference between the “real” (asli) in Shirdi and “fake” (nakli) in Puttaparthi (Loar 2016). However, further research into this matter is necessary to provide greater nuance into our understanding of the place of each Sai Baba in the devotional context of the other.

RITUALS/PRACTICES

According to hagiography, Shirdi Sai Baba’s ascetic lifestyle and religious practices reflected his blended approach to Hindu and Islamic traditions. According to the seventh chapter of the Satcharita, he had pierced ears and was circumcised, a combination of Hindu and Muslim physical features. His long white robe and headscarf were similar to the garb of a Muslim mendicant, or fakir, in the Deccan region, and he lived in the village’s dilapidated mosque. But he referred to the mosque as Dwarka or Dwarkamai in reference to the holy city associated with the Hindu god Krishna. Inside the mosque, the saint kept his constantly burning sacred fire from which he prescribed its ash (udi) as a healing substance. He either read or had someone else read passages from the Quran and he once demonstrated his knowledge of Sanskrit grammar by interpreting the Bhagavad Gita for a Hindu devotee. He occasionally spoke about Hindu metaphysical concepts like brahmajnana and maya, while the name of God that was always on his lips, per Satcharita 7:30, was Allah malik (“God is master”). This religiosity that resists and critiques the social act of categorization is not unprecedented in South Asia, as scholars have explored Shirdi Sai Baba in light of similar antecedents, such as the Nath community of ascetics, the god Dattatreya, the poet-saint Kabir, and other Maharashtrian saints like Gajanan Maharaj and Swami Samarth Maharaj (White 1972; Rigopoulous 1993; Warren 2004).

Another genre of action associated with Shirdi Sai Baba is the miracle. English-language literature often uses the word “miracle” to describe Sai Baba’s supernatural actions and events, both those that took place during his lifetime and those that continue to happen in the present. Works in South Asian languages, such as Hindi and Marathi, typically describe the saint’s miracles as camatkar (lit. “that which astonishes”) and lila, a Hindu theological term that means “play,” as in, a divine figure’s playful manipulation of reality. The saint rarely performed largescale miracles in public during his lifetime, with the notable exceptions of his three-day period of death and revivification, and the miraculous lighting of lamps in his mosque with water instead of oil. Much more common throughout Shirdi Sai Baba literature are the personal testimonies from individuals who recount personal experiences of a miraculous cure, life-saving protection, or material result (e.g., a new job, acceptance into a college, success with a new business).

Despite the blended nature of Sai Baba’s practices and the ecumenical nature of his teachings, many of the rituals of Sai Baba worship fall under the umbrella of Hindu practice, such as puja, arati, and darshan. The major festivals celebrated in Shirdi and Sai Baba temples around the world are Hindu   celebrations: Ram Navami, Guru Purnima, and Vijayadashami, which also commemorates Sai Baba’s mahasamadhi. A major moment in the development of Sai Baba worship was the establishment in 1954 of a marble image (a murti consecrated in Hindu fashion) above the saint’s tomb in the Samadhi Mandir. [Image at right] Similar consecrated images are found in some Hindu temples, and smaller murtis and devotional posters or framed prints may be found in people’s homes and businesses alongside virtually any other sacred figure. The generally Hindu character of Sai Baba worship reflects the predominantly Hindu demographic of his devotees, including hagiographers, past and present. Exact numbers are impossible to ascertain, but one study of Shirdi as a site of religious tourism shows that visitors are mostly Hindus (ninety-two percent), with Muslims, Christians, Parsis, and Sikhs all together in a distinct minority (Ghosal and Maity 2011:271).

ORGANIZATION/LEADERSHIP

In 1922, the Ahmednagar District Court ordered the formation of the Shri Saibaba Sansthan and Trust, the organizational body that would oversee the tomb’s activities and finances. Shortly after its formation, the all-Hindu board of trustees ousted Abdul as caretaker (Warren 2004:347). Today, the Sansthan and Trust continues to manage the Samadhi Mandir in Shirdi, a town that has undergone tremendous transformation over the last century. It has been estimated that 25,000 devotees visit Shirdi daily and around 80,000 over weekends, with substantially more during major festivals (Shinde and Pinkney 2013:563).

A notable feature of the Sansthan and Trust is that it routinely ranks among India’s wealthiest religious organizations, alongside Hindu sites like the Venkateshwara Mandir in Tirupati and the Vaishno Devi Mandir in Jammu. Large donation amounts to the Sansthan and Trust are sometimes reported in the media, especially around holidays and festivals. While exact figures are hard to discern, a Marathi article by Vijay Chavan and Manohar Sonawane provides some insight into the increase in the Sansthan and Trust’s finances during the last half of the twentieth century. In 1952, when the organization was registered with the Indian government, it reported an annual income of 214,000 Rupees. By 1973, this amount had climbed to 1,800,000 Rupees, and by the end of the 1980s, annual income spiked to upwards of 60,000,000 Rupees. The turning point in the Sansthan and Trust’s finances, according to Chavan and Sonawane, was the release of director Ashok Bhushan’s 1977 Hindi film Shirdi ke Sai Baba, which introduced the saint to the large audience of Hindi filmgoers. The authors further cite a 2004 report from the organization’s management committee that listed its income as approximately 870,000,000 Rupees and deposits valued at more than 2,000,000,000 Rupees (Chavan and Sonawane 2012:37-38).

While the Sansthan and Trust manages the Samadhi Mandir in Shirdi, there are a many other Sai Baba organizations and temples throughout India and around the world. For example, B.V. Narasimhaswami founded the All India Sai Samaj in Madras in 1940 with the purpose of propagating devotion to Sai Baba beyond the movement’s center in Shirdi. This organization ultimately established hundreds of branches and dozens of Shirdi Sai Baba temples in India over the following decades. One such temple in suburban Bengaluru, which presents the saint more as a Hindu deity than a figure with composite heritage, is discussed in Smriti Srinivas’s 2008 In the Presence of Sai Baba: Body, City, and Memory in a Global Religious Movement. Srinivas finds that the temple’s “bourgeois incarnation of Baba” exclusively appeals to middle-class Hindus aspiring to lead successful lives in a thriving metropolis, and that the consequence of this perspective is that the saint’s “Sufi heritage has passed into a zone of cultural amnesia in the suburban landscape of believers” (Srinivas 2008:233, 239).

Another ethnographic study by Karline McLain is a counterbalance to the understanding of Sai Baba’s story as one of simple Hinduization. McLain’s field research at the Shri Shirdi Sai Heritage Foundation Trust in New Delhi highlights Hindu and non-Hindu voices who express little interest or concern with the politics of religious identity in the saint’s legacy. Rather, she finds devotees “drawn to this new movement because they perceive Shirdi Sai Baba’s life and teachings as a syncretistic example of spirituality that defies rigid religious boundaries” (McLain 2012:192). The organization’s founder C.B. Satpathy, who is also a prolific author of Sai Baba hagiographic literature, echoes Narasimhaswami’s earlier vision of the saint as an example of composite spirituality, which crosses divisions and brings people together. McLain’s work also importantly connects the notion of Sai Baba’s compositeness to the practice of seva, or humanitarian service rendered as worship to one’s guru, which can be practiced by anyone of any faith.

ISSUES/CHALLENGES

The initial academic study of Shirdi Sai Baba focused on reconstructing his life through various hagiographic sources and attempting to locate the “real” Sai Baba, whom many have argued was likely a Sufi fakir (Shepherd 1986; Rigopoulos 1993; Warren 2004). More recent scholarship has approached additional topics in the history of the Shirdi Sai Baba hagiographic tradition and prominently highlighted the works of Das Ganu Maharaj, an understudied voice in the early devotional community (Loar 2016; McLain 2016a). Scholars have also adopted new and fruitful perspectives, such as his many shrines in urban public space in Mumbai (Elison 2014), the competing visions of religious pluralism situated between the local and the global (McLain 2016a), the intersection of his healing miracles and the modern Indian nation (Hardiman 2015), and the ways in which individuals and communities find inspiration in his message of peace and unity within religious diversity (McLain 2011; 2012).

Perhaps the most important issue yet to be more fully explored is the nexus of the sainthood embodied by Shirdi Sai Baba in the rural Marathi-speaking region in late colonial India and the region’s broader history of droughts, famines, epidemics, and economic transformation with the advent of new technologies (e.g., railroads) and the shifting of agricultural practices (e.g., sugarcane cultivation). To this effect, Smriti Srinivas has made three very important points: that “congregational worship” in Shirdi “was paralleled by a shift in the economy of the Godavari river region in which Shirdi lies;” that the saint’s “polyvalent personality” enabled him to acquire devotees, especially from among the emerging middle classes from diverse communities; and that his knack for miracles “contravened or interrogated bourgeois rationality that exerted increasing power over these classes” (Srinivas 2008:37-38). Each of these points deserves more scholarly attention to further historicize the popularization of Shirdi Sai Baba in colonial and postcolonial India. While this certainly does not discount the saint’s connections to earlier modes of religious expression (e.g., references in hagiography to Sai Baba as a reincarnation of Kabir), it nonetheless speaks to the sense that Shirdi Sai Baba is both a product of and also a saint for the “modern” and rapidly changing world.

The perennial issue animating much of this recent scholarship is the attempt to explain how this simple fakir from the colonial frontier became so popular, so fast in postcolonial India. Karline McLain, the scholar who has currently written the most extensively on Shirdi Sai Baba, echoes three reasons previously posited by Marianne Warren (2004) to explain the saint’s popularization over the last century: the guarantee of material results obtained through prayer; the proliferation of hagiographic books and films on him; and Sathya Sai Baba’s self-declaration to be his reincarnation. McLain adds a fourth reason: Shirdi Sai Baba’s embodiment of India’s “composite culture.” Adding nuance to the earlier theses about Shirdi Sai Baba’s Hinduization, McLain finds, both textually and ethnographically, that there are multiple understandings of the saint as an incarnation of Dattatreya, a figure who recalls the example of the Prophet, and someone who shows the path to God in ways consistent with Sikh teachings. A particular manifestation of this compositeness is the poster that inspired McLain’s article, “Be United, Be Virtuous,” which features Shirdi Sai Baba wearing the colors of the Indian flag and framed by a mosque, temple, gurdwara, and church (McLain 2011).

My previous work on the Shirdi Sai Baba hagiographic tradition has reframed this “composite culture” as the politics of compositeness, in which there are dominant Hindu and subordinate Muslim aspects to Sai Baba’s legacy. One locus of this process is N.V. Gunaji’s The Wonderful Life and Teachings of Shri Sai Baba, Adapted from the Original Marathi Book Shri Sai Satcharita by Govindrao Raghunath Dabholkar alias ‘Hemadpant’ (1944). As an adaptation and not a full translation, Gunaji’s text warrants close scrutiny. (A dutifully comprehensive translation of the Satcharita is available through Indira Kher’s 1999 publication). There are very detailed accountings of the hagiographic Hinduization evident in Gunaji’s adaptation of the Satcharita and how it omits, suppresses, and glosses over the many connections between Sai Baba and Islam in the original text (Warren 2004; Loar 2016). For example, Gunaji inserts a footnote to his rendering of the Satcharita in reference to Sai Baba’s circumcision; the footnote clarifies that a Hindu devotee closely inspected the saint and confirmed he was actually not circumcised. Another example is Gunaji’s handling of Satcharita 11:62-63, in which Sai Baba describes himself as a Muslim by birth who nonetheless welcomes the worship offered to him by a Brahmin man named Dr. Pandit. In his adaptation, Gunaji simply omits Sai Baba’s self-description of his Muslim-ness, thereby changing the tone of the story: from a teaching on sincere devotion to one’s guru as beyond religious categories to a simple example of the saint accepting worship from a Brahmin (Loar 2016). Following Gunaji’s attempt to create a more Hindu and less Muslim saint, I have followed this politics of compositeness to the next major figure in the saint’s reconfiguration, B.V. Narasimhaswami, author of the English text Life of Sai Baba. Narasimhaswami focuses his attention on the saint’s mysterious origin and draws together other devotees’ testimonies to create the theory of Sai Baba’s hybridized upbringing: Brahmin parentage, Muslim (Sufi) foster care, and Brahmin tutelage under Venkusha. Here, it is more accurate to refine the Hinduization in Sai Baba hagiography as actually a form of Brahminization, an act of assigning caste to a figure previously described as having unknown parentage. But this hybridized upbringing is very important to Narasimhaswami. He writes in the third volume of Life of Sai Baba: “From Hindu parentage… [Baba] passed to Muslim hands and from Muslim care again to a Hindu saint’s care. The fusion of Hindu and Muslim had to be perfected first in his own person before he could affect any fusion of the Hindu-Muslim elements in society” (Narasimhaswami 2004:595). This language of syncretism, which is evident throughout Life of Sai Baba, evidences Narasimhaswami’s rebranding of the saint for a postcolonial audience and a postcolonial discourse, namely, the discourse of national integration in independent India. In doing so, we see Sai Baba’s elevation from a primarily regional to increasingly national figure of religious unity (Loar 2018).

Not everyone, though, is a fan of Shirdi Sai Baba. In particular, there are some voices aiming to challenge the legitimacy of the saint’s notion of Hindu-Muslim unity. My study of anti-Sai Baba rhetoric on several Facebook pages finds that the Muslim elements of the saint’s life have become the subject of harsh critique. Polemical memes proliferate on such pages, suggesting that Shirdi Sai Baba is part of a “bhakti jihad,” an essentially Muslim figure who has tricked Hindus into worshipping him and defiling their religion (Loar 2016). These pages also lend support to a leading a voice of anti-Sai Baba rhetoric: Swami Swaroopananda, the nonagenerarian head of the Dwarka Pitham in Gujarat.  In the summer of 2014, Swami Swaroopananda launched several critiques of Sai Baba worship that were picked up in the Indian news media. On June 23, Maharashtra Times reported the swami’s claim that Shirdi Sai Bab was not a divine figure and therefore unworthy of worship. On June 30, the Deccan Chronicle covered his attempt to provoke Hindus into rejecting their worship of a “Muslim fakir.” In August, he led a gathering of 400 Hindu leaders during a religious conclave, or dharma sansad, which passed a resolution on the incompatibility of Shirdi Sai Baba and Hinduism, or sanatan dharma. The Sansthan and Trust in Shirdi quickly condemned Swami Swaroopananda, while devotees in several states filed court cases against the swami by citing sections of the Indian penal code that criminalize statements that outrage and hurt the religious sentiments of others. In September 2015, Swami Swaroopananda presented an apology for his critical statements before the Madhya Pradesh High Court, although he continued to make occasional inflammatory comments, such as blaming Maharashtra’s drought in 2016 on the continued worship of Sai Baba alongside Hindu deities. While the swami’s public campaign against Sai Baba was ultimately ineffectual, he became another example of the many fundamentalist religious figures in modern India who claim the authority to define what is and is not properly “Hindu” but are not recognized universally by all Hindus as having the power to do so (Loar 2016).

IMAGES

Image #1: Photograph taken around 1916 that shows Shirdi Sai Baba wearing headscarf (topi) and robe (kafni) while leaning against his mosque in Shirdi with several male devotees. Source: Wikipedia commons.
Image #2: Hindi placard from Shirdi: “Shri Sadguru Sai Baba’s 11 Assurances.” Source: Jonathan Loar.
Image #3: Murti at the Shri Shirdi Sai Baba Mandir in Kukas near Jaipur in Rajasthan. Source: Jonathan Loar.

REFERENCES

Chaturvedi B. K. and S. P. Ruhela. 2000. Sai Baba of Shirdi. New Delhi: Diamond Pocket Books.

Chopra, Raj. 2012. Shirdi Sai Baba: The Divine Healer. New Delhi: Sterling Publishers.

Dabholkar, G. R. 2008 [1930]. Shri Sai Satcharita. Shirdi: Shri Sai Baba Sansthan and Trust.

Elison, William. 2014. “Sai Baba of Bombay: A Saint, His Icon, and the Urban Geography of Darshan.” History of Religions 54:151–87.

Ghosal, Samit and Maity, Tamal. 2010. “Development and Sustenance of Shirdi as a Centre for Religious Tourism in India.” Pp. 263-82 in Holy Places and Pilgrimages: Essays on India, edited by Rana P.B. Singh. New Delhi: Shubhi Publications.

Gunaji, N.V. 2007 [1944]. The Wonderful Life and Teachings of Shri Sai Baba, adapted from the original Marathi book Shri Sai Satcharita by Govindrao Raghunath Dabholkar alias ‘Hemadpant. Shri Sai Baba Sansthan and Trust: Shirdi.

Hardiman, David. 2015. “Miracle Cures for a Suffering Nation: Sai Baba of Shirdi.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 57:355-80.

Kher, Indira. 1999. Shri Sai Satcharita: The Life and Teachings of Shirdi Sai

Baba by Govind R. Dabholkar (Hemad Pant). Translated from the original Marathi by Indira Kher. New Delhi: Sterling Publishers.

Loar, Jonathan 2018. “From Neither/Nor to Both/And: Reconfiguring the Life and Legacy of Shridi Sai Baba in Hagiography.” International Journal of Hindu Studies 22:475-96.

Loar, Jonathan. 2016. My Bones Shall Speak from beyond the Tomb:” The Life and Legacy of Shirdi Sai Baba in History and Hagiography. Ph.D. dissertation, Emory University.

Loar, Jonathan. 2014. “If You See Shirdi Sai Baba’s Face on This Wall, Don’t Worry… It’s Normal.” Sacred Matters, May 19. Accessed from https://sacredmattersmagazine.com/if-you-see-shirdi-sai-babas-face-on-this-wall-dont-worry-its-normal/ on 26 October 2020.

McLain, Karline. 2016a. The Afterlife of Sai Baba: Competing Visions of a Global Saint. Seattle: University of Washington Press.

McLain, Karline. 2016b. “Shirdi Sai Baba as Guru and God: Narasimhaswami’s Vision of the Samartha Sadguru.” The Journal of Hindu Studies 9:186-204.

McLain, Karline. 2012. “Praying for Peace and Amity: The Shri Shirdi Sai Heritage Foundation Trust.” Pp. 190-209 in Public Hinduisms, edited by John Zavos, Pralay Kanungo, Deepa S. Reddy, Maya Warrier, and Raymond Brady Williams. London: SAGE Publications.

McLain, Karline. 2011. “Be United, Be Virtuous: Composite Culture and the Growth of Shirdi Sai Baba Devotion.” Nova Religio 15:20–49.

Narasimhaswami, B. V. 2008 [1940]. Devotees’ Experiences of Sri Sai Baba. Madras: All India Sai Samaj.

Narasimhaswami, B. V. 2004 [1955–69]. Life of Sai Baba. Madras: All India Sai Samaj.

Narasimhaswami, B. V. 1942 [1939]. Sri Sai Baba’s Charters and Sayings. Madras: All India Sai Samaj.

Rigopoulos, Antonio. 1993. The Life and Teachings of Sai Baba of Shirdi. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Sahasrabuddhe, G. D. (alias Das Ganu Maharaj). 2012 [1918]. Shri Sainatha Stavanamanjari. Shirdi: Shri Sai Baba Sansthan and Trust.

Sahasrabuddhe, G. D. (alias Das Ganu Maharaj). 2010 [1906]. Shri Bhaktililamrita. Gortha: Shri Das Ganu Maharaj Pratishthan.

Sahasrabuddhe, G. D. (alias Das Ganu Maharaj). 2003 [1925]. Shri Bhaktisaramrita. Gortha: Shri Das Ganu Maharaj Pratishthan.

Sahasrabuddhe, G. D. (alias Das Ganu Maharaj). 1999 [1903]. Shri Santakathamrita. Gortha: Shri Das Ganu Maharaj Pratishthan.

Sharma, Bela. 2012. Sai Baba: Ek avatar. New Delhi: Sterling Publishers.

Shinde, Kiran A. and Andrea Marion Pinkney. 2013. “Shirdi in Transition: Guru Devotion, Urbanisation and Regional Pluralism in India.” South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies 36:554-70.

Shepherd, Kevin R. D. 1986. Gurus Rediscovered: Biographies of Sai Baba of Shirdi and Upasni Maharaj of Sakori. Cambridge: Anthropographia Publications.

Srinivas, Smriti. 2008. In the Presence of Sai Baba: Body, City, and Memory in a Global Religious Movement. Boston: Brill.

Warren, Marianne. 2004 [1999]. Unraveling the Enigma: Shirdi in the Light of Sufism. New Delhi: Sterling Publishers.

White, Charles S. J. 1972. “The Sai Baba Movement: Approaches to the Study of Indian Saints.” The Journal of Asian Studies 31:863–78.

Publication Date:
20 November 2020

Share

Jehovah’s Witnesses (Russia)


JEHOVAH’S WITNESSES IN RUSSIA TIMELINE

1891:  Charles Taze Russell visited Kishinev (now Chișinău).

1911:  Charles Taze Russell visited L’viv.

1928:  George Young, Bible Student missionary, traveled to Soviet Union.

1949:  Operation South secretly deported Witnesses from Soviet Moldavia.

1951:  Operation North secretly deported Witnesses from western borderlands of Soviet Union.

1957:  Jehovah’s Witnesses worldwide signed a petition to the Soviet government asking for end to persecution.

1965:  Jehovah’s Witnesses were released from special exile.

1991:  The Soviet Union granted registration to Jehovah’s Witnesses organization.

1992:  Russia granted registration to Jehovah’s Witnesses organization.

1997:  The Russian government passed the law “On Freedom of Conscience and Religious Associations” that implemented stricter regulation of religious groups.

2002:  The Russian government passed the law “On Combatting Extremist Activity” that implemented broad measures to combat extremism, including by religious groups.

2004:  Moscow Jehovah’s Witnesses were barred from registration within city limits.

2009:  Jehovah’s Witness publications began to be declared extremist and banned.

2017:  The Russian Supreme Court liquidated the Russian organization of Jehovah’s Witnesses.

2019:  The first Jehovah’s Witness in post-Soviet Russia was sentenced to prison for religious reasons.

FOUNDER/GROUP HISTORY

Founder Charles Taze Russell [Image at right] preached in the Russian Empire as part of his broader global missionary outreach in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries (Jehovah’s Witnesses: Proclaimers, 1993:406). A few interested Russian subjects requested copies of his publications, and wrote letters to his organization. Still, interest in his message did not lead to a sustained missionary presence in the Russian Empire (Baran 2014:16).

In the interwar period, sporadic attempts at evangelism within Soviet borders continued (Young 1929:356-61). Soviet hostility to religion made it impossible for Witnesses to establish any official or organized presence. Meanwhile, the Witnesses attracted significant converts in Eastern Europe just across the Soviet Union’s western borders. The situation for these communities changed dramatically as a result of World War II. During this period, the Soviet Union annexed territories along its western borders, including the countries of Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia, and portions of Poland, Romania, and Czechoslovakia. These territories contained thousands of Jehovah’s Witnesses. Soviet annexation made them Soviet citizens overnight (Baran 2014:14-30).

Soviet Witnesses showed remarkable dexterity in adapting to challenging conditions and surviving decades of persecution. Without the ability to establish Kingdom Halls, they met in small groups in private homes, often at odd hours to avoid detection. Baptisms were likewise done in secret, typically in local rivers and lakes (Baran 2014:119-20). Large gatherings were rare, but some communities found ways to discretely hold outdoor events under various guises. While the international organization established a country committee to oversee Soviet operations, it kept this leadership structure confidential to avoid the arrest and imprisonment of members. A small number of Witnesses illegally smuggled in religious literature from abroad, duplicating it either by hand or with private printing equipment. Courier networks then distributed this literature to members (2008 Yearbook 2008:144-52). As such, Bible Studies and meetings typically did not have the same circulation and discussion of a regularly rotating set of magazines and tracts as is typical in other countries. Evangelism took on creative approaches, and depended less on door to door methods. Witnesses tended instead to seek out opportunities to share their faith in less formal settings with neighbors, coworkers, and strangers, even as these actions carried substantial risk (2008 Yearbook 2008:106-07).

Despite such conditions, Witnesses managed to maintain a steady following in the Soviet Union. While it is difficult to calculate the exact membership, tens of thousands of adult Soviet citizens belonged to the Witnesses in the postwar period. Their membership was heavily concentrated in the western borderlands, and also in and around sites of exile and imprisonment throughout the Soviet Union. Most Witnesses lived in rural locations, and most had only a basic education and worked in agriculture or unskilled professions. In large part, this demographic situation reflects the Soviet state’s discriminatory policies against religious believers in the workforce and at universities (Baran 2014:113-14).

After the collapse of the Soviet Union in December 1991, Jehovah’s Witnesses experienced rapid growth and sudden freedom in Russia. Witnesses now enjoyed legal protections to safely evangelize to their neighbors, publish and circulate literature used by Witnesses worldwide, rent and buy property for Kingdom Halls, [Image at right] and hold larger gatherings of Witnesses across the country. As of 2017, the organization counted roughly 175,000 active members. Nearly double that number attended meetings or Bible studies (Baran 2020:2).

DOCTRINES/BELIEFS

The Watch Tower organization teaches that only Jehovah’s Witnesses are faithful to Christianity as taught by Jesus and practiced by the early apostles. They believe that every other interpretation of Christianity but their own is erroneous.

Jehovah’s Witnesses regard the Bible as the ultimate source of authority and justify all of their doctrines and beliefs with reference to scripture. They regard the Bible as inerrant. Witnesses do not interpret the entire Bible literally, regarding parts of it as metaphorical or symbolic. In 1961, a committee of Watch Tower translators completed a version of the Bible that is used by Witnesses worldwide. Witnesses consider the New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures the most accurate translation of the Bible. Unlike other versions of the Bible, it consistently renders the name “God” as “Jehovah” and refers to the Old and New Testaments as the “Hebrew-Aramaic Scriptures” and the “Christian Greek Scriptures.” This Bible is translated into other languages from the English-language version, including a Russian translation in 2007 (2008 Yearbook 2008:237). [Image at right] The English version is regularly updated and the most recent edition appeared in 2013 (Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society 2013).

Witnesses believe that Jesus was the only begotten son of God but, since he was begotten, deny any scriptural basis for the Trinitarian doctrine that the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit together form one Godhead (Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society 2013: 2-3). They believe that the Kingdom of God is a government in heaven (Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society 1953:113-126). This Kingdom will soon replace worldly governments and carry out God’s will upon the earth. Witnesses regard this event as imminent and teach that humanity is living in the “last days,” citing 2 Timothy 3:1-5 and Matthew 24:3-14, hence the urgency of spreading their message (Knox 2018:111-115).

Witnesses teach that Jesus cast Satan out from heaven and that Jesus began ruling the Kingdom of God in 1914. Upon their death, only 144,000 people (known as the “anointed class” or the “little flock”) will dwell in the Kingdom of Heaven, where they rule with God and Jesus Christ. Most of the 144,000 have already taken their places in heaven. Witnesses believe that the rest of the faithful (known as the “the great crowd”) will live through Armageddon and then enjoy paradise on earth during the millennial rule of Christ. If they have already died before Armageddon, they will be resurrected after the battle to live in this millennial kingdom (Knox 2018:33)

Life in the eternal paradise will be open to all who decide to live “in the truth,” as they call it. The dead will be raised during the millennium and judged. Those who do not attain salvation simply pass out of existence forever. Jehovah’s Witnesses do not believe in hell as a place of fiery punishment, but rather consider it the common grave for all mankind. They do not believe in purgatory. When people die, they are in an unconscious state, much like dreamless sleep.

Jehovah’s Witnesses do not venerate the cross or any other Christian symbol or image. The organization teaches that Jesus died on a wooden stake, rendered as “torture stake” in the New World Translation.

Witnesses abide by the laws of governments, except in cases where they believe that state law contradicts Jehovah’s law. Although they aspire to be law abiding, they will continue to meet under ban or refuse to fulfill national military service because Jehovah’s law takes precedence. The belief that the Bible teaches they ought to stand aloof from worldly affairs means they do not engage with ideological or political issues. They do not stand for public office and refuse to fight in wars.

RITUALS/PRACTICES

Baptism is a precondition to attaining everlasting life (Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society 1958:472-478). Only youths and adults can be considered by elders for baptism. They must undertake a period of guided Bible study using Watch Tower literature as study aids, before they are accepted as one of Jehovah’s Witnesses. Baptism is by full water immersion. Witnesses have wedding celebrations and funerals in much the same way as other Christian faiths.

There is only one event on the Witnesses’ religious calendar: the Memorial, also known as the Lord’s Evening Meal (Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society 2003:12-16).  Witnesses gather in their congregations to listen to elders give a Bible talk and to watch them distribute the “emblems,” as the bread and wine representing the body and blood of Christ are known. Only members of the anointed class consume the bread and wine at the Memorial service (usually there are none in a congregation) (Chryssides 2016:217-220).

Jehovah’s Witnesses do not celebrate Christmas or Easter, and regard them as pagan practices. Occasions that venerate the individual rather than Jehovah are banned, hence Witnesses do not celebrate birthdays or Mother’s Day. They do not celebrate patriotic holidays, salute the flag, or sing national anthems since this would be to profess allegiance to a secular government (Knox 2018:61-106).

While weekly meeting schedules have changed over the faith’s history, as of 2020, Witnesses meet at a Kingdom Hall with other members of their congregations twice a week, for around two hours. The program of the meeting is determined by the Governing Body, as is the literature Witnesses must read in preparation for it. Members of the congregation listen to elders speak, participate in Bible study sessions, and train for ministering to the public. Even young children are expected to remain attentive during these meetings. Witnesses undertake Bible study at home at least one evening a week, sometimes with other Witnesses from their congregations as guests. Their discussions are closely guided by publications from the organization, including the Watchtower magazine and a monthly bulletin focusing on ministry, among others, all of which are available on its website.

Every able Witness is expected to minister, most notably through door-to-door evangelism. In the past decade, they have become highly visible by standing with literature carts in busy thoroughfares and on city streets. Those who are too frail are encouraged to witness to the extent that they are able, which might be over the telephone or by writing letters, or through what the organization calls “informal witnessing.” The time Witnesses spend “in the field,” as they call it, is reported to elders, who pass the information up to the central organization. It compiles these statistics into figures for every country, which feed into worldwide statistics, which are publicly available on the Jehovah’s Witnesses website.

ORGANIZATION/LEADERSHIP

Witnesses regard the ultimate authority on interpreting the Bible on all matters, sacred and profane, as the Governing Body. The Governing Body is a group of men based at the worldwide headquarters in upstate New York. The number of members has fluctuated, but has always been between seven and eighteen. The men are appointed, rather than elected. Facilitating its governance are six committees, each led by a chairman serving a one-year term: the Coordinators’ Committee; Personnel Committee; Publishing Committee; Service Committee; Teaching Committee; and Writing Committee.  Between them, these six committees direct all of the organization’s activities around the world.

The Governing Body’s teachings are transmitted to rank-and-file Witnesses through clearly defined levels of regional, national, local, and congregational authority. The leadership roles and organizational hierarchy is detailed in the book Organized to do Jehovah’s Will, designed for use within congregations to define the structure of and to clarify the sources of authority within the organization (Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylvania 2019).

The elders carry the authority within the congregation and are responsible for, among other things, disciplining Witnesses found to have committed serious offences. If a Witness has ignored or flouted the teachings of the Governing Body and, after meeting a judicial committee, is regarded as unrepentant, they may be “disfellowshipped,” meaning they are no longer considered one of Jehovah’s Witnesses. Other Witnesses, including those in their congregation, are required to shun them.  This may include members of their own family. The congregations also have “ministerial servants,” who are primarily concerned with the day-to-day functioning of the community, such as financial matters, literature stocks, and so on. In addition, each congregation has three categories of pioneers who dedicate a different amount of time to ministry: auxiliary pioneers, fregular pioneers, and special pioneers (Knox 2018:41-47).

ISSUES/CHALLENGES

Soviet laws narrowly restricted which religious organizations could register with the state and legally operate on Soviet soil. Without registration, Witnesses had no legal standing. They did not have the right to conduct worship services or Bible studies, evangelize to others, or import and distribute religious literature (Walters 1993:3-30). For nearly all of Soviet history, any organized activities by Jehovah’s Witnesses were considered violations of Soviet law and subject to criminal prosecution.

The most severe persecution of Witnesses occurred under the rule of Joseph Stalin, who oversaw mass arrests of Witnesses in the years immediately following World War II. In 1949 and 1951, the Soviet state exiled nearly all Witnesses from the western borderlands to remote outposts in the Soviet interior. This “special exile” included both the elderly and children, and was done in secret. Families had no warning, lost nearly all of their possessions, and had to adjust to difficult conditions in isolated regions (Neizvestnyi Stranitsy Istorii 1999; Odintsov 2002).

After Stalin, the state eventually released Witness communities from special exile, and most imprisoned Witnesses received sentence reductions and early release. In the decades that followed, most Witnesses did not suffer arrest or imprisonment, but they did face steady harassment and job discrimination. Arrests, though relatively rare, did occur, especially for young men who refused to complete military service. Some Witnesses lost custody of their children (Baran 2014:77-82, 180-86).

Perhaps the biggest and most enduring challenge for Soviet Witnesses was one of state scrutiny and public perception. The Soviet Union’s attitude toward Jehovah’s Witnesses was consistently hostile. Soviet publications repeatedly referred to Witnesses as “sectarians,” framing them as a fringe group far outside the mainstream (Baran 2019:105-27). This led the public to view Witnesses as dangerous, unpatriotic, and anti-social. State hostility was based on several factors. First and foremost, Witnesses did not comply with many of the state’s basic expectations for its citizens. They did not complete mandatory military service, a matter of particular importance given the recent worldwide conflict that had cost the Soviet Union millions of lives, and the ensuing Cold War. They also did not vote in elections, a requirement of all Soviet citizens. In addition, Witnesses kept apart from state-run organizations, including trade unions and youth organizations affiliated with the Communist Party.

Further, the Witnesses’ organizational structure made them vulnerable to accusations of divided loyalties. On a basic level, the Witnesses were (and remain) headquartered in the United States, the Soviet Union’s Cold War rival. State propaganda accused Witnesses of harboring secret loyalties to a foreign power. Moreover, the Witnesses continued to illegally import and distribute religious literature produced in the United States, which frequently contained Cold War rhetoric against the Soviet Union (Knox 2018:257-62).

For the Soviet state, the Witnesses’ actions went beyond the requirements of private religious belief and directly threatened state control over its citizens. As such, the state expended significant resources into attempting to convince or coerce Witnesses into abandoning their faith, or at least into modifying their specific practices to avoid violations of the law. Witnesses were frequently subjected to intense public pressure. Newspapers trumpeted the alleged misdeeds of individual believers. Atheist agitators approached Witness families to share antireligious tracts and convince them to join mainstream society. Teachers pressured Witness children to join extracurricular activities. They also browbeat parents into allowing their children to wear Young Pioneer scarves and attend Pioneer events (Baran 2014:128-31).

Overall, Witnesses were severely marginalized in the postwar Soviet Union, and did not enjoy any freedom to practice their faith without fear of harassment or persecution.

In March 1985, when Mikhail Gorbachev became General Secretary of the Communist Party, and therefore leader of the USSR, Russian Jehovah’s Witnesses operated entirely underground and at great personal risk. Gorbachev introduced far-reaching reforms in the years following his accession, dramatically altering conditions for Russian Witnesses. One element of his reform programme was “glasnost,” usually translated as “openness,” which permitted the acknowledgment, discussion, and debate of previously taboo topics, among them the repression of religion in the USSR and the stranglehold of the one-party state over cultural and spiritual life. As a result of Gorbachev’s commitment to pluralism and tolerance, religious life was, gradually at first and then at swift pace, liberated from state repression and control (Ramet 1993:31-52).

As for many other religious communities, this degree of freedom was unprecedented for Russian Witnesses. Administrative processes and legislative procedures soon caught up, and Jehovah’s Witnesses were able to legally register in the Ukrainian republic on February 28, 1991 and in the Russian republic on March 27, 1991. With this, Russian Witnesses could meet for Bible Study in private homes, hire venues for larger meetings, maintain contact with Witnesses abroad (including the worldwide headquarters) and preach their beliefs openly, all without fear of state reprisal. When the Soviet Union collapsed in December 1991, Witnesses in the Russian Federation, one of the USSR’s successor states, retained their newfound freedoms. New legislation on religious life allowed Witnesses, and other religious groups, both Russian and foreign, a wide range of rights (Knox 2012:244-71).

In the immediate post-Soviet period, the resurgence of faith, in all of its varieties, concerned Russia’s ideologically conservative and nationally-oriented political, cultural, and religious elites. The leadership of the Russian Orthodox Church, Russia’s majority faith, argued that it needed an opportunity to reach Russians confused by the seismic socioeconomic shifts that accompanied the period of transition from communism to capitalism without being in competition with wealthier religious groups more experienced in outreach, charitable work, and missionizing (Bourdeaux and Witte 1999). The Church lobbied for restrictions on religious freedom, resulting in the federal law “On Freedom of Conscience and Religious Associations,” passed in 1997. The law, which has been subject to comprehensive analysis, sought to marginalize non-traditional religious communities and ensure the dominance of Russian Orthodoxy in post-Soviet society (Knox 2005:2-4; Baran 2007:266-68). It cast foreign religious organizations such as the Jehovah’s Witnesses as interlopers. The Putin regime’s increasingly nationalistic and authoritarian tendencies meant that foreign religious groups came to be regarded with suspicion and even contempt by the government, lawmakers, and cultural elites.

The Russian state’s treatment of Witnesses led to multiple cases before the European Court of Human Rights, which upholds rights in the member states of the Council of Europe. The first of these was in 2007, when the Court ruled in favor of Konstantin Kuznetsov and 102 other Witnesses in Kuznetsov and Others v. Russia. The Court found that local authorities had illegally disrupted a meeting of hearing impaired Witnesses in Cheliabinsk. Three years later, the Court again upheld the rights of Russian Witnesses in Jehovah’s Witnesses of Moscow v. Russia after the Moscow City Prosecutor’s Office banned the Watch Tower organization in the capital (Baran 2006). A third relevant ruling against Russia centered on Article 8 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (the European Convention on Human Rights), on the right to privacy. The Court ruled that city officials in St. Petersburg committed rights’ violations when they ordered the disclosure of confidential medical information about two Witness patients who refused a blood transfusion (Avilkina and Others v. Russia, 2013). A fourth case, Krupko and Others v. Russia (2014), resulted from a raid on a Memorial celebration in Moscow in 2006, when Witnesses were under ban in the city. Several Witnesses were detained. The Court found in favor of Jehovah’s Witnesses, awarding them money for damages and legal expenses (Knox 2019:141-43).

In 2002, the federal law “On Combatting Extremist Activity,” known simply as the “extremism law,” was introduced in response to terrorist attacks on Russian apartment buildings in 1999. Although ostensibly introduced to eliminate radicalism, Russian authorities used it to restrict the rights of oppositional or radical groups, secular and religious. Human rights activists and international observers widely criticized the law for its broad definition of extremism, which included anti-social views and offensive statements, even those without any violent content (Baran and Knox 2019; Verkhovsky 2009). In 2009, a Witness community in Taganrog was dissolved on the grounds that it was extremist, a decision upheld in the regional court at Rostov. In 2014, congregations in Samara and Abinsk were dissolved under the same pretext. The following year, numerous other regions followed suit, leading to a clear sense that the net was closing in on the national organization.

In 2017, the Russian Supreme Court banned the administrative body of Jehovah’s Witnesses under the extremism law. The federal case against Witnesses centered on statements made in Watch Tower literature rather than on Witness activities in Russia. The prosecution alleged that the organization’s claim that Witnesses are the sole bearers of Biblical truth denigrated the country’s traditional religious faiths. As a result, Watch Tower literature was added to the Federal List of Extremist Materials, a database of banned works maintained by the Ministry of Justice. The Watch Tower organization’s official web site (www.jw.org) is on the list and is blocked by Russian internet providers. Also in 2017, Russian federal prosecutors banned the New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures. It was declared extremist by a court in Vyborg, a ruling later upheld by the regional court.

The 2017 ruling effectively led to the liquidation of this religious community in Russia. It dissolved the Administrative Center of Jehovah’s Witnesses in Russia (the national headquarters) [Image at right] and all of the congregations registered under its auspices. The state confiscated the organization’s property. Authorities seized the national headquarters, a large property on the outskirts of St Petersburg. In addition to these legal moves against the organization, ordinary Witnesses have faced violence and intimidation across the country, from arson attacks on Kingdom Halls to loss of their jobs. Russian Witnesses are no longer able to legally meet, even in small groups in their own homes. Any evangelism is considered extremist activity and a criminal offense. Russian courts have charged some Witnesses with extremist activity for allegedly continuing organized religious activity after the ban went into effect. Some have been found guilty and sentenced to terms in labor camps. Witness activity is also forbidden in China, Egypt, North Korea, Saudi Arabia, Iran, and Iraq and in the former Soviet republics of Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, and Tajikistan. In this respect, the 2017 ruling aligns Russia with some of the world’s most repressive regimes (Knox 2019).

As of 2020, Witnesses continue to face persecution, imprisonment, and harassment across the country. The Watch Tower organization issues regular press releases on the sentencing of Russian Witnesses for practicing their faith, efforts to overturn the ban in the European Court of Human Rights, and the condemnation of the ruling by legal scholars, religious rights activists, and foreign governments (Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society 2020). Until the ban is lifted, Russian Witnesses will continue to operate underground, as they did in the Soviet period, directed by the worldwide headquarters and aided by an expansive network of resilient communities who have adjusted to these difficult circumstances.

IMAGES

Image #1: Charles Taze Russell.
Image #2: The former Jehovah’s Witness Kingdom Hall, Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, June 27, 2014.
Image #3: Russian translation of the New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures.
Image #4: The former Russian administrative centre of Jehovah’s Witnesses.

REFERENCES

Baran, Emily B. 2020. “Written Testimony on Religious Freedom in Russia and Central Asia.” U.S. Commission on International Religio.us Freedom.

Baran, Emily B. and Zoe Knox. 2019. “The 2002 Russian Anti-Extremism Law: An Introduction.” The Soviet and Post-Soviet Review 46:97-104.

Baran, Emily B. 2019. “From Sectarians to Extremists: The Language of Marginalization in Soviet and Post-Soviet Society.” The Soviet and Post-Soviet Review 46:105-27.

Baran, Emily B. 2014. Dissent on the Margins: How Soviet Jehovah’s Witnesses Defied Communism and Lived to Preach About It. New York: Oxford University Press.

Baran, Emily B. 2007. “Contested Victims: Jehovah’s Witnesses and the Russian Orthodox Church, 1990-2004.” Religion, State and Society 35:261-78.

Baran, Emily B. 2006. “Negotiating the Limits of Religious Pluralism in Post-Soviet Russia: The Anticult Movement in the Russian Orthodox Church, 1990-2004.” Russian Review 65:637-56.

Chryssides, George D. 2016. Jehovah’s Witnesses: Continuity and Change. London: Routledge.

Jehovah’s Witnesses: Proclaimers of God’s Kingdom. 1993. Brooklyn: Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York, Inc. and International Bible Students Association.

Knox, Zoe. 2019. “Jehovah’s Witnesses as Extremists: The Russian State, Religious Pluralism, and Human Rights.” The Soviet and Post-Soviet Review 46:128-57.

Knox, Zoe. 2018. Jehovah’s Witnesses and the Secular World: From the 1870s to the Present. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Knox, Zoe. 2012. “Preaching the Kingdom Message: The Jehovah’s Witnesses and Soviet Secularization.” Pp. 244-71 in State Secularism and Lived Religion in Soviet Russia and Ukraine, edited by Catherine Wanner. New York: Oxford University Press.

Odintsov, M. I. 2002. Sovet ministrov SSSR postanovliaet: “Vyselit’ navechno!” Moscow: Art-Biznes-Tsentr.

Neizvestnye stranitsy istorii: po materialam konferentsii “Uroki represii. 1991. Chita.

Ramet, Sabrina Petra. 1993. “Religious Policy in the Era of Gorbachev.” Pp. 31-52 in Religious Policy in the Soviet Union, edited by Sabrina Petra Ramet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Verkhovsky, Alexander. 2009. “Russian Approaches to Radicalism and ‘Extremism’ as Applied to Nationalism and Religion.” Pp. 26-43 in Russia and Islam: State, Society and Radicalism, edited by R. Dannreuther and L. March. London: Routledge.

Walters, Phillip. 1993. “A Survey of Soviet Religious Policy.” Pp. 3-30 in Religious Policy in the Soviet Union, edited by Sabrina Petra Ramet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society. 2020. “Russian Court Imposes Two-Year Suspended Sentence on Brother Konstantin Bazhenov, His Wife, and a 73-Year-Old Sister.” Official Website of Jehovah’s Witnesses, September 25. Accessed from https://www.jw.org/en/news/jw/region/russia/Russian-Court-Imposes-Two-Year-Suspended-Sentence-on-Brother-Konstantin-Bazhenov-His-Wife-and-a-73-Year-Old-Sister/ on 19 October 2020.

Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylvania. 2019. Organized to do Jehovah’s Will. Walkill, NY: Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylvania.

Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society. 2013. New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures. Brooklyn, NY: Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society.

Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society. 2013. “Should You Believe in the Trinity?” Awake!, August 13, pp. 2-3.

Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society. 2008. 2008 Yearbook of Jehovah’s Witnesses. Brooklyn, NY: Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York, Inc.

Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society. 2003. “Why Observe the Lord’s Evening Meal?” The Watchtower, February 15, pp. 12-16.

Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylvania. 1976. 1977 Yearbook of Jehovah’s Witnesses. New York City: Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of New York, Inc.

Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society. 1958. “Baptism.” The Watchtower, August 1, pp. 472-78.

Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society. 1953. “When Will God’s Kingdom Come?” The Watchtower, February 15, pp.113-26.

Witte Jr, John and Michael Bordeaux, eds. 1999. Proselytism and Orthodoxy in Russia: The New Wars for Souls. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis.

SUPPLEMENTARY RESOURCES

Berezhko, Konstantyn. 2005. Istoriia Svidkiv Egovy na Zhitomyrshchyni. Zhytomyr: Zhytomyrs’kyy Derzhavnyy Universytet im. Ivana Franka.

Chryssides, George D. 2019. Historical Dictionary of Jehovah’s Witnesses. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York.  2001. “Faithful under Trials: Jehovah’s Witnesses in the Soviet Union.” Brooklyn, NY: Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York.

Gazhos, V.F. 1969. Osobennosti ideologii iegovizma i religioznoe soznanie sektantov. Kishinev: Redaktsionno-izdatel’skii otdel akademii nauk Moldavskoi SSR.

Gol’ko, Oleg. 2007. Sibirskii marshrut. Third Edition. Moscow: Bibleist.

Gordienko, N.S. 2000. Rossiiskie Svideteli Iegovy: Istoriia i sovremennost. Saint Petersburg: Tipografiia pravda.

Iarotskii, P.L. 1981. Evoliutsiia sovremennogo Iegovizma. Kiev: Izdatel’stvo politicheskoi literatury Ukrainy.

Ivanenko, Sergei. 1999. O liudiakh, nikogda ne rasstaiushchikhsia s Bibliei. Moscow: Art-Biznes-Tsentr.

Ivanenko, Sergei. 2002. Svideteli Iegovy: Traditsionnaia dlia Rossii religioznaia organizatsiia Moscow: Art-Biznes-Tsentr.

Knox, Zoe. 2020. “Russian Religious Life in the Soviet Era.” Pp. 60-75 in Oxford Handbook of Russian Religious Thought, edited by Caryl Emerson, George Pattison, and Randall A. Poole. London: Oxford University Press.

Moskalenko, A.T. 1961. Sekta iegovistov i ee reaktsionnaia sushchnost. Moscow: Vyshaia shkola.

Pasat, V.I. 1994. Trudnye stranitsy istorii Moldovy. Moscow: Terra.

Rurak, Pavel. 2008. Tri aresta za istinu. L’viv: Piramida.

Publication Date:
15 November 2020

 

 

Share

Ballinspittle

 

BALLINSPITTLE TIMELINE

1985 (July 22):  A group of five people who stopped to pray at the Ballinspittle grotto claimed to have seen the statue of Our Lady breathing and or moving to and fro.

1985 (July 24):  A police sergeant went to check out possible statue movements and reported that he saw the statue move vigorously.

1985 (July 25):  The Cork Examiner reported that “hundreds” were now praying at the Ballinspittle grotto.

1985 (July 31):  The Bishop of Cork and Ross, issued a statement urging restraint on the part of visitors to the grotto.

1985 (August 1):  Catherine (“Kathy”) O’Mahony and the Ballinspittle apparition were featured on a primetime television news broadcast.

1985 (August 2):  A Cork city newspaper estimated the number of people gathering at the Ballinspittle grotto each evening to be around 10,000.

1985 (August 15):  Police estimated the number of people who gathered at the grotto for the Feast of the Assumption was 15,000.

1985 (September 18):  A national newspaper reported claims that a deaf woman was “cured at statue” in Ballinspittle.

1985 (October 8):  It was estimated in the press that since the time of the first reports of the Ballinspittle apparition the grotto had received 600,000 visitors.

1985 (October 31):  The statue erected at the site was attacked and damaged.

1985 (November 8):  The repaired statue was returned to the grotto

1985:  The number of pilgrims attending the site had begun dwindling toward the end of the summer school holidays and decreased further with the coming of winter.

Post 1985:  The numbers attending in the years after 1985 rarely reached more than 100.

2015:  There was renewed interest in the events at Ballinspittle on the thirtieth anniversary of the 1985 events.

FOUNDER/GROUP HISTORY

There is a long history of divine apparitions in Ireland. In the second half of the twentieth century, for example, local people told of claims of “moving statues” similar to those that would be made later at Ballinspittle. [Image at right] For example, such reports were made by two priests in the early 1970s; by two children in 1981 and 1982; by a cousin of Catherine O’Mahony in 1982; and in 1983 by two of the girls at the centre of the 1985 claims, Helen and Claire O’Mahony (Ryan and Kirakowski 1985:11).

There were numerous apparitions associated with the Marian shrines that were established in many parishes to celebrate the Marian Year of 1954. It has been estimated that there were about thirty such occurrences, many centering around the Virgin Mary, but some that involved other saints as well.

Some observers (Mulholland 2009, 2011) have connected this series of apparitional  events to conditions in Ireland during this time (Quinlan 2019):

The summer of 1985 was an unusually difficult one for Ireland — 329 people were killed in the Air India disaster in July when an airplane was blown up by a bomb crashing into the Atlantic Ocean while in Irish airspace. Meanwhile Ireland was in the midst of a crushing economic recession. High unemployment figures and mass emigration left families and communities struggling, while traditional church teachings were being challenged as the divorce and abortion referendums were contested.

The Marian grotto in Ballinspittle was one of the most prominent apparitional events of this time. In 1985, claims of an apparition at that site attracted so many visitors that it “looked set to become Ireland’s second national Marian shrine” (Allen 2014:227). However, though it also attracted a great deal of national and international media attention, the Ballinspittle apparition was just one in a spate of similar apparition claims from numerous other locations that collectively soon came to be known as the “moving statues.”

The group that claimed to see the Ballinspittle statue move on July 22, 1985, was comprised of Christopher Daly and his wife “Pat” along with their sons John and Michael and their neighbour Catherine (‘Kathy’) O’Mahony and her two daughters, Helen and Claire. [Image at right] Two years before that, in 1983, Helen and Claire had made a similar claim.

The events of July 22, 1985 began when seventeen-year-old Claire was overheard telling John Daly that the statue was moving. When John responded saying that he could see it moving, Catherine O’Mahony and the rest of the group said they could also see it moving. They told some passers-by who also saw it move or change in some way. Word spread, and later that night about thirty other people claimed to see some kind of movement, a transformation or a change in the statue’s appearance (Ryan and Kirakowski 1985:10-13).

On approximately July 24, a police sergeant from the locality visited the site and reported that he too saw the statue move with such vigour that he feared it would topple over. Sergeant Sean Murray is said to have added greatly to the credibility and increased the attention of the public’ (Ryan and Kirakowski 1985:15). The following day The Cork Examiner carried a front-page story reporting that “hundreds” were now praying at the Ballinspittle grotto. [Image at right]

In the first days of August media coverage of the Ballinspittle apparition intensified. Catherine O’Mahony and the Ballinspittle apparition were featured on primetime television news broadcast. A newspaper in Cork estimated daily visitation to the grotto to be around 10,000.

The site gained additional visibility in September when a media report claimed that a “deaf woman” had been healed. In early October, it was estimated in the press that total visitation at the site was around 600,000. The statue at the site was attacked by men armed with an axe and hammer and supported by another man who took photographs and accused the gathering of idolatry. Repairs to the statue were made rapidly, and it was repositioned at the grotto. [Image at right]

The auspicious beginning of the Ballinspittle apparition site did not last, however. Toward the end of the summer school holidays, visitation began to decline. Further declines occurred with the arrival of the winter months. Visitation rates never rebounded and subsequent daily visitation numbers rarely exceeded 100. There was renewed interest in the events at Ballinspittle in 2015 on the thirtieth anniversary of the 1985 events, with prayers and processions taking place for a week (Egan 2015).

DOCTRINES/BELIEFS

All of the moving statue visionaries, their supporters, and the vast majority of those who visited the apparition sites were brought up in the Roman Catholic faith. So, it is reasonable to assume that the great majority of them believed in the core doctrines of the Catholic Church. Belief in the possibility of divine intervention was fundamental to that belief system, and the moving statue visionaries and pilgrims were familiar with the apparition stories from Knock, Lourdes, Fatima and Medjugorje. Some pilgrims also believed in the possibility of miraculous cures, and Catholic Church officials like Bishop Michael Murphy were careful not to disparage such beliefs when advising “extreme caution” regarding the claims of the Ballinspittle and other visionaries (The Cork Examiner, July 31, 1985).

Each Marian shrine has a vernacular theology of its own, which devotees situate into the wider theology of the Catholic Church; that is to say that the theologies of these shrines are hybrids of vernacular and institutional beliefs and doctrines. The devotional poetry and prayers reflect the vernacular theology the shrine’s devotees create (Beesley 2000; Sigal 2005; Morgan 2010; Wojcik 1996). This is exemplified in a prayer recited by the grotto committee after the recitation of the rosary at the grotto. It is simply known as “Evening prayer.” The opening lines immediately capture the beliefs about the moving statue and the Ballinspittle Madonna teased out above:

Night is falling dear Mother, the long day is o’er And before your loved image I’m kneeling once more,To thank you for keeping me safe thro’ the day,To ask you this night to keep evil away (Grotto Committees 2015:59)

There are continuing experiences of a moving statue at Ballinspittle, although they are few in number and no longer draw significant media coverage (Allen 2015: 93).

Some of the visionaries and some of the pilgrims at the Ballinspittle grotto may have received divine messages of a personal nature, but none of them claimed to have received any kind of prophetic message or warning for relaying to the faithful or to the world at large. However, some people interpreted the actual apparitions as being a message in and of themselves. As the grotto committee [Image at right] put it in their 2015 booklet: ‘Many believe that it was a call and invitation to prayer and most especially to pray the Rosary for peace and harmony in the world’ (2015: 52). Hence, in a chapter headed “The Message of Ballinspittle Grotto” the committee explained its own raison d’être as being to “spread devotion to Our blessed lady” (2015: 53). But closer to the time of the 1985 apparitions other meanings were being offered up. For example, as Ryan and Kirakowski noted, on August 23 the Cork Examiner published a letter from a woman who claimed to have seen the Ballinspittle statue moving and who interpreted it as being Our Lady calling ”her children from sin to save their immortal souls” and as a warning against “The rejection of the Blessed Virgin by the atheist mods…”. Then, on August 26, Time Magazine quoted the Ballinspittle post mistress, Marie Collins, as having explained the apparitions as being “a sign to prepare us for the end of the world”  (Ryan and Kirakowski 1985:23, 30). It should be noted, however, that warnings of an impending global catastrophe had been issued by a couple of youthful visionaries at the Mount Melleray grotto over a week before, on August 16, 1985 (Allen 2014:123-24).

ORGANIZATION/LEADERSHIP

The idea of building the grotto that later became the site of moving statues began at a meeting of the Pioneer Total Abstinence Association in February, 1954. A group of parishioners chose a suitable site, and a week later three of them sought permission from the parish priest to go ahead with the work at Sand Cross, Dromdough. The site was chosen for its picturesque setting and because it had a natural rock face reminiscent of the grotto in Lourdes. [Image at right] The site was donated by Denis O’Leary. According to the Grotto Committee book, part of the hilly field across the road from the grotto was “acquired” in 1985 from Michael McCarthy, so as to accommodate the large crowds. A cabin also was erected that was used to house the public address system and served a venue for committee meetings (Grotto Committee book 2015:6-8)

As word of the 1985 apparitions drew ever-increasing crowds to the site, the 1982 committee called elections, and with Brendan Murphy as chairman the new committee took charge of organizing the crowds. They also reorganized the committee, and Fr Tom Kelleher replaced Fr Kieran Twomey CC as their spiritual director. By then the committee had around 100 other volunteers (Ballinspittle Grotto & The Moving Statue 2015:71, 74). Under the committee’s guidance, those volunteers helped organize vigils and had the assistance of the Garda traffic corps and the Red Cross while Denis O’Reilly, who helped to build the grotto back in 1954, used his position as a county councilor to lobby for road and other infrastructural improvements around the site (Ryan and Kirakowski 1985:10, 17, 18).

ISSUES/CHALLENGES

From its inception, Ballinspittle faced several external sources of challenge that impacted its development and sustainability. The most important of these were competition from other Marian sites, opposition from various media sources, and opposition from Roman Catholic officials.

The 1982 committee produced a booklet containing witness testimonies as part of a campaign to have church authorities officially recognise the grotto as a place of pilgrimage (Ryan and Kirakowski 1985:17; Allen 2014:108). However, the Ballinspittle site falls within the organizational jurisdiction of the Bishops of Cork, and it has withheld any affirmation that it is a place where the Virgin Mary appeared. In the absence of official legitimation, the committee has adopted a more traditionalist stance, promoting recitation of the rosary at the grotto and by families in their homes (Allen 2015:108).

The grotto, however, remains a place where cherished practices no longer hailed by the church find a home and are readily promoted by the grotto committee. They are especially desirous to promote the family rosary, placing signs at the grotto to encourage people to recite it in their homes. The issue of agency arises out of this, and that issue has led to disputes between the committee and the local clergy in the past. The priest and the committee differ in opinions regarding the benefits of prayer at the local shrine and the intercession of Mary. For the church the grotto acts as a secondary shrine, but for the committee and pilgrims the apparitions have elevated its significance and, for some, it has become a place where the divine can be experienced without priestly intermediaries. And therein lays the crux of the problem for the clergy. If people can directly see and invoke Mary’s agency at the local grotto, then the priest’s agency becomes a lesser and secondary one at best. Media coverage of those differences ensured that they were widely known. For example, on August 16, 1985, a national newspaper reported that a priest in Ballinspittle parish had insisted that local clergy were not in any way involved in what was happening at the grotto (The Irish Press). There is also another worry for the clergy concerning what is and is not acceptable in Catholic orthodoxy and how this can be threatened and at the times flouted at the grotto, at least from the vantage point of the clergy (Allen 2015:113). These differences notwithstanding, the fact that both the 1985 and the 2015 committees had/have a priest as a “spiritual adviser” demonstrates the committees’ willingness to conform to Catholic orthodoxy.

Along with resistance from local clergy and the Catholic hierarchy, those who strove to promote the Ballinspittle grotto also had to deal with local scepticism, competing claims, and being ridiculed in the media where the economic benefits of large numbers of pilgrims was often mentioned (“The Moving Statue” n.d.). These were the main challenges facing the Ballinspittle grotto committee’s attempts to garner lay and religious support for their goal of turning the shrine into an officially recognized place of pilgrimage.

Incredulity and scepticism regarding the moving statues was evident in press reports about the phenomenon, even from those associated with the site. For example, one of the original Ballinspittle seers, the grotto committee’s assistant secretary Kathy O’Mahony, is said to have “remained puzzled as to why people willingly accepted” the apparition claims (Allen 2014:75). Another woman who had a visionary experience at the Ballinspittle grotto “was very sceptical of the phenomenon and remains so despite what she has seen and experienced” (Allen 2014: 92).

The Ballinspittle claims also affected the way in which other apparition claims were received. For example, a mother of one of the children who claimed an apparition at Rossmore grotto on August 5, 1985, is reported to have said “It was just after Ballinspittle, and we thought they were having a laugh at the locals. No way did we believe it at all” (Allen 2000:349).

Media coverage of claims emanating from some apparition sites may also have sowed doubt and confusion amongst believers. For example, on September 16, 1985, The Irish Press reported that some people had claimed to see images of the devil at a Marian shrine in Mitchelstown, Co Cork. And on August 23, 1986 The Cork Examiner reported that two priests had carried out an exorcism at a grotto near Inchigeela. Such reports undermined the credibility of apparition claims and supported perceptions of them as involving some “hysteria” (see Allen 2014: 3, 222-25, 233-36, 249).

Furthermore, when interviewed by the media and or researchers investigating the apparitions, people attending the various shrines offered alternative interpretive filters. Some offered religious explanations, and others tended towards rational explanations. Those offering rational  explanations sometimes mixed them with sociological theories, such as their being a “sign of the times” or a reaction to moral decline or the secularisation of Irish society.  Some interpreted them as being a reaction to the changes wrought by Vatican II, using them to criticize Vatican II and argue for theological changes. For example, in 1986, The Furrow published a paper in which Fr Joseph O’Leary held that the apparitions were a delayed reaction to the reforms of the Second Vatican Council and suggested that the whole phenomenon revealed “gaps in the theology of the institutional Church” (O’Leary 1986). As a clerical columnist with one of the two national Sunday newspapers explained them, the moving statues and related phenomenon reflected a widespread desire for “genuine spiritual experiences” and “having their emotions charged by a bit of liturgy with life in it” (See, Mulholland 2019:319).

Though the committee’s “spiritual adviser,” Fr Kelleher, was determined to dampen enthusiasm for the apparitions and thought Church officials advised caution or skepticism regarding all apparition claims (Allen 2016:109; Salazar 2008:245), television footage from the time shows that some religious personnel did participate in ritual activities at certain apparition sites. However, with reports of 10,000 people attending the Ballinspittle grotto each evening and with the proliferation of apparition claims being accompanied by increasing levels of ridicule in the media, some of the less sympathetic or indulgent clerics spoke out and took action. For example, on August 9, 1985, The Irish Press reported that some “witnesses” had been told to “shun publicity” and that a priest had told mass-goers in Asdee “that it is only those who have a weak faith that look for signs” (See. Allen 2008:358; Allen 2014:82-84, 109; Salazar 2008:242; Ryan and Kirakowski 1985:79; Vose1986:71).

The reports of a ”Scary Mary” at the Ballinspittle grotto and of devilish intrusions or satanic apparitions at other locations [Image at right] inspired fear and a “deep seated anger and disgust” amongst some erstwhile enthusiasts (Allen 2014:93-94). Reports of priests carrying out “an unapproved exorcism” at the Inchigeela shrine also caused some consternation amongst enthusiasts and drew criticism from Bishop Michael Murphy.

The Grotto Committee was well aware of the reduced but “steady trickle of pilgrims and visitors.” In the 2015 Committee Book, the authors asked: “So is the grotto at Ballinspittle and the events that took place there in 1985, still relevant in our modern, secular and materialistic society?” Their response captures their understanding of the grotto’s historical and contemporary relevance:

In an interview with Leo McMahon of the Southern Star in the year 2010, Sean Murray, then chairperson of the grotto committee said that “the legacy of the grotto continues to be Mary’s call for prayer and living the Gospel. “We do not dwell nor retract nor apologise for what took place”. That statement still holds true on the 30th anniversary of the Moving Statue. Ballinspittle is not embarrassed or ashamed of what happened in 1985. Sean is also convinced that “Our Lady was deeply concerned about what was happening in the Church at that time”. The tsunami of revelations of major scandals within the Church which have come to light in recent years has rocked the institution to its very core. Attendances at Mass and the sacraments have dwindled drastically and our society becomes more and more secular and materialistic. “In a passage from Scripture” he said “ Jesus felt the need to go to a lonely place to pray and reflect and over two millennia later many Christians feel the urge to do the same and places such as Ballinspittle grotto provide peace, healing and comfort”. (2015: 66)

IMAGES

Image #1: The statue in the grotto at Ballinspittle. The halo of 12 stars that was added to the statue in 1956
Image #2: Claire and Helen O’Mahony. Ballinspittle Grotto & The Moving Statue, p. 10. Credit Eddie O’Hare, Evening Echo.
Image #3: Pilgrims gathered at Ballinspittle in 1985.
Image #4:The damaged statue.
Image #5: The 2015 Grotto Committee.
Image #6: The Ballinspittle grotto, 1984. Photo credit, John McCarthy.
Image #7: A press report of images of the devil in Inchigeela in 1986.

REFERENCES

Allen, Michael.  2012. “From Men to Women to Children: Some Changing Paradigms in the Anthropological Understanding of Religion.” AntropoChildren. Accessed from https://popups.uliege.be/2034-8517/index.php?id=1499&file=1&pid=1347 on 10 November 2020.

Allen, Michael. 2000. Ritual, Power and Gender: Explorations in the Ethnography of Vanuata, Nepal and Ireland. New Delhi: Manohar.

Allen, William. 2014. “A nation preferring visions: Moving Statues, Apparitions and Vernacular Religion in Contemporary Ireland.” PhD Thesis, National University of Ireland, Cork.

Ballinspittle Grotto Committee. 2015. Ballinspittle Grotto & The Moving Statue. Waterford, Ireland: DVF Print & Graphic Solutions.

Beesley Arthur. 2000. “Ross finds religious belief a solace in troubled times.” The Irish Times March 4. 2000. p. 19.

Cluskey, Jim. 1985. “Hundreds pray before ‘moving’ statue’.’’ The Cork Examiner, July 25, p. 1

Collins, Dan and Mark Hennessy. 1986. “Priests exorcises shrine of ‘Devil’s Shadow’.’’ The Cork Examiner, August 23.

Egan, Casey. 2015. “Crowds Still Flock to Moving Virgin Mary Statue at Ballinspittle Three Decades On.” Irish Central, July 23. https://www.irishcentral.com/culture/craic/crowds-still-flock-to-moving-virgin-mary-statue-at-ballinspittle-three-decades-on-video Accessed 20 July 2020.

Kirakowski, Jurek and Tim Ryan. 2014. Ballinspittle: Moving Statues and Faith. Cork and Dublin: Mercier Press.

“Moving Statues.” 1985. The Irish Press, September 16, p. 1.

Mulholland, Peter. 2011. “Marian Apparitions, the New Age, and the FÁS Prophet.” Pp. 176-200 in Ireland’s New Religious Movements, edited by Olivia Cosgrove, Laurence Cox, Carmen Kuhling and Peter Mulholland. Newcastle upon Tyne: Scholars Publishing.

Mulholland, Peter. 2009. “Moving Statues and Concrete Thinking.” Accessed from  http://mural.maynoothuniversity.ie/1919/1/PMMoving_Statues.pdf on 10 November 2020.

O’Leary, Joseph. 1986. “Thoughts After Ballinspittle.” The Furrow 37:285-94. Accessed from https://www.jstor.org/stable/i27678262 on 10 November 2020.

Power, Vincent. 1985. “‘Moving’ statue: Bishop urges caution.” The Cork Examiner, July 31, p. 1.

Salazar, Carles. 2008. “Meaning, cognition and intersubjectivity in the experience of a religious event.” Emerging Theories and Practices in Anthropology of Religion. Accessed from  https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/libro?codigo=397206 on 10 November 2020.

Sigal, Pierre André. 2005. “Pilgrimage: Roman Catholic Pilgrimage in Europe.” In The Encyclopaedia of Religion, Second Edition. edited by Lindsay Jones. Detroit; Macmillan Reference.

7148291  Lindsay Jones (ed.) (ed.)2nded. vol. 10

Morgan, David. 2010.  “Introduction.” Religion and Material Culture:: The Matter of Belief. Oxon: Routledge.

Quinlan, Áilin Stranger things: Looking back at the year the statues. 2019. Irish Examiner, April 10. Accessed from https://www.irishexaminer.com/lifestyle/arid-30916794.html on 10 November 2020.

“The moving statue of Ballinspittle grotto (Ireland 1985).” Accessed from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kZjM83wZmWw on 15 November 2020.

Vose, John D. 1986. The Statues that Moved a Nation. Cornwall: United Writers.

Wojick, Daniel. 1996. “Polaroids from Heaven: Photography, Folk Religion, and the Miraculous Image Tradition at a Marian Apparition Site.” The Journal of American Folklore 109:129-48.

 

Share