Jihadism

The Jihadism Special Project offers a range of materials on armed jihad by fundamentalist Islamic groups. This tradition extends back to at least the nineteenth century, but primary emphasis on this site is to contemporary jihad. Materials offered on this site include primary source documents authored by jihadist groups, profiles of jihadist groups, scholarly papers on jihadism, reactions to
jihadism, and media reports on jihadism.

Project Directors:
Jean Rosenfeld
Charles Cameron

JIHADIST TEXTS

CONTEXTUAL INTERPRETATIONS OF JIHAD

READINGS

 

MAJOR ARTICLES

JIHADIST MAGAZINES AND COMMENTARY

WEB RESOURCES

VIDEO RESOURCES

NEWS MEDIA REPORTS

 

AZAN MAGAZINE

A Call to Jihad,” Issue 1, March 2013.

COMMENTARY ON AZAN MAGAZINE

Charles Cameron, “Early notes on the first issue of the jihadist magazine, Azan”


DABIQ

Islamic State. DABIQ, Issue 1. The Return of Khilafah
     Post Date: 9/14/2014
     DABIQ is an official public relations publication of the Islamic State

Islamic State. DABIQ, Issue 2. The Flood
     Post Date: 9/14/2014
     DABIQ is an official public relations publication of the Islamic State

Islamic State. DABIQ, Issue 3. A Call to Jijrah
Post Date: 9/14/2014
     DABIQ is an official public relations publication of the Islamic State

Islamic State. DABIQ, Issue 4. The Failed Crusade
     Post Date: 1/14/2015
     DABIQ is an official public relations publication of the Islamic State

     Islamic State. DABIQ, Issue 5. Remaining and Expanding
Post Date: 1/14/2015
     DABIQ is an official public relations publication of the Islamic State

     Islamic State. DABIQ, Issue 6. Al-Qa’idah of Waziristan
Post Date: 1/14/2015
     DABIQ is an official public relations publication of the Islamic State
  

   Islamic State, “Email to the Family of James Foley
Post Date: 9/1/2014

COMMENTARY ON DABIQ

Jean Rosenfeld, Notes on DABIQ , The Online Journal of the IS
Post Date: 9/15/2014

 Charles Cameron, Notes on Dabiq, Issue 3, Part 1
Post Date 9/24/2014

DOCUMENTS ON THE HISTORY OF JIHADISM

Abu Bakr Naji, “The Management of Savagery: The Most Critical Stage
Through Which the Umma Will Pass
” (Translation by William McCants)
Funding for this translation was provided by the John M. Olin Institute for
Strategic Studies at Harvard University.

Al-Qa’ida Organization Addresses a Message to Iraqi, Islamic Peoples
Post Date: 9/19/2014

 “Biography of Sheikh Abdullah Azzam
Post Date: 9/17/2014
Jean Rosenfeld, “Notes on Abdullah Azzam
Post Date: 9/17/2014

     “Defence of Muslim Lands: The First Obligation After Iman
Post Date: 9/17/2014

JIHADISM ARTICLES/PAPERS BY ACADEMIC SCHOLARS

Charles Cameron, “Islamic Eschatology
Post Date: 9/1/2014

      Jeffrey T. Kenney, Muslim Rebels Kharijites and the Politics of Extremism in Egypt
Post Date: 2/7/2015

David Rapoport, “The Four Waves of Rebel Terror and September 11
Post Date: 9/1/2014

     Jean Rosenfeld, “Fire in the Garden: The Religion of bin Laden.”
Post Date: 9/1/2014

Jean Rosenfeld, “Holy Terror: Al Qai’da and Other Fundamentalisms.”
Post Date: 9/1/2014

      Phillip Smyth, “The Shite Jihad in Syria and its Regional Effects.”
The Washington Institute for Near East Policy, 2015
Post Date: 2/7/2015

RESPONSES TO JIHADISM BY CLERICS AND SCHOLARS

     Abdallah bin Bayyah, “This is Not the Path to Paradise

Fatwa on the So-Called ‘Islamic State’ (Formerly ‘Islamic State in Iraq & Syria’)

MEDIA REPORTS

The Middle East is full of ancient, mysterious religious sects. The Islamic State is wiping them out.”
Gerard Russell,  Washington Post, January 9, 2015.
     http://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2015/01/09/the-middle-east-is-full-
of-ancient-mysterious-religious-sects-the-islamic-state-is-wiping-them-out/

Contributor: WRSP

     “Author’s journey inside ISIS: They’re ‘more dangerous than people realize‘.”
Frederik Pleitgen, CNN, December 25, 2014
     http://www.edition.cnn.com/2014/12/22/world/meast/inside-isis-juergen-
todenhoefer/index.html?hpt=hp_c5
     Contributor: Jean Rosenfeld

     “Islamic Islamic State recruits broadly, not just fighters
Eric Tucker and Sadie Gurman, Associated Press, December 16, 2014
     http://bigstory.ap.org/article/81f6edb84a924937a81c3bdc75eeb577/islamic-state-recruits-broadly-not-just-
fighters
     Contributor: WRSP

     “Denver Emerges As Model For Countering ISIS Recruiting Tactics”
     Dina Temple-Raston, NPR, December 11, 2014
     http://www.npr.org/2014/12/11/370156282/denver-emerges-as-model-for-countering-isis-recruiting-tactics
     Contributor: WRSP

     “Three American teens, recruited online, are caught trying to join the Islamic State
Kevin Sullivan, Washington Post, December 8, 2014
     http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/three-american-teens-recruited-online-are-
caught-trying-to-join-the-islamic-state/2014/12/08/8022e6c4-7afb-11e4-84d4-
7c896b90abdc_story.html?hpid=z1

Contributor: WRSP

     “The Roots of the Islamic State’s Appeal”
Shadi Hamid, The Atlantic, October 31, 2014
     http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2014/10/the-roots-of-the-islamic-states-
appeal/382175/?single_page=true

Contributor: WRSP

     “Radicalization : Why do Western youth join extremist groups?”
Marian Scott, Montreal Gazette, October 23, 2014
     http://montrealgazette.com/news/local-news/radicalization-why-do-western-youth-join-extremist-groups
Contributor: WRSP

     “Parents of extremists urged to come out of shadows and help fight radicalization”
Douglas Quan, Montreal Gazette, October 23, 2013
     http://www.montrealgazette.com/news/national/Parents+extremists+urged+come+shadows+help+fight
/10322562/story.html
     Contributor: WRSP

     “New Freedoms in Tunisia Drive Support for ISIS”
David Kirkpatrick, New York Times, October 21, 2014
     http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/22/world/africa/new-freedoms-in-tunisia-drive-support-for-
isis.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&version=HpSum&module=first-column-region&region=top-
news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=1

     “Denmark tries a soft-handed approach to returned Islamist fighters
Anthony Faiola and Souad Mekhennet, Washington Post, October 19, 2014
     http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/denmark-tries-a-soft-handed-approach-to-returned-
islamist-fighters/2014/10/19/3516e8f3-515e-4adc-a2cb-c0261dd7dd4a_story.html

     “Joining Islamic State is about ‘sex and agression,’ not religion”
     Arie W. Kruglanski, Reuters, October 16, 2014
     http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2014/10/16/joining-islamic-state-is-about-sex-and-aggression-not-
religion/

    “How 2 French girls were lured to jihad online”
Lori Hinnant, Associated Press, October 10, 2014
     http://bigstory.ap.org/article/017703d2f69141c39996d868a456d7e1/how-2-french-girls-were-lured-jihad-      online

“Families torn apart as young Western women join jihadist cause
     Nicholas Vinocur and Pauline Mevel, Reuters, October 9, 2014
     http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/10/09/us-mideast-crisis-girls-insight-idUSKCN0HY0RA20141009

     “How to talk to terrorists
Jonathan Powell, The Guardian, October 7, 2014
     http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/oct/07/-sp-how-to-talk-to-terrorists-isis-al-      aida?CMP=ema_565#comment-41917012

     “American explains why he’s fighting ISIL”
Sophie Cousins, USA TODAY, October 7, 2014
     http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2014/10/06/jordan-matson-joins-kurds-against-islamic-
state/16796487/

     “Prominent Muslim Sheik Issues Fatwa Against ISIS Violence
Dina Temple-Raston, NPR, September 25, 2014
http://www.npr.org/2014/09/25/351277631/prominent-muslim-sheikh-issues-fatwa-against-isis-
violence?utm_medium=RSS&utm_campaign=news

     “ISIS’ Harsh Brand of Islam Is Rooted in Austere Saudi Creed”
David Kirkpatrick, New York Times, September 24, 2014
     http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/25/world/middleeast/isis-abu-bakr-baghdadi-caliph-wahhabi.html

     British Muslims Release Fearless Message to ISIS Members Who Use Religion as an Excuse for Violence
     Kevin Boyd, Independent Journal Review, September 17, 2014
http://www.ijreview.com/2014/09/173312-british-muslim-leaders-denounce-isis-heretics-muslims-religious-
duty-oppose/

     “Saudi clerics declare Isis terrorism a ‘heinous crime’ under sharia law
Ian Black, The Guardian, September 17, 2014
     http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/sep/17/saudi-clerics-fatwa-declares-terrorism-heinous-crime-
sharia-law

     “The apocalyptic magazine the Islamic State uses to recruit and radicalize foreigners”
     Terrence McCoy, Washington Post, September 16, 2014
     http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2014/09/16/the-apocalyptic-magazine-the-islamic-
state-uses-to-recruit-and-radicalize-foreigners/?tid=hp_mm&hpid=z3


     “ISIS Starts Recruiting in Istanbul’s Vulnerable Suburbs”
     Alev Scott and Alexander Christie-Miller, Newsweek, September 12, 2014
     http://www.newsweek.com/2014/09/19/exclusive-how-istanbul-became-recruiting-ground-islamic-state-
269247.html

     “Why Muslims fare better in America than in Europe
Economist, September 6, 2014
     http://www.economist.com/news/united-states/21615611-why-muslims-fare-better-america-europe-islamic-
yet-integrated

     “ISIS vs. mainstream Muslims: The media war”
     Daniel Burke, CNN, September 4, 2014
http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/2014/09/04/isis-vs-mainstream-muslims-the-media-battle/

     “It ain’t half hot here, mum: Why and how Westerners go to fight in Syria and Iraq”
     Sarah Birke, The Economist, August 30, 2014
     http://www.economist.com/news/middle-east-and-africa/21614226-why-and-how-westerners-go-fight-syria-
and-iraq-it-aint-half-hot-here-mum

     “Inside the Mind of the Western Jihadist”
     Sohrab Ahmari, Wall Street Journal, August 29, 2014
     http://online.wsj.com/articles/sohrab-ahmari-inside-the-mind-of-the-western-jihadist-1409352541

     “Western military intervention is what ISIS wants”
     Andrea Tornielli, Vatican Insider, August 26, 2014
     http://vaticaninsider.lastampa.it/en/inquiries-and-interviews/detail/articolo/iraq-irak-introvigne-35980/

     “Islamic State Recruits Are Young, Angry And Rebellious, But Are They Actually Religious?
Jessica Elgot, The Huffington Post, August 22, 2014
     http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2014/08/21/isis-recruits-are-young-angry-and-rebellious-but-are-they-
actually-religious_n_5697744.html

     “ISIS Email To Family Of Executed American Journalist James Foley Revealed”
     Andrew Hart, The Huffington Post, August 21, 2014
     http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/regions/middle-east/syria/140821/text-last-email-islamic-state-
sent-foley-family

WEBSITES OFFERING ADDITIONAL RESOURCES

The Quranic Arabic Corpus
This site offers an English Translation of the Holy Quran and was established by the Language Research Group at the University of Leeds.

Center for Muslim-Jewish Engagement
This site offers Aa collection of the Hadith. The Center is a partnership between the Hebrew Union College-Jewish Institute of Religion, Omar Ibn Al Khattab Foundation, & USC Center for Religion and Civic Culture.

Combatting Terrorism Center, U.S. Military Academy
Among the resources offered by CTC is: Nelly Lahoud, Stuart Caudill, Liam Collins, Gabriel Koehler-Derrick, Don Rassler, and Muhammad al-`Ubaydi, Letters from Abbottabad: Bin Ladin Sidelined?”

Jihadology
One of the foremost sites for jihad-related source material in both Arabic and English.

 

Share

Jihadiist Magazines



]]>]]>]]>]]>]]>]]>

JIHADIST MAGAZINES AND COMMENTARY


AZAN MAGAZINE

     “A Call to Jihad,” Issue 1, March 2013.

COMMENTARY ON AZAN MAGAZINE

     Charles Cameron, “Early notes on the first issue of the jihadist magazine, Azan”


DABIQ

     Islamic State. DABIQ, Issue 1. The Return of Khilafah
     Post Date: 9/14/2014
     DABIQ is an official public relations publication of the Islamic State
 
     Islamic State. DABIQ, Issue 2. The Flood
     Post Date: 9/14/2014
     DABIQ is an official public relations publication of the Islamic State

     Islamic State. DABIQ, Issue 3. A Call to Jijrah
     Post Date: 9/14/2014
     DABIQ is an official public relations publication of the Islamic State

     Islamic State. DABIQ, Issue 4. The Failed Crusade
     Post Date: 1/14/2015
     DABIQ is an official public relations publication of the Islamic State

     Islamic State. DABIQ, Issue 5. Remaining and Expanding
     Post Date: 1/14/2015
     DABIQ is an official public relations publication of the Islamic State

     Islamic State. DABIQ, Issue 6. Al-Qa’idah of Waziristan
     Post Date: 1/14/2015
     DABIQ is an official public relations publication of the Islamic State

COMMENTARY ON DABIQ

     Jean Rosenfeld, Notes on DABIQ , The Online Journal of the IS
     Post Date: 9/15/2014

     Charles Cameron, Notes on Dabiq, Issue 3, Part 1
     Post Date 9/24/2014

Home | About Us |Partnerships |Profiles |Resources |WRSP Authors |Donate |Contact
Copyright © 2016 World Religions & Spirituality Project• All Rights Reserved

Web Design by Luke Alexander

Share

News Media Reports



]]>]]>]]>]]>]]>]]>

NEWS MEDIA REPORTS


     “The Middle East is full of ancient, mysterious religious sects. The Islamic State is wiping them out.”
     Gerard Russell,  Washington Post, January 9, 2015.
     http://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2015/01/09/the-middle-east-is-full-
     of-ancient-mysterious-religious-sects-the-islamic-state-is-wiping-them-out/

     “Author’s journey inside ISIS: They’re ‘more dangerous than people realize‘.”
     Frederik Pleitgen, CNN, December 25, 2014
     http://www.edition.cnn.com/2014/12/22/world/meast/inside-isis-juergen-
      todenhoefer/index.html?hpt=hp_c5
      

     “Islamic Islamic State recruits broadly, not just fighters
     Eric Tucker and Sadie Gurman, Associated Press, December 16, 2014
     http://bigstory.ap.org/article/81f6edb84a924937a81c3bdc75eeb577/islamic-state-recruits-broadly-not-just-
     fighters

     “Denver Emerges As Model For Countering ISIS Recruiting Tactics”
     Dina Temple-Raston, NPR, December 11, 2014
     http://www.npr.org/2014/12/11/370156282/denver-emerges-as-model-for-countering-isis-recruiting-tactics

     “Three American teens, recruited online, are caught trying to join the Islamic State
     Kevin Sullivan, Washington Post, December 8, 2014
     http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/three-american-teens-recruited-online-are-
     caught-trying-to-join-the-islamic-state/2014/12/08/8022e6c4-7afb-11e4-84d4-
     7c896b90abdc_story.html?hpid=z1

     “The Roots of the Islamic State’s Appeal”
     Shadi Hamid, The Atlantic, October 31, 2014
     http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2014/10/the-roots-of-the-islamic-states-
     appeal/382175/?single_page=true

     “Radicalization : Why do Western youth join extremist groups?”
     Marian Scott, Montreal Gazette, October 23, 2014
     http://montrealgazette.com/news/local-news/radicalization-why-do-western-youth-join-extremist-groups

     “Parents of extremists urged to come out of shadows and help fight radicalization”
     Douglas Quan, Montreal Gazette, October 23, 2013
     http://www.montrealgazette.com/news/national/Parents+extremists+urged+come+shadows+help+fight
     /10322562/story.html

     “New Freedoms in Tunisia Drive Support for ISIS”
     David Kirkpatrick, New York Times, October 21, 2014
     http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/22/world/africa/new-freedoms-in-tunisia-drive-support-for-
     isis.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&version=HpSum&module=first-column-region&region=top-
     news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=1

     “Denmark tries a soft-handed approach to returned Islamist fighters
     Anthony Faiola and Souad Mekhennet, Washington Post, October 19, 2014
     http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/denmark-tries-a-soft-handed-approach-to-returned-
     islamist-fighters/2014/10/19/3516e8f3-515e-4adc-a2cb-c0261dd7dd4a_story.html

     “Joining Islamic State is about ‘sex and agression,’ not religion”
     Arie W. Kruglanski, Reuters, October 16, 2014
     http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2014/10/16/joining-islamic-state-is-about-sex-and-aggression-not-
     religion/

    “How 2 French girls were lured to jihad online”
     Lori Hinnant, Associated Press, October 10, 2014
     http://bigstory.ap.org/article/017703d2f69141c39996d868a456d7e1/how-2-french-girls-were-lured-jihad-      online

     “Families torn apart as young Western women join jihadist cause
     Nicholas Vinocur and Pauline Mevel, Reuters, October 9, 2014
     http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/10/09/us-mideast-crisis-girls-insight-idUSKCN0HY0RA20141009

     “How to talk to terrorists
     Jonathan Powell, The Guardian, October 7, 2014
     http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/oct/07/-sp-how-to-talk-to-terrorists-isis-al-      aida?CMP=ema_565#comment-41917012

     “American explains why he’s fighting ISIL”
     Sophie Cousins, USA TODAY, October 7, 2014
     http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2014/10/06/jordan-matson-joins-kurds-against-islamic-
     state/16796487/

     “Prominent Muslim Sheik Issues Fatwa Against ISIS Violence
     Dina Temple-Raston, NPR, September 25, 2014
     http://www.npr.org/2014/09/25/351277631/prominent-muslim-sheikh-issues-fatwa-against-isis-
     violence?utm_medium=RSS&utm_campaign=news

     “ISIS’ Harsh Brand of Islam Is Rooted in Austere Saudi Creed”
     David Kirkpatrick, New York Times, September 24, 2014
     http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/25/world/middleeast/isis-abu-bakr-baghdadi-caliph-wahhabi.html

     British Muslims Release Fearless Message to ISIS Members Who Use Religion as an Excuse for Violence 
     Kevin Boyd, Independent Journal Review, September 17, 2014
     http://www.ijreview.com/2014/09/173312-british-muslim-leaders-denounce-isis-heretics-muslims-religious-
     duty-oppose/

     “Saudi clerics declare Isis terrorism a ‘heinous crime’ under sharia law
     Ian Black, The Guardian, September 17, 2014
     http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/sep/17/saudi-clerics-fatwa-declares-terrorism-heinous-crime-
     sharia-law

     “The apocalyptic magazine the Islamic State uses to recruit and radicalize foreigners”
     Terrence McCoy, Washington Post, September 16, 2014
     http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2014/09/16/the-apocalyptic-magazine-the-islamic-
     state-uses-to-recruit-and-radicalize-foreigners/?tid=hp_mm&hpid=z3


     “ISIS Starts Recruiting in Istanbul’s Vulnerable Suburbs”
     Alev Scott and Alexander Christie-Miller, Newsweek, September 12, 2014
     http://www.newsweek.com/2014/09/19/exclusive-how-istanbul-became-recruiting-ground-islamic-state-
     269247.html

     “Why Muslims fare better in America than in Europe
     Economist, September 6, 2014
     http://www.economist.com/news/united-states/21615611-why-muslims-fare-better-america-europe-islamic-
      yet-integrated

     “ISIS vs. mainstream Muslims: The media war”
     Daniel Burke, CNN, September 4, 2014
     http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/2014/09/04/isis-vs-mainstream-muslims-the-media-battle/

     “It ain’t half hot here, mum: Why and how Westerners go to fight in Syria and Iraq”
     Sarah Birke, The Economist, August 30, 2014
     http://www.economist.com/news/middle-east-and-africa/21614226-why-and-how-westerners-go-fight-syria-
      and-iraq-it-aint-half-hot-here-mum

     “Inside the Mind of the Western Jihadist”
     Sohrab Ahmari, Wall Street Journal, August 29, 2014
     http://online.wsj.com/articles/sohrab-ahmari-inside-the-mind-of-the-western-jihadist-1409352541

     “Western military intervention is what ISIS wants”
     Andrea Tornielli, Vatican Insider, August 26, 2014
     http://vaticaninsider.lastampa.it/en/inquiries-and-interviews/detail/articolo/iraq-irak-introvigne-35980/

     “Islamic State Recruits Are Young, Angry And Rebellious, But Are They Actually Religious?
     Jessica Elgot, The Huffington Post, August 22, 2014
     http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2014/08/21/isis-recruits-are-young-angry-and-rebellious-but-are-they-
     actually-religious_n_5697744.html

     “ISIS Email To Family Of Executed American Journalist James Foley Revealed”
     Andrew Hart, The Huffington Post, August 21, 2014
     http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/regions/middle-east/syria/140821/text-last-email-islamic-state-
      sent-foley-family

Home | About Us |Partnerships |Profiles |Resources |WRSP Authors |Donate |Contact
Copyright © 2016 World Religions & Spirituality Project• All Rights Reserved

Web Design by Luke Alexander

Share

Jihadism Video Resources



]]>]]>]]>]]>

VIDEO RESOURCES

 

#Generation Caliphate:
Apocalyptic Hopes, Millennial Dreams, and Global Jihad: A Conference at Boston University

     Landes, Richard. (Boston University). “Active Cataclysmic Apocalyptic Scenarios, Demonizing and Megadeath: Taiping,      Communists, Nazis, and Jihadis.” 38:18 minutes. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mPXZCYq9UfI

     Landes, Richard. (Boston University). “Globalization as a Millennial Praeparatio Califatae: A Problematic Discussion.” 23:44      minutes. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8gmeYJiHltQ

     Berger, J.M. (Brookings Institution). “The role of communications Technology in mediating apocalyptic communities.” 18:00      minutes. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YiRr2yXYqD4

     Cook, David. (Rice University). “ISIS and Boko Haram: Profiles in Apocalyptic Jihad.” 37:03 minutes.
     https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pgQGy1PbUG8

     Bunzel, Cole. (Princeton University). “From Apocalypse Now to Caliphate Now: Revisiting Juhayman al-‘Utaybi’s Siege of Mecca in      1979.” 27:52 minutes. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rs4omAypK9s

     Furnish, Timothy. (Independent Scholar). ” Rejecting Millennial Time: The Ottoman Empire’s 700-year War against Mahdism in      its Realm.” 35:21 minutes. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X-dK0DKLwQo

     Wood, Graeme. (Yale University, Atlantic Monthly). “On the Resistance to seeing Global Jihad as Apocalyptic Movement.” 18:51      minutes. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0RLDDi-xbcY

     Mc Cants, William. (Brookings Institution) “ISIS and the Absent Mahdi: Studies in Cognitive Dissonance and Apocalyptic Jazz.”      23:02 minutes. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vW3OHLnFYlU

 


https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3h1eOkQaclwPkRJ8bZaGow

Bibliography

Beware of Imitators: Al-Qa`ida through the Lens of its Confidential Secretary
CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform (June 15, 2012)

 

 

Home | About Us |Partnerships |Profiles |Resources |WRSP Authors |Donate |Contact
Copyright © 2016 World Religions & Spirituality Project• All Rights Reserved

Web Design by Luke Alexander

Share

Jihadism Web Resources



]]>]]>]]>]]>]]>]]>

WEB RESOURCES

Qur’anic Page

Jihadica

Jihadology

Sentinel

CTC West Point


The Quranic Arabic Corpus
This site offers an English Translation of the Holy Quran and was established by the Language Research Group at the University of Leeds.

Center for Muslim-Jewish Engagement
This site offers a collection of the Hadith. The Center is a partnership between the Hebrew Union College-Jewish Institute of Religion, Omar Ibn Al Khattab Foundation, & USC Center for Religion and Civic Culture.

Combatting Terrorism Center, U.S. Military Academy
Among the resources offered by CTC is: Nelly Lahoud, Stuart Caudill, Liam Collins, Gabriel Koehler-Derrick, Don Rassler, and Muhammad al-`Ubaydi, Letters from Abbottabad: Bin Ladin Sidelined?”

Jihadology
One of the foremost sites for jihad-related source material in both Arabic and English.


Home | About Us |Partnerships |Profiles |Resources |WRSP Authors |Donate |Contact
Copyright © 2016 World Religions & Spirituality Project• All Rights Reserved

Web Design by Luke Alexander

Share

Branch Davidians (1981-2006)

BRANCH DAVIDIAN TIMELINE  [See an extended profile here)

1981 Vernon Howell (age 22) arrived at Mount Carmel Center on the outskirts of Waco, Texas.

1984 Vernon Howell married Rachel Jones (age 14), daughter of long-time Branch Davidians Perry and Mary Belle Jones.

1984 Lois Roden sent a letter inviting Branch Davidians around the country to come to Mount Carmel for Passover and hear Vernon Howell give Bible studies.

1984 The Passover gathering of Branch Davidians was divided between people who listened to Vernon Howell’s Bible studies and people who gathered around George Roden.

1984 Because of George Roden’s violence, the core group of Branch Davidians following Vernon Howell left Mount Carmel to live in Waco.

1985 Vernon and Rachel Howell visited Israel, where he received his messianic calling. This was the origin of his identity as David Koresh.

1985 David Koresh and Branch Davidians settled at a camp they constructed in the woods near Palestine, Texas.

1985 Koresh traveled to California and Hawaii to proselytize. He promoted his band and music in Los Angeles.

1986 Koresh and Clive Doyle visited Australia to spread Koresh’s message. Koresh subsequently returned to Australia twice more and gained converts.

1986 Lois Roden died and George Roden assumed control of Mount Carmel.

1986 Koresh began to take additional (extralegal) wives with whom to have children to fulfill what he taught were biblical prophecies.

1987 George Roden and Koresh and a group of his followers were involved in a gun fight at Mt. Carmel; the participants were arrested.

1988 The trial of Vernon Howell (David Koresh) and his men resulted in acquittal of the men and a hung jury on Howell. All were released from jail.

1988 In an unrelated incident, George Roden was put into jail for a time. He was also prohibited from returning to Mount Carmel due to reactivation of an old restraining order that had been taken out originally by Lois Roden.

1988 The Branch Davidians returned to Mount Carmel and began to repair the property.

1988 Steve Schneider made his first trip to Britain to present Koresh’s message to Adventists. Koresh followed up by visiting Britain to proselytize. A number of British converts were gained.

1989 Koresh began teaching a “New Light” revelation that all the women (including already married women) in the community were his wives, and all the men other than himself were to be celibate.

1989 Marc Breault and his wife, Elizabeth Baranyai, left Mount Carmel, moved to Australia, and began a campaign to discredit Koresh and his teachings.

1990 Vernon Howell legally changed his name to David Koresh.

1990 Koresh initiated a number of business ventures involving the buying and selling of arms and related paraphernalia at gun shows.

1991 David Jewell, the non-Branch Davidian father of Kiri Jewell, age ten, obtained temporary custody of Kiri when she cames to visit him in Michigan.

1992 Martin King of Australia’s A Current Affair traveled with a camera crew to Mount Carmel to film Koresh giving a Bible study and to interview Koresh for a story aired on Australian television.

1992 Marc Breault testified about Koresh’s sexual relations with underage girls in a custody hearing in Michigan. The result was that the mother, a Branch Davidian member, lost custody.

1992 Koresh was investigated by the Texas Child Protection Services, but the case was closed due to lack of evidence.

1992 The Branch Davidians moved into the large residence at Mount Carmel that they began constructing in 1991, tearing down the individual cottages.

1992 Numerous Branch Davidians came to Mount Carmel from abroad for Passover. Allegations of impending group suicide proved unfounded.

1992 (Late) The Branch Davidians were aware that Mount Carmel was under surveillance by men living in a house across the street and helicopters frequently flying overhead.

1993 (February 28) About 9:45 a.m. agents with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms carried out an armed raid on the residence at Mount Carmel to deliver warrants, and a shootout ensued. Six Branch Davidians and four ATF agents died.

1993 (March 1) FBI agents took control of Mount Carmel and oversaw the siege. Tanks were brought onto the property the next day.

1993 (April 19) A tank and CS-gas assault on the residence by the FBI’s Hostage Rescue Team began at 6:00 a.m. In the conflagration that ensued, seventy-six Branch Davidians died.

1994 A criminal trial was held to try charges brought against eleven of the Branch Davidian survivors.

1995 Crape myrtle trees were planted at Mount Carmel for each Branch Davidian who died in 1993.

1999 Clive Doyle and his mother Edna Doyle moved back to Mount Carmel. A new chapel and visitor’s center were constructed.

1999 Attorney General Janet Reno appointed former Senator John C. Danforth as Special Counsel to conduct an investigation into whether the actions of FBI agents caused the deaths on April 19.

2000 The Special Counsel conducted a “FLIR reenactment” at Fort Hood to determine if flashes captured on Forward Looking Infrared film on April 19, 1993 were automatic gunfire directed toward the Branch Davidians.

2000 Wrongful death lawsuits were brought against the government by relatives of deceased Branch Davidians and by Branch Davidian survivors who had come to trial in federal court. The case was dismissed.

2000 The Danforth Report, which concluded that actions of FBI agents did not cause deaths of Branch Davidians on April 19, 1993, was published.

2000 As a result of a Supreme Court appeal, several Branch Davidians had their sentences reduced.

2000 (April 19) The first memorial service was held in the new chapel.

2006 Clive Doyle left Mount Carmel; the Visitor’s Center was closed. Charles Pace, prophet of a rival group that rejected David Koresh as prophet and messiah, took control of Mount Carmel.

FOUNDER/GROUP HISTORY

In 1981, when 22-year-old Vernon Howell, who in 1990 legally changed his name to David Koresh (1959-1993), arrived at Mount Carmel Center on the outskirts of Waco, Texas, the Branch Davidian Seventh-day Adventist movement had been in existence for 26 years. It had been founded by Ben Roden (1902-1978) in 1955, and, in 1981, the movement was led by his wife Lois Roden (1905-1986). The Branch Davidian movement had split off from an earlier group in Waco, the Davidian Seventh-day Adventists led by Victor T. Houteff (1885-1955). Both movements were offshoots from the Seventh-day Adventist Church, and therefore Davidians and Branch Davidians viewed the writings of Ellen G. White (1827-1915), the Seventh-day Adventist prophet, as authoritative. Based on the model of Ellen G. White, both Davidians and Branch Davidians regarded their leaders who presented interpretations of the Bible’s apocalyptic prophecies they found convincing as prophets.

Lois Roden’s status as Branch Davidian prophet was challenged by her violent son, George Roden (1938-1998); so when Vernon Howell demonstrated a talent for learning and interpreting Bible passages, she began to promote him as her successor. Branch Davidians scattered around North America were invited to come to Mount Carmel for Passover in 1984 to hear Howell give Bible studies. This marked the shift in allegiance on the part of some long-time Branch Davidians living at Mount Carmel to Vernon Howell. They regarded Lois Roden as having lost “the Spirit of Prophecy” (Pitts 2009).

Later in 1984, Howell and his followers left Mount Carmel due to George Roden’s violence. They lived in Waco for a time, then at a campground in Mexia, Texas, and then settled in a camp they constructed in the piney woods near Palestine, Texas (Doyle with Wessinger and Wittmer 2012:58-63; Martin 2009:33-41; Haldeman 2007:33-38).

In 1985, Howell and his wife Rachel visited Israel where Howell had experiences that revealed he was the Christ for the Last Days. This marks the emergence of his identity as David Koresh (Tabor 2005). After they returned to Texas, their son Cyrus was born. The Branch Davidians noted that he taught with greater confidence and authority after he returned from Israel.

While the community lived at the Palestine camp, a number of members traveled to work in Texas, California, and Hawaii. David Koresh traveled to California, Hawaii, and Australia to proselytize. In Los Angeles, he promoted his rock band; his theology was expressed in the songs that he composed and sang.

In 1986, Koresh revealed to his followers that God wanted him to take additional wives with whom to have children who would play key roles in the coming Judgment. In Texas at that time, fourteen was the age at which it was legal for a girl to marry with parental consent. Koresh’s first extralegal wife was fourteen, but the second, Michele Jones, the sister of his wife Rachel, was twelve when he first had sex with her (Thibodeau with Whiteson 1999:109, 114).

In 1987, George Roden dug up the casket of Anna Hughes, who was buried in the cemetery at Mount Carmel. Roden challengedKoresh to a contest to see which of them could raise her from the dead. Koresh declined and reported the disinterment to the McLennan County Sheriff’s Department. The deputies declined to go to Mount Carmel without proof that a body had been removed from its grave, so Koresh and some of his men purchased weapons for protection and went to Mount Carmel to try to photograph the corpse without being detected by Roden. While they were there, Roden fired at them, and Koresh shot back. Sheriff’s deputies arrived to arrest Koresh and his men (Doyle with Wessinger and Wittmer 2012:65-66; Haldeman 2007:55-59).

The trial in 1988 resulted in the acquittal of the Branch Davidian men, but the jury could not decide whether or not Howell (Koresh) was guilty of attempted murder. All of them went free. George Roden was put into jail for writing threatening letters to the judge, and the Branch Davidians had a restraining order prohibiting Roden from coming onto the Mount Carmel property reactivated. The Branch Davidians returned to Mount Carmel to live, and cleaned up the little houses in which they would live until 1992 when the large building was finished. They found equipment to make methamphetamine in one of the houses, which Koresh turned over to the Sheriff’s Department (Haldeman 2007:59-63).

In 1988, Steve Schneider, one of Koresh’s apostles, went to England to present Bible studies about Koresh’s message to Adventists. Koresh also visited England to present his message. A number of British converts were gained who would ultimately relocate to Mount Carmel.

In 1989, Koresh taught that all the women in the community were his wives, and all the men except himself should be celibate (Tabor and Gallagher 1995:68-76). An increasing number of his children began to be born. Marc Breault and his wife Elizabeth Baranyai left the group and moved to Australia. Breault worked to persuade Australian Branch Davidians that Koresh’s teachings were false. Breault contacted American authorities and the media in Texas and Australia about Koresh’s activities (Tabor and Gallagher 1995:80-93).

In September, 1990, Koresh was introduced to Henry McMahon, a licensed gun dealer, who taught Koresh about guns and the firearms trade (Thibodeau and Whiteson 1999:127). David Koresh and some of his men increasingly bought and sold guns and related paraphernalia at gun shows: (1) to be prepared for self-defense in the assault that Koresh predicted would occur as part of Endtime events and (2) to make money to support the members of the community.

In 1992, in Michigan Breault testified about Koresh’s sexual relations with underage girls in a hearing concerning the custody of Kiri Jewell who had been living with her mother, Sherri Jewell, at Mount Carmel. Kiri’s father was not a Branch Davidian. Kiri reported that Koresh had sexual contact with her at age ten in a motel room where she had been left by her mother. Sherri Jewell lost custody and returned to Mount Carmel. Kiri declined to press charges, but her father filed a complaint with Texas Child Protective Services. David Koresh was investigated but the case was closed for lack of evidence (Tabor and Gallagher 1993:85-86; Kiri Jewell’s testimony and written statement in Joint Hearings 1995:1:147-55).

In 1992, Branch Davidians from around North America and other countries traveled to Mount Carmel to celebrate Passover in the large building by listening to Koresh’s Bible studies. By this time, the little houses had been torn down. Breault and other former Branch Davidians alleged to the Sheriff’s Department that the Branch Davidians were going to commit group suicide during Passover week, but nothing happened (Doyle with Wessinger and Wittmer 2012:71-72).

By late 1992, the Branch Davidians were aware that they were under surveillance by the overflights of helicopters and the men who had rented a house across Double EE Ranch Road from Mount Carmel. It was obvious to the Branch Davidians that the two men from the house who came over to Mount Carmel on various pretexts were inspecting their property. On one occasion in 1993, the two men came over with two AR-15 semi-automatic rifles, showed them to Koresh, and went with him behind the large residence to shoot the weapons (Doyle with Wessinger and Wittmer 2012:115-19; Haldeman 2007:73-74; ATF memo reprinted in Hardy with Kimball 2001:326). Unknown to the Branch Davidians at that time, the men were with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms. One of them, Robert Rodriguez, came to Mount Carmel for Bible studies with Koresh inside the residence. When other ATF agents interviewed Henry McMahon, the licensed gun dealer with whom Koresh did business, he called Koresh while ATF agents were present. Through McMahon, Koresh extended an invitation to the ATF agents to come to Mount Carmel and inspect his weapons; the agents brushed off the invitation and declined to speak with Koresh on the telephone (Henry McMahon testimony in Joint Hearings 1995:1:162-63).

ATF agents obtained warrants to search the Mount Carmel residence and arrest Koresh. Their allegation was that the Branch Davidians were converting legally purchased AR-15 semi-automatic rifles to M-16 automatic weapons without paying the fee and filling out the required paperwork to obtain license permits. Since the ATF agents had found no evidence that supported this claim, the affidavit composed to obtain approval of the warrants from a judge was filled with inflammatory language about cults and child abuse (Tabor and Gallagher 1995:100-03). Child abuse does not come under ATF jurisdiction. The ATF agents made plans to execute a “no knock” “dynamic entry” into the residence. In order to receive training from Army Special Forces at Fort Hood in Killeen, Texas, and support from National Guard helicopters and pilots, ATF agents falsely alleged that the Branch Davidians were operating a methamphetamine lab (House of Representatives 1996:30-55).

The ATF raid was carried out on the morning of February 28, 1993, even though Robert Rodriguez alerted the commanders that
Koresh had learned that a raid was imminent. ATF agents arrived in covered cattle trailers, and stormed the front door while another team of agents broke windows on the second floor, fired and threw flash-bang grenades inside, before entering (see footage in Gifford, Gazecki, and McNulty 1997). Armed ATF agents were also in National Guard helicopters.

A shootout ensued in which four ATF agents were killed and twenty agents were wounded, some severely; David Koresh received a severe wound to his side and another wound on his wrist; Perry Jones (64, American), Koresh’s father-in-law, received a mortal wound; four other Branch Davidians were killed and several wounded. About 5:00 p.m. that day Michael Schroeder (29, American), another Branch Davidian, and a friend attempted to walk back to Mount Carmel coming from behind the property. Schroeder was attempting to return to his wife, baby son, and three stepchildren at Mount Carmel. He was shot and killed by ATF agents stationed on the property behind Mount Carmel. His body was left where it fell for four days (FBI 1993a). Of the six Branch Davidians who died on February 28, four were American, one was British, and one was Australian. One, Jaydean Wendel (34, American), was the mother of four children.

FBI agents took charge of Mount Carmel on March 1. They brought in tanks on March 2 after Koresh backed out on an agreement to come out and be taken into custody. From February 28 to March 5 twenty-one children were sent out by their parents. From March 2 to March 23 adults came out at various times, sometimes singly, sometimes in groups (FBI 1993a). Whenever adults came out, the FBI tactical team known as the Hostage Rescue Team punished the remaining Branch Davidians in various ways: cutting off the electricity; crushing and removing their vehicles with tanks; blasting high-decibel sounds at them (FBI 1993a; Tabor 1994). The bright spotlights directed at the residence at night had the purpose of obscuring SOS signals that Branch Davidans first flashed on March 12 (FBI 1993a). The lights were also another means to disrupt the Branch Davidians’ sleep.

Koresh and Steve Schneider, who did most of the negotiating, said that the Branch Davidians would come out after the eight-day Passover holiday. Koresh had predicted to the Branch Davidians that they would either be attacked and martyred or “translated” into Heaven while living during Passover (Craddock 1993). When there was no attack that week, on April 14, the day after the conclusion of Passover, Koresh talked to his attorney by telephone and read a letter in which he formulated his exit plan. He would write a “little book” (see Rev. 10:1-11) giving his commentary on the Seven Seals of Revelation, and after the manuscript was given to Drs. James Tabor and J. Phillip Arnold, two Bible scholars who had communicated with the Branch Davidians via a radio discussion on April 1, he and the other Branch Davidians would come out. Koresh’s attorney conveyed the plan to FBI agents. Later that day, Koresh’s letter was sent out to the FBI along with Koresh’s signed contract to retain his attorney to represent him (FBI 1993a). On April 16 Koresh reported to a negotiator that he had completed writing his commentary on the First Seal, and the Branch Davidians began requesting wordprocessing supplies, which were delivered on April 18 (Wessinger 2000:77, 105; FBI 1993a).

On April 19, 1993, at 6:00 a.m. a tank and CS gas assault was carried out by FBI agents on the residence. The CS, suspended in methylene chloride, was inserted through nozzles on the tanks’ booms and delivered by ferret rounds that were fired into the building. CS gas burns the skin and the internal mucous membranes, which can cause acute bronchial pneumonia, vomiting and asphyxiation. CS (chlorobenzylidene malonitrile) converts into cyanide upon contact with water, which in the body causes pain, edema and leakage of fluid from the capillaries. CS also converts to cyanide when it burns. CS gas is intended for outdoor use to control crowds, and is not recommended for use in enclosed spaces (Hardy with Kimball 2001:264-66, 290; House of Representatives 1996:68-75).

Tanks drove through and demolished parts of the building. A tank drove through the front of the building toward the open door of a concrete vault located at the base of the central tower, where the young children and their mothers had taken shelter. The tank gassed that area from 11:31 to 11:55 a.m. (Hardy with Kimball 2001:275-76, 285). By 12:07 p.m. the first fire was visible in a second-floor window, and fire rapidly engulfed the building. Nine people escaped, suffering moderate to severe burns. Seventy-six Branch Davidians of all ages died.

Twenty-two children from babies to age 13 died in the vault. This number includes the two infants who were born during the CS gas assault and fire. Fourteen, including the trauma-born infants, were David Koresh’s biological children. Seven teenagers, age 14-19, died. Of the adults who died, 23 were Americans; one was Australian; 20 were British, most with Jamaican origins; one was Canadian, one was Israeli, and one was a New Zealander. One of the women who escaped the fire, Ruth Riddle (31, Canadian), had in her pocket a floppy disk on which Koresh’s interpretation of the First Seal of the book of Revelation had been saved (published in Tabor and Gallagher 1995: 191-203).

Prior to the assault, FBI agents had been told by Branch Davidian Janet Kendrick that based on Numbers 9:6-13 the Branch Davidians believed there would be a Second Passover. A man who had entered the building during the siege, Louis Alaniz, came out on April 17 and told FBI agents that the Branch Davidians considered the Second Passover to take place between April 14-21 ([FBI] 1993b). This would have been the period that Koresh was writing his “little book.”

DOCTRINES/BELIEFS

Many of the Branch Davidians, including David Koresh, had Seventh-day Adventist backgrounds. Therefore, like Seventh-day Adventists, Branch Davidians were ultimately concerned with understanding the Bible’s prophecies about believed imminent events of the Last Days and establishment of God’s Kingdom. Koresh taught that he and the Branch Davidians would play key roles in those events.

The Branch Davidians considered, and survivors still consider, themselves to be among the “wave sheaf,” the first of the “first fruits” to be harvested into God’s Kingdom. Their concept of “wave sheaf” is based on the biblical description of harvesting the tallest and ripest stalks of barley in the springtime and taking them to the sanctuary at Passover where “it was waved by a priest before the Lord” (Doyle with Wessinger and Wittmer 2012:83; see Lev. 23:10-14). According to survivor Clive Doyle, “the wave sheaf has been that group in every generation who were first to acknowledge God’s instructions and obey God, sometimes at the cost of their lives.” They “stepped out in faith ahead of everybody else…” (Doyle with Wessinger and Wittmer 2012:84).

When Christ (Jesus Christ) was resurrected, other people, members of the wave sheaf up to that time, were resurrected with him (see Matt. 27:52-53). According to Branch Davidian theology, these members of the wave sheaf were martyrs who were killed for their obedience to God; they were offered before the Father “as trophies of Christ’s victory over death and the grave” (Doyle with Wessinger and Wittmer 2012:84).

Koresh taught that the Christ Spirit had taken a number of incarnations prior to Christ (Jesus Christ). Koresh taught that he was the Christ to fulfill the events prophesied in the Bible relating to the Last Days. He and a number of his followers would be martyred in an assault by the United States government, represented by the “two-horned beast” or “lamblike beast” in the book of Revelation (Doyle with Wessinger and Wittmer 2012:92; see Rev. 13:11-18). Subsequently, Koresh would be resurrected with the remaining martyred wave sheaf, including the martyred members of the Branch Davidian community. Koresh as Christ would lead an army of 200 million (Rev. 9:16) martyrs of the ages (the entire wave sheaf) who would carry out God’s Judgment. Members of the wave sheaf living at that time would also become part of Christ’s army. “Millions of other people will be resurrected later, but this first group needs to be brought up so that in the Judgment you have somebody from every generation in order that people will be judged by their peers” (Doyle with Wessinger and Wittmer 2012:85).

The Twenty-Four Elders in Rev. 4:4, 10-11, Koresh’s children, were considered part of the wave sheaf. Koresh taught that his children were “born for Judgment.” He taught that the children had been on Earth before and had chosen to come back to play a role in the Judgment (Doyle with Wessinger and Wittmer 2012:87).

According to Branch Davidian theology, the members of the wave sheaf will attend the marriage of the Lamb (David Koresh as Christ) in heaven (Doyle with Wessinger and Wittmer 2012:88; see Rev. 19:7-9). Since 1978, when Lois Roden received a revelation that the Holy Spirit is female, Branch Davidians have believed there is a heavenly Father and Mother. Christ is the Son. In the Endtime events, the Son will have a perfect mate, an “extension of the Spirit” (Doyle with Wessinger and Wittmer 2012:88). After the marriage of the Lamb in heaven, the members of the wave sheaf will “sing a new song” (Rev. 5: 8-10, 14:2-3) to the 144,000 who stand on Mount Zion with the Lamb (Christ), thus delivering Christ’s message to them.

The Jewish feast of Shavu’ot or Pentecost (Lev. 23:15-21) in the early summer was the time of the wheat harvest. A symbolic amount of wheat was baked into two loaves that were waved before the Lord. In Branch Davidian theology, the two wave loaves represent the 120 disciples of (Jesus) Christ, and the 144,000 of the Last Days. They are the first fruits in the harvest of souls (Doyle with Wessinger and Wittmer 2012:89). Their gathering marks the beginning of God’s Kingdom of Earth.

The “great multitude” (Rev. 7:9-17), symbolized by the summer fruits (fruits and vegetables), will be gathered into the Kingdom by the 144,000. People from all cultures, even all religions, will be invited to join the Kingdom in the Holy Land. They will be invited to come to the Feast of Tabernacles, Sukkot, in the fall. These summer fruits are harvested from people living on Earth at that time. The resurrection of the blessed, the dead who will be added to the Kingdom, happens later in the Branch Davidian scenario (Doyle with Wessinger and Wittmer 2012:90).

Kenneth G. C. Newport (2006, 2009) has explicated how Victor Houteff, the Davidian prophet, had articulated that at some point the Davidians would have to undergo a baptism of fire (see Matt. 3:11). This theme was continued by Ben Roden, and especially by Lois Roden. She taught that those living at “ Jerusalem” ( Mount Carmel), would undergo a baptism of fire “by full immersion,” not merely a “sprinkling,” as a “gateway” into the Kingdom (Roden 1978). David Koresh and his lieutenant Steve Schneider (1990) also taught that the Branch Davidians would have to undergo a purifying baptism of fire. This idea is implicit in the name of the Branch Davidians’ property, which had originally been owned and named Mount Carmel by Davidians. Mount Carmel in the Holy Land is where the prophet Elijah prayed to God to light a fire to consume Elijah’s sacrifice in a contest with the prophets of Baal, who were defeated when fire from heaven consumed the offering (1 Kings 18:19-39).

RITUALS/PRACTICES

Ben Roden had instituted the observance of “the Daily” as a period of prayer and Bible study in the morning and afternoon at the
times priests in the Jerusalem temple were believed to place a sacrificed lamb on an altar to burn to atone for the priest’s mistakes or sins. Lois Roden had added to the Daily observance the consumption of grape juice and an unleavened cracker, the Emblems representing Christ’s blood and body given for humanity (Interview with Clive Doyle, July 3, 2004; Martin 2009:22-23; Haldeman 2007:34, 88). This practice was discontinued after April 19, 1993.

The Branch Davidians inherited from Seventh-day Adventists and the Davidians the ritual of the “Bible study,” in which the Bible’s passages are explicated in light of each other to unveil God’s plan for the Last Days. Bible studies were the primary tool of proselytization, conversion, and preparation of the wave sheaf members for the upcoming events. Koresh gave lengthy Bible studies, as did Steve Schneider, and Marc Breault before he left the community. Any Branch Davidian who was well versed in the scriptures could give a Bible study.

ORGANIZATION/LEADERSHIP

David Koresh’s “charisma,” defined here as belief on the part of his followers that he had access to an unseen source of authority (Wessinger 2012:80-82), was based on his ability to “open” or reveal the meaning of the Seven Seals of the book of Revelation in light of other biblical passages in the Old and New Testaments. During the siege, Steve Schneider told an FBI negotiator that the Branch Davidians tested everything that Koresh taught against the Bible. The King James Version of the Bible was the ultimate source of authority for the Branch Davidians. The Book itself had charisma since it was God’s Word.

On March 15, Schneider asked that Dr. Phillip Arnold, whom the Branch Davidians had heard on the radio, be permitted to discuss the Bible’s prophecies with Koresh. Schneider said that if Arnold could provide a persuasive alternative intepretation of the Bible’s prophecies, the Branch Davidians would come out regardless of what Koresh said (Wessinger 2000:73-74; Wessinger 2009:34-35; Negotiation tape no. 129, March 15, 1993). The FBI did not permit Arnold to communicate directly with the Branch Davidians. In the last days of the siege, conversations picked up on surveillance devices reveal that the Hostage Rescue Team’s tactical actions reinforced the Branch Davidians’ perception that the time had come for many of them to die in obedience to God’s Endtime plan (Wessinger 2009).

The Branch Davidians included members of families who had lived at Mount Carmel since the Ben and Lois Roden days as well as members converted by David Koresh. The members’ commitment to Koresh was reinforced by his sexual relations with the girls and women, a number of whom had given birth to his children or were pregnant by him, and the men’s celibacy. Branch Davidians worked in various capacities at Mount Carmel and away from the property to support the community.

ISSUES/CHALLENGES

The longer profile on this website discusses issues and challenges related to David Koresh’s Branch Davidians in greater detail. There are numerous points of controversy and debate. A few of them are:

  • The unconventional sexual arrangements within the community, and Koresh’s sexual relations with underage girls.
  • Whether or not Branch Davidians were converting AR-15 semi-automatic rifles to M-16 automatic weapons without paying the tax and filling out paperwork required for a license.
  • Whether or not the ATF raid was necessary.
  • Whether ATF agents knowingly lied about an alleged methamphetamine lab at Mount Carmel in order to obtain Army Special Forces training and National Guard support.
  • Whether or not ATF agents fired blindly into the building, something that is illegal for American law enforcement agents to do.
  • Whether ATF agents or Branch Davidians shot first, and which side did most of the shooting.
  • The lack of investigation of the shooting of Michael Schroeder by ATF agents.
  • Whether or not actions by the FBI’s Hostage Rescue Team had the goal of sabotaging negotiations to discourage Branch Davidians from coming out.
  • Whether there was a breakthrough in negotiations on April 14 when Koresh presented his exit plan, or if this was another delaying tactic as alleged by FBI agents.
  • Whether David Koresh’s apocalyptic theology made a fire inevitable once the siege began (Newport 2006, 2009), or whether Koresh and the Branch Davidians were reading the events to see if they did or did not fit into the predicted apocalyptic scenario and were adjusting their biblical interpretations accordingly (Gallagher 2000; Tabor and Gallagher 1995; Wessinger 2000, 2009).
  • The extent to which FBI decision-makers knew about and understood the implications of Koresh’s apocalyptic theology of martyrdom as they formulated and directed tactical actions against the Branch Davidians (see Wessinger 2009; FBI 1993a; longer profile on this page.
  • Whether or not Attorney General Janet Reno was misled into approving a plan for the assault on April 19 by being presented with incorrect information about the state of the negotiations and the effects of CS gas on children, pregnant women, and the elderly (see [FBI] 1993c).
  • Whether the actions of FBI’s Hostage Rescue Team contributed to the fire and deaths of seventy-six Branch Davidians on April 19, 1993, or whether responsibility for the fire rests solely on David Koresh and the Branch Davidians.
  • The problem of multiple types of evidence that went missing, were destroyed, and were withheld due to actions of ATF and FBI agents.
  • Whether or not the Branch Davidians charged and tried in the criminal trial in 1994 were treated fairly by the judge and given fair sentences (see Richardson 2001).
  • Whether or not FLIR (infrared thermal imaging) tapes recorded by a Nightstalker aircraft flying over the building on April 19, 1993, recorded automatic gunfire directed toward the back of the building, as was alleged by several American FLIR experts, but denied by British experts hired by the government (see Gifford, Gazecki, and McNulty 1997; Danforth Report 2000; Hardy with Kimball 2001; McNulty 2001).
  • Whether or not the Danforth Report (2000) produced by Special Counsel John C. Danforth, which exonerates federal agents of responsibility in the deaths, is the final word on the case (see Rosenfeld 2001; and Newport 2006).


REFERENCES

Breault, Marc, and Martin King. 1993. Inside the Cult: A Chilling, Exclusive Account of Madness and Depravity in David Koresh’s Compound. New York: Signet.

Craddock, Graeme. 1993. Testimony of Graeme Craddock. United States District Court, Western District of Texas, Waco Division, Federal Grand Jury Proceedings. April 20.

Danforth, John C., Special Counsel. 2000. “Final Report to the Deputy Attorney General Concerning the 1993 Confrontation at the Mt. Carmel Complex.” November 8.

Doyle, Clive, with Catherine Wessinger and Matthew D. Wittmer. 2012. A Journey to Waco: Autobiography of a Branch Davidian. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield.

Federal Bureau of Investigation. 1993a. WACMUR Major Event Log, February-July 1993. Available in the Lee Hancock Collection, Southwestern Writers Collection, Texas State University-San Marcos.

Federal Bureau of Investigation. 1993b. “Passover Analysis Addendum.” April 18. Available in Lee Hancock Collection, Southwestern Writers Collection, Texas State University-San Marcos.

Federal Bureau of Investigation . 1993c. Reno Briefing File. Available in Lee Hancock Collection, Southwestern Writers Collection, Texas State University-San Marcos.

Gallagher, Eugene V. 2000. “‘Theology Is Life and Death’: David Koresh on Violence, Persecution, and the Millennium.” Pp. 82-100 in Millennialism, Persecution, and Violence: Historical Cases, edited by Catherine Wessinger. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.

Gifford, Dan, William Gazecki, and Michael McNulty, producers. 1997. Waco: The Rules of Engagement. Los Angeles: Fifth Estate Productions.

Haldeman, Bonnie. 2007. Memories of the Branch Davidians: The Autobiography of David Koresh’s Mother, ed. Catherine Wessinger. Waco: Baylor University Press.

Hardy, David T., with Rex Kimball. 2001. This Is Not an Assault: Penetrating the Web of Official Lies Regarding the Waco Incident. N.p.: Xlibris.

House of Representatives. 1996. Investigation into the Activities of Federal Law Enforcement Agencies toward the Branch Davidians. Report 104-749. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Joint Hearings. 1996. Activities of Federal Law Enforcement Agencies toward the Branch Davidians (Parts 1-3). Committee on the Judiciary Serial No. 72. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Martin, Sheila. 2009. When They Were Mine: Memoirs of a Branch Davidian Wife and Mother, ed. Catherine Wessinger. Waco: Baylor University Press.

Michael McNulty, producer. 2001. The F.L.I.R. Project. Fort Collins, Colo.: COPS Productions.

Newport , Kenneth G. C. 2009. “‘A Baptism by Fire’: The Branch Davidians and Apocalyptic Self-Destruction.” Nova Religio 13:61-94.

Newport, Kenneth G. C. 2006. The Branch Davidians of Waco: The History and Beliefs of an Apocalyptic Sect. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Pitts, William L., Jr. 2009. “Women Leaders in the Davidian and Branch Davidian Traditions.” Nova Religio 12:50-71.

Richardson, James T. 2001. “‘Showtime’ in Texas: Social Production of the Branch Davidian Trials.” Nova Religio 5:152-70.

Roden, Lois. 1978. “Baptism by Fire,” audiotape. March 21. Available in the Texas Collection, Baylor University.

Rosenfeld, Jean E. 2001. “The Use of the Military at Waco: The Danforth Report in Context.” Nova Religio 5:171-85.

Schneider, Steve. 1990. Audiotaped Bible studies given in Manchester, England. Available in the Texas Collection, Baylor University.

Tabor, James D., and Eugene V. Gallagher. 1995. Why Waco? Cults and the Battle for Religious Freedom in America. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Tabor, James D. 2005. “David Koresh.” Encyclopedia of Religion, edited by Lindsay Jones, 8: 5237-39. 2d ed. Farmington Hills, MI.: Thompson Gale.

Tabor, James. 1994. “Events at Mount Carmel: An Interpretive Log.” February. Accessed from http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/gopher/text/religion/koresh/Koresh%20Log on 20 April 2013.

Thibodeau, David, and Leon Whiteson. 1999. A Place Called Waco: A Survivor’s Story. New York: Public Affairs.

Wessinger, Catherine. 2012. “Charismatic Leaders in New Religions.” Pp. 80-96 in The Cambridge Companion to New Religious Movements, edited by Olav Hammer and Mikael Rothstein. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wessinger, Catherine. 2009. “Deaths in the Fire at the Branch Davidians’ Mount Carmel: Who Bears Responsibility?” Nova Religio 13:25-60.

Wessinger, Catherine. 2000. “1993 ¾ Branch Davidians.” In How the Millennium Comes Violently: From Jonestown to Heaven’s Gate. New York: Seven Bridges Press. Accessed from http://www.loyno.edu/~wessing on 20 April 2013.

Post Date:
10 October 2016

 

Share

Davidians and Branch Davidians



]]>]]>]]>

THE DAVIDIAN AND BRANCH DAVIDIAN
SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTISTS (1929-1981)

DAVIDIAN AND BRANCH DAVIDIAN TIMELINE

1885 (March 2)  Victor Tasho Houteff was born in Raikovo, Bulgaria.

1902 (January 5)  Benjamin L. Roden was born in Bearden, Oklahoma.

1907  Houteff immigrated to the United States.

1919   Houteff became a Seventh – day Adventist.

1928  Houteff began intensive study of Bible prophecy.

1929  Houteff began to teach his ideas at his local Seventh-day Adventist church in Los Angeles.

1929  Houteff began to publish his ideas in The Shepherd’s Rod.

1934  After a hearing with Seventh-day Adventist officials, Houteff was officially removed from the church rolls because of his teachings.

1935 (May)  Houteff and a small group of followers moved to a 189-acre parcel of land outside of Waco, Texas, which they named Mount Carmel.

1937 (January 1)  At age fifty-two, Houteff married Florence Hermanson, the seventeen-year-old daughter of two of his followers.

1937 (February 12)  Ben Roden married Lois I. Scott.

1940  Ben and Lois Roden joined the Seventh-day Adventist Church, first in Kilgore then in Odessa, Texas.

1940s  In the early to mid-1940s the Rodens encountered Houteff’s Shepherd’s Rod movement.

1943  Houteff’s group was formally incorporated as “the General Association of Davidian Seventh-day Adventists.”

1952  Houteff sent out thirty missionaries from Mount Carmel, with the goal of spreading his message to every Seventh-day Adventist family in North America.

1955 (February 5)  Houteff died at the age of 69.

1955  Florence Houteff assumed leadership of the group of her husband’s followers.

1955  Identifying himself as “the Branch” mentioned in Zechariah 3:8 and 6:12, Ben Roden laid claim to leadership of the Davidians.

1955 (December 7)  The Davidians sold their original parcel of land and relocated to “New Mount Carmel,” 941 acres near the town of Elk, Texas, nine miles east of Waco.

1958  Ben Roden went to Israel to set up a community that would form the core of the new Davidian community of 144,000.

1959  Florence Houteff became convinced that the events of the end would take place during the Passover season, culminating on or about April 22.

1959  Some 1,000 Davidians gathered at New Mount Carmel for Passover, but their numbers dwindled when no significant events transpired.

1959  Florence Houteff left New Mount Carmel for California and ceased to exercise any leadership over the Davidians.

1959  Ben Roden emerged as the leader of the group at the New Mount Carmel Center.

1961  In the wake of Florence Houteff’s failed prophecy, some Davidians decided to relocate first to Riverside, California and then in 1970 to Salem, South Carolina; this splinter group has remained faithful to Houteff’s theology.

1962 (March 1)  Florence Houteff formally resigned as leader of the Davidians.

1960s  Rival factions battled in court for control of the New Mount Carmel property.

1973 (February 27)  Ben Roden and the Branch Davidians completed the purchase of Mount Carmel .

1977  Lois Roden initiated her own prophetic claims and received revelation that the Holy Spirit is a feminine figure.

1978  Ben Roden dies and is succeeded in his leadership role by his wife, Lois.

1980  Lois Roden published the first edition of her magazine, Shekinah.

1981  David Koresh, then known as Vernon Howell, joined the Branch Davidians at Mount Carmel.

1983  Lois Roden recognized David Koresh as her successor.

1986  Lois Roden died and was buried next to her husband on the Mount of Olives in Jerusalem.

FOUNDER/GROUP HISTORY

The sectarian group that became known as the Branch Davidians was part of a complex religious history. The Branch Davidians led by David Koresh, so familiar from the disastrous BATF raid on their Mount Carmel Center on February 28, 1993 and the ensuing fifty-one day siege conducted by the FBI that ended with a fire that destroyed the Center and took 74 lives, were part of a tradition that reached back at least to the nineteenth century.

In the mid-nineteenth century in upper New York state the Baptist layman William Miller (1782-1849) proclaimed that through
diligent study he had been unable to unravel the mysteries of the biblical book of Revelation and, hence, of the time of the end of the world and the second coming of Jesus. From 1831 to 1843 he estimated that he had brought his message to a half million persons. By Miller’s calculation, the return of Jesus would happen between March 21, 1843 and March 21, 1844. When latter date passed without anything significant happening, Miller, like many others who have prophesied the end, did not lose faith in his prediction. Instead, he adjusted his calculations and reset the date for October 22, 1844. Expectations heightened as summer turned into fall, but the date again came and went without incident. Those who had believed Miller’s prophecy experienced what came to be called the “Great Disappointment , ” and his prophetic career came to an end. But even that second experience of disconfirmation was not sufficient to quell completely an interest in the imminent dawn of the millennium (Rowe 2008: 192-225).

Among the Millerites who held onto the conviction that Miller had actually been correct in his prophecies, was a small group in Washington , New Hampshire led by Joseph Bates, James White and Ellen G. Harmon (1827-1915), whom White married in 1846. They believed that Miller’s prophecy correctly referred to Christ entering the inner room of the heavenly temple in order to begin his final work of judgment. So, the events of the end had in fact begun, but they had not yet manifested themselves on earth. Based on their interpretation of Revelation 14 and other biblical texts, the Whites and Bates advocated for observing the Lord’s Day on Saturday as the seventh day of the week, believed that the final judgment was currently unfolding, and expected to be guided by revelation from God in their own time. Ellen G. White, who became the group’s prophet, came to call that contemporary revelation “present truth” or “new light.” The twin foci of observing the Lord’s Day on Saturday and maintaining the expectation of Jesus’ imminent return to initiate the final judgment would remain central characteristics of Seventh-day Adventism from the time of its origins in the small band of New Hampshire Millerites through its entire history. The openness to receiving prophetic “present truth” introduced a principle of dynamism into the broad Adventist tradition that played an especially important role in the origins of both the Davidians and the Branch Davidians (see Gallagher 2013) .

The more proximate origins of the Branch Davidians can be traced to the activities of Victor Houteff (1885-1955), a Bulgarian
immigrant to the United States who joined the Seventh-day Adventist (SDA) Church in 1919 in Illinois . As Houteff studied the Bible, he developed two distinctive ideas that were out of conformity with established SDA doctrine. First, expressing a vivid sectarian indictment of the SDA Church, he disagreed with Ellen G. White that the 144,000 mentioned in Revelation 7 as being worthy of entering the new Jerusalem referred to the Adventists themselves. Instead, he argued that the Church had become complacent and pervaded by “worldly” influences. He saw his own mission as purifying the church from within and gathering a truly faithful 144,000 in anticipation of the Lord’s return. Second, he argued that it was his task to lead the purified 144,000 to the ancient land of Israel , where they would meet Christ at his return. Both the Davidian and Branch Davidian traditions developed an elitist self-conception according to which they would be the first to be redeemed upon the return of Jesus. Borrowing a concept from the agricultural festivals of the ancient Israelites, Ben Roden , one of the leaders who followed Houteff, described the Branch Davidians as “the first of the first fruits – wave-sheaf , vanguard NOT wave-loaves – 144,000, army” of the final harvest of salvation (Ben Roden 1959: 4).

Unlike Ellen G. White, Houteff did not base his authority on visions or other kinds of immediate interaction with the divine, but he did claim that his own work was important in his day as Moses’ work was in his. He was convinced that the moral and spiritual decline of the SDA Church had led it to a crisis point and that its members could either choose to follow him and embark again on the path towards salvation or stick with the Church’s teachings as recently articulated and experience damnation. In 1929, Houteff, then in Los Angeles , began to teach his message. When the SDA Church formally rejected Houteff’s teachings in 1934 and excommunicated him, he felt he had no choice other than to form his own organization. By 1935, Houteff had decided to relocate with his followers to Texas and he arranged for the purchase of a large tract of land outside Waco where they established the Mount Carmel Center (based on their understanding of the prophecy in Amos 1:2). Signaling his hope for the restoration of a physical messianic kingdom in the land of Israel , he named his group the Davidian Seventh-day Adventist Association to evoke the ancient kingdom ruled by King David.

Houteff first published his theological ideas in a tract entitled The Shepherd’s Rod , and the group of his followers was informally known by that name ( Victor Houteff 1930) . The first volume was quickly followed by a second and throughout the 1930s, 1940s and early 1950s Houteff produced multiple religious tracts and collections of his sermons that were distributed by the Davidian publishing operation to a growing list of SDA Church members. In February, 1943 he published The Leviticus of the Davidian Seventh-day Adventists , which details the constitution, by-laws, system of government, and form of education for the Davidian community (Victor Houteff 1943) . Much of the one hundred page document is devoted to citing the authorizing precedents from both the Bible and the writings of Ellen G. White.

Under Houteff’s leadership the Davidians consolidated and developed the community at the Mount Carmel Center and devoted considerable time, effort, and money to spreading their message to all SDA Church members in North America and beyond (including Australia , England , India , and the West Indies ). They continued to refine their understanding of biblical prophecy while maintaining their hope that the return of Jesus to conduct the final judgment would happen soon.

When Houteff died in February, 1955, the Davidians lost their leader and faced a dilemma that affects virtually every first-generation religious group. Kenneth Newport suggests that at least some of the 100 or so members of the Mount Carmel community probably left after Houteff’s death, but those who remained faced the task of developing new leadership (Newport 2006: 66). Into that breach entered Houteff’s wife, Florence, along with several other contenders. Soon after Victor’s death, Florence began to make predictions about the future of the community, apparently including the idea that Victor himself would be resurrected. Claiming that on his deathbed Victor had urged her to take over his position, Florence quickly and persistently made her case to the Executive Council of the Davidian Association and eventually garnered their recognition.

During her time as the leader of the Davidians, Florence Houteff continued to put out new issues of the periodical The Symbolic
Code
, of which nine volumes had been published during her husband’s life (Florence Houteff 1955-1958). To this day there remains controversy about whether Florence ‘s “new Codes” contain the genuine teaching of her husband. But by far the most dramatic and controversial move that Florence made was to set the date of the beginning of the end times. Echoing William Miller’s decision that produced the Great Disappointment, Florence proclaimed that at the end of the Passover season, on April 22, 1959, the events of the end would begin to take place (Newport 2006:101). She urged the Davidians to assemble at the Mount Carmel Center, and some 1,000 did.

The scenario that Florence envisioned replicated much of what her husband had already preached. War would devastate the Middle East and open the possibility for the Davidians to set up their messianic kingdom in the land of Israel; the SDA Church would be purified and the 144,000 eligible for salvation would be gathered.

The failure of Florence Houteff’s prophecy nearly devastated the Mount Carmel community. Those who remained in the community resorted to another familiar strategy for dealing with the disconfirmation of prophecy. A 1960 report argued that the kingdom had failed to materialize because Davidian evangelization efforts had been limited only to the SDA church. It urged that the mission be extended to all Protestant churches (Newport 2006:107). That decision, at least, bought the community more time to spread its message.

There was additional fallout from the disconfirmation as well. A 1961 meeting in Los Angeles effectively split the Davidians into two separate groups. One remained centered at Mount Carmel and the other ended up being based in Salem, South Carolina, where it continues to this day (The General Association of Davidian Seventh-day Adventists 2013; Newport 2006:108).

It then took some time for clear leadership to emerge among the Mount Carmel Branch Davidians. When it did, it was in the person of Benjamin Roden (1902-1978). After joining the SDA church in 1940 Roden and his wife Lois (1905-1986) had first encountered Victor Houteff’s Shepherd’s Rod message sometime in the mid-1940s. It appears that the Rodens had first visited Mount Carmel no later than 1945. They returned several times over the next decade, and when Victor Houteff died in 1955, Ben Roden was confident enough of himself that he made an unsuccessful bid for the leadership of the community.

Roden justified his claim to leadership on the foundation of his own prophetic call. Building on texts like Isaiah 11:1, Zechariah 3:8 and 6:12, and John 15:1-3, he began to conceive of himself as “The Branch,” the individual chosen by God to complete the work that Victor Houteff had begun ( Ben Roden 1958) . Roden’s self-designation would also carry over to his followers, who came to be known as the Branches or Branch Davidians. Although Roden did not really acknowledge that he was not the leader of Mount Carmel community, he directed his attention elsewhere in the later 1950s. With his wife and family, he turned to Israel and setting up a community that would form the basis of the eventual Davidic messianic community in the Holy Land Ben Roden 1960). While Florence Houteff and the Mount Carmel Davidians moved inexorably towards the date of April 22, 1959, Ben Roden busied himself with establishing a community in Israel, developing his own distinctive teachings as “The Branch,” and setting up a headquarters in Odessa, Texas. In 1965, after Florence ‘s abdication, he tried to purchase the remaining Mount Carmel property from the trustee who was assigned to liquidate it. After extensive legal wrangling about who really held title to the property, among other things, Roden finally completed the purchase in February of 1973 (Newport 2006:128) .

Throughout the 1960s and 1970s Roden continued to develop and refine his theological ideas. The establishment of a literal kingdom of God in Israel remained a central focus, and Roden even had himself crowned “Viceregent of the Most High God” in June, 1970 at Mount Carmel (Newport 2006: 148) . Ben Roden’s writings are not easily accessible. He follows the example of Victor Houteff in compiling complex mosaics of quotations from the Bible and other authorities like Ellen G. White. Their meaning is apparently intended to be self-evident because he offers very little guidance about how they are to be interpreted. David Koresh would later adopt the same expository style in his unfinished manuscript on the meaning of the seven seals in the book of Revelation.

Roden also emphasized that true Adventists should observe not only the moral law of the Christian Old Testament but the ceremonial law as well. Consequently, he introduced the observation of festivals like Passover, Pentecost, and Tabernacles to the Mount Carmel community and framed the understanding of them in eschatological terms. The observation of Passover at Mount Carmel would play an important role in the negotiations between the FBI and members of the community during the fifty-one day siege (Tabor and Gallagher 1995:15).

Like the Adventist leaders before him, Ben Roden did not live to see his fondest hopes fulfilled. The return of Jesus to conduct the
Last Judgment was again delayed. But Roden’s death did not threaten the community with disintegration because his wife Lois was already poised to assume the responsibility of leadership, although the Roden’s son George did dispute her right of succession and would remain a serious irritant to the Mount Carmel community for some time. Like her husband, Lois based her claims on charismatic grounds. She had begun to receive revelations in 1977, and they were the driving force for her innovative theological program, particularly the idea that the Holy Spirit was feminine (Lois Roden 1980). George resorted to more traditional grounds for his claims, asserting that his father had appointed him to a central role in the movement, since Ben Roden believed that his sons would live to see the rebuilding of the temple in Jerusalem .

Even though his mother was clearly elected to lead the Branch Davidians in 1979, George Roden continued to agitate on his own behalf, directing his vitriol first against his mother and then against her and David Koresh, who, as Vernon Howell, joined the Mount Carmel community in 1981. George eventually succeeded in winning a leadership election in 1984, after which he assertively changed the name of Mount Carmel to “Rodenville” and vigorously argued for his primacy. It took a complex series of events, including multiple hearings in court, George’s conviction on contempt of court charges, and his 1989 arrest for murder and eventual confinement in a mental institution, before Koresh could enjoy uncontested leadership of the Branch Davidians.

In the meantime Lois worked assiduously to develop the ideas stemming from her 1977 vision which revealed that the Holy Spirit was the feminine aspect of God. Beginning in 1980, she published Shekinah magazine (always capitalizing or otherwise emphasizing the first three letters in whatever typography she used), which reprinted materials that supported her theology from a variety of popular sources (Lois Roden 1981-1983; Pitts, forthcoming). Like others before her, Lois understood her work as the last stage in the reformation of the SDA church in preparation for the imminent last judgment.

Through the early 1980s Lois continued spread her message, travelling through the U.S., to Canada, Israel, and the Philippines. At the same time, the future David Koresh both learned from her, largely through her Bible Studies, and began to develop his own distinctive theology, which is outlined in the entry on the Branch Davidians (1981-2006). Koresh eventually succeeded Lois as the central teacher for the Mount Carmel Community, though not without interference from George Roden and a contentious break from his former mentor, Lois.

DOCTRINES/BELIEFS

Since the Davidians originated in a sectarian desire to purify the SDA church and that goal remained prominent from Victor Houteff through the time of the Rodens, it is not surprising that many of the distinctive ideas of the SDA church were carried over into the Davidians and Branch Davidians. No matter what theological innovations were introduced, the Davidians and Branch Davidians retained the hope that that the return of Jesus to conduct the last judgment was imminent. Like the Millerites and SDAs before them, they arrived at that conclusion through a painstaking examination of the scriptures, in which the decipherment of the symbolic language of the book of Revelation figured prominently. Their interpretative efforts are preserved in a wide array of theological tracts, Bible Studies, and other literature , much of which is archived on the internet . Davidian and Branch Davidian exegesis frequently makes elaborate and complex typological arguments, in which, for example, figures or events from the Christian Old Testament are viewed as types of figures and events from the New Testament, are viewed which in turn are seen as as their antitypes. The new name adopted by the former Vernon Howell rested on that sort of biblical interpretation in which he could be seen as the antitypical David and Cyrus.

From the time of Victor Houteff through the leadership period of David Koresh, the establishment of a physical Davidic messianic kingdom in the land of Israel was also a prominent theological theme. Ben Roden worked hardest to bring such a kingdom into being in anticipation of the dawning of the end times, taking many trips to Israel in order to set up a community there to which his followers could then emigrate. The central role of Israel in Branch Davidian thinking would later figure into the 1993 siege of the Mount Carmel Center, as David Koresh and his followers struggled to fit the BATF attack into the end-times scenario that they expected.

The SDA notion that a contemporary prophetic figure could be the bearer of “present truth” also animated the various sectarian offshoots from that tradition. In the early days of the SDA Church, James White, a founder of the SDAs along with his wife Ellen, published a periodical entitled The Present Truth. On the first page of its first issue in 1849, he cited the promise of the author of II Peter 1:12 to the early Christian church, “I will not be negligent to put you always in remembrance of these things, though ye know them, and be established in the present truth.” White argued that such present truth could not be limited to the apostolic age but must at least potentially be continually available. He wrote that “Present truth must be oft repeated, even to those who are established in it. This was needful in the apostles ( sic ) day, and it certainly is no less important for us, who are living just before the close of time.” (James White 1849:1). Similarly, with regard to the observance of the Sabbath on Saturday, Ellen G. White wrote in her second volume of Testimonies for the Church (1885) that “The present truth, which is a test to the people of this generation, was not a test to the people of generations far back. If the light which now shines upon us in regard to the Sabbath of the fourth commandment had been given to the generations in the past, God would have held them accountable for that light.” (Ellen White 1885: 693).

In their own distinctive ways, each of the leaders of the Davidians and the Branch Davidians laid claim to deliver such present truth. Victor Houteff was the most reticent about claiming any kind of prophetic authority, but that did not stop him from depicting the Shepherd’s Rod teachings as being of momentous consequence. In the first volume of The Shepherd’s Rod , he wrote concerning his own teaching that “no new-revealed truth was given to the church during the forty years from 1890 to 1930, and that therefore every claimant to a heaven-sent message during that period was a false one.” (Houteff 1930: 86 ). With Houteff’s own teaching, he implies, “new light” once more shone on the SDA church. Florence Houteff’s contribution of present truth centered on her prediction that April 22, 1959 would initiate the times of the end. Ben Roden had a robust prophetic self-consciousness and introduced a number of theological and ritual innovations based on his own ability to deliver present truth. So also did Lois Roden, especially with her teaching that the Holy Spirit was female. In general, appealing to the Adventist theological conception of “present truth” was the primary way in which a succession of Branch Davidian leaders strove to legitimate their authority. In constructing their prophetic personae, they drew on a well-established theological idea that simultaneously linked them to an authoritative past and justified their efforts at innovation. Their theological innovations were grounded in the idea of present truth.

RITUALS/PRACTICES

Given the importance of deciphering the Bible’s message about the end of the world and the last judgment, it is not surprising that a central ritual for the Davidians and Branch Davidians was the Bible Study. As conducted by leaders like Lois Roden, and later David Koresh, Bible Studies were less free-ranging investigations into the meanings of certain passages than they were catechetical exercises designed to reinforce the proper understanding of the text. In both Bible Studies and the various theological writings of Davidian and Branch Davidian leaders, the Bible was viewed as a single, coherent, self-interpreting whole. The interpreter’s exegetical ingenuity focused on arranging a mosaic of biblical passages that would clarify any obscurities in the text under consideration and deepen readers’ understanding of it. Transcriptions and audiotapes of Bible Studies also were a way for leaders to spread their messages to audiences well beyond the Mount Carmel Center .

The SDAs were well aware of the Jewish roots of Christianity, which originally led them to the observance of the Sabbath on Saturday. Among the Davidian and Branch Davidian leaders Ben Roden was particularly interested in extending ritual practice at Mount Carmel to include the major Jewish festivals as well (Ben Roden 1965). The Davidians and Branch Davidians favored a contemporary form of Jewish Christianity that emphasized the ritual continuities between the Judaism of Jesus’ day and the movement that he founded.

ORGANIZATION/LEADERSHIP

Although the Davidians and Branch Davidians had well-developed bureaucratic organizations, they were nonetheless highly dependent on charismatic forms of leadership. The concept of present truth prepared Adventists to look favorably on contemporary claimants to prophetic authority, even as religious authority came to be concentrated in one family and then another. In distinctive ways, each of the leaders from Victor Houteff through David Koresh claimed to provide just such guidance. Ben Roden, for example, not only came to understand himself as the biblical “Branch,” he also understood his work to continue that not only of Victor Houteff but of Ellen G. White herself, not to mention the prophets from the Bible. He wrote that “it is plain to see that Ellen G. White and Victor T. Houteff were indeed prophets of God and were, truly, writing under the influence of the Spirit of Prophecy. See Amos 3:7. Since Mrs. White and V. T. Houteff both are in the grave, as are the Bible prophets, it is necessary to consult the Branch and Joshua, the Living Testimony of Jesus in the church today, for an interpretation in harmony with the Scriptures and their writings.” (Ben Roden 1955-1956:95). Lois Roden legitimated her own authority primarily by reference to her 1977 vision in which she learned the true nature and gender of the Holy Spirit. Against the backdrop of his predecessors, David Koresh’s claims to authority in the Mount Carmel community appear as variations on a theme. Like Ben Roden, he saw himself in the pages of the Bible, specifically in the figure of the Lamb of God mentioned in Revelation 5, as being worthy of opening the scroll sealed with seven seals. Like Lois Roden, Koresh also claimed an extraordinary revelatory experience, something like an ascent into the heavens while he was in Jerusalem in 1985. Also, like Victor Houteff and Ben Roden, Koresh saw himself as playing a distinctive role in the establishment of a Davidic messianic kingdom.

Charismatic claims to authority do not have a social impact unless they are recognized and acted upon. All of the Davidian and Branch Davidian leaders proved capable of attracting at least some followers to the Mount Carmel Center and, through the dissemination of their teachings, to persuade others that they had achieved substantial new insight into the meaning of the scriptures. The introduction of distinctive theological innovations, such as Florence Houteff’s setting a date for the beginning of the end times and Lois Roden’s proclamation that the Holy Spirit was feminine, typically provoked moments of crisis for at least some of their followers. Defections and at least one significant schism among the Davidians can be traced to moments like those. On the other hand, those who managed to assimilate the new theological ideas into their pre-existing repertoires of commitments only strengthened their commitment to the group and its current leader. The process of strengthening commitment can be seen clearly in the interactive Bible Studies. Since the Bible Studies had more of a catechetical than exploratory function, every time someone attended one in person, read one, or heard one on audiotape, it became an opportunity for demonstrating and reinforcing commitment to the message being taught. In addition to being occasions to expound the distinctive theology of the Davidians and Branch Davidians, the Bible Studies became opportunities for successive leaders to enact and reinforce their leadership.

ISSUES/CHALLENGES

Both Davidians and Branch Davidians continued to face a challenge that they had in common with all other millennialists. Like the followers of William Miller who faced the Great Disappointment, they continually had to reckon with the delay of the advent of Jesus at the final judgment. When Florence Houteff, like Miller and others before her, actually set a particular date for the events of the end, the challenge became all the greater. The continued delay of the end inevitably cost the various groups that occupied the Mount Carmel Center members, but even those whose commitment was not thoroughly shaken by failed predictions or evident delays consistently had to calibrate their understanding of when and how the events of the end would, finally, unfold. Leaders faced the challenge of maintaining a sense of urgency in the expectation that the world would soon be transformed at the same time that they had to develop explanations for its undeniable delay.

Despite their substantial missionary efforts, primarily among members of the SDA church, Davidians and Branch Davidians also had to reckon with the reality that their message was being rebuffed by their target audiences much more often than it was being accepted. From Victor Houteff on, Davidian and Branch Davidian leaders were unsparing in their indictments of the SDA church. They also, however, made members of the church their primary targets for proselytization. The comparatively small numbers of members of the Mount Carmel community and sympathizers over time, however, show that the groups remained as deviant and heretical in the eyes of the SDA church as they were when Houteff was first excommunicated in 1934. The various traditions initiated by Houteff’s challenge to the SDA church remained small sects in relatively high tension with their parent body and were persistently unable to recruit more than a few hundred followers. The ongoing tension that the Davidians and Branch Davidians experienced with the SDA church eventually paled next to the armed conflict that the Mount Carmel community of David Koresh experienced with the forces of the U. S. government.

REFERENCES

Gallagher, Eugene V. 2013. “’Present Truth’ and Diversification among the Branch Davidians” in Revisionism and Diversification in New Religious Movements, edited by Eileen Barker. London: Ashgate.

Houteff, Florence. 1958. The Symbolic Code , Vols. 10-13. Accessed from http://www.davidiansda.org/new_codes_or_false_codes.htm on 2 August 2013.

Houteff, Victor. 1943. The Leviticus of the Davidian Seventh-day Adventists. Accessed from http://www.the- B ranch.org/Davidian_Association_Leviticus_Bylaws_Constitution_Houteff on 2 August 2013.

Houteff, Victor. 1930. “The Shepherd’s Rod, Vol. I Tract.” A ccessed from http://www.the-branch.org/Shepherds_Rod_Tract_Israel_Esau_Jacob_Types_Houteff on 2 August 2013.

Newport, Kenneth G. C. 2006. The Branch Davidians of Waco : The History and Beliefs of an Apocalyptic Sect. New York: Oxford University Press.

Pitts, William L. forthcoming. “SHEkinah: Lois Roden’s Quest for Gender Equality.” Nova Religio .

Roden, Ben L. 1965. “God’s Holy Feasts.” Accessed from http://www.the-branch.org/Six_Holy_Feasts_In_The_Old_And_New_Testaments_Ben_Roden on 2 August 2013.

Roden, Ben L. 1960. “Branch Field Letter to the Believers in the Land of Promise.” Accesed from http://www.the-branch.org/Lois_Roden_In_Israel_As_Chairman_Ben_Roden on 2 August 2013.

Roden, Ben L. 1959. “ The Three Harvest Feasts of Exodus 23:14-19; Lev. 23.” Accessed from http://www.the-branch.org/Passover_Wavesheaf_Antitype_Branch_Davidians_Ben_Roden on 2 August 2013.

Roden, Ben L. 1958. “ The Family Tree—Isaiah 11:1.” Accessed from http://www.the-branch.org/Isaiah_11_Family_Tree_Judgment_Of_The_Living_Ben_Roden on 2 August 2013.

Roden, Ben L. 1955-1956. “Seven Letters to Florence Houteff. ” Accessed from http://www.the-branch.org/Jesus%27_New_Name_The_Branch_Day_Of_Atonement_Ben_Roden on 2 August 2013.

Roden, Lois I. 1981-1983. SHEkinah. Accessed from http://www.the-branch.org/Shekinah_Magazine on 2 August 2013.

Roden Lois I. 1980. “By His Spirit . . . .” Accessed from http://www.the-branch.org/Godhead_Masculine_Feminine_Father_Mother_Son_Lois_Roden on 2 August 2013.

Rowe, David L. 2008. God’s Strange Work: William Miller and the End of the World. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.

Tabor, James D. and Eugene V. Gallagher. 1995. Why Waco? Cults and the Battle for Religious Freedom in America Today. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

The General Association of Davidian Seventh-day Adventists. 2013. Accessed from http://www.davidian.org/ on 2 August 2013.

White, Ellen. 1885. Testimonies for the Church , vol. II. p. 693. Accessed from http://www.gilead.net/egw/books/testimonies/Testimonies_for_the_Church_Volume_Two on 2 August 2013. .

Author:
Eugene V. Gallagher

Post Date:
3 August 2013

 

Home | About Us |Partnerships |Profiles |Resources |WRSP Authors |Donate |Contact
Copyright © 2016 World Religions & Spirituality Project• All Rights Reserved

Web Design by Luke Alexander

Share

FUNDAMENTALIST CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS (FLDS) (2002-PRESENT)

FLDS TIMELINE (2002-present)

2002 (September 8) – FLDS leader Rulon Jeffs died at age 92.

2002 Rulon Jeffs’ son, Warren Jeffs, became FLDS president and prophet at age 47.

2003 Property for the Yearning For Zion Ranch (YFZ) was purchased.

2005 The foundation for the YFZ temple was dedicated.

2005 (June) Warren Jeffs was arrested on sexual misconduct charges.

2011 Warren Jeffs was sentenced to life in prison plus 20 years.

FLDS HISTORY (2002-present)

When Rulon Jeffs died in 2002, his son, Warren, assumed the office of President and Prophet of the FLDS. Warren Jeffs was thesecond son of Rulon’s fourth (and favorite) wife, Marilyn Steed. Rulon Jeffs left behind twenty-two wives, many of whom Warren married. Warren Jeffs’ leadership marked a significant shift in key FLDS practices and policies. Jeffs sought to solidify his power and authority in the new policy changes. He called for greater centralization of political and economic power in the person of the prophet. Though the FLDS had already moved to the “one man doctrine” of First Ward governance, Jeffs expanded this doctrine to a new level. Jeffs centralized finances and ordered business owners in the community to surrender ownership. He excommunicated long-term community leaders Dan and Louis Barlow and twenty other FLDS men who challenged the new rules and practices. Their property was seized and their wives and children reassigned to men loyal to Jeffs (Evans 2011). This culminated in a mass exodus of 700 members led by Winston Blackmore to another FLDS community in Bountiful in Canada (B.C.). Jeffs also ousted several hundred teenage boys (Lost Boys”) for violations of community rules. These self-aggrandizing actions created new divisions and conflicts within the FLDS. Critics charged Jeffs with blatant disregard for church law and its officers. It was in this contentious context that Jeffs set about to establish a new FLDS community in Texas.

The property for the Yearning for Zion (YFZ) Ranch near Eldorado was purchased in 2003 by FLDS member David Allred. He claimed the 1,700 acre property was to be developed as a corporate hunting retreat. But construction crews quickly began building log homes to house the new residents and set about working on the new temple. The new construction and the arrival of hundreds of FLDS members in their traditional dress raised deep suspicions and rumors in the neighboring towns, exacerbated by the aggressive claims-making of anti-FLDS apostates and anticult activists (Wright 2011).

The Yearning for Zion (YFZ) Ranch was envisioned as a new “center place” where true believers could seek more perfect lives. Critics suggest that Jeffs’ intent was to separate his most loyal followers from rest of the fundamentalists in Colorado City and Hildale. Indeed, Jeffs claimed that the Lord had rejected Colorado City as a place where the spirit of God could dwell and that he was led by God to build a new city of Zion and a new temple. Only the most righteous or elect could reside in the new YFZ community. The temple foundation was dedicated in January, 2005. The population of the ranch was estimated to be about 500 at that time.

One of the policy shifts under Jeffs reign was the return to the practice of underage (plural) marriage. In the years leading up to the Warren Jeffs presidency, the age of marriage for women in the FLDS had risen. Martha Bradley (1993) reports that by the late 1980s, the average age of marriage for FLDS women had reached 18 as these women were expressing more interest in waiting to marry and obtaining higher education or professional training outside the community (see also Hammon and Jankoviak, 2011:69). Underage marriages were becoming less common. But Jeffs reversed this trend, promoting underage marriages.

In June, 2005, Jeffs was charged with sexual assault of a minor and with conspiracy to commit sexual misconduct with a minor for allegedly arranging a marriage between a 14 year-old girl and her 19 year-old first cousin. Jeffs became a fugitive to avoid arrest. Photos were later released showing Jeffs celebrating his marriage to an underage girl who was only 12. In late 2005, Jeffs was put on the FBI’s most wanted list. Jeffs was captured in Nevada in August, 2006. He stood trial in St. George, Utah in 2007 and was found guilty on two counts of being an accomplice to rape. He was sentenced to 10 years in prison. But the Utah Supreme Court later overturned the ruling and ordered a new trial due to faulty instructions given to jurors. Jeffs was still in custody when the state of Texas launched a raid on the YFZ property the following year.

On April 3, 2008, Texas state police and the Department of Family and Protective Services (DFPS) raided the YFZ Ranch. Officials alleged that they had evidence of the “widespread pattern and practice” of child sexual abuse. The massive raid was triggered by phone calls to the Newbridge Family Shelter hotline in San Angelo. The caller claimed to be a sixteen year-old girl, Sarah Jessop, who resided at the YFZ Ranch and who said she was raped and beaten by her forty-nine year old spiritual husband. But the raid failed to locate Sarah, and authorities later learned that the calls were a hoax. The caller turned out to be Rozita Swinton, a mentally disturbed thirty-three year-old woman from Colorado Springs. Ms. Swinton, who had previously been arrested for making false charges to police, initially made calls to an anti-FLDS apostate and activist, Flora Jessop, who contacted Texas authorities and forwarded the calls to child protection officials. In an unprecedented action, DFPS officials seized 439 FLDS children at the YFZ Ranch asserting that all the children were at risk of abuse even though the raid and the allegations were predicated on hoax phone calls (Wright and Richardson 2011). The District court granted the DFPS requests for emergency custody, but the Texas Appeals Court later reversed the District court after determining that the state did not have evidence for mass custodial detention and had overreached. The appellate court’s decision was upheld by the Texas Supreme Court (Schreinert and Richardson 2011). Eleven FLDS men, including Jeffs, were charged with sexual assault of a minor.

According to a DFPS report issued December 22, 2008, all but 15 of the 439 cases (96 percent) were “non-suited” (i.e., parents had taken appropriate action to protect children from abuse). All but one of the FLDS children taken into state custody was returned to their parents. However, evidence garnered from the YFZ raid implicated Jeffs in underage marriage practices and led to convictions in Texas on two charges of sexual assault of a child, and he was sentenced to life in prison plus 20 years. Nine of the FLDS men were charged and convicted of sexual assault of a minor, one was convicted of performing an unlawful marriage ceremony, and the other pleaded guilty to bigamy.

The conviction of Jeffs has left the FLDS community in some disarray. Some of the families whose children were seized by the state of Texas did not return. Other FLDS members have left as Jeffs has continued to press his authority from prison. Warren Jeffs’ brother, Lyle Jeffs, was running the daily operations of the church as of 2012.

ISSUES/CHALLENGES

The leadership of Warren Jeffs represented a power grab and reversal of a trend away from underage marriage. In Jeffs’ trial in Texas, former FLDS member Ezra Draper testified that “FLDS men began taking brides younger and younger after Jeffs took over” (Weber, 2011). Draper also testified that “Jeffs ruled FLDS with a far heavier and crueler hand than his father,” whom he succeeded (Weber 2011). It is important to remember that the FLDS community is almost 100 years-old. The origins of the FLDS date back to the statement of Lorin Wooley in 1912 regarding the disagreement with the LDS church over the decision to abandon Celestial Marriage. The community of Short Creek (now Colorado City/Hildale) was founded the next year. As age of consent laws have been raised over the years in the U.S., the FLDS has been reluctant to make these accommodations to modernity, preferring to live as if they were still residing in the frontier society of the 19 th century. But research suggests that they were making these accommodations, albeit slowly and reluctantly, until Jeffs took over.

While plural marriage or “Celestial marriage” is controversial in its own right, irrespective of the age of consent issue, the broader abuse and forced marriage claims by opponents and critics have to be examined carefully and in context. Some of these claims have been discredited or shown to be wildly exaggerated (Wright 2011, Wright and Fagen 2011). There is substantial research to suggest that FLDS women are not simply pawns of a predatory patriarchal system. Cultural anthropologist Janet Bennion, who has studied the FLDS perhaps more extensively than anyone, contends that these women reveal a unique strength and independence, carving out lives of “female autonomy” and “widespread sharing” (2008:ix). She found that FLDS women had created an innovative matrifocal network that provides shared childcare while pursuing an education or career outside the community. This finding comports with the observations of other scholars and with the results of other studies of the FLDS (Altman and Ginat 1996; Bennion 2004, 2008, 2011a, 2011b; Bradley 1993; Campbell 2008, 2009; Daynes 2001; Driggs 2011; Fagen and Wright, forthcoming). The focus on Warren Jeff’s brief reign and abuse of power distorts the evolved roles of women in the FLDS overall. But it also points to the vulnerability of the FLDS or “First Ward” governance advocating the “one-man doctrine” which concentrates power in the hands of a single individual. As Hammon and Jankowiak (2011:55) observe, the split in the FLDS in 1984 produced two separate wards, and the Second Warders have placed more emphasis on individual choice, personal responsibility, merit, and reliance on a Priesthood Council rather than unwavering allegiance to the prophet characteristic of the First Ward.

As Warren Jeffs continues to insist on ruling the FLDS from prison, it remains to be seen how this will play out among members over time: whether there will arise competing prophets to challenge Jeffs’ authority, whether new factions will emerge, or if out of practical necessity those who administer the day-to-day operations of the church become de facto leaders who develop their own authority. Jeffs has imposed even stricter and more rigid requirements on members since his incarceration, dissolving marriages, declaring a moratorium on sex, and attempting to purge the doubters (Dobner 2012; Hollenhorst 2011). He has also issued a series of revelations declaring God’s judgment on the nation for imprisoning him, warning of earthquakes, volcanoes, fires, storms, and floods. But it seems highly unlikely that Jeffs will ever be released from prison, given his life sentence plus twenty years. This permanent sequestration may empower some FLDS members to accept future changes in leadership.

REFERENCES

Altman, Irwin and Joseph Ginat. 1996. Polygamous Families in Contemporary Society. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Bennion, Janet. 2011a. “History, Culture, and Variability of Mormon Schismatic Groups.” Pp. 101-24 in Modern Polygamy in the United States, edited by Cardell K. Jacobson and Lara Burton. New York: Oxford University Press.

Bennion, Janet. 2011b. “The Many Faces of Polygamy: An Analysis of the Variability in Modern Mormon Fundamentalism in the Intermountain West.” Pp. 163-84 in Modern Polygamy in the United States, edited by Cardell K. Jacobson and Lara Burton. New York: Oxford University Press.

Bennion, Janet. 2008. Evaluating the Effects of Polygamy on Women and Children in Four North American Mormon Fundamentalist Groups. Lewiston, NY: The Edwin Mellen Press.

Bennion, Janet. 2004. Desert Patriarchy. Tuscon, AZ: University of Arizona Press.

Bradley, Martha Sontag. 1993. Kidnapped from That Land: The Government Raids on the Short Creek Polygamists. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.

Campbell, Angela. 2009. “Bountiful Voices.” Osgoode Hall Law Journal 47: 183-234.

Campbell, Angela. 2008. “Wives’ Tales: Reflecting on Research in Bountiful.” Canadian Journal of Law and Society 23(1-2):121-41.

Daynes, Katherine M. 2011. “Differing Polygamous Patterns: Nineteenth-Century LDS and Twenty-First Century Marriage Systems.” Pp.125-50 in Modern Polygamy in the United States, edited by Cardell K. Jacobson and Lara Burton,. New York: Oxford University Press.

Dobner, Jennifer. 2012. “Imprisoned Warren Jeffs Imposes Change on Polygamous Sect.” Deseret News, January 15. Accessed from www.deseretnews.com on 13 March 2012.

Driggs, Ken. 2011. “Twenty Years of Observations about the Fundamentalist Polygamists.” Pp. 77-100 in Modern Polygamy in the United States, edited by Cardell K. Jacobson and Lara Burton. New York: Oxford University Press.

Evans, Martha Bradley. 2011. “The Past as Prologue: A Comparison of the Short Creek and Eldorado Polygamy Raids.” Pp. 25-50 in Saints under Siege: The Texas State Raid on the Fundamentalist Latter Day Saints, edited by Stuart A. Wright and James T. Richardson. New York: New York University Press.

Fagen, Jennifer Lara and Stuart A. Wright. Forthcoming. “Gender, Sexuality and Women’s Empowerment in Mormon Fundamentalist Communities.” In Sexuality and New Religious Movements, edited by Henrik Bogdan and James R. Lewis. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.

Hammon, Heber B. and William Jankoviak. 2011. “One Vision: The Making, Unmaking, and Remaking of a Fundamentalist Polygamous Community.” Pp.41-75 in Modern Polygamy in the United States, edited by Cardell K. Jacobson and Lara Burton. New York: Oxford University Press.

Holenhorst, John. 2011. “Purge of Nonbelievers Under Way in FLDS Town.” Deseret News, December 5. Accessed from www.deseretnews.com on 13 March 2012.

Schreinert, Tamatha L. and James T. Richardson. 2011. “Pyrrhic Victory? An Analysis of the Appeal Court Opinions Concerning the FLDS Children.” Pp.242-64 in Saints under Siege: The Texas State Raid on the Fundamentalist Latter Day Saints , edited by Stuart A. Wright and James T. Richardson. New York: New York University Press.

Weber, Paul J. 2011. “Warren Jeffs ruled with heavy hand, Texas jurors hear in sentencing phase,” Deseret News, August 9. Accessed from www.deseretnews.com on 15 October 2012.

Wright, Stuart A. 2011. “Deconstructing Official Rationales for the Texas State Raid on the FLDS.” Pp.124-49 in Saints under Siege: The Texas State Raid on the Fundamentalist Latter Day Saints , edited by Stuart A. Wright and James T. Richardson. New York: New York University Press.

Wright, Stuart A. and Jennifer Lara Fagen. 2011. “ Texas Redux: A Comparative Analysis of the FLDS and Branch Davidian Raids.” Pp.150-77 in Saints under Siege: The Texas State Raid on the Fundamentalist Latter Day Saints , edited by Stuart A. Wright and James T. Richardson . New York: New York University Press.

Wright, Stuart A. and James T. Richardson, eds. Saints under Siege: The Texas State Raid on the Fundamentalist Latter Day Saints. New York: New York University Press.

Post Date:
31 October 2012

Share

Fundamentalist Latter-Day Saints



]]>]]>]]>]]>

THE FUNDAMENTALIST LATTER-DAY SAINTS (FLDS)
(1843-2002)

FLDS TIMELINE

1843 Joseph Smith announced his revelation on plural marriage.

1862 The U.S. Congress passed the Morrill Anti-Bigamy Act.

1882 The U.S. Congress passed the Edmunds Anti-Polygamy Act.

1886 (September 26-27) Fundamentalists claimed that John Taylor received a revelation about the continuation of plural marriage while on the underground.

1887 The U.S. Congress passed the Edmunds-Tucker Act.

1890 (October 6) Wilfred Woodruff announced a Manifesto forbidding plural marriage.

1904-07 Hearings were held in the U.S. Senate on the seating of Reed Smoot as Senator from Utah.

1904 (April 6) A second Manifesto was issued by Joseph F. Smith that threatened excommunication for LDS members who engaged in plural marriage.

1910 LDS Church began a policy of excommunication for new plural marriages.

1929-1933 Lorin C. Woolley created the “Priesthood Council.”

1935 (September 18) Lorin C. Woolley died, and Joseph Leslie Broadbent became head of the Priesthood Council.

1935 Broadbent died, and John Y. Barlow became head of the Priesthood Council.

1935 Truth magazine began publication.

1941 Leroy S. Johnson and Marion Hammon were ordained to the Priesthood Council by John Y. Barlow

1942 The United Effort Plan Trust was established.

1944 (March 7-8) The Boyden polygamy raid was conducted.

1949 (December 29) John Y. Barlow died, leading to a succession crisis in the Priesthood Council.

1952 The Priesthood Council split when Joseph W. Musser announced that Rulon Allred would become a new member. Result was two factions: the FLDS (Leroy S. Johnson) and the Apostolic United Brethren (Rulon Allred).

1953 (August 16) In the case of In re Black the U.S. Supreme Court held that polygamous parents have no rights as parents.

1953 (July 26) The raid on the polygamist community at Short Creek was conducted.

1954 (January 12) With Joseph Musser’s death, Rulon Allred became the head of the Priesthood Council.

1985 Colorado City was incorporated.

1986 Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints organized.

1986 (September 26) J. Marion Hammon dedicated Centennial Park (new intentional community formed by the Second Warders).

1986 (November 25) Leroy S. Johnson died, and Rulon T. Jeffs became the FLDS leader.

2002 (September 8) Rulon Jeffs died.

FOUNDER/GROUP HISTORY

Mormon fundamentalism originated in the teachings of the Latter-day Saint Prophet, Joseph Smith, who introduced the doctrineof a plurality of wives to a select group of his followers in the 1840s. By the time of his death in 1844, according to scholar George D. Smith’s analysis, at least 196 men and 717 women had entered the practice privately (Smith 2008:573-639). His vision for the “new and everlasting covenant of marriage” became part of LDS scripture on July 12, 1843 with the 132 nd section of the Doctrine and Covenants. He positioned the uniquely Mormon interpretation of the significance of marriage, in the restoration of the model of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. According to the revelation, “Celestial marriage” was marriage for time and eternity. Men with priesthood authority had the power to seal men and women for eternity. Essential for the highest level of salvation in what Smith described as the “Celestial” kingdom, Smith interpreted plural marriage “as a uniquely exalted form of ‘celestial marriage’—the ‘further order’ of the patriarchal order of marriage mentioned in Doctrine of Covenants” (Bradley 1993:2)

The next three presidents of the LDS church were also polygamists. Brigham Young, John Taylor and Wilford Woodruff led a church that had at its center the doctrine of plural marriage. As prophet and president of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Brigham Young expanded the practice of plurality, married at least fifty-five women himself, and had fifty-seven children (Johnson 1987). Like Young, President John Taylor and Wilford Woodruff continued to tie the Mormon concept of salvation and the afterlife to the doctrine of plural marriage. With the 1890 Manifesto, the church began a multi-year process of ending the official practice of plural marriage among the Latter-day Saints.

Despite LDS claims to priesthood authority or the revelatory origins of the doctrine, the federal government fought the church and its practice of plural marriage through the second half of the nineteenth century. After the public announcement of the practice by Apostle Orson Pratt from the pulpit in front of an Utah audience of thousands of Latter-day Saints, the Congress passed a series of bills designed to limit the practice, punish those who continued to violate the law, and ultimately to damage the church corporation itself. These included the Morrill Anti-Bigamy Act of 1862, the Poland Act of 1874, the Edmunds Act of 1882, and, finally, the Edmunds-Tucker Act of 1887. During the 1880s and the federal pursuit of polygamists, men and women went on the “underground” to avoid arrest, hiding in Arizona, Nevada, Idaho and throughout Utah. Church president John Taylor went into hiding in January, 1885 and died two years later on the underground (Bradley 1993:5).

In important ways, the story of the FLDS begins with the 1890 Manifesto. President Wilford Woodruff introduced the Manifesto at the October semiannual conference of the Church. Eventually included in the Doctrine and Covenants, it was initially essentially a press release. It denied that the LDS church advocated continuing in the practice of plural marriage, stating that “We are not teaching polygamy or plural marriage, nor permitting any person to enter into its practice….” It went on to assert:

Inasmuch as laws have been enacted by Congress forbidding plural marriages, which laws have been pronounced constitutional by the court of last resort, I hereby declare my intention to submit to those laws, and to use my influence with the members of the Church over which I preside to have them do likewise….I now publicly declare that my advice to the Latter-day Saints is to refrain from contracting any marriage forbidden by the law of the land (Doctrine and Covenants).

The impact of the Manifesto was neither absolute nor swift in causing plural marriages to cease. In fact, for the next two decades at least 250 new marriages were performed in secret in the Salt Lake Valley, the Canadian or Mexican colonies or in other areas throughout the church (Hardy 1992:167-335, Appendix II).

During the U.S. Senate hearings over the confirmation of Utah Senator Reed Smoot between 1904-1907, plural marriage surfaced again as a national issue. Smoot was not himself a polygamist, but the issue was whether he would be loyal to the laws of the United States or those of his church. In response to this new pressure, President Joseph F. Smith in April conference, 1904 announced the “Second Manifesto” that added the threat of excommunication to those who failed to follow the prohibition against plural marriages. The document decried allegations that new marriages had occurred “with the sanction, consent or knowledge of the Church” (Allen and Leonard 1976:443).

President Smith framed the discussion with reference to the church’s patriotism and particularly the importance of the guarantee of freedom of religion. “What our people did in disregard of the law and the decisions of the Supreme Court affecting plural marriages,” he said, “was in the spirit of maintaining religious rights under constitutional guarantees, and not in any spirit of defiance or disloyalty to the government.” Importantly, “the Church abandoned the controversy and announced its intention to be obedient to the laws of the land” (Clark 1965-75:4:151).

Regardless of the Second Manifesto, considerable ambiguity still existed in the church over the issue of plural marriage. Marriages continued to be performed without the official sanction of the Church president and sometimes by General Authorities of the church. A significant tightening of the policy and punishment for disobedience of the prohibition occurred during the 1910s under presidents Joseph F. Smith and Heber Grant. Church President Grant spoke publicly about priesthood authority, and clarified the official LDS position, asserting that the “keys” rested only in the prophet and in the Church (Bradley 1933:13).

Although Short Creek, Arizona became publicly identifiable in 1953 with the Arizona raid on its polygamous community, settlers first came to the area in the 1910’s. Nestled in the stark desert landscape at the base of the Vermillion Cliffs, beginning in the late 1920s, Short Creek became the home to polygamists seeking refuge from persecution from the world outside. When John Y. Barlow became senior member of the Priesthood Council and fundamentalist leader, he encouraged his followers to gather at Short Creek. Practicing the principle of the gathering, like mid-nineteenth century Latter-day Saints, true believers formed communities apart from the mainstream where they could continue in their practice of a plurality of wives. It is estimated that forty families settled in the isolated landscape of the Arizona strip country.

In 1935, the LDS church excommunicated Short Creek polygamists, Price W. Johnson, Edner Allred, and Carling Spencer. While Barlow was absent from his leadership role and visiting with fundamentalists throughout the region, Joseph Jessop, and later his son, Fred Jessop, guided social life in Short Creek and helped with economic growth and development. The Barlows, Jessops and Johnsons became closely connected through religious and community ties through the 1940s and 1950s.

In 1944, in the first mass arrest of polygamists, federal and state officials arrested fifty men and women in both Utah and Arizona. The Boyden Raid executed charges of conspiracy, Mann Act and Lindberg Act violations. Eventually, fifteen men served in the Utah State penitentiary before signing a loyalty oath that allowed some of them to return to their families before their terms had transpired (Bradley 1993:79).

On July 26, 1953, the government of Arizona raided the polygamous community of Short Creek. As more than 100 vehicles of the state rolled over the rocky roadbeds leading into town, Governor Howard Pyle justified the raid over the radio, announcing his fight against “insurrection within [ Arizona’s] own borders,” with the intent “to protect the lives and future of 263 children . . . . the product and the victims of the foulest conspiracy . . . . a community dedicated to the production of white slaves. . . . degrading slavery.” He elaborated further on this theme.

Here is a community—many of the women, sadly right along with the men—unalterably dedicated to the wicked theory that every maturing girl child should be forced into the bondage of multiple wifehood with men of all ages for the sole purpose of producing more children to be reared to become mere chattels of this totally lawless enterprise.

As the highest authority in Arizona, on whom is laid the constitutional injunction to ‘take care that the laws be faithfully executed,’ I have taken the ultimate responsibility for setting into motion the actions that will end this insurrection (Pyle 1953).

More than one hundred Arizona state officials brought with them the warrants for thirty-six men and eighty-six women. Thirty-nine of the warrants were for individuals who lived on the Utah side of town. The charges included: rape, statutory rape, carnal knowledge, polygamous living, cohabitation, bigamy, adultery, and misappropriation of school funds (Bradley 1993:131). The raid sought to “rescue 263 children from virtual bondage under the communal United Effort Plan,” according to Attorney General Paul LaPrade. “The principle objective is to rescue these children from a life-time of immoral practices without their ever having had an opportunity to learn of or observe the outside world and its concepts of decent living” (LaPrade 1953).

Over the next three days the state set up a magistrate’s court in the schoolhouse at the center of town. The men would be transported for a preliminary hearing in Kingman on August 31, 1953. The state also held juvenile court where Judges Lorna Lockwood and Jesse Faulkner took custody of each child and made them wards of the court. Judges, deputy sheriffs and court photographers visited the homes of polygamous families in Short Creek gathering evidence to support the accusations. On the third day after the raid, the state gave mothers the chance to travel with their children (153 in total) to foster homes in Mesa, Phoenix and other locations nearby where they stayed for the next two years while their cases played out in the court and they appeared before state agencies. Two years after the raid all of the women had returned to Short Creek with the exception of one who had been a minor at the time of the raid, but who returned once she was legally old enough to do so.

Utah took a different tack in attempting to dismantle plural families. Judge David F. Anderson, of Utah’s Sixth District Juvenile Court in St. George, Utah devised a legal tactic that attacked the alleged neglect of the children of polygamous children. Although Anderson filed twenty different petitions alleging that eighty children had been neglected, he chose to make Vera and Leonard Black a test case of the legitimacy of this approach. The polygamous couple had eight children together by 1953. Anderson depended on Section 55-10-6, Utah Code Annotated, 1953 for the definition of neglect: “A child who lacks proper parental care by reason of the fault or habits of the parent, guardian or custodian….A child whose parent, guardian or custodian neglects or refuses to provide proper or necessary subsistence, education, medical or surgical care or other care necessary for his health, morals or well-being. A child who is found in a disreputable place or who associates with vagrant, vicious, or immoral persons.”

The case, In Re Black , moved through the courts for almost two years, eventually in 1955 ending up on appeal at the Utah Supreme Court. In 1955, the Court upheld the decision of the lower court against the mother, concluding that polygamists have no right to the custody of their children. The majority opinion stated: “the practice of polygamy, unlawful cohabitation and adultery are sufficiently reprehensible, without the innocent lives of children being seared by their evil influence. There can be no compromise with evil” (Driggs 1991:3) After staying in foster care for three years, Vera gained custody of her children, but only after she signed an oath denying she believed in plural marriage (Bradley 1993:178).

Estimates of the number of individuals practicing plural marriage in the late twentieth century, ranged from thirty to fifty thousand. Before he died, polygamist Ogden Kraut estimated that “there are probably at least 30,000 people who consider themselves Fundamentalist Mormons, espousing at least the belief in the doctrine of plural marriage” (Kraut 1989). Historian Richard Van Wagoner also estimated 30,000 fundamentalists in 1986 (Van Wagoner 1992). In 2009, Melton offered the same estimate (Melton 2009:650). Since its inception among the Mormons in the 1840s, the practice of a plurality of wives has proceeded beneath the surface in a private, subterranean world protected by religious ritual and belief, behavior and life practice, and sometimes, as in the case of Short Creek, Arizona, by the protection provided by the natural world.

DOCTRINES/BELIEFS

The FLDS believe in the core doctrines of the nineteenth century Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, including the Principle (the doctrine of plural marriage), consecration and stewardship (a type of communal organization), the plurality of Gods (the potential for every righteous man to become a God in the afterlife), and the right of a prophet to receive revelations from God. Many describe the LDS Church as God’s church and some participate in LDS temple rituals, serve LDS missions or pay tithes in LDS wards before they are excommunicated for their polygamous beliefs or life style.

Although outsiders commonly describe Mormon fundamentalists as polygamists, the FLDS themselves use a variety of terms to describe their unique practice of a plurality of wives: “the Principle,” “Celestial Marriage,” the “New and Everlasting Covenant,” “plural marriage,” or the “Priesthood work” (Quinn 1993:240-41).

The principal point of division between the FLDS and the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is over priesthood authority. The fundamentalists believe that the LDS Church moved off course with the 1890 Manifesto and eventually lost priesthood authority to perform Celestial marriages. The FLDS believe that a plurality of wives is a core doctrine of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, essential to salvation and a sign of individual righteousness. Moreover, the FLDS recognize priesthood authority in their own leadership, authority they trace to 1886 through the narrative of Lorin C. Woolley. Woolley claimed that in 1886 President John Taylor was living in Centerville, Utah on the underground hiding from federal officials. He reported being was visited by the Prophet Joseph Smith and pledging that he would “suffer my right hand to be cut off” before he would sign a document ordering the desertion of plural marriage (Musser 1934). According to Joseph Musser’s 1912 account, Taylor allegedly instructed Woolley and the other men present: George Q. Cannon, L. John Nuttall, John W. Woolley, Samuel Bateman, Daniel R. Bateman, Charles H. Wilkins, Charles Birrell, and George Earl to continue the practice of plural marriages. If the LDS Church abandoned the practice, or the “Principle,” a smaller group of five men—Cannon, Wilkins, Bateman, John W. Woolley, and Lorin C. Woolley would carry priesthood authority forward to perform plural marriages and could ordain others to do the same (Bradley 1993: 19). By 1929, Woolley was the only one of these men still alive. He transferred the same priesthood power to a select group in the “Council of Friends or the Priesthood Council.” These men became the leaders of the movement that would eventually be known as Mormon fundamentalism, former Latter-day Saints who continued in the practice of a plurality of wives.

For the FLDS, the marriage relationship was the nucleus of a family kingdom. The primary aim of marriage, however, was not love, but a celestial social order. Plural marriage was part of a deferential and hierarchical society strictly ordered along patriarchal lines. The child was subordinate to the mother; the mother bowed to her husband’s authority; he, in turn, looked to the prophet for direction; while the prophet was answerable to and spoke for Jesus Christ. As God was at the head of the world, the husband was the earthly head of the family. The appropriate behavior directed toward one’s superior consisted of deference and obedience. The appropriate behavior directed toward one’s subordinates consisted of instruction, benevolence, and the meting out of either rewards or punishments (Bradley 1993:101).

Men and women married to “Multiply and replenish the earth.” Sexuality had religious significance and was tied to procreation. Musser taught that “every normal woman yearns for wifehood and motherhood. She yearns to wear the crown of glory. The most precious and yearned for jewels are children to call her mother” (Musser 1948:134).

Joseph Musser articulated the meaning of the difference between men and women for Truth magazine in 1948: “Thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee. In placing man at the head, he bearing the Priesthood, a law, an eternal law, was announced.” The roles of men and women were scripturally defined and existed to create social order. “Man, with divine endowments, was born to lead, and woman to follow, though often times the female is endowed with rare talents of leadership. But women, by right, look to the male members for leadership and protection.” According to Musser, women should “respect and revere themselves, as holy vessels, destined to sustain and magnify the eternal and sacred relationship of wife and mother.” Women’s role was related to that of men, as the “ornament and glory of man; to share with him a never fading crown, and an eternally increasing dominion” (Musser 1948:134).

RITUALS

The scriptures used by the FLDS are the same as those of the LDS church: the Book of Mormon, the Bible, the Pearl of Great Price and the Doctrine and Covenants. Beliefs such as the plurality of Gods, the Word of Wisdom, the nature of heaven and the afterlife are virtually the same. Both churches are founded on the structure of male, priesthood authority.

Although many of the religious rituals practiced by the FLDS resemble those practiced by the Latter-day Saints, the tradition of holding Sunday School in private homes where the sacrament is served, rather than in the meetinghouse, is one significant difference. The Johnson meetinghouse at the center of the community in Colorado City is the size of two LDS stake centers and is the backdrop for group worship services, community dances, and community business meetings. The central meeting space holds an audience of between 1,500 and 2,500. Also, the FLDS hold worship meetings throughout the week as was true in the nineteenth century LDS church. Like the LDS, fundamentalists wear sacred priesthood undergarments and choose modest clothing over modern popular styles.

Priesthood leaders, and ultimately the group’s prophet, arrange marriages among the FLDS in a practice called placement marriage. One plural wife commented that “we were raised believing that the Priesthood [Council] would choose our mate and that we were not to allow ourselves to fall in love with anybody,” and another FLDS youth said “In our group we don’t date” (Quinn 1992:257). The church president and leader of the Priesthood Council prays for God’s instruction about marriage partnerships. For the FLDS, arranged marriages create social stability and a sense of familial structure that has eternal significance.

The FLDS family is strictly patriarchal, although in the day-to-day life of a family women play key economic and social roles. Many have a high degree of functional autonomy. There are multiple styles of housing for families in FLDS communities. Some families prefer to have all of the wives and their children in the same household and other have multiple households for different mothers and their children. Colorado City/Hildale and Centennial Park are distinguished by the number of large-scale family homes. Local architect, Edmund Barlow, in 2003 suggested that as homes became larger in terms of square footage, they had to accommodate housing codes for apartment units. Large families with multi-families under a single roof built Sunday School rooms for family worship in their homes.

Joseph Smith revealed the principle of consecration and stewardship to the nineteenth century church. In Utah, the “United Order” functioned as an intentional community and the expression of religious ideals. Under the United Order, members consecrated property and received a stewardship that obligated them to use resources for the good of the group as well as the individual. Under Barlow’s leadership, the Priesthood Council in 1936 formed the United Trust. Besides land, the trust owned a sawmill and equipment used for agriculture “for the purpose of building up the Kingdom of God” (Driggs 2011:88). Six years later, the community dissolved the trust and returned the property. The second attempt at a communal organization of property was the United Effort Plan, which was a property holding or business trust rather than religious organization. At one point, the property in the UEP was valued at more than $100 million and “subject to the disposal of the UEP board or the Priesthood Council (Hammon and Jankowiak 2011:52).

ORGANIZATION/LEADERSHIP

The pinnacle of FLDS leadership and organization is the Priesthood Council, which they believe holds authority to perform plural marriages and which is considered higher in authority than the LDS church itself. Members of the group, also called the Council of Friends, are apostles of Jesus Christ or high priest apostles (Hammon and Jankowiak 2011:44). The president of the high priesthood, the senior member of the group, leads the council. According to the fundamentalists, John W. Woolley led the Priesthood Council until his death in 1928. At that time, Lorin Woolley called new members to the council, ordaining four new men as apostles: J. Leslie Broadbent, John Y. Barlow, Joseph W. Musser, and Charles F. Zitting (Hammon and Jankowiak 2011:45). Typically, the senior apostle or president of the council receives a revelation about who will be called to the council, or the Brethren. During these same years, the LDS church distanced itself from the practice of a plurality of wives. The movement eventually known as Mormon fundamentalism organized around those individuals who believed plural marriage was essential to their salvation and questioned both the authority and the course that the LDS church had taken.


ISSUES/CHALLENGES

Between the 1930s and the present, educational training has varied. In 1991, the community developed an elaborate plan for “Barlow University,” with a physical plan for a horseshoe loop of educational buildings like that at the University of Utah. Under the leadership of Warren Jeffs in the late 2000’s, parents took their children out of public schools and home schooled them. For decades before that, children attended schools funded with tax dollars including an elementary school, middle school and high school. Many members of the community attended Southern Utah State College at Cedar City to receive their teaching credentials, and according to D. Michael Quinn’s estimate in 1993, 85 percent of the young men and women in the group attended college, including Mohave County Community College that was located in town (Quinn 1993:267). In 1960, Short Creek changed its name to Colorado City/Hildale and built a community school—the Colorado City Academy. Until its closure in 1980, the Academy offered an education grounded in religious instruction as an alternative to public education.

In 1981, the community of the FLDS divided into two groups over priesthood leadership (priesthood council vs. one man doctrine), different interpretations of private/collective property (entitlements), and social practices (varying degrees of scriptural and social orthodoxy). Known from that time forward as “First Warders” or “Second Warders,” the split created competing and sometimes hostile sects. After 1984, Leroy Johnson led the FLDS under the “one man doctrine” and dismantled the Priesthood Council until the second coming of Christ (Driggs 2011:91). When Rulon T. Jeffs succeeded Johnson as prophet of the First Ward in 1986, the newly organized Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, excommunicated the members of the Second Ward.

REFERENCES

Allen, James B. and Glen A. Leonard. 1976. The Story of the Latter-day Saints. Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Company and the Historical Department of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

Bradley, Martha Sontag. 1993. The Government Raids on the Short Creek Polygamists. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.

Clark, James R., ed. 1965-1975. Messages of the First Presidency. Vol. 4. Salt Lake City: Bookcraft.

Hardy, B. Carmon. 1992. Solemn Covenant: The Mormon Polygamous Passage. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

Johnson, Jeffrey Ogden. 1987. “Determining and Defining ‘Wife’ — The Brigham Young Households.” Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought 20:57-70.

Kraut, Ogden. 1989. “The Fundamentalist Mormon: A History and Doctrinal Review.” Paper presented at the Sunstone Theological Symposium. Salt Lake City, Utah.

LaPrade, Paul, quoted in Arizona Daily Star. July 27, 1953.

Melton, J. Gordon. 2009. “Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints.” Pp. 649-50 in Melton’s Encyclopedia of American Religion, 8 th Edition. Detroit, MI: Gale, Cengage Learning.

Musser, Joseph White. 1948. “The Inalienable Rights of Women.” Truth , 14 October, p. 134.

Musser, Joseph White. 1934. The New and Everlasting Covenant of Marriage an Interpretation of Celestial Marriage, Plural Marriage. Salt Lake City: Truth Publishing Company.

“Official Declaration 1.” 1890. Doctrine and Covenants. Salt Lake City, UT, October 6. Accessed from http://www.lds.org/scriptures/dc-testament/od/1?lang=eng on 15 October 2012.

Pyle, Howard W. 1993. Radio Address. July 26, 1953. KTAR Radio. Phoenix, Arizona.

Quinn, D. Michael. 1993. “Plural Marriage and Fundamentalism.” Pp. 240-93 in Fundamentalisms and Society: Reclaiming the Sciences, the Family, and Education , edited by Martin E. Marty and R. Scott Appleby. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.

Smith, George D. 2008. Nauvoo Polygamy: “But We Called It Celestial Marriage.” Salt Lake City, UT: Signature Books.

Van Wagoner, Richard. 1992. Mormon Polygamy: A History. Salt Lake City, UT: Signature Books.

ADDITIONAL RESOURCES

Allred, B. Harvey. 1933. A Leaf in Review. 2d ed. Caldwell, ID: Caxton Printers.

Allred, Rulon C. 1981. Treasures of Knowledge: Selected Discourses and Excerpts from Talks. 2 vols. Hamilton, MN: Bitterroot Publishing.

Allred, Vance L. 1984. “Mormon Polygamy and the Manifesto of 1890: A Study of Hegemony and Social Conflict.” Senior Thesis. Missoula, MT: University of Montana.

Altman, Irwin and Joseph Ginat. 1996. Polygamous Families in Contemporary Society. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Anderson, J. Max. 1979. The Polygamy Story: Fiction and Fact. Salt Lake City: Publishers Press.

Baird, Mark J. and Rhea A. Kunz Baird, eds. [ca. 2003] Reminiscences of John W. and Lorin C. Woolley. 5 vols. 2nd edition. Salt Lake City: Lynn L. Bishop.

Barlow, John Y. 2005. “A Selection of the Sermons of John Y. Barlow, 1940-49.” ebooks@thoughtfactory. B17.

Batchelor, Mary, Marianne Watson, and Anne Wilde. 2000. Voices in Harmony: Contemporary Women Celebrate Plural Marriage. Salt Lake City: Principle Voices.

Bennion, Janet. 1998. Women of Principle: Female Networking in Contemporary Mormon Polygyny. New York: Oxford University Press.

Bistline, Benjamin. 1998. The Polygamists: A History of Colorado City. Colorado City, Arizona: Ben Bistline and Associates.

Bradley, Martha. 2004. “Cultural Configurations of Mormon Fundamentalist Polygamous Communities.” Nova Religio 8:5- 38.

Bradley, Martha Sontag. 2012. Plural Wife: The Autobiography of Mabel Finlayson Allred. Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.

Daynes, Kathryn M. 2001. More Wives Than One: Transformation of the Mormon Marriage System, 1840-1910. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

Driggs, Ken. 2005. “Imprisonment, Defiance, and Division: A History of Mormon Fundamentalism in the 1940s and 1950s.” Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought 38:65-95.

Driggs, Ken. 2001. “This Will Someday Be the Head and Not the Tail of the Church.’” Journal of Church and State 43:49-80.

Driggs, Ken. 1992. “’Who Shall Raise the Children?’ Vera Black and the Rights of Polygamous Utah Parents.” Utah Historical Quarterly 60:27-46.

Driggs, Ken. 1991a. “Twentieth-Century Polygamy and Fundamentalist Mormons and Southern Utah.” Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought 24:44-58.

Driggs, Ken. 1991b. “ Utah Supreme Court Decides Polygamist Adoption Case.” Sunstone 15: 67-8. Accessed from http://www.childbrides.org/politics_sunstone_UT_Supreme_Court_decides_polyg_adoption_case.html on 15 October 2012.

Driggs, Ken. 1990a. “After the Manifesto: Modern Polygamy and Fundamentalist Mormons.” Journal of Church and State 32:367-89.

Driggs, Ken. 1990b. “Fundamentalist Attitudes toward the Church as Reflected in the Sermons of the Late Leroy S. Johnson.” Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought 23: 38-60.

Hales, Brian C. 2006. Modern Polygamy and Mormon Fundamentalism: The Generations after the Manifesto. Salt Lake City: Greg Kofford Books.

Hales, Brian C., and J. Max Anderson. 1991. The Priesthood of Modern Polygamy: A LDS Perspective. Portland, OR: Northwest Publishers.

Jacobson, Cardell. 2011. Mormon Polygamy in the United States: Historical, Cultural, and Legal Issues. New York: Oxford University Press.

Johnson, Leroy S. The L. S. Johnson Sermons, 1983-1984. 7 vols. Hildale, Utah: Twin Cities Courier.

Kunz, Rhea Allred. 1978. Voices of Women Approbating Celestial or Plural Marriage. Draper, UT: Review and Preview Publishers.

Kunz, Rhea Allred, ed. 1984. A Second Leaf in Review. n.p.

Marty, Martin, and R. Scott Appleby, eds. 1991-1995. The Fundamentalism Project. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Musser, Joseph White. 1953-57. Star of Truth. 4 vols. n.p.

Quinn, D. Michael. 1998. “Plural Marriage and Mormon Fundamentalism.” Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought 311-68.

Quinn, D. Michael. 1983. J. Reuben Clark: The Church Years. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University Press.

Solomon, Dorothy Allred. 2003a. Daughter of the Saints: Growing Up in Polygamy. New York: W. W. Norton.

Solomon, Dorothy Allred. 2003b. Predators, Prey, and Other Kinfold: Growing Up in Polygamy. New York: W. W. Norton.

Solomon, Dorothy Allred. 1984. In My Father’s House. New York: Franklin Watts.

Watson, Marianne T. 2003. “Short Creek: ‘A Refuge for the Saints.’” Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought 36:71-87.

Wright, Stuart A. and James T. Richardson. 2011. Saints under Siege: The Texas State Raid on the Fundamentalist Latter Day Saints. New York : New York University Press.

Author:
Martha Bradley-Evans

Post Date:
31 October 2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Home | About Us |Partnerships |Profiles |Resources |WRSP Authors |Donate |Contact
Copyright © 2016 World Religions & Spirituality Project• All Rights Reserved

Web Design by Luke Alexander

Share