World Mate

WORLD MATE

WORLD MATE TIMELINE

1934:  Uematsu Aiko was born.

1951 (March 18):  Handa Haruhisa (aka Fukami Seizan [until 1994] and thereafter Fukami Tōshū) was born in Hyōgo Prefecture.

c. 1960:  Handa Shihoko, Fukami’s mother, joined Sekai Kyūseikyō and began to visit its local church with Fukami.

c. 1966:  Fukami received from Sekai Kyūseikyō an ohikari locket pendant, which authorised him to perform the movement’s main ritual known as jōrei .

c. 1970:  Fukami developed a strong interest in, and then converted to, Oomoto.

1976:  Having graduated from Dōshisha University in Kyoto, Fukami started work as a salesperson in Tokyo, and began to visit the Japanese office of the Chinese philanthropic organization World Red Swastika Society.

1977:  Fukami met Uematsu at the Japanese office of the World Red Swastika Society.

1978:  Uematsu founded the company Misuzu Corporation, and Fukami established the preparatory school Misuzu Gakuen as part of its business.

1984:  Uematsu and Fukami established the religious group Cosmo Core.

1985:  Cosmo Core changed its name to Cosmo Mate.

1986:  Fukami published his best-selling book Kyōun (Lucky Fortune).

1989:  Fukami founded the publisher Tachibana Publishing.

1991:  Fukami founded the consulting firm B. C. Consulting.

1993:  Two former female members of Cosmo Mate sued Fukami for damages in March, claiming that he acted indecently with them, and reached a settlement in December of that year.

1994 (April):  Cosmo Mate changed its name to Powerful Cosmo Mate.

1994 (May and June):  Former members sued Fukami and Powerful Cosmo Mate for damages in May and June respectively, claiming that he and the movement defrauded them of a lot of money.

1994 (December):  Powerful Cosmo Mate changed its name to World Mate.

1994:  The International Shinto Foundation (ISF, New York) and Shinto Kokusai Gakkai (International Shinto Studies Association [formerly known as International Shinto Research Institute], Tokyo) were established.

1995:  World Mate began to hold kokubō shingyō gatherings, which aimed to empower Japan’s national defence.

1996 (April):  World Mate sued the Shizuoka Prefecture government for not accepting the movement’s application for registration under the Religious Corporation Law.

1996 (May):  Tax penalties were imposed by the Ogikubo tax office in Tokyo on the company Cosmo World, which the tax bureau claimed was linked to World Mate.

1996:  World Mate provided funds for establishing, and operating, the Sihanouk Hospital Center of Hope, as World Mate and Fukami emphasized practising philanthropy and charity in Cambodia thereafter.

1997:  Fukami completed a master’s course in voice at Musashino Academia Musicae, a Japanese college of music.

2001:  World Mate and Fukami filed a defamation suit against Noh critic Ōkouchi Toshiteru and the publisher of the magazine psiko. They also made a claim for damages against journalists contributing to, and the publisher of, the magazine Cyzo.

2002:  The website Wārudo Meito Higai Kyūsai Netto ワールドメイト被害救済ネット (the title of which translates as “the website that aims to support those who suffer damage caused by World Mate”) was launched by lawyers and journalists.

2005 (January):  Fukami stood down from the position of vice president of Shinto Kokusai Gakkai.

2006 (May):  At the Tokyo High Court, World Mate obtained a reversal of the tax penalty imposed by the Ogikubo tax office in 1996.

2006:  Fukami received a Doctor of Literature at Tsinghua University in China.

2007:  Fukami obtained a Doctor of Literature in Chinese Classic Literature degree at Zhejiang University in China.

2008:  The Worldwide Support for Development (WSD), a not-for-profit organization chaired by Fukami, was established.

2010:  World Mate was the fifth largest donor (and the largest among religious organizations) to political parties and Diet members.

2012:  World Mate gained certification as a religious corporation by Japan’s Minister of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology.

2013-2014:  The Global Opinion Leaders Summit, hosted by the WSD, was held three times.

FOUNDER/GROUP HISTORY

World Mate’s charismatic leader Fukami Tōshū 深見東州 (formerly known as Fukami Seizan 深見青山 ), whosebirth name is Handa Haruhisa 半田晴久, [Image at right] was born in Hyōgo Prefecture in 1951. At that time his father, Handa Toshiharu, was still a university student actively involved in left-wing political movements. According to Fukami’s column posted on World Mate’s website, his mother Shihoko, three years older than Toshiharu, was a relative of Toshiharu’s father (i.e. Fukami’s grandfather).

Toshiharu found it quite difficult to get a steady job due to his political activities and therefore could not afford to take care of Shihoko and Fukami. According to Ōhara (1992), in addition to such financial difficulties , his increasingly arrogant attitude and violence towards Shihoko troubled her deeply. As a result, she joined Sekai Kyūseikyō 世界救世教, one of Japan’s largest Shinto-based NRMs (new religious movements), with the hope that Toshiharu would stop his domestic violence.

She made frequent visits to a local Kyūseikyō church with Fukami, which caused him to gradually deepen his faith in the movement. When Fukami was fifteen, he was given an ohikari locket pendant by Kyūseikyō; fifteen is the usual age for bestowing this pendant on members. According to Kyūseikyō, the pendant enables its holder to do the practice of jōrei, a healing art of purifying the spirit by radiating a divine light (ohikari) from the palm.

Although Shihoko sincerely believed in the efficacy of the healing art of jōrei , she suffered an unidentified, serious illness around the end of the 1960s, when Fukami was a high school student. He asked a senior member of Oomoto 大本 to remove the spiritual cause of her illness (Isozaki 1991; Ōhara 1992). Oomoto was a Shinto-based NRM emphasizing healing practices, to which Okada Mokichi, Kyūseikyō’s founder, had belonged prior to establishing his movement. Shihoko subsequently recovered from her illness. Then Fukami visited Matsumoto Matsuko, a female psychic of Oomoto, who, he claimed, led him to become aware of the presence of kami or deity. After entering D ō shisha University in Kyoto in 1972 (Yonemoto 1993; Hasegawa 2015), he became deeply committed to Oomoto.

Fukami received a degree in Economics at Dōshisha in 1976 and started to work at a construction company in Tokyo. Then he visited the Japanese office of the Chinese philanthropic organization World Red Swastika Society, established by the religious movement Tao-yuan. The Red Swastika Society had been on close terms with Oomoto since the 1920s. In its Japanese office located in Tokyo, Fukami displayed an outstanding ability as a saniwa , a spiritual interlocutor or interpreter who claims to be able to judge the authenticity and nature of divine oracles received by mediums. Then, according to Ishizaki (1991) and Ōhara (1992), Su no Kami the Supreme Deity, who was believed in Kyūseikyō to be the creator of the universe, told Fukami to devote himself to the way of Deity (kami no michi) and informed him that a person would come to see him in the near future; Fukami decided to quit his job and deepen his relationship with the Red Swastika Society.

In 1977, a middle-aged woman named Uematsu Aiko 植松愛子 (formerly known as Tachibana Kaoru) visited the Japanese office of the Red Swastika Society. It was the person that Deity had talked to Fukami about, for Uematsu also had been informed by Deity that a young man would come to see her soon. Uematsu, born in 1934, used to be a member of Mahikari 真光 (Yonemoto 1993), which was established in 1959 by Okada Kōtama, a former follower of Sekai Kyūseikyō. After her mother died when Uematsu was thirty-three, she, Fukami claims, received a divine revelation that told her to train her soul through housework and to lead women. Uematsu then organized a personal school for tea ceremony, flower arrangement, and confectionery making ( Ōhara 1992 ), which were traditional women’s arts in Japan. After she met Fukami, her school gradually developed into a small religious group, which had some twenty members (Yonemoto 1993).

While they congregated at her house in the Ogikubo area of Tokyo, Uematsu, who was sponsored by Tsugamura Shigerō, a patent attorney and former member of Mahikari (Yonemoto 1993), formally founded the company Misuzu Corporation in 1978. In practical terms, however, Fukami was the operating force behind the company. In that year he established Misuzu Gakuen みすず学苑 , a preparatory school for potential applicants to high status universities. Eventually he succeeded in running this school, which has become widely known among high-school students in Tokyo.

Although busy with his business, Fukami continued to be engaged in doing religious activities with Uematsu. In 1984, they established the religious group Cosmo Core, which has formally been regarded as the beginning of World Mate. In 1985, they changed its name to Cosmo Mate. In 1986, Fukami published five books under the pseudonym Fukami Seizan, which enhanced his profile as a leader of the movement. His second book Kyōun 強運 (Fukami 1986b), whose English-edition is entitled Lucky Fortune, [Image at right] sold especially well (According to Tachibana Publishing, a publishing firm established in 1989 by Fukami, more than 1,700,000 copies of the book have been sold). Consequently Cosmo Mate showed rapid growth from the late 1980s to the early 1990s. During this period some other NRMs, such as Aum Shinrikyō and Kōfuku no Kagaku, began to be active in Tokyo and they, along with Cosmo Mate, became increasingly visible and attracted media and public attention. For example, in its January 1993 issue, Bungei Shunj ū , one of the most popular, opinion-shaping magazines in Japan, selected fifty potential reformers from a variety of fields, two of whom were Fukami and the Aum founder, Asahara Shōkō.

After that, however, the pace of the growth of Cosmo Mate slowed down mainly due to several lawsuits that members or former members brought against Fukami in 1993 and 1994 claiming, for example, sexual harassment and fraudulent activities. Moreover, in December 1993 and in March 1994 the Tokyo Regional Taxation Bureau, suspecting tax evasion, conducted inspections of the company Cosmo Mate (which l ater, around 1995, changed its name to Cosmo World and then later to its present name of  Nihon Shichōkaku-sha 日本視聴覚社 ), claiming that this company was related to the religious organization Cosmo Mate. This also worsened the movement’s image. Cosmo Mate (as a religious organization) changed its name to Powerful Cosmo Mate in March 1994, and then to World Mate in December of that year.

Fukami also changed his personal name from Seizan to Tōshū in 1994. In this same year he began to pursue academic studies in Japanese and Chinese religions. In December 1994, Fukami established the International Shinto Foundation (ISF). This non-profit organization has promoted Shinto studies, especially beyond Japan, seeking in particular to promote Fukami’s view of what Shinto studies should be (Antoni 2001). Fukami has in such ways made large donations to universities and colleges abroad, including the School of Oriental and African Studies in London and Columbia University in New York. He has also been awarded a number of honorary and visiting professorships and degrees. Moreover, since the mid-1990s, Tachibana Publishing, run by Fukami, has focused especially on publishing books on classic Zen and Confucianism. Most of these books are written or edited by Japanese scholars. In 2006, Fukami received the degree of Doctor of Literature at Tsinghua University in China. In 2007, Tachibana Publishing published his doctoral thesis, Bijutsu to Shijō 美術と市場 (Fine Arts and their Market). Also in that year, Fukami obtained the degree of Doctor of Literature in Chinese Classic Literature degree at Zhejiang University in China.

In addition to academic studies, Fukami has been increasingly committed to art activities since the 1990s. He has performed as a music composer and arranger, conductor, vocalist, composer of waka and haiku poetry, calligrapher, tea master, flower arrangement master, Noh actor, ballet dancer, and modern stage actor. In 1997, Fukami completed a master’s course in voice at Musashino Academia Musicae, a Japanese college of music. He has licenses to teach Noh plays for the Hōshō School, tea ceremony for the Edo Senke Shinryū School, flower arrangement for the Saga Goryū School, and Japanese calligraphy. Fukami has given these kinds of art performances not only to World Mate members but also to the general public. In 2009, Fukami received an Honorary Doctor of Humane Letters from the Julliard School in New York. In 2014, he demonstrated Japanese calligraphy, the art of writing characters with a large fude 筆 (brush), at the British Museum in London.

Furthermore, Fukami has made prophetic pronouncements about a coming crisis that he said would occur in Japan in the near future, and emphasised the need to prevent this. In February 1995, a month after the Hanshin-Awaji great earthquake of January, and before Aum Shinrikyō’s sarin attack on the Tokyo subway system in March, World Mate held kokubō shingyō 国防神業 gatherings, or gatherings for Shinto-style rituals that aimed to empower Japan’s national defence. These drew on the spiritual message Fukami said he had received from the female Oomoto founder, Deguchi Nao, that Japan would face an impending crisis. In the later part of the 1990s, kokubō shingyō gatherings became regarded as one of the most crucial events within the movement.

In the early years of this century, World Mate developed the aim of establishing a World Federal Government in Japan by the year 2020, for Fukami maintained that Japan, as a spiritual centre of the world, would play a critical role in achieving world peace. According to Fukami, unless this World Federal Government was realised, Miroku no yo (Age of Miroku) or Paradise on Earth, would not come. However, he abandoned the goal of founding the Government by 2020. He feared that if he tried to carry this plan out, it would bring about a catastrophic natural disaster and mass deaths provoked by deities seeking to assist in the establishment of this Government.

In the earlier part of the 1990s, World Mate had sought to legally register itself as shūkyō hōjin 宗教法人 (religious corporation) under the 1952 Religious Corporation Law. It made this application to the government of Shizuoka Prefecture, where its headquarters was located. However, at this juncture the government did not accept the application, for it doubted that activities of World Mate, regarded as closely related to the company Nihon Shichōkaku-sha , were totally religious (according to Asahi Shimbun, April 19, 1996, Shizuoka edition; Shizuoka Shimbun, May 17, 1996, Evening edition).

Moreover, in the early 2000s, World Mate faced various accusations. With the rapid growth of the Internet at the time, a large number of self-described, existing and former members argued for and against World Mate and Fukami within cyberspace. For example, in 2002, several journalists and lawyers launched a website attacking the movement on behalf of those who, they claimed, had suffered damage at the hands of World Mate. Although World Mate claimed to be suffering a lot of groundless calumnies and rumours on the Internet, these accusations inevitably damaged its image.

Nevertheless, after a renewed application, in 2012 World Mate was successful in gaining certification as a religious corporation from the Cultural Affairs Agency (the section within Japan’s Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology in charge of administering religious corporations). Little reliable information has been available about why World Mate was approved as a religious corporation in that year. It, however, might be that, due to the Supreme Court’s decision made on May 22, 2006 that Nihon Shichōkaku-sha was not related to World Mate (Handa 2006), the movement’s activities formally came to be seen as religious.

There have been some suggestions that Shimomura Hakubun, a former Minister of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, might have had an influence in this decision of the Cultural Affairs Agency. This, at least, was the implication behind the claim made in the April 16, 2015 issue of Shūkan Bunshun, a weekly magazine with one of the largest circulations in Japan. The magazine reported that some companies established by Fukami, including Tachibana Publishing, had donated three million yen to Shimomura in 2005, a year when Shimomura was serving either as Minister (Monbu Kagaku Daijin Seimukan 文部科学大臣政務 ) or as a Parliamentary Secretary for Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. The magazine also claimed that World Mate had donated three million yen to Shimomura in 2009. Given that weekly magazines in Japan have a reputation for using questionable sources for their stories and for not always being reliable, these claims remain unverified. However, they have contributed to a wider perception, fuelled by parts of the mass media, that World Mate’s activities may not be restricted solely to the realms of religious practice.

After registering with the government as a religious corporation in 2012, World Mate, Fukami Tōshū in particular, considerably enhanced its media visibility by placing frequent, spectacular advertisements of his books and events in national newspapers. In addition, for the past several years World Mate has become active in making large donations to several influential politicians (Hasegawa 2015), while Fukami has emphasized inviting these politicians to various events focusing on him. Although World Mate has postponed its plan of establishing a World Federal Government in Japan, it appears to have developed a policy of seeking to enhance its influence in the Japanese political world.

DOCTRINES/BELIEFS

World Mate claims itself to be a Shinto-based movement. Nevertheless, its leader, Fukami Tōshū, shows interest in various religions, including not only Shinto but also Buddhism and Confucianism, as is common among many other founders of Japanese NRMs. Moreover, he has published widely on a variety of themes from religion to divination, business and management, education, comedies, romances, and fine art. Therefore, it is quite difficult to give a clear description of his teachings.

However, in many of these writings, including those apparently unrelated to religion, Fukami has repeatedly emphasised that any of our daily activities should be carried out as shingyō 神業, or divine practices whereby one can train one’s soul, and that one could cultivate one’s good fortune through such practices. In fact, World Mate has encouraged followers to do the practice of shingyō and to understand its meanings.

According to Fukami, one’s fortune mainly depends on the karma (in’nen 因縁) of both/either one’s ancestors and/or oneself in one’s previous life. He also states that one is born into a family of good fortune because one did a number of good deeds to save others in one’s previous life (Fukami 1986a). By contrast, those who consider themselves out of luck, Fukami argues, should bear in mind that their improper conduct in their former lives has resulted in their misfortune in this world. Fukami, therefore, suggests that in order to have good fortune, individuals should break their connection with their bad karma (Fukami 1986a).

Japanese NRMs have commonly developed the classic Indian notion of karma in ways that highlight its moral dimensions (Kisala 1994). In this context, Fukami’s view of karma is not uncommon among Japanese NRMs. He maintains that since karma is inherent in the human mind and conduct, individuals should reform themselves so as to break away from their bad karma (Fukami 1987). The best method of cutting off one’s bad karma is to cultivate virtue by acting on behalf of others.

However, in order to completely cut off one’s bad karma, according to Fukami, one needs to not only cultivate virtue but also to worship one’s ancestors. In the middle of every August, World Mate, although it is a Shinto-based movement, holds a Buddhist memorial service for its members’ ancestors, called go-senzo tokubetsu dai-hōyō ご先祖特別 大法要, focusing on a magical ritual Fukami performs for the purpose of saving, or reforming, the spirits of participants’ ancestors linked to their bad karma. Such a view of the potential variability of karma through the practice of ancestor worship mainly derives from the tradition of Japanese folk religion rather than from Buddhism.

World Mate regards the ultimate goal of a person’s life as attaining the state of shinjin gōitsu 神人合一, or oneness with kami or a deity. Fukami (1987) claims that, in contrast to the paternal relationship between God and humans in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, humans can have a friendly relationship with deities in the divine world of Japan. In order to achieve the state of oneness with kami, it is important to maintain a good relationship with them by cultivating virtue, for deities are pleased with a person’s virtue cultivation. According to Fukami (1986b), however, many Japanese people have the wrong idea that self-oriented shugyō 修行 or ascetic practices are required to attain the state of oneness with kami. He claims that religious austerities drain people of their physical power and undermine the vigour of their souls, and that those who practise self-oriented shugyō tend to be possessed by evil spirits. Fukami calls this kind of ascetic exercise kōten no shugyō 後天の修行 (posterior practice), while he recommends doing senten no shugyō 先天の修行 (anterior practice) by which a person pleases kami (Fukami 1986b; 1986c).

By senten no shugyō, Fukami means the daily practice of obeying the moral principle of makoto 誠 (sincerity), which tells people to be unselfish and free from greed (mushi muyoku 無私無欲) (Fukami 1986c), and, in other words, to devote themselves entirely to the service of others and do what others are reluctant to do. Fukami regards self-oriented ascetic practices, including not only shugyō in Buddhism but also misogi 禊 (cold water purification practices) in Shinto, as meaningless. According to him, people find it much more difficult to obtain merits (kudoku 功徳) through such self-oriented practices, than working tirelessly for others in their everyday lives. These merits are materialised in the spiritual world after one’s death and the amount of merits earned becomes an important indicator of whether one is sent by kami to heaven or hell.

The spiritual world is the place to which humans move after their death and departure from this material world. It consists of three realms: heaven, hell, and chūyū reikai 中有霊界, located between heaven and hell (Fukami 1986a). Such a view of the spiritual world is similar to that of the movements, Oomoto and Sekai Kyūseikyō, that Fukami was initially involved with.

The realm to which a dead person goes depends on what that person did in the present world. Fukami (1986a) indicates the conditions under which a dead person can ascend to heaven. The heavenly world, according to Fukami, also consists of three realms. The lowest one is a place for those who were dedicated to others in this world, or those who showed their profound sincerity through the practices of taise 体施, busse 物施, and hosse 法施 (i.e. voluntary work, material donation, and religious education). The highest realm comprises those who were not only active in religious practices but also materially rich, or those who spent their own wealth for the benefit of society through their true religious faith and who make effective use of their status and honour as a means to save others.

Many of the dead, according to Fukami, are not allowed to ascend to heaven and normally are sent to chūyū reikai, the realm for those who hardly ever did astonishingly good or dreadfully bad deeds; therefore, dead persons in chūyū reikai, are regarded as ordinary ones in the spiritual world. Hell comprises those who did a large number of bad deeds in this world and consists of numerous realms, each of which corresponds to the type of bad deed that the dead person has done in this world. If a dead person in hell completely mended his/her ways, the person could move out of it.

According to Fukami (1987), materially rich persons are much more likely than materially poor ones to be spiritually rich as well. Fukami (1986b) attributes one’s material benefits in this world chiefly to one’s luck, rather than to one’s efforts to make money. Moreover, one’s luck reflects the quality of one’s karma caused originally by one’s soul training in the previous world. Therefore, people in this world should train their souls to improve the quality of their karma that will influence their life in the next world. For these reasons, Fukami encourages his followers to train their souls as senten no shugyō (anterior practice) through a variety of daily activities in the real world.

Consequently Fukami regards seeking material success in this world as a sort of soul-training that leads to potential improvement in the quality of one’s karma. Therefore, Fukami, who is also the president of several companies and a business consultant, emphasises the importance of acquiring wealth as a spiritual act. This kind of idea is similar to that of Ōkawa Ryūhō, the founder of Kōfuku no Kagaku, who places an emphasis on acquiring wealth in this world as a method of soul-training, and who maintains that those achieving great material success in this world are more likely to be sent to heaven in the next world.

Moreover, according to World Mate, Fukami is a philanthropist, who has made large donations to charity while leading a very frugal life. In World Mate, Fukami provides a role model for its members, who, therefore, are expected to work hard to make money, and to spend much time and money doing activities for others.

RITUALS/PRACTICES

World Mate places a primary emphasis on worshipping deities through the practice of shinji 神事, or Shinto-style rituals. It has regularly organized gatherings for shinji either on mountains linked to specific deities or in places near well-known Shinto shrines. Normally thousands of followers attend these gatherings and pray earnestly for deities to forestall terrible crises that, Fukami Tōshū claims, people all over the world, and the Japanese in particular, are facing.

World Mate’s major shinji are: Setsubun shinji 節分神事 (in February) held at the calendric beginning of spring, Golden Week shingyō ゴールデンウィーク神業 (in May) held during the holiday period of early May, O-Bon shingyō お盆神業 (in August) held during the holiday period of mid-August associated with festivals for the dead, Fuji Hakone shingyō 富士箱根神業 (in October) held in a place near the Hakone Shrine close to Mount Fuji, and Ise shingyō 伊勢神業 (in December), World Mate’s largest shinji held from the end of December to the beginning of January in the vicinity of Ise, the location of Japan’s most prominent Shinto shrines.

In these shinji gatherings, Fukami repeatedly requires participants to pray together so that he can receive divine messages from the deity of the mountain or the shrine. Praying is regarded as a highly important practice in World Mate. Its new members are encouraged to attend a seminar called shinpō gotokue nyūmon-hen 神法悟得会入門編, where they are expected to learn the basic method of praying to deities that Fukami has developed. Participants in the seminar are asked to keep secret about the methods taught and not relay them to outsiders.

While many members of World Mate may have learned how to pray to deities, participation in shinji gatherings tends to be chiefly limited to those active followers who give voluntary service to, or make frequent visits to, a local branch office of the movement. In World Mate, it is fairly difficult for ordinary members to develop contacts with other members without joining its local activities; therefore ordinary members appear to be reluctant to participate in such gatherings that normally last until late at night in places far from urban areas. During the practice of shinji, Fukami often maintains that the collective power of its participants’ prayer is not strong enough to receive divine messages, suggesting that a larger number of members should take part in the shinji. In such cases, Fukami tends not to perform magical rituals until or unless thousands of members come to pray together.

By contrast, monthly seminars held in Tokyo are popular among the followers in general. They are broadcast by satellite to World Mate’s local branch offices so that members can attend them throughout Japan. In these monthly seminars, Fukami not only gives a lecture, frequently giving a vocal performance as a singer as well, but also practises magical arts aimed at improving the luck of the attendants. These are something that, Fukami claims, only he is able to do. These magical arts include, for example, dai-kyūrei 大救霊 (a special version of kyūrei, the art of saving evil spirits from suffering torment in hell or from being unable to achieve jōbutsu 成仏 [settling themselves in the spiritual world] and then of changing the evil spirits to good ones) and kettō tenkan 血統転換 (the art of improving one’s bloodline, which aims to modify one’s “spiritual genes,” or one’s ancestors’ karma).

These monthly seminars appear to be occasions of great fun, especially for those ordinary followers who just want to improve their own luck through Fukami’s magical practices. They are also occasions aimed at recruiting and introducing new members to World Mate. Active followers are also expected to take care of such new, ordinary and potential members and to view their role in so doing during the monthly seminars as a form of soul-training, rather than as a form of enjoyment.

In addition to the shinji gatherings and seminars that World Mate organizes, iyasaka no gi 弥栄の儀 is conducted in its local branch offices almost on a daily basis. Iyasaka no gi is a Shinto-style ritual where the participants display their gratitude to deities in front of a Shinto altar and pray for the prosperity of the world, of Japan, and of World Mate members. Moreover, a small festival called shinshin-sai 振神祭 is held once a month in its local offices. While the aim of shinshin-sai is to worship the supreme deity Su, branch members organizing the festival, formally open to the public, tend to, like the monthly seminars mentioned above, emphasise entertaining potential, new, and/or less active members by performing magical practices, which, however, are believed to be much less effective than those done by Fukami himself, and by doing fortune-telling, and holding naorai 直会 , a Shinto-based feast where they consume offerings of food and sake (Japanese rice wine) that have been placed before the deities.

While Fukami performs a variety of magical arts that, he claims, enable one to cut off one’s bad karma and improve one’s luck, active followers of World Mate believe that unless they also cultivate their soul by dedicating themselves to the service of others, his magical arts would not be very effective for their luck. In addition, they tend to make efforts to get internal qualifications in World Mate that, Fukami claims, enable them to perform some magical rites, rather than receiving them from other higher-ranking members. Moreover, they are encouraged to do voluntary work for activities of World Mate as a way of self-cultivation, especially for those of its local branch to which they belong. In addition to their daily work in the wider society outside World Mate, they tend to assist, a few times a week, in the activities of their local branch offices of World Mate, which usually are open in the evening on weekdays, and do voluntary work for various activities of World Mate on weekends. They are encouraged to devote tireless efforts to do these daily activities, and to see any of these activities as being part of shingyō or divine practices, which Fukami claims not only train their souls but also impress deities favourably.

Fukami has published a large number of books, just as have Ōkawa Ryūhō of Kōfuku no Kagaku and many other founders of NRMs, but he, unlike Ōkawa, does not frequently tell his followers to read them. Fukami has often pointed out that, although it may be fun reading books and visiting shrines, anyone can do that without much effort and therefore that deities would not be pleased with such easy practices (Fukami 2002). Instead, he has repeatedly encouraged his followers to do what others are reluctant to do, which would result in polishing their soul. According to Fukami, he learned this idea from Sekai Kyūseikyō and, as a method of polishing his soul, he cleaned the toilet of a local church every morning on his way to high school ( Ōhara 1992). World Mate followers, therefore, are encouraged to work diligently behind the scenes at a local branch office of, and various event sites of, the movement.

ORGANIZATION/LEADERSHIP

The shrine Sumera- ōkami On-yashiro 皇大神御社 serves as the central headquarters of World Mate and is based in Shizuoka Prefecture. The movement also has fifteen Eria Honbu エリア本部 (area or local headquarters) that are located mainly in large cities in Japan, as well as some 190 local branch offices scattered throughout Japan. These branch offices are operated by its local members largely on a voluntary basis, while Eria Honbu or local headquarters are managed by World Mate’s staff members. It appears, therefore, that these local headquarters play a crucial role in making local branch leaders understand, and carry out, World Mate’s policies.

The number of World Mate’s members, according to its website, is some 72,000 (in July 2011), but according to Aonuma (2015), Hasegawa (2015), and Ōhira (2016), is some 75,000. No reliable information about the number of staff members is available, for it seems that formally some of the full-time staff members are either employees or board members of the companies run by Fukami Tōshū.

While World Mate’s organization is hierarchical, with Fukami at its apex, it is not highly centralised. In contrast to other large NRMs of Japan, World Mate does not take direct control over the operation of the branches through the dispatch of its full-time staff members. In this sense its branches have a high degree of autonomy.

However, shibu-chō 支部長, or local branch leaders, selected from among the branch members, are required to have appropriate administrative skills to enable them to operate their branches properly. They make efforts to motivate their branch members to do voluntary work for World Mate, participate in shinji gatherings, be engaged in missionary work, and so on. Otherwise, inactive branches could be forced to close or to be merged into one of the nearest branches.

World Mate members do not have any obligations to belong to a particular local branch. In fact, some of them may never have visited a branch office. However, those who want to be deeply committed to World Mate are encouraged to visit a local branch office and join Enzeru-kai エンゼル会 (Angel Society) there. The Angel Society, formally independent of World Mate, comprises the movement’s active followers who belong to a particular local branch and who are expected to do voluntary work for activities of World Mate, especially for those of their local branch. No information about the number of Angel members is available. Inferring from the number of participants in World Mate’s major shinji gatherings, most of whom appear to be Angel members, they are very roughly estimated at 20,000.

Although World Mate’s membership categories can be divided into sei-kai’in 正会員 or full membership and jun-kai’in 準会員 or associate membership, this division seems less important among the active followers than the difference between full membership, including membership of the Angel Society, and any other form of membership. This is clearly because Angels are given “ rights,” rather than “duties,” to do voluntary work for World Mate as a form of shingyō (divine practice) and because they can readily attend shinji gatherings as a genuine member of a particular local branch. Ordinary followers who do not belong to any local branches would find it lonely and uncomfortable to spend hours in the field participating in shinji gatherings. Angel membership is also essential to being elected as a high-ranking member, such as shibu-chō and eria-komitti (a committee member of a local headquarters).

Moreover Angel members are normally encouraged to strive to be shi 師 or internal “masters,” such as kyūrei-shi 救霊師, kuzuryū-shi 九頭龍師, and yakuju-shi 薬寿師. Especially kyūrei-shi are seen as high-ranking masters, for Fukami regards them as his jiki-deshi 直弟子 or immediate disciples. Kyūrei-shi candidates not only are expected to participate in seminars especially for them and learn a lot about how to practise the art of kyūrei there but also are required to train themselves because kyūrei-shi are supposed to often perform the secret art of kyūrei (saving spirits) for about two hours without intermission. The number of kuzuryū-shi was some 4,000 in 2003, although no information about the numbers of kyūrei-shi and yakuju-shi is currently available.

Despite such Angel membership privileges, there are also many who do not join the Angel Society. This seems to be both/either because Angel members tend to spend much time and money (largely, donations in formal terms, including expenditures to various events and services offered by World Mate) being committed to various activities of World Mate and/or because they need to get on with other Angel members of the same local branch. Moreover, even ordinary members who do not join the Angel Society can enjoy a variety of services provided by World Mate, although they might have little interest in shingyō that Fukami sees as being essential to his followers

Besides World Mate, Fukami is involved with and has established a number of other organizations, such as business corporations, including Tachibana Publishing and Misuzu Corporation, and non-profit organizations, including Worldwide Support for Development (WSD), International Shinto Foundation (ISF), International Foundation for Arts and Culture (IFAC), and Tokyo Art Foundation (TAF). World Mate claims to have no or little relation to the operations of these organizations but the extent to which they can be seen as entirely separate from Fukami’s activities with World Mate is unclear. For some members, his involvement in other organizations and the prominence he appears to have achieved through them (for example, with the WSD and the ISF) serve as a sign of his charismatic status and importance, and enhance their interest in his movement. At the same time, his association with organizations, such as ISF that he has helped to establish, has led to concerns about the status of ISF and concerns being raised by some scholars about the links between ISF, Fukami, and World Mate (Antoni 2001).

ISSUES/CHALLENGES

Since the 1990s, it has been repeatedly pointed out by critics and journalists that it is unclear whether World Mate has financial relationships with commercial companies that are operated by Fukami Tōshū or by its senior officials. It seems that this issue was originally caused by the fact that World Mate’s previous name (Cosmo Core, subsequently Cosmo Mate) was the same as that of the company Nihon Shichōkaku-sha. For example, on November 5, 1991, the newspaper Nikkei Ryūtsū Shimbun referred to Cosmo Mate as a “company” that Fukami organized as a membership society. Moreover, according to World Mate (Handa 2006), a former leading member of the movement and his supporters leaked false information about the tax evasion of the company Cosmo Mate to tax authorities in 2003.

Eventually, the Tokyo Regional Taxation Bureau twice audited the company Cosmo Mate (in December 1993 and in March 1994) on suspicion of failing to report taxable revenues from the activities of the religious group Cosmo Mate. As a result of this audit, the Ogikubo tax office in Tokyo imposed a penalty of some three-billion yen on allegedly undeclared income in May 1996. The company (Nihon Shichōkaku-sha) denied any financial link with the religious group (World Mate) and filed a suit against the director of the Ogikubo tax office and finally obtained a reversal of this tax penalty in May 2006 at the Tokyo High Court.

Despite this, some journalists and lawyers have remained suspicious of the financial transactions that World Mate conducts. It has been reported that World Mate’s annual revenues are some ten-billion yen (Aonuma 2015; Hasegawa 2015) or twelve-billion yen ( Ōhira 2016) and that companies in which Fukami is a major stockholder generate some four-billion yen in total annual sales (Hasegawa 2015) or seven-billion yen ( Ōhira 2016). Meanwhile, Fukami has established, and/or has taken executive positions in, a number of non-profit organizations (NPOs). Fukami, as a director or board member of such organizations, has made large donations to scholarly organizations and activities, cultural and art activities, charities, and influential politicians, and he has organized a variety of public events, concerts, conferences, and exhibitions. It could be inferred from this that a huge amount of money has been spent to carry out all of these things. However, little reliable information has been available about the extent to which World Mate and the companies operated by Fukami or by his followers financially support his activities that are claimed by Fukami and his supporters to be unrelated to World Mate.

While Fukami has shown strong interest in a variety of art activities, his deep involvement with Japanese traditional Noh plays has caused a problem for World Mate. Tachibana Publishing, run by Fukami, published the bimonthly magazine Shin Nōgaku Jānaru 新・能楽ジャーナル (New Journal of Noh ) from 2000 to 2012. This Noh review journal was originally issued as Nōgaku Jānaru (Journal of Noh ) by the small publisher Dengei Kikaku from 1994 to 1999, after which it was published by Tachibana. In 2001, the Noh critic Ōkouchi Toshiteru discussed the background to the change from Dengei to Tachibana in the magazine psiko. In his article he said that Tachibana was closely connected to a jakyō 邪教 (“false religion”). Because he called it jakyō, a term that had been widely used pejoratively against a number of NRMs in Japan in earlier times, World Mate sued him for libel.

In February 2003, the Tokyo District Court ruled against World Mate. In its decision the court ruled that the term jakyō could be used to describe either an unrighteous religion or an unethical religion, and that it was not totally incorrect to describe World Mate in such terms, as a jakyō. In October of that year, World Mate and Ōkouchi finally reached a settlement at the Tokyo High Court. However, the lower court’s decision had effectively labelled World Mate as a “false religion,” a point emphasised by Kitō Masaki, who had been Ōkouchi’s defence counsel. He has referred to the court decision as the jakyō hanketsu 邪教判決 (“false religion” decision) on the website mentioned earlier (see the section on Founder/Group History) that was launched in 2002 by journalists and lawyers. Kitō was one of the lawyers involved in setting up this website.

While many NRMs have faced problems related to scandals and mass media attacks, including allegations of being “false religions” and little more than money-making enterprises, World Mate has perhaps faced more of these problems and attacks than most other NRMs. This is in particular not only because of Fukami’s business activities, which he claims are separate from his religious ones, but also because court judgements such as the one that legitimated the use of the term jakyō in connection with World Mate have made it a particular target for critics. Such issues have affected World Mate’s standing and posed a threat to its membership levels as well as to its capacity for recruiting members.

The rapid spread of the Internet since the late-1990s has increased World Mate’s visibility within cyberspace and created new problems for the movement. It has faced numerous attacks online from a large number of self-described, existing and former followers who, benefitting from the anonymity that the Internet provides, argue for and against World Mate and Fukami on the Internet.

A number of people who claim to be ex-members of World Mate have complained online that World Mate and Fukami have cheated them. Cyberspace attacks have constantly tried to project negative images of World Mate followers as being under the influence of “mind control.” World Mate’s response to such attacks has been to claim that it is suffering a lot of groundless calumnies on the Internet. In August 2002, for instance, immediately after Kitō Masaki and other lawyers had established the aforementioned website that was critical of the movement, World Mate distributed to its members a booklet entitled Hontō no Kamisama wa konna Tokoro ni Oriteiru ! 本当の神様はこんなところに降りている! (True Deity is coming down here!), which focused on the past scandals and troubles that World Mate and Fukami had faced. In this booklet, Fukami stated that the rapid expansion of the Internet had largely changed the circumstances surrounding World Mate, and had enabled groundless rumours and calumnies about the movement to spread like wildfire in cyberspace. He further said that, in order to protect members from such inaccurate rumours and calumnies, World Mate had no choice but to have recourse to the law. In fact, World Mate has sued several ex-members and journalists for libel. As a result, it has also gained a reputation for being a litigious movement.

In the eyes of some, Fukami has gradually developed an interest in politics. World Mate’s political aims, notably that of establishing the World Federal Government in Japan by 2020 (and as an initial step the formation of an Asian Federal Government in Japan by the year 2010), aroused concern in some circles, especially given that these aims seemed to have a highly nationalist dimension to them that, for some, was redolent of pre-war Japanese policies. However, as was noted earlier, World Mate has subsequently retreated from this position, although it continues to express a politicised nationalism that arouses disquiet in some circles.

Since the late-2000s World Mate and some of the companies operated or established by Fukami have made sizable donations to political parties and influential politicians, including, as was mentioned earlier, Shimomura Hakubun. In 2010, World Mate donated thirty-million yen to the People’s New Party (Kokumin Shintō), whose representative was Kamei Shizuka, a well-known politician who had served as Minister for Financial Services from September 2009 to June 2010. Eventually, the movement became the fifth largest donor (and the largest among religious organizations) to political parties and Diet members in 2010. At that time Kamei was also an advisor to B. C. Consulting, a company run by Fukami.

The politician to whom World Mate has made the largest donation appears to be Ozawa Ichirō, the co-founder and representative of the People’s Life Party (Seikatsu no Tō). Ozawa is one of Japan’s most influential and well-known politicians, and his annual income was the largest among party leaders for three consecutive years from 2012 to 2014. World Mate appears to have been a major source of funding for his political activities during that time. Like Kamei, Ozawa received advisory fees from B. C. Consulting (according to Mainichi Shimbun July 2, 2012, Evening edition), while World Mate made large donations to his political organization and the People’s Life Party.

Fukami has emphasised not only making political donations but also holding extravagant conferences that invite world-renowned political figures. For example, the Global Opinion Leaders Summit, hosted by the Worldwide Support for Development (WSD), whose chairman was Fukami, was held three times in 2013 and 2014. Tony Blair (invited twice), Bill Clinton, Colin Powell, John Howard (former Australian Prime Minister), Fidel Valdez Ramos ( former Philippine President ), and more than a dozen other well-known figures were invited to this international conference, while Fukami served as its moderator.

Moreover, influential Japanese politicians have been frequently invited to the events organized by his NPOs that are apparently unrelated to politics, such as art exhibitions hosted by the Tokyo Art Foundation. Notable board members of this incorporated foundation have included such well-known political figures as Kamei, Ozawa, Hatoyama Yukio (former Prime Minister), and his younger brother Hatoyama Kunio (who was also an advisor of B. C. Consulting and who passed away in 2016), all of whom used to be Diet members of the Liberal Democratic Party. Thus Fukami has placed strong emphasis on developing his influence among rather conservative politicians. Such links and financial donations to conservative politicians, along with the movement’s perceived associations with nationalism, continue to be viewed with suspicion by those who are hostile to the movement, and add to its problematic public image.

Many members of World Mate appear to be concerned about who might be a potential successor to Fukami, for he remains unmarried and has no children. In 2010, a daughter of Tsugamura Shigerō, who had initially been a formal representative of World Mate, was married to Fukami’s younger brother. Some expect her to succeed Fukami as the leader of World Mate while others claim that World Mate would not survive without the charismatic leadership of Fukami. It appears that Fukami himself has not yet made an official statement about his successor. This issue will remain a key challenge for the movement in the long term.

IMAGES

Image #1: Photograph of Fukami Tōshū, founder of World Mate.

Image #2: Photograph of Toshu Fukami’s popular book, Lucky Fortune. 

Image #3: Photograph the shrine Sumera-ōkami On-yashir in Shizuoka Prefecture that serves as the central headquarters of World Mate.

REFERENCES**

** Note: Some of the information in this profile derives from my field research conducted mainly from 2001 to 2003 and from my PhD thesis: Kawakami, Tsuneo. 2008. “ Stories of Conversion and Commitment in Japanese New Religious Movements: The Cases of Tōhōno Hikari, World Mate, and Kōfuku no Kagaku.” Lancaster University, U.K.

Antoni, Klaus. 2001. “Review: Shinto in History: Ways of the Kami.” Journal of Japanese Studies 27:405–09.

Aonuma, Yōichirō. 2015. “Shinkō shūkyō Wārudo Meito to kyōso Fukami Tōshū.” G2 18:184-209.

Fukami, Toshu. 1987. Make Your Own Luck. Tokyo: Tachibana. English edition: 1997.

Fukami, Tōshū. 2002. Shinbutsu no Kotoga Wakaru Hon. Tokyo: Tachibana.

Fukami, Toshu. 1986a. Divine Powers. Tokyo: Tachibana. English edition: 1998.

Fukami, Toshu. 1986b. Lucky Fortune . Tokyo: Tachibana. English edition: 1998.

Fukami Toshu. 1986c. Divine World. Tokyo: Tachibana. English edition: 1997.

Fukami, Tōshū. n.d. “Anime Songu to Nandemo Bōdāresu Ni Natta Ikisatsu” Accessed from http://www.worldmate.or.jp/about/column.html on 26 August 2016.

Handa, Haruhisa. 2006. “Oshirase.” Accessed from http://www.worldmate.or.jp/faq/answer13.html on 26 August 2016.

Hasegawa, Manabu. 2015. “Shimbun Kōkoku de Yatara Menitsuku Nazo No Otoko: Fukami Tōshū.” Shūkan Gendai 57:162-66.

Isozaki, Shirō. 1991. Fukami Seizan. Tokyo: Keibunsha.

Kisala, Robert A. 1994. “Contemporary Karma: Interpretations of Karma in Tenrikyō and Risshō Kōseikai.” Japanese Journal of Religious Studies 21:73-91.

Ōhara, Kazuhiro. 1992. Naze Hito wa Kami wo Motomerunoka. Tokyo: Sh ō densha.

Ōhira, Makoto. 2016. “Utatte Odoru Kyōso No Kareina Kane to Jinmyaku.” AERA 29:24-25.

Yonemoto, Kazuhiro. 1993. “Rein ō sha Fukami Seizan no Sugao Wa‘aruku Y ō chien’?” Takarajima 30:34-50.

Author:
Tsuneo Kawakami

Post Date:
14 September 2016

 

Share

Seicho no Ie

SEICHŌ NO IE ( 生長の家)

SEICHŌ NO IE TIMELINE

1893  Taniguchi Masaharu was born.

1920  Taniguchi Masaharu married Emori Teruko.

1922  Taniguchi left Ōmoto after its suppression in 1921.

1923  Taniguchi’s only child Emiko was born shortly after the major earthquake in Tokyo.

1929-1933  Taniguchi received twenty nine divine revelations.

1930 (March)  The first issue of magazine Seichō no Ie was published. This is the official date of Seichō no Ie’s foundation.

1936  The Women’s Association was founded.

1945 (August)  The Pacific War and the nationalistic era ended, followed by a new constitution (1946) and a new law governing religious organisations (1951).

1948  The Youth and Young Adults Association was founded.

1954  A hierarchical structure of the branches was established.

1954  Headquarters were moved to a new location in central Tōkyō and the temple complex in Uji (near Kyoto) was opened.

1963  Taniguchi’s visit prompted proselytisation in Brazil.

1977  The temple complex in Nagasaki was completed.

1985  Taniguchi Masaharu died.

2002  The first fathers’ study groups were founded.

2006  The Sundial Movement was initiated.

2008 (October)  Taniguchi Seichō died

2009 (March)  Taniguchi Masanobu was inaugurated as third president.

2013  Headquartes were scheduled to move to Yamanashi prefecture.

FOUNDER/GROUP HISTORY

On November 22, 1893 Taniguchi Masaharu ( 谷口雅春 , originally written 谷口正治 ) was born in a hamlet in today’s city of Kōbe. He was adopted by his aunt who had the financial means of sending him to school. He graduated from Waseda High School as the best student in the literature program and enrolled in the English Literature Department of the prestigious Waseda University. After a dramatic love affair, he had to discontinue his academic career and take on various poorly paying jobs. He contracted a venereal disease and, searching for a cure, became interested in traditional and spiritual healing as well as in hypnotism and other spiritual practices that were quite fashionable at that time (Biographies of Taniguchi can be found in Seimei no jissō volumes 19 and 20 and Ono 1995).

In September, 1919, he took up residence with the new religion Ōmoto near Kyoto where he helped edit Ōmoto’s magazine and newspaper and became an important member of the staff. In November, 1920, he married Emori Teruko ( 江守輝子 , 1896-1988). Taniguchi left Ōmoto in 1922 because he was disappointed with its failed prophecy of world renewal and had begun to doubt the existence of a judging and punitive creator god and also because of Ōmoto’s suppression by the nationalistic authorities the year before (Lins 1976:74-112).

The next few years were tumultuous. Because of his wife’s illness, Taniguchi tried various forms of faith healing. He assisted a former colleague from Ōmoto with editing a spiritualist magazine. He completed his first novel, pay for which he would have needed desperately, just before the 1923 earthquake entirely destroyed Tokyo. His only daughter, Emiko ( 恵美子), was born in autumn of 1923. His family moved to the Osaka area where at last he found work as a translator for an oil company in 1924. Because the job paid so well and he found it so suddenly, Taniguchi was convinced that it had materialized after he had pictured it during meditation.

Taniguchi continued writing and translating spiritualist and New Thought texts, saving money to eventually publish his own magazine. During and through meditation he started hearing voices, writing religious poems and healing illnesses . On December 13, 1929, Taniguchi heard a loud voice within himself telling him to get up, not to wait until the conditions seemed right, but to start now because the material world did not exist and he was part of divine reality and already perfect now. Taniguchi immediately took up his pen and started his magazine Seichō no Ie , official publication of whose first issue in March, 1930 is now regarded as the date of foundation of the new religion Seichō no Ie. Between November, 1929 and September, 1933 Taniguchi received twenty nine divine revelations informing him about the nature of the divine and of human beings, thus laying the foundations of some of Seichō no Ie’s key practices and doctrines (Seichō no Ie Honbu 1980:246-78).

In the following years Seichō no Ie , whose names literally means “House of Growth”, gradually developed into a religious organization with branches in various communities, suborganizations, a system of lecturers, and an increasing number of publications and public lectures by Taniguchi. In 1940, Seichō no Ie was officially established as a religious organisation, and in 1952 it was registered as a Religious Corporation according to post-war legislation. In the years between 1945 and 1983, Seich ō no Ie was actively involved in conservative national politics, supporting among other issues a strong position of the emperor. Taniguchi Masaharu died in 1985 and was succeeded by his son-in-law Taniguchi Seichō. He dedicated his life to the promulgation of Seichō no Ie in Japan and abroad giving lectures, writing books and travelling to overseas branches He established “world peace” as a major issue in Seichō no Ie (Seichō no Ie online b) . Current head is Taniguchi Seichō’s son Taniguchi Masanobu who is currently shifting Seichō no Ie’s practical emphasis to environmental issues.

Seichō no Ie sees itself as “Humanity Enlightenment Movement,” a theme that was first proclaimed in March, 1930 and has been reaffirmed and put in concrete forms continuously since then. Taniguchi explained that he could no longer silently watch human misery, but like the fire of a candle had to lead humankind to salvation ( Seichō no Ie 1/1:3f.). The motto communicates that members should be conscious that humans are children of god, should live accordingly, feel grateful and responsible for their environment, bear Seichō no Ie’s mission in mind and, last but not least, spread the message to as many other people as possible (Taniguchi S. et al. 1979:73, 80-94).

In anticipation of the twenty first century, the “International Peace by Faith Movement” was added to the Human Enlightenment Movement as Seichō no Ie’s general guideline in 1993. It aims at enhancing Seichō no Ie’s international activities, arguing that information technology seemed to be making the world smaller. Consequently, internationally coordinated actions against environmental problems and local natural disasters had become increasingly desirable and possible (Taniguchi Masanobu 1993). Concrete measures towards world peace also include a prayer for world peace and imagining a peaceful world during meditation (the doctrinal explanation for this is given below.

Since 2000, Seichō no Ie’s publications and activities have shifted their focus to environmental protection and the sparing use of natural resources. Initially, this translated into popular campaigns of using one’s own (cotton) bags and plastic chopsticks rather than plastic bags and wooden one-way chopsticks. In a second step, meat-free communal meals were introduced, and members were assisted in equipping their homes with solar panels. In 2011, Seichō no Ie became a founding member of the Religious and Scholarly Eco-Initiative (e.g. Religious and Scholarly Eco-Initiative online ) (Personal Communication, March, 2009 and February, 2013).

DOCTRINES/BELIEFS

Seichō no Ie belongs to what Shimazono (1992:74-75) called the “intellectual thought type” of new religions, that is, religions founded by widely read, well-educated men with a logically written, abstract yet easy-to-understand doctrine. Taniguchi Masaharu had enjoyed literature and read widely on topics, including Freud, Western theology and philosophies as well as on traditional and scientific schools of medicine (all of which eventually contributed to the formation of Seichō no Ie’s doctrine).

Witnessing a snake trying to devour a frog and torn between sympathy for both the hungry snake and the frog Taniguchi realized that a loving and perfect creator god could not have created an imperfect world in which some creatures had to kill others for their living. Instead, he turned to a more Buddhist worldview based on the belief in the non-existence of material things including human bodies, and in the existence of their True Image ( 実相 , jissō ) only. Seichō no Ie’s main object of worship is, thus, not a specific deity but absolute divine reality, the Great Universe itself, which is represented by the calligraphy of the word “ jissō ” (= True Image). The world as we see it does not exist. It is but a reflection of its True Image as it is perceived through the lens of our human minds. The True Image is taught to be perfect, harmonious, beautiful and complete. However, because the human mind is polluted through vices or crimes, reality can only be perceived as imperfect, full of cruelties and illnesses.

Human beings are taught to be children of this supreme god who is identical with the Great Universe. “Man is a child of God” ( 人間・神の子 , ningen, kami no ko ) is Seichô no Ie’s central creed. Human beings are, therefore, really perfect and harmonious but they are not usually able to perceive themselves that way. These doctrines, that humans are really perfect children of god and that this world only exists in our imagination, coupled with the New Thought philosophy that a positive perception positively affects this world, led Taniguchi to emphasise that by imagining positive things, humans can manipulate their perception of the world and thereby improve it. Imagining things strongly and sincerely enough, for instance that humans are perfect and powerful and illness does not exist, is, therefore, believed to make these things come true. Consequently, Seichō no Ie places great emphasis on a positive attitude towards life, the most important element of which is gratitude. Members are taught to feel grateful for every aspect of their lives, positive and negative alike. Numerous testimonials narrate how feelings of gratitude saved members from otherwise unbearable situations (Fieldwork Observations).

One essential element of a positive, grateful attitude is Seichō no Ie’s Neo-Confucianism-influenced emphasis on filial piety. Filial piety ought to be expressed in everyday tokens of respect for and compliance with one’s parents (and for female members particularly their in-laws) as well as in regular rituals of veneration of the deceased. Seichō no Ie’s doctrine also includes Christian elements, such as the belief in an absolute life-giving force, the Great Universe, of which humans are believed to be children. In his writings, Taniguchi frequently referred to the Bible, especially the power of the spoken word for the creation of the visible world as described in Moses 1,1 and John 1,1 (e.g. Taniguchi 1974 [1923]:303f.). Taniguchi explained that all religions have the same core and only differ in details and appearance due to local developments. Hence it was quite logical that his doctrine included elements from various traditions ( Seimei no jissō volume 6).

Seichō no Ie’s most important publication and key doctrinal text is Taniguchi Masaharu’s 40-volume Seimei no jissō 『生命の實相,
rendered in English as Truth of Life , written in 1932. Seimei no jissō has been translated fully into Portuguese ( A Verdade da Vida ), but only partially into English and even less into other languages. Taniguchi’s second series of books is his eleven-volume Shinri ( 『真理』 , The Truth ) which is an introduction to the doctrine expounded in Seimei no jissō and was first published between 1954 and 1958. Kanro no hōu 『甘露の法雨』 , officially translated into English as Nectarean Shower of Holy Doctrines , is the most important of Seichō no Ie’s four holy sutras. It has been translated into several languages and has recently been published in Braille. Kanro no hōu was divinely revealed to Taniguchi Masaharu by the Bodhisattva Kannon on December 1, 1930. Carrying, reading or copying the sutra are said to evoke miracles, such as unexpected recovery from illnesses and protection during accidents.

Apart from these key doctrinal texts Taniguchi Masaharu, as well as his successors and their wives, published innumerable books and articles explaining various parts of doctrine and practice and their realization in everyday life. All of these books are used in lectures, seminars and study groups, and many members own a large collection of them, thereby contributing to Seichō no Ie economically. Seichō no Ie publishes a monthly newspaper and three magazines, which are often displayed openly in shops or stations to attract new readers. Additionally, it hosts a network of loosely related websites (Seichō no Ie online a; Kienle and Staemmler 2003), Taniguchi Masanobu’s private weblog (Taniguchi Masanobu online ), and approximately thirty minutes of radio broadcasting very early on Sunday mornings on various regional radio stations.

RITUALS

Seich ō no Ie m embers are encouraged to read passages of Taniguchi’s scriptures and sutras, practice meditation, and do something good every day. They are also strongly encouraged to tell others of Seichō no Ie’s doctrine and lead them to its way of life. Apart from this general ideal, however, Seichō no Ie offers a large number of private and communal rituals and activities in which members (and potential members) are encouraged to participate.

Based on the doctrines that the world exits the way we perceive it and that positive thoughts and words have creative power, Seichō no Ie emphasizes the necessity of transforming one’s attitude to be harmonious, grateful and cheerful. This is done by small everyday habits, such as using “ arigatō gozaimasu ” (thank you) as a greeting and expressing gratitude for blessings yet to be received in prayers (Fieldwork Observations). Also based on these doctrines are the “practice of laughter,” during which members engage in happy thoughts until they laugh loudly, and the sundial movement initiated in 2006 in which members are encouraged to record – in a diary or online – a happy moment for every day, much like a sundial only marking hours of sunshine (Taniguchi J. 2008 and Seichō no Ie online c).

An essentially important ritual is shinsōkan 神想観 , a form of meditation (Taniguchi 1996 [1970]; Seimei no jissō volume 8; Taniguchi S. 1991; Staemmler 2009:305-08). Shinsōkan is defined as a religious practice through which the formless, ubiquitous and truly divine reality ( shin ) can be thought about ( ) and visualised ( kan ) directly and without employing the eyes or the brain. Shinsōkan is regarded as one of the main techniques for becoming aware of the fact that what humans perceive as reality is not reality at all and that humans are children of god, perfect because god is perfect, and with the same supernatural powers as god. Becoming fully aware of this through shinsōkan is said to free divine supernatural powers in anyone.

Shinsōkan may be performed either on one’s own or as a group exercise and ideally twice a day every day for about thirty minutes in bright rooms to further bright and happy thoughts. There are no restrictions on the age from which children may begin to practise shinsōkan , and there are no regulations about appropriate clothing or time of day. Shinsōkan begins with a short song of praise to the all-pervading life-giving god with whom unity is to be established. This is followed by a quarter of an hour of silent meditation. A variant of shinsōkan is the inori-ai shinsōkan during which people perform shinsōkan for the sake of other, unhappy or ill people. It is believed that the positive atmosphere created by a group of people performing shinsōkan will contribute towards alleviating or eliminating the sufferer’s problems. Similarly, shinsōkan is performed as a communal ritual to further world peace.

Seichō no Ie’s religious practice includes various ceremonies (private and communal, daily and annually) of reverence for ancestors which are quite common in the Japanese religious repertory. In Seichō no Ie their primary aim is not to ask for ancestors’ assistance or protection. Rather it is to express one’s gratitude towards one’s ancestors and to please them with a bright, grateful heart, positive words and the delightful smell of incense, which contributes towards one’s salvation. Most prominent is the annual ancestor ceremony in August at the main ancestral shrine in Uji. For this occasion paper strips bearing names, dates of birth and death of members’ ancestors are collected to be ritually read and finally burnt in a large purificatory fire (Fieldwork Observations). In 1977, rites for stillborn and aborted babies were separated from those for ancestors because of unborn babies’ distinct spiritual status. The suffering and respite felt by the souls of unborn babies finds its expression, it is thought, through disorderly siblings or other family problems and needs to be alleviated through special rituals as tokens of parental love and repentance ( Seichō no Ie Uji Bekkaku Honzan 1997: preface).

As in most other new religions, seasonal festivals of various scale and frequency may also be found in Seichō no Ie. Some ceremonies, such as annual celebrations in memory of Taniguchi’s revelations and monthly memorial days for Taniguchi, Taniguchi Seichō and Teruko (as well as larger annual festivals) are only or primarily performed in Nagasaki (see Shūkyō Hōjin Seichō no Ie Sōhonzan online b). Others, such as ancestor veneration, and especially the annual Ancestral Memorial Festival in August, take place in Uji (see Seichō no Ie Uji Bekkaku Honzan online b ). Other events, such as ceremonies at the beginning of every month , are celebrated in all the facilities.

Seichō no Ie runs several kinds of training events. Apart from local, private study groups there are large scale public lecture meetings by Taniguchi Masanobu and his wife as well as “spiritual training seminars” ( 錬成会 , reinseikai ). Renseikai take place on a regular basis and instruct new members (or refresh older members) in Seichō no Ie’s doctrine and key rituals. They last for three to ten days and include overnight stays and communal (and recently meat-free) meals. Lectures during renseikai are given by appointed lecturers and are interspersed with testimonials, performance of various rituals as well as communal singing and morning and evening worship. Another important element are small, informal sessions for discussion and personal exchange. The number of participants range from three or four to fifty or sixty depending on time and location. There are various kinds of renseikai depending on target groups (teenagers, women, experienced members and so on) and foci (such as general introductions and seasonal). Venues are the main and regional headquarters as well as two rensei centres conveniently located within easy reach of Tokyo (Fieldwork Observations; Shūkyō Hōjin Seichō no Ie Sōhonzan online c).

ORGANIZATION/LEADERSHIP

When Taniguchi Masaharu died in 1985 he was succeeded by his son-in-law Taniguchi Seichō ( 谷口清超 , 1919-2008, born as Arachi Kiyosuke 荒地清介 ), who had been the first head of Seichō no Ie’s youth assocciation. Simultaneously Taniguchi Seichō’s wife, Emiko, succeeeded her mother as president of the women’s association (both associations are described below). When Taniguchi Seichō’s health began to fail in 2005, his second son, Taniguchi Masanobu ( 谷口雅宣 , born 1951), gradually succeeded him and became officially inaugurated as Seichō no Ie’s third president on March 1, 2009, four months after his father’s death. Simultaneously, the presidency of the women’s organisation was passed from Taniguchi Emiko to Taniguchi Masanobu’s wife, Junko ( 谷口純子 , born 1952).

According to its official English-language website, as of December, 2010 Seichō no Ie had 651,119 members within and 1,032,108 members outside of Japan ( Seichō no Ie online d ). Seichō no Ie is, thus not only one of the largest new religions in Japan, together with Sōka Gakkai it is also the largest Japanese new religion outside of Japan. Missionary activities in Brazil began in the mid-1950s when members immigrating to Brazil transmitted their faith to fellow Japanese immigrants. After Taniguchi’s visit to Brazil in 1963, however, missionary efforts turned to non-Japanese as well. Recently, Seichō no Ie’s membership in Brazil (the Brazilian headquarters are Seichō no Ie’s missionary headquarters for all of Latin America) has been estimated at around half a million members, eighty to ninety per cent of whom have no Japanese ancestry ( Carpenter and Roof 1995; Maeyama 1992; Shimazono 1991 ). Although missions to Hawai’i and other parts of the United States began before the Pacific War, membership figures do not compare to those in Brazil and most members are of Japanese descent. There are Seichō no Ie branches in several European countries, such as Germany, France, Great Britain and Portugal. However, they have only a few members, many of whom are Japanese students or employees or of Brazilian origin (Clarke 2000:290-93).

Seichō no Ie’s International Headquarters is its doctrinal and administrative center. It is scheduled to move from central Tokyo into an “office in the forest,” that is, a zero energy building in the mountains of Yamanashi prefecture, in autumn of 2013 (Taniguchi M. and J. 2010 and Seichō no Ie online e ). The main temple in Nagasaki primarily serves ceremonial functions and contains the main shrine dedicated to Sumiyoshi Daijin, a Shintō deity said to “protect the state and purify the universe” ( Shūkyō Hōjin Seichō no Ie Sōhonzan online d) . The third religious center is the Additional Main Temple in Uji, near Kyoto, which focuses on the veneration of members’ ancestors and the care for stillborn or aborted babies. Hence it includes the main ancestral shrine (Fieldwork Observations; and Seichō no Ie Uji Bekkaku Honzan online a) . Additionally, Seichō no Ie has 129 hierarchically structured regional and local branches in Japan ( Seich<o no Ie online d ). It runs its own publishing company, Nihon Kyōbunsha, and a young women’s boarding school ( Seichō no Ie Yōshin Joshi Gakuen), whose educational focus lies on Seichō no Ie’s scriptures, on housewifely skills such as childcare and nutrition, on artistic courses such as music and traditional Japanese arts, and on basic office skills ( Seichō no Ie Yōshin Joshi Gakuen online ).

A key function in Seichō no Ie’s internal, horizontal structure, however, is fulfilled by its three suborganisations, membership in one of which implies full membership in Seichō no Ie as opposed to mere reading membership. Headquarters of these organisations are in the International Headquarters in Tokyo, activities are conducted nationwide in local branches. All of these groups are official yet small and informal study groups. Members meet regularly to read current issues of monthly magazines or listen to lectures on Taniguchi’s doctrine, to exchange news and talk about current and often very private problems.

The largest of these suborganisations is Shirohatokai, the women’s association. It was founded in February, 1936 and derives its name (White Dove Association) from the fact that doves are associated with purity, friendliness and peace (attributes women, too, ought to have). Shirohatokai’s aim is to teach women how to make their families paradises and to establish enlightenment of love and peace (Seicho-no-Ie online f). The “ Brotherhood Association” (Sōaikai) is intended for middle-aged men (Seicho-no-Ie online g) aiming to assist them in coping with problems of work, family and health. It also aims at spreading Taniguchi’s message into male-dominated areas of society. Parallel to the long-standing mothers’ study groups within Shirohatokai, the Sōaikai successfully took up recent social trends and in 2002 established fathers’ study groups to assist and instruct men in their parental duties (Personal Communication). The “ Youth and Young Adult Association” (Seinenkai), finally, was founded in 1948. It addresses young men and women between junior high school and their late thirties, that is, those in education and early working years. In addition to regular study groups, members may participate in special weekend courses or training seminars and, as in other new religions, in other (for instance environmental, fund-raising or, recently, disaster relief) activities on a local level (Seichō no Ie online h).

ISSUES/CHALLENGES

Seichō no Ie is more overtly patriotic than many new religions. The 1890, the Imperial Rescript on Education, whose importance for Japan’s nationalistic period is well documented (e.g. Antoni 1991:44-47), is included in Seichō no Ie members’ “indispensable” collection of texts (cf. subtitle of Taniguchi S. et al. 1979). In addition, a recent edition of the youth group’s magazine answers questions about the emperor, the national flag and anthem, with emphasis on nationalistic auto-stereotypes of Japan as a peace-loving country and its unique imperial lineage uninterrupted since times immemorial ( Risō sekai 2009/2: 12-16).

Seichō no Ie’s Confucian-influenced ideal female role is readily discernible in the policies of its girls’s school, countless testimonials and, above all, Taniguchi’s own writings (see e.g. Seimei no jissō volume 29; Taniguchi 1954-1958 volume 5). Rather than equality between men and women or superiority of men over women, Taniguchi teaches that men and women are fundamentally different and that women, like men, should strive to fully develop their innate potential. As Seichō no Ie regards the family, especially husband and wife, as society’s basic unit, peace and harmony (which are prerequisites for a peaceful, prosperous society), it encourages women to be loving housewives and caring mothers who “obey their husbands without hesitation” (Taniguchi Masaharu 1991:135) because husbands are head of the family endowed with fatherly, that is divine, wisdom (Taniguchi 1954-1958 I: 63-67).

As in many other new religions, testimonials describing people’s release from illness, misery or strife through belief in a new religion’s doctrine or the performance of its rituals are commonplace in Seichō no Ie. Frequently new, often female, members report their change of attitude from anger, disappointment and frustration towards gratitude, forgiveness, optimism and endurance (and in effect often to a large degree towards a denial of the member’s true needs) (Fieldwork Observations).

Parallel to these aspects which my own political and moderately feminstic point of view might induce me to regard as more problematic than others, however, it must be noted that Seichō no Ie has recently taken up environmental issues with more seriousness than most Japanese people and organisations. This is based on the founder’s doctrine to “be grateful for everything in the world” ( Passage from Taniguchi’s founding issue of Seichō no Ie quoted in Taniguchi M. and J. (2010:229) ) includes all natural phenomena and resources. Additionally, the current leader is convinced that religious practice is not only a matter of performing rituals but should reflect on one’s everyday behaviour and activities (Taniguchi Masanobu 2009: 290-94), that, secondly, changing circumstances required changes in religious practice, and that, thirdly, living in harmony means not only harmony with humans but also with nature.

Seichō no Ie is therefore a fascinating example of an organisation that draws on various religious traditions and is simultaneously very conservative and very progressive. As the environmental focus is a relatively new development within Seichō no Ie, its development during the next decade or so is bound to remain fascinating.

REFERENCES

Antoni, Klaus. 1991. Der himmlische Herrscher und sein Staat: Essays zur Stellung des Tennō im modernen Japan . München: Iudicium.

Carpenter, Robert T. and Wade C. Roof. 1995. “ The Transplanting of Seicho-no-ie from Japan to Brazil: Moving Beyond the Ethnic Enclave.“ Journal of Contemporary Religion 10:41-54.

Clarke, Peter B. 2000. “Modern Japanese Millenarian Movements: Their Changing Perception of Japan’s Global Mission with Special Reference to the Church of World Messianity in Brazil.” Pp. 129-81 in Japanese New Religions in Global Perspective edited by Peter B. Clarke. Richmond: Curzon Press.

Kienle, Petra and Staemmler, Birgit. 2003. “Self-representation of Two New Religions on the Japanese Internet: Jehovah’s Witnesses and Seichō no Ie.” Pp. 222-34 in Japanese Cybercultures edited by Nanette Gottlieb and Mark McLelland. London: Routledge.

Lins, Ulrich. 1976. Die Ōmoto-Bewegung und der radikale Nationalismus in Japan . München: R. Oldenbourg Verlag.

Maeyama Takashi. 1992. “ Burajiru Seichō no Ie Kyōkai no tagen kōzō: Shinkuretizumu to esunishiti no mondai. ” Pp. 141-74 in Tōsei suru bunka: Chūnanbei no shūkyō to shakai edited by Nakamaki Hirochika. Tokyo: Heibonsha.
前山隆 「ブラジル生長の家教会の多元構造ーーシンクレティズムとエスニシティの問題」 . 中牧弘允 編 『陶酔する文化ーー中南米の宗教と社会』 . 東京:平凡社 , 1992: 141-74.

Ono Yasuhiro. 1995. Taniguchi Masaharu to sono jidai . Tokyo: Tōkyōdō Shuppan.
小野泰博 『谷口雅春とその時代』 . 東京:東京堂出版 , 1995.

“Religious and Scholarly Eco-Initiative.“ online. Shūkyō Taiyō Hatsudensho .
宗教・研究者エコイニシアティブ 『宗教太陽発電所』 . Accessed from http://rse-greenenergy.org/ on 17 June 2013.

Risō sekai (Seichō no Ie monthly magazine). Tokyo: Nihon Kyōbunsha, since January 1948. 『 理想世界』 . 東京 : 日本教文社 , 1948 創号 .

Seichō no Ie . (Seichō no Ie monthly magazine). Tokyo: Nihon Kyōbunsha, March, 1930 until March, 2010 . 『 生長の家』 . 東京 : 日本教文社 , 1930 創号 .

Seichō no Ie. online a. Seicho-No-Ie Global Site . Accessed from http://www.seicho-no-ie.org/ on 17 June 17 2013.

Seichō no Ie . online b. “Rev.Seicho Taniguchi Passes Away on October 28.“ Accessed from http://www.seicho-no-ie.org/eng/news/200811/news_200811-01.html on 17 June 2013.

Seichō no Ie. online c. Hidokei nyūsu@SniSundial News . 生長の家 『 日時計ニュース @SniSundialNews 』 . Accessed from https://twitter.com/SniSundialNews on 17 June 2013.

Seichō no Ie . online d. “What’s SNI”. Accessed from http://www.seicho-no-ie.org/eng/whats_sni/index.html on 17 June 2013.

Seichō no Ie. online e. Mori no naka no ofisu .
生長の家 『 森の中のオフィス 』 . Accessed from http://office-in-the-forest.jp.seicho-no-ie.org/ on 17 June 2013.

Seichō no Ie . online f. Shirohatokai . 生長の家 『 白鳩会 』 .
Accessed from http://www.jp.seicho-no-ie.org/whda/about/index.html on 17 June 2013.

Seichō no Ie . online g. Sōaikai .
生長の家 『 相愛会 』 . Accessed from http://www.jp.seicho-no-ie.org/brha/about/index.html on 17 June 2013.

Seichō no Ie . online h. Seinenkai .
生長の家 『 青年会 』 . Accessed from http://seinenkai.jp.seicho-no-ie.org/ on 17 June 2013.

Seichō no Ie Honbu, ed. 1980. Seichō no Ie goj ū nen shi . Tokyo: Nihon Kyōbunsha. 生長の家本部編 『生長の家五十年史』 . 東京:日本教文社 , 1980.

Seichō no Ie Uji Bekkaku Honzan. online a . (Official Website)
生長の家宇治別格本山 『生長の家宇治別格本山』 Accessed from http://www.uji-sni.jp/ on 17 June 2013.

Seichō no Ie . online b. “Senzo kuyō, ryūzanji kuyō”
生長の家宇治別格本山 「先祖供養・流産児供養」 . Accessed from http://www.uji-sni.jp/senzo/reihai.htm on 13 June 2013.

Seichō no Ie Uji Bekkaku Honzan, ed. 1997. Bessatsu H ō z ō : Ryūzanji kuy ō no kiseki . Uji: Seichō no Ie Uji Bekkaku Honzan. 生長の家宇治別格本山編 『別冊宝蔵一一流産児供養の奇跡』 . 宇治:生長の家宇治別格本山 , 1997.

Seichō no Ie Yōshin Joshi Gakuen. online. (Official Website). Accessed from http://www5.ocn.ne.jp/~yousin/ in February 2013. (site is currently undergoing renewal).

Seimei no jissō see Taniguchi Masahar u 1962-1967.

Shimazono, S . 1992. Gendai kyūsai shūkyōron . Tokyo: Seikyūsha. 島薗進 『現代救済宗教論』 . 東京:青弓社 , 1992.

Shimazono, S . 1991. “The Expansion of Japan’s New Religions into Foreign Cultures.” Japanese Journal of Religious Studies 18:105-32.

Shūkyō Hōjin Seichō no Ie Sōhonzan. online a. Kōshiki Web saito .
宗教法人生長の家総本山 『 公式 Web サイト』 . Accessed from http://snis.jp/ on 17 June 2013.

Shūkyō Hōjin Seichō no Ie Sōhonzan ———-. online b. “Matsurigoto”. 宗教法人生長の家総本山 「祭事」 .
Accessed from http://snis.jp/main.php?menu=3&index=3000 on 17 June 2013.

Shūkyō Hōjin Seichō no Ie Sōhonzan ———-. online c. “Renseikai”.
宗教法人生長の家総本山 「錬成会」 . Accessed from http://snis.jp/main.php?menu=2&index=2001 on 17 June 2013.

Shūkyō Hōjin Seichō no Ie Sōhonzan ———-. online d. “Gedaichi no go-annai”.
宗教法人生長の家総本山 「 境内地のご案内 」 . Accessed from http://snis.jp/main.php?menu=1&index=1002 on 17 June 2013.

Staemmler, Birgit . Forthcoming. “Seichō no Ie.” in Handbook of East Asian New Religious Movements . (Brill Handbooks of Contemporary Religion) edited by Lukas Pokorny und Franz Winter. Leiden: Brill .

Staemmler, Birgit. 2011. “Seichō no Ie.” Pp. 141-60 in Establishing the Revolutionary: An Introduction to New Religions in Japan , edited by Birgit Staemmler and Ulrich Dehn. Hamburg: LIT Verlag.

Staemmler, Birgit. 2009. Chinkon kishin: Mediated Spirit Possession in Japanese New Religions . Hamburg: LIT Verlag.

Taniguchi Junko. 2008. Hidokei nikki 2009 . Tōkyō: Nihon Seiten Fukyū Kyōkai.
谷口純子 『日時計日記 2009 』 . 東京:日本聖典普及協会 , 2008.

Taniguchi Masaharu ———-. 1996 [1970]. Shinsōkan . Tokyo: Nihon Kyōbunsha.
谷口雅春 『神想観』 . 東京:日本教文社 , 1996 [1970].

Taniguchi Masaharu. 1991. Das Buch für die Jugend: Erfolg, Glück und Erfüllung . São Paolo: Seicho-No-Ie do Brasil.

Taniguchi Masaharu. 1974 [1923]. Shōdō e . Tokyo: Nihon Kyōbunsha.
谷口雅春 『聖道へ』 . 東京:日本教文社 , 1974 [1923].

Taniguchi Masaharu. 1962-1967. Seimei no jissō, tōchūhan . 40 vols. Tokyo: Nihon Kyōbunsha. 谷口雅春 『生命の實相、頭注版』 全 40 巻 . 東京:日本教文社 , 1962-1967.

Taniguchi Masaharu. 1954-1958. Shinri . 10 vols. Tōkyō: Nihon Kyōbunsha.
谷口雅春 『真理』 . 東京:日本教文社 , 1954-1958.

Taniguchi Masanobu ———-. 2009. Mezamuru kokochi . Tōkyō: Nihon Kyōbunsha.
谷口雅宣 『目覚むる心地』 . 東京:日本教文社 , 2009.

Taniguchi Masanobu. 1993. Seichō no Ie no undō ni okeru ‚Kokusai Honbu’ o kangaeru tame ni . 谷口雅宣 『生長の家の運動における「国際本部」を考えるために』 . 1993.
Accessed from http://homepage2.nifty.com/masanobu-taniguchi/PDFfiles/SuperOff.PDF on 17 June 17 2013.

Taniguchi Masanobu. online. Website of Masanobu Taniguchi .
谷口雅宣 『 谷口雅宣のウェブサイト 』 . Accessed from http://homepage2.nifty.com/masanobu-taniguchi/ on 17 June 2013.

Taniguchi Masanobu and Taniguchi Junko. 2010. ‘Mori no naka’ ni iku: Hito to shizen no chōwa no tame ni Seichō no Ie ga kangaeta koto . Tōkyō: Nihon Kyōbunsha.
谷口雅宣・ 谷口純子 『“森の中” へ行くーー人と自然の調和のために生長の家が考えたこと 』 . 東京:日本教文社 , 2010.

Taniguchi Seichō. 1991. Shinsōkan ha subarashii . Tokyo: Nihon Kyōbunsha.
谷口清超 『神想観はすばらしい』 . 東京:日本教文社 , 1991.

Taniguchi Seichō et al., eds. 1979. Shinhen. Seikōroku: Seichō no Ie shinto hikkei . Tōkyō: Nihon Kyōbunsha. 谷口清超他編 『新編:聖光録一一生長の家信徒必携』 . 東京:日本教文社 , 1979.

Author:
Birgit Staemmler

Post Date:
8/1/2013

 

Share

Sōka Gakkai

SŌKA GAKKAI TIMELINE

1871 (6 th day of the 6 th month):  Makiguchi Tsunesaburō, founder of Sōka Kyōiku Gakkai (Value Creation Education Study Association), was born Watanabe Chōshichi in a town now called Kashiwazaki, Niigata Prefecture, Japan. He was adopted at the age of six into the Makiguchi family and moved to Otaru, Hokkaidō at the age of thirteen.

1889:  Makiguchi entered Hokkaidō Normal School (predecessor to Hokkaido University of Education) in Sapporo. Upon graduation, he began teaching at the Normal School’s attached elementary school.

1893:  Makiguchi changed his given name to Tsunesaburō.

1900 (February 11):  Toda Jōsei, second president of Sōka Gakkai (Value Creation Study Association), was born Toda Jin’ichi in Ishikawa Prefecture. He moved with his family to Ishikari, Hokkaido two years later.

1901 (April):  Makiguchi moved with his wife and children from Sapporo to Tokyo.

1903 (October 15):  Makiguchi published his first major book, Geography of Human Life, (Jinsei chirigaku ).

1910:  Makiguchi joined the Kyōdokai (Home Town Association).

1917:   Toda obtained an elementary school teaching license and began teaching at Mayachi Elementary School in Yūbari, Hokkaido.

1920:  Toda visited Makiguchi upon moving to Tokyo. Makiguchi helped Toda obtain a position teaching elementary school in the imperial capital, and the two began a lifelong mentor-disciple relationship.

1922 (December):  Toda quit teaching at Mikasa Elementary School and left the profession thereafter.

1923:  Toda founded a private academy called Jishū Gakkan that was dedicated to preparing elementary school students for secondary school entrance examinations; the academy’s pedagogy was based on Makiguchi’s theories of pragmatic instruction. Toda changed his given name to Jōgai (“outside the fortress”).

1928 (January 2):  Ikeda Daisaku (originally Taisaku) was born in what is now the Ōmori neighborhood of Ōta Ward, Tokyo.

1928 (June):  Makiguchi was convinced by fellow elementary school educator Mitani Sōkei to dedicate himself to Nichiren Shōshū Buddhism. Toda later followed his mentor’s example.

1930 (November 18):  Makiguchi published Volume One of Sōka kyōikugaku taikei ( System of Value-Creating Educational Study ); Toda oversaw the publication of this text and suggested the term sōka, or “value creation,” as a title for Makiguchi’s educational theories. This publication date has subsequently been memorialized as Sōka Gakkai’s founding moment.

1932:  Makiguchi retired from schoolteaching.

1935:  Makiguchi and Toda began publishing the magazine Shinkyō (New Teachings), which bore the byline “educational revolution, religious revolution” (kyōiku kakumei / shūkyō kakumei ).

1937 (January 27):  The inaugural formal meeting of Sōka Kyōiku Gakkai was convened at a Tokyo restaurant .

1940:  The Japanese government enacted the Religious Corporations Law and Sōka Kyōiku Gakkai came under increased scrutiny by the Special Higher Police. Despite this, Makiguchi and other Gakkai leaders dedicated the next several years to organizing hundreds of study meetings and engaging enthusiastically in shakubuku, the form of proselytization promoted within Nichiren Shōshū tradition. After Gakkai adherents took up shakubuku in earnest, the organization grew to more than five thousand registered members by 1943.

1940 (October 20):  Makiguchi was appointed Sōka Kyōiku Gakkai’s first president, and Toda its general director.

1941 (June 20):  Sōka Kyōiku Gakkai launched a new periodical titled Kachi sōzō (Value Creation).

1942 (May 10):  The Japanese government ended Kachi sōzō ‘s publication at its ninth issue.

1943 (July 6):  Makiguchi, Toda, and nineteen other Gakkai leaders were arrested in multiple locations during a coordinated police raid. They were charged with violating the Peace Preservation Law and detained thereafter at Sugamo Prison in Tokyo. Makiguchi and Toda were the only two leaders who refused to recant their convictions.

1944 (November 18):  Makiguchi Tsunesaburō died of malnutrition at the hospital ward in Sugamo Prison.

1944 (November 18):  Toda, after months of intense study of the Lotus Sūtra and chanting the Lotus ‘s title namu-myōhō-renge-kyō (the daimoku) millions of times, experienced a vision in which he joined the innumerable Bodhisattvas of the Earth (jiyu no bosatsu).

1945 (July 3):  Toda was released on parole, only a few weeks before Japan surrendered to Allied forces on August 15. He changed his given name from Jōgai to Jōsei (“holy fortress”) and set about reconvening the Gakkai.

1946 (March):  Toda changed the name of the organization from Sōka Kyōiku Gakkai to Sōka Gakkai (Value Creation Study Association). The newly reformed group met on the second floor of Toda’s publishing and distance education company Nihon Shōgakkan.

1946 (May 1):  Toda was appointed general director of Sōka Gakkai.

1947 (August 14):  Ikeda accompanied a friend to a Sōka Gakkai study meeting; he joined the group ten days later.

1949 (January 3):  Ikeda began working at Nihon Shōgakkan.

1950 (November 12):  Toda resigned as Sōka Gakkai’s general director.

1951 (April 4):  The first edition of the Seikyō shinbun (Holy Teaching Newspaper), the periodical that would become Sōka Gakkai’s primary media outlet, was published.

1951 (May 3):  Toda accepted appointment as second president of Sōka Gakkai at a gathering of approximately 1,500 members.

1951 (May):  The launch of the Great March of Shakubuku (shakubuku daikōshin) that saw Sōka Gakkai surge from relative obscurity into Japan’s largest new religious movement.

1951 (November 18):  The first edition of the Shakubuku Doctrine Manual (Shakubuku kyōten) was published, a book which, for the next nineteen years, supplied Gakkai members with explanations of Nichiren Buddhist concepts and arguments to employ against “false sects” in the course of proselytizing.

1952 (April 27):  The “Tanuki Festival,” an incident in which a group of Young Men’s Division members on a pilgrimage to the Nichiren Shōshū head temple Taisekiji seized a Shōshū priest named Ogasawara Jimon.

1952 (April 28):  The first edition of the New Edition of the Complete Works of the Great Sage Nichiren ( Shinpen Nichiren Daishōnin gosho zenshū) was published. Known as the Gosho zenshū or simply the Gosho, a single-volume collection of Nichiren’s writings that continues to serve as the organization’s primary source for its Buddhist practice. It was published on a date that commemorated Nichiren’s first chanting of namu-myōhō-renge-kyō (the daimoku) seven hundred years earlier.

1953 (January 2):  Ikeda was appointed Young Men’s Division leader.

1953 (November 25):  Ikeda changed his given name to Daisaku.

1953:  Sōka Gakkai began holding written and oral “appointment examinations” (nin’yō shiken) to test youth leaders on Nichiren Buddhist doctrinal knowledge.

1954 (October 31):  Toda reviewed ten thousand Young Men’s and Young Women’s Division members at Taisekiji from atop a white horse.

1954 (November 7):  The Youth Division held its first sports competition on the grounds of Nihon University in Tokyo; this event served as the model for Sōka Gakkai’s subsequent mass performances.

1954 (22 November):  Sōka Gakkai established a Culture Division (Bunkabu), a sub-organization dedicated primarily to selecting candidates to run in elections and to mobilizing members to gather votes.

1954 (December 13):  Ikeda was appointed Sōka Gakkai’s Public Relations Director.

955 (March 11):  In an event known as the “Otaru Debate” (Otaru montō), members of Sōka Gakkai’s Study Department challenged priests from the Minobu sect of Nichiren Buddhism to a doctrinal debate.

1955 (April 3):  Members of Sōka Gakkai’s Culture Division won election in city councils in Tokyo wards and in other municipalities; this marked the first time Sōka Gakkai ran its own candidates for office.

1955:  By the end of this year, Sōka Gakkai claimed 300,000 member households.

1956 (8 July):  Sōka Gakkai ran six independent candidates for election to the House of Councilors (Upper House); three were elected.

1956 (August 1):  Toda issued an essay titled “On the Harmonious Union of Government and Buddhism “ (Ōbutsu myōgō ron) in the Gakkai study magazine Daibyaku renge (Great White Lotus).

1957 (June):  Gakkai members clashed with affiliates of Tanrō, a coal miner’s union in Yūbari, Hokkaidō, in conflicts over electioneering and collective bargaining.

1957 (July 3):  The beginning of an event memorialized as the “Osaka Incident” took place. Ikeda Daisaku was arrested in Osaka in his capacity as Sōka Gakkai’s Youth Division Chief of Staff for overseeing activities that constituted violations of elections law.

1957 (September 8):  Toda issued “Declaration for the Banning of the Hydrogen Bomb,” calling for the death penalty as punishment for evil people who use this weapon.

1957 (December):  Sōka Gakkai surpassed Toda Jōsei’s stated goal of 750,000 convert households.

1958 (April 2):  Toda Jōsei died of liver disease. By the time of Toda’s death, Sōka Gakkai claimed in excess of one million adherent households.

1958 (June 30):  Ikeda was appointed head of Sōka Gakkai’s newly organized bureaucratic hierarchy, occupying the post of General Manager.

1958 (September 23):  70,000 Gakkai adherents gathered at Tokyo’s Gaien National Stadium to watch 3,000 fellow members perform in the organization’s fifth sporting competition.

1959 (June 30):  Ikeda was appointed head of Sōka Gakkai’s board of directors.

1960 (May 3):  Ikeda Daisaku was appointed third president of Sōka Gakkai.

1960 (October 2):  Ikeda departed with fellow Gakkai leaders on a visit to the United States, Canada, and Brazil, officially inaugurating the spread of Sōka Gakkai into a global enterprise. This grip was followed by trips to Asia, Europe, the Middle East, Australia, India, and other places over the following years.

1961 (November 27):  Sōka Gakkai formed the Clean Government League (Kōmei Seiji Renmei), which successfully ran nine candidates for the House of Councilors in January, 1962.

1962 (April 2):  The first edition of Kōmei shinbun was published; this newspaper became the primary media outlet for political operations.

1963 (October 18):  Sōka Gakkai’s Min-on Concert Association was founded; it sponsored thousands of artistic performances in ensuing years.

1964 (May 3):  Ikeda abolished political subdivisions within Sōka Gakkai and declared that henceforth the group was to be a purely religious organization. Sōka Gakkai now claimed in excess of 3.8 million member households.

1964 (November 8):  One hundred thousand Gakkai members participated in a Culture Festival ( bunkasai ) at National Stadium in Sendagaya, Tokyo. Sōka Gakkai staged numerous other massive Culture Festivals in subsequent years.

1964 (November 17):  Ikeda announced the dissolution of Kōmei Seiji Renmei and the founding of the “Clean Government Party” (Kōmeitō).

1965 (January):  Seikyō shinbun began carrying serial installments of The Human Revolution ( Ningen kakumei ), the novelized version of Sōka Gakkai’s history and Ikeda Daisaku’s biography that members came to regard as an essential text.

1965 (October):  Between October 9 and 12, eight million members in Japan contributed more than 35.5 billion yen to the construction of the Shōhondō, a massive new hall to be constructed at Taisekiji to house the daigohonzon , the calligraphic mandala that serves as Sōka Gakkai’s and Nichiren Shōshū’s primary object of worship.

1967 (January 29):  Twenty-five Kōmeitō candidates were elected to the House of Representatives (Lower House).

1968 (April 1):  Junior and Senior High Schools (Sōka Gakuen) were founded in Tokyo, marking the start of Sōka Gakkai’s private accredited school system.

1969 (October 19):  Sōka Gakkai launched the New Student Alliance (Shin Gakusei Undō) as its answer to the Student Movement protesting the renewal of the U.S.-Japan Security Treaty. 70,000 members of the Gakkai’s Student Division gathered in Tokyo’s Yoyogi Park.

1969 (November):  Events that came to be known as the genron shuppan bōgai mondai , or “problem over obstructing freedom of expression and the press” surrounding attempts by Kōmeitō and allies to forestall publication of the book I Denounce Sōka Gakkai.

1969 (December 28):  Forty-seven Kōmeitō candidates were elected to the Lower House, and Kōmeitō received just over 10 percent of the popular vote. It was now the third largest party in the Japanese Diet.

1970 (January):  Sōka Gakkai claimed 7.55 million member households.

1970 (May 3):  In the wake of the I Denounce Sōka Gakkai scandal, Ikeda Daisaku announced the official separation of Sōka Gakkai and Kōmeitō and a new Gakkai policy of seikyō bunri , or “separation of politics and religion.”

1971 (April 2):  Sōka University opened in Hachiōji, western Tokyo.

1971 (June 15):  Takeiri Yoshikatsu, head of Kōmeitō, accompanied Prime Minister Tanaka Kakuei to the People’s Republic of China as part of a mission that ushered in normalization of diplomatic relations between China and Japan.

1972 (May 5):  Ikeda met for the first time with British historian Arnold J. Toynbee in the first of hundreds of dialogues with prominent figures. The “dialogue” format became a central feature of Gakkai media and propagation efforts after this point.

1972 (October):  Sōka Gakkai and Nichiren Shōshū celebrated the opening of the Shōhondō, a massive modern hall at Taisekiji that could accommodate more than six thousand worshippers.

1973 (May 3):  Fuji Art Museum opened in Shizuoka; moved later to Hachiōji, next to Sōka University, and was renamed Tokyo Fuji Art Museum.

1974 (December 5):  Ikeda met with Premier Zhou Enlai in Beijing.

1975 (January 26):  Soka Gakkai International (SGI) was founded at a World Peace Conference in Guam, and Ikeda Daisaku was declared SGI president.

1976 (March):  The tabloid Gekkan pen (Monthy Pen) began publishing a series of articles alleging liaisons between Ikeda and six women, including top Women’s Division leaders. Sōka Gakkai sued for defamation and the Tokyo District Court ruled in its favor.

1977 (October):  Sōka Gakkai opened Toda Memorial Park, its first gravesite outside a Nichiren Shōshū temple and the first of thirteen massive mortuary facilities the group has built in Japan. Competition for Gakkai member graves began to escalate between Sōka Gakkai and Nichiren Shōshū.

1977:  The first major conflict between Ikeda Daisaku and the Nichiren Shōshū priesthood took place.

1978 (June 30):  Sōka Gakkai issued a statement in the Seikyō shinbun reaffirming Nichiren Shōshū priestly lineage claims.

1978 (November 7):  Ikeda led two thousand Gakkai administrators to Taisekiji on an “apology pilgrimage” (owabi tōzan).

1979:  The Youth Division established a Peace Conference, and the Married Women’s Division and other subgroups soon followed with similar initiatives. World peace, in place within Sōka Gakkai since the early 1960s as a guiding theme, became a central organizational concern from this era onward.

1979 (April 24):  Ikeda resigned as third president of Sōka Gakkai. He took the position Honorary President and retained his post as president of SGI. He maintained a low profile for approximately one year. Hōjō Hiroshi was inaugurated as Sōka Gakkai’s fourth president.

1981 (April):  Sōka Gakkai registered as an NGO (non-governmental organization) with the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR).

1981 (July 18):  Akiya Einosuke was appointed fifth Sōka Gakkai president.

1983 (January 25):  Ikeda issued his first annual “Peace Proposal.”`

1984 (January 2):  Ikeda was reappointed as Nichiren Shōshū’s chief lay representative by the Shōshū’s Chief Abbot Abe Nikken.

1984 (September 29 and 30):  The World Youth Culture Festival was held at Osaka’s Kōshien Stadium.

1990 (December):  The second major conflict between Ikeda Daisaku and the Nichiren Shōshū priesthood took place. Acrimony between the Shōshū priesthood and the Sōka Gakkai leadership erupted in a series of missives between the two camps.

1991:  Conflict between the priesthood and Sōka Gakkai leaders escalated.

1991 (November 28):  In a final move, the priesthood issued a “Notice of Excommunication of Sōka Gakkai and Nichiren Shōshū.” Henceforth, parishioners who wished to enter sect temples, including the head temple Taisekiji, were required to pledge that they were unaffiliated with Sōka Gakkai. Gakkai members were henceforth barred from pilgrimages to their principal object of worship.

1992 (August 11):  Nichiren Shōshū issued a specific edict excommunicating Ikeda Daisaku.

1993 (October 2):  Sōka Gakkai began conferring objects of worship ( gohonzon ) replicas made from a transcription of the daigohonzon mandala inscribed by the Shōshū Chief Abbot Nichikan in 1720. Gakkai members were instructed to turn in their old gohonzon and receive new ones directly from Sōka Gakkai.

1995 (January):  In response to the January 17 Hanshin Awaji Earthquake that devastated the city of Kobe and the surrounding region, Sōka Gakkai opened ten Culture Centers to refugees, mobilized thousands of member volunteers, and gathered over 230 million yen in relief funds.

1998 (May):  Nichiren Shōshū destroyed the Shōhondō at Taisekiji.

1999 (October 5):  Kōmeitō, now New Kōmeitō after decades of political transformations, entered into coalition with the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP). Kōmeitō remained allied with the LDP in government until 2009, and the LDP-Kōmeitō coalition was reelected to government in December, 2012.

2001 (May 3):  Soka University of America opened in Aliso Viejo, California.

2002 (April):  Sōka Gakkai issued new institutional regulations.

2006 (November 9):  Harada Minoru was appointed sixth Sōka Gakkai president.

2011 (March):  In the wake of the March 11 earthquake, tsunami, and nuclear disasters that devastated northeastern Japan, Sōka Gakkai housed in excess of 5,000 refugees in Culture Centers across the region, gathered hundreds of millions of yen in emergency aid, and mobilized thousands of volunteers from across Japan to take part in both short- and long-term rescue and relief initiatives.

2013 (November 18):  Sōka Gakkai officially opened its new General Headquarters at Shinanomachi, Tokyo. The organization now claims 8.27 million member households, and Soka Gakkai International claims in excess of 1.5 million members in 192 countries outside Japan.

2023 (November 15):  Ikeda Daisaku died.

FOUNDER/GROUP HISTORY

Sōka Gakkai can be described as Japan’s most successful new religious movement. The group claims 8.27 million adherent households in Japan, and more than 1.5 million members in 192 other countries under its overseas umbrella organization Soka Gakkai International, or SGI. These numbers are inflated, but statistical surveys conducted over the past few decades indicate that between roughly two and three percent of the Japanese population self-identifies as belonging to Sōka Gakkai (McLaughlin 2009; Roemer 2009). This makes the organization the largest active religious group in the country. No temple-based Buddhist group, Shintō organization, or other new religious group matches Sōka Gakkai’s ability to mobilize adherents for the sake of proselytizing, electioneering, and other activities.

Sōka Gakkai’s history distinguishes it from many Japanese new religious movements. First, as its name Sōka Gakkai, or “Value Creation Study Association” suggests, the group did not begin as a religion, but was founded as an educational reform association. Second, Sōka Gakkai in effect had three separate foundings, one each under its first three presidents: Makiguchi Tsunesaburō (1871-1944), Toda Jōsei (1900-1944), and Ikeda Daisaku (1928-2023). Each of these founders oversaw a new era of institutional changes.

Sōka Gakkai claims its founding moment as November 18, 1930, when its first president Makiguchi Tsunesaburō published the firstvolume of his collected essays, System of Value-Creating Educational Study ( Sōka kyōikugaku taikei ), marking the start of the Value Creation Education Study Association (Sōka Kyōiku Gakkai), Sōka Gakkai’s predecessor. Makiguchi was born in 1871 in what is now Niigata Prefecture in northeastern Japan, but he moved to the northern island of Hokkaido at the age of thirteen, where he was raised and eventually educated as an elementary school teacher. In 1901, he moved with his wife and children from the Hokkaido city of Sapporo to Tokyo, where he embarked on a career teaching at a series of Tokyo elementary schools. He also collaborated with intellectuals concerned with educational reform as he published books and essays. From 1910, Makiguchi joined the Kyōdokai, or Home Town Association, a research group engaged in ethnology and surveys of local culture in rural areas; the group included the famed folklorist Yanagita Kunio (1875-1962) and internationally renowned educator Nitobe Inazō (1862-1933). Thanks to scholarly engagements in these circles and through his own research, Makiguchi’s ideas were influenced by educational and philosophical trends, including neo-Kantian thought and pragmatism, which moved from Europe and the United States into Japan around the turn of the twentieth century.

On November 18, 1930, Makiguchi published Volume One of System of Value-Creating Educational Study ( Sōka kyōikugaku taikei ). When Makiguchi compiled his essays on educational reform in this volume, he was beginning of process of summarizing a lifetime of scholarship, and his interests after this moved in the direction of religion. In 1928, Makiguchi converted to Nichiren Shōshū Buddhism. Nichiren Shōshū, or “Nichiren True Sect,” follows the teachings of Nichiren (1222-1282), a medieval Buddhist reformer. Trained primarily in the Tendai tradition, Nichiren broke away from established temples to preach that only faith in the Lotus Sūtra , held to be the historical Buddha Śākyamuni’s final teaching, and the practice of chanting the title of the Lotus in the seven-syllable formula namu-myōhō-renge-kyō were effective means of achieving salvation in the degraded Latter Days of the Buddha’s Dharma ( mappō ) (see below).

In 1932, Makiguchi retired from schoolteaching, and he turned thereafter toward concentrated study and practice of Nichiren Shōshū Buddhism. Sōka Kyōiku Gakkai began to meet formally from 1937, and by the 1940s Makiguchi and the organization he established, which claimed approximately five thousand members at its peak, were firmly committed to defending Nichiren Buddhist principles. From 1941, Sōka Kyōiku Gakkai launched a periodical titled Value Creation (Kachi sōzō). This short-lived magazine featured several articles by Makiguchi in which he directly challenged the Japanese government’s religious policies. The Japanese government ended Kachi sōzō ‘s publication at its ninth issue; Makiguchi remonstrated the government for its decision in a short article titled “An Address on the Discontinuation of Publication.”

On June 27, 1943, Makiguchi and other Gakkai leaders were summoned by the Nichiren Shōshū priesthood to the sect’s headquarters at the temple Taisekiji. They were urged to abide by the dictates of the Religious Corporations Law and Japan’s wartime State Shintō injunctions by instructing Sōka Kyōiku Gakkai adherents to enshrine talismans ( kamifuda ) from the Grand Shrine at Ise, despite the fact that the practice constituted a violation of Nichiren Buddhism. Makiguchi refused to do so. On July 6, Makiguchi, his disciple Toda, and nineteen other Gakkai leaders were arrested on charges of violating the Peace Preservation Law. They were charged with violating the Peace Preservation Law and imprisoned thereafter at Sugamo Prison in Tokyo. Makiguchi died of malnutrition on November 18, 1944.

Makiguchi’s disciple Toda Jōsei was, like his mentor, born in northern Japan, raised in poverty in the northern island of Hokkaidō, and made his way to the imperial capital to pursue his fortunes in teaching. Even after he left the teaching profession in late 1922, Toda remained beholden to his mentor Makiguchi, and he attributed his subsequent success in business to Makiguchi’s teachings. Toda alone demonstrated absolute commitment to Makiguchi by refusing to bow to the Japanese state’s pressure to recant his Nichiren Shōshū beliefs. While in prison, Toda experienced a vision in which he joined the innumerable Bodhisattvas of the Earth ( jiyu no bosatsu ) at Vulture Peak where the Buddha Śākyamuni delivers the Lotus Sūtra . He interpreted this revelation as an awakening to the sacred task of continuing his master Makiguchi’s mission to propagate Nichiren Shōshū Buddhism.

After his release from prison in July, 1945, weeks before the end of the Second World War, Toda devoted himself to resuming Makiguchi’s religious mission. He is responsible for transforming the group from a small collective into a religious mass movement. In 1946, he dropped “education” (kyōiku) from the title, changing the group’s name to Sōka Gakkai. The reformed group met initially on the second floor of Toda’s publishing and distance education company Nihon Shōgakkan. On May 1, 1946, Toda was appointed general director of Sōka Gakkai. As he continued launching business ventures, he began holding regular Gakkai study meetings (called zadankai , or “study roundtables”) and organizing a growing number of new converts under the group’s developing administrative leadership. Japan’s tumultuous economy created trouble for Toda’s businesses, and on November 12, 1950, Toda resigned as Sōka Gakkai’s general director, citing his business failures as proof of retribution for failing to commit fully to rebuilding his mentor Makiguchi’s organization. The group, which had experienced slow but steady growth to this point, began to organize for the purpose of radical expansion.

On May 3, 1951, Toda accepted appointment as second president of Sōka Gakkai. At his inauguration, Toda challenged the Gakkai’s adherents to convert seven hundred and fifty thousand families to Sōka Gakkai before his death: “If this goal is not realized while I am alive,” he declared, “do not hold a funeral for me. Simply dump my remains in the bay at Shinagawa.” The group soon developed a widely publicized reputation for aggressive proselytizing and harsh condemnation of rival religions. These tactics met with success: from 1951, Sōka Gakkai grew from a few thousand members to claim over one million adherent households by the end of the decade. The majority of the people who joined the group in the immediate postwar years were some of the millions who were flooding Japan’s cities seeking material security, social infrastructure, and spiritual certainty. Toda relied upon the organization’s structure as a study association (gakkai) to school converts in Nichiren Buddhist doctrine and attract disenfranchised people to Sōka Gakkai’s legitimizing framework of standardized education. He also relied upon the group’s original emphasis on pragmatic thought to emphasize practical benefits. Toda likened Nichiren’s main object of worship to a “happiness-producing machine” that provides its user endless possibilities, and he organized converts into efficient cadres that relentlessly employed persuasive tactics to combat “false sects” (rival religions) in their conversion efforts. Converts enjoyed a renewed sense of self-worth as they were given the task of not only mastering command of Nichiren Buddhist doctrine but also of teaching it to others. Members combined their study of Nichiren and the Lotus with discussions of value, ethics, and pragmatic evaluation that Toda derived from Makiguchi as well as the canon of modern philosophy and world literature.

Sōka Gakkai’s hard-sell approach brought it a rush of new converts, but its aggressive approach also earned the group a negative public image, particularly in the wake of several scandals. One of the most notorious events came to be known as the “Ogasawara Incident” or “Tanuki (Racoon Dog) Festival.” On April 27, 1952, during rituals marking the seven hundredth anniversary of Nichiren’s first chanting of namu-myōhō-renge-kyō, a group of Young Men’s Division members on a pilgrimage to the Nichiren Shōshū head temple Taisekiji seized a Shōshū priest named Ogasawara Jimon. Ogasawara had promoted a controversial plan during the wartime era (one opposed by Sōka Kyōiku Gakkai and the Shōshū leadership) to amalgamate all Nichiren sects into one nation-promoting denomination. He was accused by Toda and the Gakkai youth members of alerting wartime authorities to Makiguchi’s refusal to follow State Shintō protocol, and was blamed for the arrest of the Gakkai leaders and the resulting death of Makiguchi. The Gakkai youth stripped Ogasawara of his robes, paraded him around the Taisekiji grounds, hung a placard from his neck bearing the phrase “tanuki monk” (associating him with the tanuki, an animal that appears in Japanese folk tradition as a shape-changing trickster), and brought him to Makiguchi’s grave, where he was forced to sign a prepared written apology. Reports of this incident in the popular press created a negative public image for Sōka Gakkai, an image that came to permanently define public opinion about the organization in Japan.

Sōka Gakkai’s reputation for aggressive behavior was amplified after another controversial event known as the “Otaru Debate,” when members of Sōka Gakkai’s Study Department challenged priests from the Minobu Sect of Nichiren Buddhism to a doctrinal debate. The event was held in a hall in the city of Otaru (Hokkaido) that was packed with Gakkai members, who jeered at the priests and accused them of heterodox worship and financial corruption. The priests withdrew, and Sōka Gakkai declared themselves the debate’s winners. Publications critical of Sōka Gakkai by the Nichiren sect and other religious organizations began to emerge in large numbers from around this time.

Despite growing controversy about its tactics, Sōka Gakkai continued unflagging growth. From 1953, Sōka Gakkai began holding written and oral “appointment examinations” (nin’yō shiken) to test youth leaders on Nichiren Buddhist doctrinal knowledge. The Gakkai’s administration across Japan expanded rapidly from around this time. With administrative expansion came expansion outside lay Buddhist practices. On May 9, 1954, the Gakkai’s Young Men’s Division leader Ikeda Daisaku (1928-2023) founded the Gungakutai (Military Band Corps), predecessor of the present-day Music Corps (Ongakutai), establishing an interest in the arts that the organization would deepen in later years. The Gungakutai played its first concert in the rain at Taisekiji on October 31, 1954, when Toda reviewed ten thousand mustered Young Men’s and Young Women’s Division members while he rode a white horse, an act viewed by critics outside the group as emulating the wartime Japanese emperor.

The Gakkai’s most notable growth beyond its lay Buddhist focus was expansion into electoral politics. From November 1954, Sōka Gakkai established a Culture Division (Bunkabu), a sub-organization dedicated primarily to selecting candidates to run in elections and to mobilizing members to gather votes. On April 3, 1955, members of Sōka Gakkai’s Culture Division won election in city councils in Tokyo wards and in other municipalities; this marked the first time Sōka Gakkai ran its own candidates for office. On August 1, 1956, Toda issued an essay titled “On the Harmonious Union of Government and Buddhism” (Ōbutsu myōgō ron) in the Gakkai study magazine Great White Lotus (Daibyaku renge), in which he stated that “the only purpose of our going into politics is the erection of the national ordination platform (kokuritsu kaidan).” Expressions of alarm regarding Sōka Gakkai’s forays into national-level politics became a media staple in Japan from around this time.

Sōka Gakkai’s initial forays into politics met with conflict. On April 23, 1957, a group of Young Men’s Division members campaigning for a Gakkai candidate in an Osaka Upper House by-election were arrested for distributing money, cigarettes, and caramels at supporters’ residences, in violation of elections law, and on July 3 of that year, at the beginning of an event memorialized as the “Osaka Incident,” Ikeda Daisaku was arrested in Osaka. He was taken into custody in his capacity as Sōka Gakkai’s Youth Division Chief of Staff for overseeing activities that constituted violations of elections law. He spent two weeks in jail and appeared in court forty-eight times before he was cleared of all charges in January 1962. Sōka Gakkai characterized this incident as Ikeda’s triumph over corrupt tyranny, and the trial of the young leader galvanized Sōka Gakkai members to greater efforts in proselytizing and electioneering.

By the time Toda Jōsei died in April 1958, Sōka Gakkai claimed in excess of one million adherent households, and its size and political clout compelled displays of respect, even from its rivals. An estimated 250,000 Gakkai members lined Tokyo streets to view Toda’s hearse passing to his official funeral on April 20, 1957, where Prime Minister Kishi Nobusuke and Minister of Education Matsunaga Tō offered incense to the deceased leader.

After Toda’s disciple Ikeda Daisaku took the post of third Sōka Gakkai president in May, 1960, he set about expanding the group from a Japan-focused lay Buddhist organization into an international enterprise with a broad mandate in religion, politics, and culture. Under Ikeda’s leadership, Sōka Gakkai established official branches in Asia, Europe, North America, Brazil, and other parts of the globe. Under Ikeda, Sōka Gakkai founded its own accredited private school system, sub-organizations committed to supporting the arts, and other education- and culture-focused initiatives.

Sōka Gakkai continued radical growth in Japan under Ikeda’s leadership throughout the 1960s, powered by the organization’s mobilization in electoral politics through its party Kōmeitō (founded 1964) and a related focus on the goal of building a “national ordination platform” (kokuritsu kaidan). This platform, a special temple facility for ordinations, was to be erected by government decree to mark the completion of kōsen rufu , interpreted by Sōka Gakkai by this time to mean the conversion of one third of the population of Japan. From late 1965, the Gakkai membership focused on the project of constructing the Shōhondō, a massivefacility at the Nichiren Shōshū head temple Taisekiji to house the daigohonzon , the calligraphic mandala inscribed by Nichiren in 1279 that serves Sōka Gakkai and Nichiren Shōshū as their primary object of worship. The Shōhondō was referred to until the end of the decade by Shōshū and Gakkai leaders as a virtual realization of the “true ordination platform” (the honmon no kaidan), marking the completed task of converting the populace.

Growth stalled at the end of the 1960s, at a point when Sōka Gakkai and Kōmeitō were compelled to officially separate. This official split followed a scandal that began in November, 1969 over events that came to be known as the “problem over obstructing freedom of expression and the press” (genron shuppan bōgai mondai ). Fujiwara Hirotatsu (1921-1999), a Meiji University professor, published a book titled I Denounce Sōka Gakkai ( Sōka gakkai o kiru ). He claimed that attempts were made by prominent Kōmeitō politicians and Liberal Democratic Party Secretary General Tanaka Kakuei (1918-1993, later Prime Minister) to block publication. Press coverage of this scandal encouraged sales of Sōka gakkai o kiru and a flood of negative press for Sōka Gakkai.

In the wake of the I Denounce Sōka Gakkai scandal, Ikeda Daisaku announced the official separation of Sōka Gakkai and Kōmeitō and a new Gakkai policy of “separation of politics and religion” (seikyō bunri ). The official separation of the religion and the political party served as a watershed moment for both organizations: Sōka Gakkai’s membership only grew by small amounts after this, and Kōmeitō suffered electoral losses throughout the following decade. Even after the official separation, devout Gakkai adherents have continued to regard electioneering on behalf of Kōmeitō candidates as part of their regular faith activities.

From the early 1970s, Sōka Gakkai moved away from its mission of aggressive expansion in favor of cultivating the generation of children born to first generation converts in discipleship under Ikeda Daisaku. On October 12, 1972, during ceremonies marking the opening of the completed Shōhondō at Taisekiji, Ikeda delivered a speech announcing the start of Sōka Gakkai’s “Phase Two,” describing a turn away from aggressive expansion toward envisioning the Gakkai as an international movement promoting peace through friendship and cultural exchange.

Sōka Gakkai’s official announcement of an inward turn did not deter critiques from outside the group. From March 1976, the tabloid Monthy Pen (Gekkan pen) began publishing a series of articles alleging liaisons between Ikeda and six women, including top Women’s Division leaders. Sōka Gakkai sued for defamation, and the Tokyo District Court ruled in its favor; Gekkan pen was forced to issue a published apology, and its publisher Kumabe Taizō served one year on probation. A recurring pattern of tabloid accusation followed by Gakkai lawsuit became an entrenched feature from this point, causing further damage to Sōka Gakkai’s public image, and the “women problem” (josei mondai) remained an angle of attack that journalists have continued to employ against Ikeda to the present.

From 1977, Ikeda began to clash openly with the Nichiren Shōshū priesthood. At several points during this year Ikeda delivered speeches and published essays in which he challenged the authority of the Nichiren Shōshū priesthood. In one of these, an essay titled “Lecture on the Heritage of the Ultimate Law of Life” (Shōji ichidaiji ketsumyakushō kōgi) that Sōka Gakkai reprinted in millions of pamphlets, Ikeda contended that Shōshū priestly claims to an exclusive lineage going back to the founder Nichiren were not superior to links Gakkai members forge to the Dharma by chanting namu-myōhō-renge-kyō. Extensive negotiations between the two organizations led to Sōka Gakkai reaffirming Nichiren Shōshū priestly lineage claims, and in 1979 Ikeda was compelled to step down from the post of third Gakkai president to take the position of Honorary President.

Distance between Sōka Gakkai and Nichiren Shōshū continued to widen throughout the 1980s, and by the middle of that decade the Shōshū priesthood found itself the uncomfortable elderly companion of a dynamic international organization led by a public intellectual who was more likely to speak of the Enlightenment of European philosophy than the enlightenment promised by Nichiren Buddhist doctrine. These years saw Sōka Gakkai grow increasingly internationally focused; concerned with world peace, culture, and education; centered on Ikeda’s authority; and distant from its Nichiren Shōshū parent organization.

In 1990, the second major conflict between Ikeda Daisaku and the Nichiren Shōshū priesthood erupted. Open acrimony between the Shōshū priesthood and the Sōka Gakkai leadership escalated through a series of missives between the two camps. The priesthood complained about speeches made by Ikeda in which he criticized Abe Nikken. Sōka Gakkai responded with lists of their own concerns about the treatment of their members by the priesthood. From early 1991, Sōka Gakkai began publishing articles in the Seikyō shinbun that were openly critical of Abe Nikken, and the organization began promoting funerals conducted by Gakkai leaders without Nichiren Shōshū priests. Tensions between the two leaderships reached a breaking point by the end of November, 1991 when Nichiren Shōshū excommunicated Sōka Gakkai; in one day, the sect expelled more than ninety-five percent of its parishioners.

Prevented from engaging directly with its principal object of worship enshrined at the Shōshū head temple, Sōka Gakkai after 1991 confirmed its identity as an organization committed entirely to Ikeda. In April, 2002, Sōka Gakkai issued new institutional regulations stipulating that Makiguchi, Toda, and Ikeda are to be known as the sandai kaichō (three generations of presidents), the “eternal mentors” ( eien no shidōsha ) who founded the movement; that the organization upholds the principle of shitei funi (the “indivisible bond of mentor and disciple”); and that the post of Sōka Gakkai president is purely administrative. Sōka Gakkai definitively curtailed the possibility of extending charismatic leadership past Ikeda Daisaku.

In recent years, Gakkai members have mostly come to learn about Nichiren Buddhism in the context of Ikeda’s writings, and dedicated adherents structure their lives around a busy calendar of large and small Gakkai events that serve as rededications of their discipleship under the Honorary President.

DOCTRINES/BELIEFS

Sōka Gakkai is commonly characterized as a lay movement within Nichiren Shōshū Buddhist tradition. However, as the history outlined above indicates, it is much more than a Buddhist organization and is instead best understood as heir to twin legacies: (1) a tradition of self-cultivation through the practice of Nichiren Shōshū Buddhism, and (2) intellectual currents that flourished in late nineteenth to early twentieth century Japan valorizing education, pedagogy, and humanism, inspired by modern Euro-American philosophy and traditions that fall under the general rubric of “culture.” These two legacies shape the commitments, expressive idioms, and combination of doctrines and practices Sōka Gakkai members uphold.

Members maintain traditional Buddhist practices in keeping with Nichiren Shōshū tradition. These include:

• Chanting. Members intone morning and evening prayers in front of their home altars in a chanting performance called gongyō, literally “to exert oneself in practice.” The twice-daily chant includes Chapter Two, “Expedient Means” (Hōben), and sections of Chapter Sixteen, “Life Span” (Juryō), of the Lotus Sūtra. The sūtra sections are followed by repeated incantations of the title of the Lotus, called the daimoku, which consists of the seven syllables namu-myōhō-renge-kyō, and by silent prayers.

• Reverence for the daigohonzon . This is the “great object of worship,” a calligraphic mandala said to have been inscribed by Nichiren on the twelfth day of the tenth month of 1279 for the sake of all humanity. Membership in Sōka Gakkai is confirmed by the reception of a gohonzon , a replica of the daigohonzon . Sōka Gakkai’s lack of access to the daigohonzon after November 1991 and the group’s practice since then of manufacturing gohonzon based on a replica produced in 1720 contribute to ongoing heated doctrinal controversies between the Gakkai and rival Nichiren groups, particularly Nichiren Shōshū and the Shōshū-based lay organization Fuji Taisekiji Kenshōkai.

• Conversion activities known as shakubuku. Shakubuku can be translated as “break and subdue [attachment to inferior teachings].” It was promoted by Nichiren as the only practice appropriate for countries, such as Japan, that slander the dharma. Recent decades have seen Sōka Gakkai, especially its international wing SGI, encourage a move away from shakubuku in favor of shōju , the proselytizing method promoted in the Nichiren tradition of gentle suasion through reasoned argument. However, ordinary members in Japan rarely speak of converting others to Sōka Gakkai in anything other than terms of shakubuku , although interpretations of that term have mostly shifted from hard-sell tactics in the early postwar decades to less intense methods in recent years.

•  The mission of kōsen rufu , which calls for the spread of the Lotus in the time of mappō, the latter day of the Buddha’s Dharma. The term, which can be translated as “widely declare and spread [the truth of the Lotus Sūtra ],” is employed within Sōka Gakkai as a means of describing any activities that promote the growth of the institution.

•  Belief that the present age is the latter days of the Buddha’s Dharma (mappō). The three stages of history in East Asian Buddhist tradition are the age of shōbō , or “true Dharma”; the age of zōhō , or “semblance Dharma”; and the final age of mappō , understood to have begun in the year 1052. Sōka Gakkai members uphold Nichiren’s belief that the only means of salvation in mappō is to embrace the Lotus Sūtra and reject all other teachings as false (Stone 1999:383-84).

•  Reverence for Nichiren and his writings. Followers in the Nichiren Shōshū tradition, including members of Sōka Gakkai, regardNichiren as the earthly avatar of the eternal or original Buddha. As such, his writings are considered by Gakkai followers to bear scriptural authority surpassing even that of the sūtra s of the Buddha Śākyamuni.

•  Though focus on this matter has diminished considerably within Sōka Gakkai since 1970, the group was greatly concerned with realizing the final of Nichiren’s Three Great Secret Dharmas (sandai hihō). These are (1) the honmon no daimoku , the title of the Lotus , namu-myōhō-renge-kyō ; (2) the honmon no honzon, or true object of worship, the calligraphic mandala with the daimoku inscribed at its center that Nichiren devised for his followers; and (3) the honmon no kaidan, or “true ordination platform,” a site for the ordination of clerics that would become the spiritual center for all people, marking the achievement of kōsen rufu , or the conversion of all people to exclusive worship of the Lotus . The first two of the Three Great Secret Dharmas were achieved by Nichiren himself, and the third remained a lofty and remote goal for Nichiren’s followers for centuries, that is, until Sōka Gakkai began to attract millions of converts in the years after the Second World War. Toda Jōsei moved Sōka Gakkai into electoral politics in the 1950s for the sake of realizing the third of the Three Great Secret Dharmas: securing state support for the construction of the honmon no kaidan, known in the modern era as the kokuritsu kaidan, or “national ordination platform,” was required, according to Nichiren Buddhist decree. Sōka Gakkai abandoned the kokuritsu kaidan objective after it separated officially from its political party Kōmeitō in 1970.

Though Nichiren Buddhism forms the core of Sōka Gakkai’s identity as a lay organization, the group’s founding as an educational reform movement concerned with pedagogy and culture guides the ethos and activities of members. In particular, members today define themselves as Gakkai adherents in terms of discipleship under Honorary President Ikeda Daisaku. They conceive of their practice as operating within an affective one-to-one relationship with Ikeda, and though they rarely meet with him directly, they constantly encourage one another to forge an “indivisible bond of mentor and disciple” (shitei funi) by formulating all of their personal objectives and accomplishments as dedications to the Honorary President.

Members are cultivated in reverence for Ikeda through constant immersion in Gakkai media. Maximally dedicated Gakkai members can receive most or even all of their information through the organization. Information is obtained through meetings and satellite broadcasts they attend at Culture Centers and through the daily newspaper Seikyō shinbun , the study magazine Daibyaku renge , videos produced by the production company Shinano Kikaku, and thousands of books, magazines, CDs, websites, and other sources. Today, members are most likely to encounter Nichiren’s writings and the Lotus Sūtra through transcribed speeches and essays by Ikeda. Culture Centers are decorated with Ikeda’s photographs and images of the historical figures he finds most inspiring; typically, apart from altars that enshrine the gohonzon , there is nothing traditionally “Buddhist” or even Japanese to be seen in a Gakkai building. Ikeda extols Napoleon, Ludwig van Beethoven, Martin Luther King Jr., the Mahātmā Gandhi, and other historical greats known for having realized their transcendent visions in the face of adversity. Members are inspired to model their own lives on the examples of these heroic figures, and constant immersion in Gakkai media encourages them to conflate the biographies of triumphant historical personages with that of Ikeda. Reverence for Ikeda is also cultivated by reading books authored by him, particularly The Human Revolution (Ningen kakumei) and its sequel The New Human Revolution (Shin ningen kakumei), serial novelized histories of Sōka Gakkai and its founding presidents that members regard as possessing de facto scriptural authority.

RITUALS/PRACTICES

In addition to twice-daily recitation of sections of the Lotus Sūtra and repetitions of namu-myōhō-renge-kyō , Gakkai members engage in numerous other activities that make up ritual life in the group. These include:

• Study meetings: Local Gakkai members meet at member homes not for Buddhist study per se but at zadankai , monthly “discussion meetings” or “study roundtables.” Members otherwise gather at Culture Centers for larger meetings and to attend broadcasts that include speeches by Honorary President Ikeda. Members will also attend many other meetings convened for the Gakkai sub-organizations to which they belong, such as the Married Women’s Division or the Young Men’s Division, and vocational groups such as the Doctor’s Division, the Educator’s Division, the Artist’s Division, or others.

• Gathering subscriptions for Gakkai publications: Sōka Gakkai members regularly solicit friends, relatives, acquaintances, and each other to sign up to receive periodicals such as the newspaper Seikyō shinbun . The group calls the practice of soliciting for its newspaper “newspaper enlightenment” (shinbun keimō) or using the European (not the Buddhist) term for “enlightenment” ( keimō ) to celebrate the awakening of new readers.

• Political campaigns: A major component of devoted members’ practice is electioneering on behalf of candidates for Kōmeitō or, on occasion, for its coalition partner the Liberal Democratic Party. Sōka Gakkai maintains Japan’s most powerful grassroots-level electioneering network, powered primarily by its Married Women’s Division, who gather votes for candidates in every election, from local town councils to races for seats in the National Diet. Though Sōka Gakkai and Kōmeitō are formally separate, most committed members regard campaigning for Kōmeitō as part of their faith-driven activities.

• Visits to important Gakkai sites: Since 1991, when they were barred from pilgrimages to the daigohonzon at the Nichiren Shōshū head temple Taisekiji in Shizuoka Prefecture, members have taken to carrying out pilgrimages to places associated with the person of Ikeda Daisaku. These include the Sōka Gakkai administrative headquarters at Shinanomachi in central Tokyo, the tree-lined campus of Sōka University in Hachiōji, and the Tokyo Fuji Art Museum. Particularly committed adherents will make annual visits on significant dates in Ikeda’s biography, such as his birthday on January 2, and his date of conversion to Sōka Gakkai on August 24. These annual observances have come to replace the nenchū gyōji, or the “cycle of annual practices” maintained by the Gakkai’s temple-based Buddhist parent Nichiren Shōshū.

• Cultural engagement: From the late 1950s, Gakkai members began to perform at mass events held in sports arenas, and from the 1960s into the early 2000s Culture Festivals (bunkasai) featuring thousands of ordinary members engaged in cast-of-thousands musical spectaculars were organized with some regularity. The last two decades has seen a decline in these mass events in favor of members attending exhibitions at Culture Centers, visiting the Tokyo Fuji Art Museum, and patronizing performances sponsored by the Min-on Concert Association. Young members also perform (primarily) Western classical music in orchestras, concert bands, and other ensembles administered by the Young Men’s Division Music Corps (Ongakutai) and the Young Women’s Division Fife-and-Drum Corps (Kotekitai).

• Ritual reception of a gohonzon : In contrast to earlier eras, when converts were urged to convert to Sōka Gakkai immediately, aspiring members are now encouraged to practice gongyō for six months before they receive their own gohonzon replica in a ceremony called gojukai, to “take the precepts,” or uphold exclusive reverence for the gohonzon .

•  Funerals and memorials: Since 1991, members have been encouraged to have “friend funerals”( yūjinsō ) conducted by Gakkai administrators from the Liturgy Division (Gitenbu) who perform gongyō for the deceased and carry out other funerary duties formerly performed by Nichiren Shōshū priests.

Regardless of the nature of the Gakkai meeting, the beginnings and endings of small and large gatherings in the presence of an enshrined gohonzon are routinely marked by reciting the daimoku sanshō : three invocations of namu-myōhō-renge-kyō.

ORGANIZATION/LEADERSHIP

Sōka Gakkai maintains an elaborate bureaucratic administration that resembles that of a modern national government and its civilservice. Honorary President Ikeda floats above a massive pyramidal structure topped by a president (currently sixth president Harada Minoru) who oversees more than five hundred vice-presidents, a board of regents, and many other paid administrators who in turn oversee the activities of the Gakkai’s many subdivisions. Members are grouped by age, marital status, gender, location, occupation, and many other demographic considerations. The primary sub-organizations are the Young Men’s and Young Women’s Divisions, the Married Women’s Division, and the Men’s Division. Children under the age of eighteen belong to the Future Division. Members across Japan belong to a vertical administrative hierarchy based in households (setai) that are organized into blocks (burokku), districts (chiku), chapters (shibu), regional headquarters (honbu), wards (ku or ken), and prefectures (ken), which are in turn administered by thirteen national districts; almost all of the administrative work ensuring the daily operation of these subdivisions is carried out by volunteer administrators. One active member may hold multiple volunteer administrative posts at different levels of the organization, from the block on upward, and each of these positions will entail numerous responsibilities. The most active members at the local level belong to the Married Women’s Division, and though the majority of regular attendees at meetings are women, membership in Sōka Gakkai’s administration, with the exception of the Future, Young Women’s, and Married Women’s Divisions, is restricted to men.

In addition to a modern rationalized bureaucracy overseen by a presidency, Sōka Gakkai maintains other administrative features that mirror the appurtenances of a nation-state. These include:

•  A Sōka Gakkai flag: A red, yellow, and blue tri-color modeled on European national flags that frequently features a lotus flower drawn at the center. Gakkai territory is instantly recognizable in Japan when the flag hangs over a building, a member’s home, or a business run by an adherent.

•  Anthems: Gakkai members learn Sōka Gakkai songs and sing them at meetings. The songs serve as rallying cries that bind members to the group’s institutional memory, and almost all of these are military marches written for optimal performance by singing in unison over brass band accompaniment.

•A Sōka Gakkai economy: The organization maintains a thriving internal economy based primarily on zaimu (literally “finances”), or monetary donations from members. Sōka Gakkai depends financially on the flow of billions of yen and material goods provided as gifts by members to the institution.

•A media empire: Members receive news about the group’s activities, doctrinal teachings, guidance from Ikeda, and other forms of information from the visual, audio, literary, and other forms of media issued by the organization. They are also bonded to Sōka Gakkai media through quotidian practices such as delivering newspapers, soliciting new subscriptions, and filling their shelves, screens, and stereos with Gakkai texts, images, and sounds.

•Schools: Since 1968, the group has built a respected private secular educational system from preschool up to Sōka University, and in recent years has added educational institutions overseas. Graduates from Sōka Gakkai educational institutions maintain lifelong ties, and in recent decades the organization has staffed the ranks of its paid administrative staff with graduates from its own schools.

•Sōka Gakkai territory: The organization maintains thousands of Culture Centers and other facilities across Japan that are patrolled by trained special cadres, usually the Gajōkai (Fortress Protection) and Sōkahan (Value Creation Team) sub-groups of the Young Men’s Division.

No matter their level of commitment to the group’s administration or the extent to which they devote themselves to life within the nation-like structure of the group, Gakkai members perceive themselves to be in an affective direct relationship with Ikeda Daisaku, a relationship that can at times circumvent Sōka Gakkai’s massive bureaucracy.

ISSUES/CHALLENGES

As a vast, expansionist organization that came to dominate Japan’s religious landscape and make its presence felt in politics, education, publishing, and many other spheres, Sōka Gakkai has provoked many conflicts. Numbering among these are:

•  A reputation for aggressive proselytizing. Though the terms of shakubuku have changed considerably, from its interpretation under Toda as aggressive conversion of all to encouraging dialogue between friends today, Sōka Gakkai retains a reputation for intolerance of other faiths and requiring its members to proselytize.

•  Conflict with other religious organizations. Sōka Gakkai exploded to millions of exclusive adherents over a few short decades by converting followers of other religions. It was able to do this in part because of arguments it leveled against “false teachings” and what it regarded as heterodox forms of worship. Perhaps unsurprisingly, this approach led almost all other religious groups in Japan (including Buddhist organizations, Shintō-based groups, Christian denominations, and New Religions) to target Sōka Gakkai as their primary rival.

The most acute religious conflict Sōka Gakkai faces today is with Nichiren Shōshū. The years following the 1991 split have seen published accusations and hundreds of lawsuits define the relationship between the two organizations. Both groups have sought to purge themselves of each other’s influence; Nichiren Shōshū demolished the Shōhondō in 1998, and Sōka Gakkai denies the religious legitimacy of the Shōshū abbot. Sōka Gakkai’s Shōshū-connected rivals, including the lay group Fuji Taisekiji Kenshōkai, focus in particular on what they regard as the sacrilege of Gakkai members’ reverence for replicas made from the 1720 Nichikan transcription of the daigohonzon .

•  Political engagement. The Sōka Gakkai activity that attracts the majority of public opposition is its continuing support of Kōmeitō. Critics accuse Sōka Gakkai of violating Article 20 of the 1947 Japanese Constitution, which bars religious organizations from receiving privileges from the state or exercising political authority. During the 1950s and 60s, when Sōka Gakkai was pushing for the construction of the ordination platform by government decree, critics also accused the group of violating Article 89, which prevents the government from expending funds for the benefit of religious enterprises. Dropping the objective of constructing the ordination platform has made it easier for Sōka Gakkai to defend its position that supporting Kōmeitō does not violate the Constitution. Sōka Gakkai argues that it and its affiliated political party are officially separate organizations and reminds critics that the 1947 Constitution guarantees freedom of expression and freedom of assembly.

•  Reverence for Honorary President Ikeda. Outside observers note that Sōka Gakkai has transformed from an organization led by Ikeda to a group dedicated to Ikeda. The Gakkai’s Nichiren Buddhist practice is now framed as a means of refining the indivisible bond of mentor and disciple (shitei funi) encouraged within all its adherents. Critics employ the singular reverence Gakkai members maintain for their Honorary President as evidence that the group has moved away from its Nichiren Buddhist origins.

Sōka Gakkai faces a looming challenge occasioned by its singular focus on Ikeda Daisaku: when the Honorary President passes away, there will be no clear successor, and the organization’s bureaucrats may face difficulties exercising authority in the absence of a charismatic living leader.

As a result of these and other conflicts (see the timeline and founder/group history above), Sōka Gakkai has earned the most prominent and longest lasting negative public reputation of any religious group in contemporary Japan. Gakkai members live ordinary lives in mainstream Japanese society, yet many experience stigma in their schools, workplaces, and personal lives due to prevailing negative associations with their faith.

REFERENCES

Asahi Shinbun Aera Henshūbu, ed. 2011. Sōka gakkai kaibō. Tokyo: Asahi Shinbun.

Bessatsu Takarajima Henshūbu, ed. 2007. Ikeda Daisaku naki ato no Sōka gakkai. Tokyo: Takarajimasha.

Bethel, Dayle M. 1989. Education for Creative Living: Ideas and Proposals of Tsunesaburō Makiguchi. Translated by Alfred Birnbaum. Ames: Iowa State University Press.

Asano Hidemitsu. 1974. Watashi no mita sōka gakkai. Tokyo: Keizai Ōraisha.

Bessatsu Takarajima, ed. 1995. Tonari no sōka gakkai: uchigawa kara mita gakkai’in to iu shiawase. Tokyo: Takarajimasha.

Asano Hidemitsu. 1973. Makiguchi the Value Creator, Revolutionary Japanese Educator and Founder of Sōka Gakkai. New York: Weatherhill.

Ehrhardt, George, Axel Klein, Levi McLaughlin, and Steven Reed, eds. Forthcoming. Kōmeitō: Politics and Religion in Japan . Berkeley: Institute of East Asian Studies Japan Monograph Series.

Fisker-Nielsen, Anne Mette. 2012. Religion and Politics in Contemporary Japan: Soka Gakkai Youth and Komeito. London and New York: Routledge.

Fujiwara Hirotatsu. 1970. I Denounce Sōka Gakkai. Translated from the Japanese by Worth C. Grant. Tokyo: Nisshin Hōdō.

Fujiwara Hirotatsu . 1969. Kono nihon wo dō suru 2: sōka gakkai o kiru . Tokyo: Nisshin Hōdō Shuppanbu.

Higuma Takenori. 1970. Toda Jōsei / Sōka gakkai. Tokyo: Shin Jinbutsu Ōraisha.

Higuma Takenori. 1983. Gendai shūkyōron. Tokyo: Shiraishi Shoten.

Ikeda Daisaku. 1998-2013. Ikeda Daisaku zenshū (130+ volumes). Tokyo: Seikyō Shinbunsha.

Ikeda Daisaku. 1998-2013. Shin ningen kakumei. Tokyo: Seikyō Shinbunsha (25 volumes).

Ikeda Daisaku. 1971-1994. Ningen kakumei. Tokyo: Seikyō bunko (12 volumes).

Inose Yūri. 2011. Shinkō wa dono yō ni keishō sareru ka: Sōka Gakkai ni miru jisedai ikusei. Sapporo: Hokkaidō Daigaku Shuppankai.

Itō Tatsunori. 2006 (March). “Kenkyū shiryō: sōka gakkai to nichirenshū no ‘otaru montō’ saigen kiroku.” Gendai Shūkyō Kenkyū 40:630-77.

Itō Tatsunori. 2004 (March). “ Shakubuku kyōten kōshō.” Gendai Shūkyō Kenkyū 38:251-75.

Itō Tatsunori. 2003 (March). “Kenkyū shiryō: kaisei sareta sōka gakkai kaisoku henkō sareta ‘Sōka gakkai’ kisoku.” Gendai Shūkyō Kenkyū 37:154-225.

Kumagai Kazunori. 1978. Makiguchi Tsunesaburō. Tokyo: Daisan Bunmeisha.

Machacek, David and Bryan Wilson, eds. 2000. Global Citizens: The Sōka Gakkai Buddhist Movement in the World . Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Makiguchi Tsunesaburō. 1981-1987. Makiguchi Tsunesaburō zenshū (10 volumes). Tokyo: Daisan Bunmeisha.

McLaughlin, Levi. 2012. “Did Aum Change Everything? What Soka Gakkai Before, During, and After the Aum Shinrikyō Affair Tells Us About the Persistent ‘Otherness’ of New Religions in Japan.” Japanese Journal of Religious Studies 39:51-75.

McLaughlin, Levi. 2012. “Sōka Gakkai in Japan.” Pp. 269-307 in Handbook of Contemporary Japanese Religion, edited by Inken Prohl and John Nelson. Leiden: Brill.

McLaughlin, Levi. 2009. “Sōka Gakkai in Japan.” Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Religion, Princeton University.

Miyata Kōichi . 2000. Makiguchi Tsunesaburō: gokuchū no tatakai. Tokyo: Daisan Bunmeisha.

Miyata Kōichi . 1993 Makiguchi Tsunesaburō no shūkyō undō. Tokyo: Daisan Bunmeisha.

Murata, Kiyoaki. 1969. Japan’s New Buddhism: An Objective Account of Sōka Gakkai. New York: Walker / Weatherhill.

Nishino Tatsukichi. 1985. Denki Toda Jōsei. Tokyo: Daisan Bunmei.

Nishiyama Shigeru. 2004 (June). “Henbō suru sōka gakkai no konjaku.” Sekai :170-81.

Nishiyama Shigeru. 1998. “Naisei shūkyō no jiyūka to shūkyō yōshiki no kakushin: sengō dainiki no sōka gakkai no baai.” In Shūkyō to shakai seikatsu no shosō, edited by Numa Gishō hakushi koki kinen ronbunshū. Tokyo: Ryūbunkan.

Nishiyama Shigeru. 1989. “Seitōka no kiki to kyōgaku kakushin: ‘Shōhondō’ kansei ikō no ishiyama kyōgaku no baai.” Pp. 263-99 in Genkin Nihon bunka ni okeru dentō to henyō 5: genkin Nihon no “shinwa, edited by Nakamaki Hirochika. Tokyo: Domesu Shuppan.

Nishiyama Shigeru. 1985. “Butsuryūkō to sōka gakkai ni miru kindai hokekei kyōdanhatten no nazo.” In Nichiren to hokekyō shinkō, edited by Tamura Yoshirō et.al. Tokyo: Yomiuri Shinbunsha.

Nishiyama Shigeru. 1975. “Nichiren shōshū sōka gakkai ni okeru ‘honmon kaidan’ ron no hensen: seijiteki shūkyō undō to shakai tōsei.” Pp. 241-75 in Nichirenshū no shomondai , edited by Nakao Takashi. Tokyo: Yūzankaku.

Roemer, Michael. 2009. “Religious Affiliation in Contemporary Japan: Untangling the Dilemma.” Review of Religious Research 50:298-320.

Saeki Yūtarō. 2000. Toda Jōsei to sono jidai . Tokyo: Mainichi Shinbunsha.

Shichiri Wajō. 2000. Ikeda Daisaku gensō no yabō: shōsetsu ningen kakumei hihan . Tokyo: Shin Nippon Shuppansha.

Shimada Hiromi. 2007. Kōmeitō vs. Sōka gakkai . Tokyo: Asahi Shinsho.

Shimada Hiromi. 2006. Sōka gakkai no jitsuryoku . Tokyo: Asahi Shinbunsha.

Shimada Hiromi. 2004. Sōka gakkai. Tokyo: Shinchō Shinsho.

Shimazono, Susumu. 2006. “Teikō no shūkyō / kyōryoku no shūkyō: senjiki sōka kyōiku gakkai no hen’yō.” Pp. 239-68 in Iwanami kōza ajia / taiheiyō sensō 6: nichijō seikatsu no naka no sōryokusen, edited by Kurazawa Aiko et. al. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.

Shimazono, Susumu. 2004. From Salvation to Spirituality: Popular Religious Movements in Modern Japan . Melbourne: Trans Pacific Press.

Sōka Gakkai. 1952. Shinpen Nichiren Daishōnin gosho zenshū. Tokyo: Sōka Gakkai.

Sōka Gakkai Kyōgakubu, ed. 1951 to 1969. Shakubuku kyōten. Tokyo: Sōka Gakkai.

Sōka Gakkai Mondai Kenkyūkai, ed. 2001. Sōka gakkai fujinbu: saikyō shūhyō gundan no kaibō. Tokyo: Gogatsu Shobō.

Sōka Gakkai Nenpyō Hensan Iinkai, ed. 1976. Sōka gakkai nenpyō. Tokyo: Seikyō Shinbunsha.

Sōka Gakkai Yonjū Shūnenshi Hensan Iinkai, ed. 1970. Sōka gakkai yonjū shūnenshi. Tokyo: Sōka Gakkai.

Stone, Jacqueline I. 2003. “By Imperial Edict and Shogunal Decree: Politics and the Issue of the Ordination Platform in Modern Lay Nichiren Buddhism.” Pp. 192-219 in Buddhism in the Modern World: Adaptions of an Ancient Tradition, edited by Steven Heine and Charles Prebish. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Stone, Jacqueline I. 2003. “Nichiren’s Activist Heirs: Sōka Gakkai, Risshō Kōseikai, Nipponzan Myōhōji.” Pp. 63-94. In Action Dharma: New Studies in Engaged Buddhism, edited by Christopher Queen, Charles Prebish and Damien Keown. London: RoutledgeCurzon.

Stone, Jacqueline I. 1999. Original Enlightenment and the Transformation of Medieval Japanese Buddhism. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.

Stone, Jacqueline I. 1998. “Chanting the August Title of the Lotus Sūtra : Daimoku Practices in Classical and Medieval Japan.” Pp. 116-66 in Re-visioning “Kamakura” Buddhism, edited by Richard Payne. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.

Stone, Jacqueline I. 1994. “Rebuking the Enemies of the Lotus : Nichirenist Exclusivism in Historical Perspective.” Japanese Journal of Religious Studies 21:231-59.

Sugimori Kōji. 1976. Kenkyū / sōka gakkai. Tokyo: Jiyūsha.

Suzuki Hiroshi. 1970. Toshiteki sekai. Tokyo: Seishin Shobō.

Tamano Kazushi. 2008. Sōka gakkai no kenkyū. Tokyo: Kōdansha.

Toda Jōsei. 1981-1990. Toda Jōsei zenshū (9 volumes). Tokyo: Seikyō Shinbunsha.

Toda Jōsei. 1961. Toda Jōsei-sensei kōenshū jō / ge. Tokyo: Sōka Gakkai.

Toda Jōsei. 1961. Toda Jōsei-sensei ronbunshū. Tokyo: Sōka Gakkai.

Tōkyō Daigaku Hokekyō Kenkyūkai. 1975. Sōka gakkai no rinen to jissen. Tokyo: Daisan Bunmeisha.

Tōkyō Daigaku Hokekyō Kenkyūkai, ed. 1962. Nichiren shōshū sōka gakkai . Tokyo: Sankibō Busshorin.

White, James Wilson. 1970. The Sōkagakkai and Mass Society. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Yamazaki Masatomo. 2001. “Gekkan Pen” jiken: Umoreteita shinjitsu. Tokyo: Daisan Shokan.

Publication Date:
1 December 2013

Share

Tenshinseikyō

TENSHINSEIKYŌ

TENSHINSEIKYŌ TIMELINE

1882:  Shimada Heikichi, the older brother of the founder Shimada Seiichi, was born in Ōgoe Village, Saitama.

1892:  Tenshin Ōmikami first appeared to Shimada Heikichi, predicting the birth of his younger brother Shimada Seiichi, who became the founder known as Shodai-sama.

1892:  Heikichi began performing miracles, such as curing blindness and “spirit writing” by channeling Tenshin Ōmikami. This became known as the First Advent of God.

1896:  Heikichi announced that Tenshin Ōmikami would return to heaven, and, shortly after, Heikichi declared that he could no longer perform miracles.

1896 (February 11):  The founder, Seiichi Shimada, was born.

1909-1920:  Seiichi moved to Tokyo and established himself as a grain trader.

1923 (February):  Seiichi married Ei, who was twenty-one at the time.

1932:  Due to declining business, Seiichi was forced to sell his house and the family fell into poverty. He took work as a millet broker.

1935 (January):  Seiichi considered suicide, beseeched God for help.

1935 (January 18):  A fellow trader, Satō Yasutaka, became possessed by Tenshin Ōmikami and told Seiichi: “I am your guardian god.” He gave Seiichi precise advice on the soybean market, which turns out to be accurate. This became known as the Second Advent of God.

1935 (February 11):  Seiichi held the first prayer meeting for Tenshin Ōmikami in his home in Saga-chō, and begian holding monthly prayer meetings.

1935 (Summer):  Seiichi and a fellow believer went on a pilgrimage from Mt. Kurama in Kyoto to Mt. Akiha and Mt. Kuno in Shizuoka. He began receiving mysterious abilities, such as reading in the dark.

1937 (November 29):  Shimada Heikichi passed away.

1937:  The first congregation, the Tokyo congregation, was founded (unofficially), and was known as Tenshin Kai.

1945 (March 10):  Seiichi’s home burned down in a Tokyo firebombing. Seiichi evacuated to Saitama with family.

1947-1949:  Saitama was flooded by Typhoon Kathleen on September 15, 1947. Seiichi’s house is miraculously left untouched. Seiichi began construction on a new home in Bunkyo Ward (near present-day headquarters) in1948; work was, completed in September 1949. The house included altar room for rituals.

1949:  Seiichi resumed monthly prayer meetings in October at his home altar. Believers began visiting and staying with him at his home. The religion becomes known as “Kagomachi no Tenshin-sama,” named after the location of his home in Kagomachi, Bunkyō Ward.

1949 (April):  Seiichi married his second wife, Kyoko (who was unaware of his religious beliefs).

1950 (July):  Seiichi grew increasingly ill. He was diagnosed with cancer of the stomach/intestines and acute appendicitis. He underwent emergency surgery and recovered miraculously.

1950 (December 25):  Seiichi miraculously cured two people suffering from mental illness. News of the miracle spread and more and more believers began visiting his home.

1951 (January 11):  Seiichi made a covenant with Tenshin Ōmikami to serve as a religious leader.

1952:  Seiichi registered Tenshin Ōmikami Kyō as a religious organization.

1960:  Tenshin Ōmikami Kyō’s Head Temple was completed in Tokyo.

1961:  Seiichi received divine instruction on healing technique using “divine water” (go-shinsui).

1967:  Tenshin Ōmikami Kyō’s affiliated clinic, Yamatoura Clinic (later renamed Tenshin Clinic), opened in Kagomachi, Tokyo.

1975 (September):  Restoration was completed on the “Ōgoe Holy Site” of Seiichi’s birthplace.

1976 (April 11):  Seiichi’s eldest son, Shimada Haruyuki, succeeded him as head of the religion.

1976 (May 8):  The twenty-fifth Anniversary Celebration was held at the Nippon Budohkan.

1985 (May 3):  Shimada Seiichi passed away at age eighty-nine.

1990:  The organization name was changed to Tenshinseikyō.

 2001 (April 11):  Shimada Kōichirō became Third Master.

2001 (May 12):  The fiftieth Anniversary Celebration was held at Tokyo International Forum.

2006 (February 11):  The new Main Temple (Honbu Seidō) was completed in Tokyo.

2009 (April):  The official group website was launched.

FOUNDER/GROUP HISTORY

While officially registered as a religious organization in 1952, Tenshinseikyō traces its origin to an event known as the “First Advent of God” during 1895-1896, when their deity, known as the Supreme Ruler Tenshin Ōmikami (天心大御神), appeared to Shimada Heikichi (島田平吉), the older brother of the founder Shimada Seiichi (島田晴一). [Image at right] In January of 1895 Shimada received a message from Tenshin Ōmikami announcing that a younger brother would be born the following year, and he was to be named Seiichi. He also received a schoolbag and shoes of high quality, which he said were gifts from the deity to be used by Seiichi when he was born. Throughout the year prior to Seiichi’s birth, Heikichi did miracle working in the name of Tenshin Ōmikami. Then in 1896, the official founder of the religion, Shimada Seiichi, was born. He is referred to as “Shodai-sama” (初代様, First Master) by followers.

For much of his early adult life Seiichi was not involved in religious activities and showed little interest in religion, but rather was a shrewd-minded and ambitious businessman. Seiichi did not graduate elementary school (a fact that is often stressed by followers), and in 1910 he became an apprentice at a fellow villager’s family’s millet business in Tokyo. He earned a reputation for being trustworthy and reliable, and he also gained recognition for his accurate market predictions. He began playing the market and participating in the drinking, gambling and cavorting of the Tokyo nightlife in the early 1910s.

From 1916-1917 he served in Section 3 of the Fifth Troop of the Azabu Third Infantry Regiment in the Imperial Army. In his memoirs he proudly notes that he was chosen to present his regiment to Crown Prince Hirohito (future Showa Emperor) at the Azabu barracks. After seven months of service he was discharged for being “unfit for military service,” which he claims was the first time that “Article 57” of the Army code was invoked to allow such discharge, though the reasons and circumstances are unclear.

After military discharge, Seiichi opened his own shop, Shimada Shōten, in 1918, which dealt in rice and bran imports, and by 1919 he became a wholesaler for a major rice trading company, Kyōsei Milled Rice. Seiichi eventually opened a branch in Yamagata Prefecture, which later became another important religious community for the future Tenshinseikyō. Also in 1919, he was investigated by police in connection with illegal business dealings conducted by Kyōsei Milled Rice, and in connection with the murder of a fellow rice-broker by a business partner. He was later cleared of involvement in both cases.

Seiichi’s business boomed until the stock market crash of March 1920, and he was further affected by the Great Kanto Earthquake on September 1, 1923. Seiichi lost all of his merchandise and property, and his business was wiped out. After briefly returning to his hometown of Ōgoe with his wife, he returned to Tokyo and used his connections to sell udon noodles from a mobile cart and began a business in buying and selling flour, soy beans, and other goods. During this time Seiichi also contracted typhoid and became severely ill. Meanwhile, his first two children, daughter Atsuko (also called Mitsuko) and daughter Shigeko were born in 1925 and 1928, respectively, and his first son, Haruyuki, was born in 1933.

By the early 1930s, Seiichi was in deeply in debt. On January 15, 1935 he contemplated suicide by jumping from Eitai Bridge in Tokyo. However, he worried about leaving his wife and family behind, and he remembered the stories of miracles surrounding his birth that his parents and brother had told him when he was younger. Desperate, he beseeched Tenshin Ōmikami to give him guidance. Three days later, on January 18, Seiichi ran into his business partner, Satō Yasutaka, who suddenly became “possessed” by a spirit claiming to be Seiichi’s “guardian deity” (保護神, hogo-gami). Through Satō, the deity (later identified by Seiichi as Tenshin Ōmikami) berated Seiichi for poor market choices and gave him practical advice on upcoming business transactions. Following the “possession,” Satō had no memory of the incident. Ultimately, Tenshin Ōmikami’s advice proved accurate and Seiichi made a large profit, and this incident became known as the Second Advent of God (the First Advent being Tenshin Ōmikami’s appearance to Shimada Heikichi).

From then on, Seiichi began to receive messages from Tenshin Ōmikami through Sato, who became a temporary channel for communicating with Tenshin Ōmikami. The divine messages included personal admonitions to be faithful and pious as well as accurate market advice, and Seiichi’s business began to turn around. Seiichi began monthly religious gatherings in his home in mid-1935 and also pursued ascetic training at Mt. Kurama in Kyoto, and Mt. Akiha and Mt. Kuno in Shizuoka to deepen his understanding of this religious experience. He also began receiving mysterious powers such as the ability to read in the dark.

In 1936 Seiichi built a second home in his hometown of Ōgoe, Saitama, which later became an important religious site for his future organization. This same year, on December 3, 1936, his mother passed away. Meanwhile, the first congregation of the new religious organization was unofficially founded in Tokyo in 1937, and was known as Tenshin Kai. The first temple was constructed with contributions from eight members, under the guise of a Buddhist-style altar in Seiichi’s house (as religious organizations were heavily restricted during this period). They also began “prayer-counting sessions,” in which members would fall into a trance and make forecasts for the futures market. In 1938, Seiichi also pursued ascetic training in Mount Kobugahara in Tochigi Prefecture. Throughout the 1930s and 1940s the group was not a registered religious organization, and so amidst the increasing wartime surveillance of citizens his followers continued to meet in secret, until evacuations and wartime pressures forced the members to disperse across Japan by 1944.

Alongside his religious pursuits, from the 1930s to the end of World War II, Seiichi was involved in numerous business activities and gained friends and followers in various government ministries and businesses. He was briefly arrested for violations of the Price Control Act in June, 1940, of which he was later absolved. In the summer of 142, Seiichi became involved in establishing the Japan Fabric Control Union; this was disbanded by government order in February 1943 (or 1944?), but was reestablished two months later. He became an executive director for a textiles union, where he worked with major corporations like Kanebo.

In the late 1930s Seiichi and his wife had two more sons, Hiromitsu and Saburō, but his family also suffered a number of losses. His father died on January 10, 1938, and in January 26, 1941, Seiichi lost his wife to typhus. Soon after, his children evacuated to their country home in Ōgoe, Saitama, to seek shelter during the war.

After the end of World War II (around 1946-1947) Seiichi and his family moved back to Fukagawa, Eitai-chō, in Tokyo. Seiichi remarried, and he built a new home in Kagomachi, Bunkyō Ward in 1939, where he resumed his monthly religious meetings this same year. As his previous contacts and members of the Tokyo congregation returned to Tokyo in the early postwar, the religion began to spread through Tokyo, particularly through his business partners, and later through his other business connections in Saitama and Yamagata. Meanwhile, in December 1949 his third daughter Atsuko married Shindō Akira, who later became a head priest for the religion.

During the early postwar period of Seiichi’s Tokyo congregation, the group was informally known as “Kagomachi no Tenshin-sama.” However, by 1951 the growing congregation attracted the attention of police who began surveillance of the organization. In response, Seiichi officially registered the religion as Tenshin Ōmikamikyō in 1952. From the 1960s to the 1970s the religion continued to grow and its activities expanded. In 1960, the Tokyo temple (Image at right) was completed, mostly through donations from members. Following this, in 1961 Seiichi received divine instruction from Tenshin Ōmikami in how to perform a healing method involving injections of “divine water” (go-shinsui) to cure a range of illnesses. In 1967, their healing facility, Yamatoura Clinic, officially opened; it was later renamed Tenshin Clinic.

Seiichi and his religion briefly attracted media attention in the 1970s, including an appearance by Seiichi on a nationwide morning television show on NET TV (presently TV Asahi) on January 7, 1975. The group also began foraying into audiovisual production, including producing a video on the origin of the organization in 1977. Organizationally, in 1976 Seiichi’s eldest son Shimada Haruyuki (島田晴行) succeeded him as the “Second Master” (第二世教主, Dai ni-sei kyōshu or 第二教主様, Dai ni kyōshu-sama). In 1985, Seiichi passed away, and around 1990 the organization changed its name from Tenshin Ōmikamikyō to Tenshinseikyō.

Through the 1980s and 1990s the religion continued to gain members in Tokyo, Saitama, and Yamagata, and their facilities in Tokyo’s Bunkyō Ward were also expanded. Beginning in 1990 they began holding introductory seminars as well as major ceremonies at the convention venue Makuhari Messe in Chiba Prefecture. In 2001, Haruyuki was succeeded by his eldest son Shimada Kōichirō (島田幸一郎), who became the “Third Master” (第三世教主, Dai san-sei kyōshu or 第三教主様, Dai san kyōshu-sama). In 2006, they completed a new temple in Hon-Komagome, Bunkyō Ward, Tokyo.

DOCTRINES/BELIEFS

Members of Tenshinseikyō revere the deity Tenshin Ōmikami, who is seen as the “Living God” who is the “same god of the Bible and all major religions.” The common name used to refer to Tenshin Ōmikami [Image at right] among members is the Japanese generic term for god, kami-sama (神様). Members note they are monotheistic, worship only Tenshin Ōmikami, and do not worship any other gods or intermediaries. Moreover, they do not see their leaders or the founder as being divine, but rather as messengers of Tenshin Ōmikami. They note that Tenshin Ōmikami has descended to Earth through human forms on three occasions, first as Moses, second as Jesus, and third as Heikichi and Seiichi (which is seen as one instance). Tenshinseiky ō is thus seen as being part of the same lineage of all world religions, though it does not posit any particular genealogical progression in terms of religious teachings or revelations. Some members also note that while they believe that Tenshinseikyō is the “right” (tadashii) religion for them, other religions may be “right” for other people, and that ultimately all religions have the same roots. Thus, members generally do not express feelings of competition or animosity with other religious groups or beliefs.

Tenshinseikyō places emphasis on three main beliefs:

● The existence of miracles ( kiseki ) performed by Tenshin Ōmikami;

● “Karmic Legacy”( 因縁, inen), which consists of in , one’s own karma, and en , the karma which comes from others, including one’s ancestors. Together, these two forms of karma shape each individual’s fate (shukumei), and they also connect individuals with their ancestors as well as with other individuals whom they meet during their lifetime. This combination of one’s personal karma and the karma of others is called one’s “karmic legacy”;

● The practice of ancestor veneration (senzo no shiawase wo kami-sama ni inoru, literally “praying to god for your ancestor’s happiness”) is seen as necessary to purify the bad karma (悪因, akuin) of one’s ancestors and thereby positively shape one’s fate and the karma (inen) of one’s descendants. According to their English handbook, “Bad karma inherited from ancestors needs to be removed by God, and only then can you pray for your wishes to be fulfilled. The correct way to pray is to first pray for your ancestors’ bad karma to be removed, to then pray for your own salvation and to finally pray for your descendants’ prosperity.”

Principle teachings include the “Teachings of God” (御心, Mi-gokoro), a collection of phrases passed down from Tenshin Ōmikami to the founder Shimada Seiichi over the course of his religious life and compiled before his death. The teachings consist of forty-seven short phrases that emphasize the virtues of positive thinking, sincerity, hard work, perseverance, self-reflection, gratitude, and forgiveness. Each day of the month is assigned a particular teaching for that day, to be addressed in the daily ritual meetings and reflected on by members, and the teachings are rotated each month. Based on the founder’s experiences as a businessman, many teachings address how to attain success and prosperity, including proper business ethics for dealing with customers, employees, and coworkers. Additional doctrinal texts include the prayers found in their prayer book, Tenshinseikyō Norito, and the book “The Origins” (由来, yurai), [Image at right] a text which documents the life of the founder.

There is no eschatology nor explicit doctrine regarding the spiritual realm or afterlife. After individuals die, their spirits continue to exist in a spiritual realm and their karmic legacy has influence over the living.

RITUALS/PRACTICES

Principal rituals consist of worship services held at the regional temples and main headquarters throughout the week, and members are free to attend as many or as few as they wish, with most members attending only on Sundays. The services are offered eight times per day on average to meet the members’ diverse scheduling needs. More-or-less mandatory monthly ceremonies are held on the eleventh of each month, and annual ceremonies celebrating events in the founder’s life and the establishment of the organization are also celebrated.

Typical daily ritual services last for ten to fifteen minutes and are held at their regional temples and headquarters. Before entering the temples, members wash their hands in a basin at the entrance. Once in the hall, members sit on pews that are designed and arranged in a manner similar to a Christian church. The services are officiated by two priests on a raised stage who present offerings to two altars, one in Buddhist design and the other in Shinto design, which represent the members’ ancestors and the deity Tenshin Ōmikami, respectively. Services begin with reading two prayers from a book of prayers which is arranged in the form of a sutra-style fold-out pamphlet. Members clap twice at the beginning and end of each prayer, very loudly and in unison. Following the service, members are free to socialize in the hall.

Consultations are another important element of Tenshinseikyō activities. Priests serve as counsellors and offer advice and ritual services for members. Dedicated consultation rooms in their temples are used for this purpose, and are available by appointment for a fee. In addition to consultations, Tenshinseikyō runs two Tenshin Clinics, one located next to the Tokyo headquarters [Image at right] and one in Nagasaki, which administer a kind of “divine water,” called go-shinsui 御神水), via injection. It is said to possess healing powers, and is available for use by both members and non-members for a fee (members receive a considerable discount).

The injection was a formula revealed to Shimada Seiichi at the request of a medical doctor who was a member of Tenshinseikyō and was vexed by his inability to cure his own wife (see Watanabe and Igeta 1991). The formula originally consisted of boiling water dedicated before the altar to Tenshin Ōmikami, with chondroitin sulfate added. The formula seems to have changed over the years, and according to Watanabe and Igeta (1991), writing in the late 1980s:

At present, the method of preparing goshinsui is for water to be offered before the deity, then placed in bottles which are sealed, and then once again dedicated with prayers before the deity. Together with water, patent medicines and drugs are likewise dedicated before the deity, and it is said that if the deity is asked to breathe its breath into the medicine, the drugs will become a “divine tonic.” Since goshinsui and divine tonics are different from the medicines produced by human beings, they are said to be capable of curing any disease without producing harmful side effects. At the same time, however, it is apparent from numerous experiential tales and sermons by religious leaders that the water will have no effect if the believers do not possess firm faith. ”

The divine water is administered by being injected into the patient with a hypodermic syringe. This is carried out by a licensed physician at their Tokyo Tenshin Clinic and in their Nagasaki Tenshin Clinic. While embracing the use of divine water injections, the physicians are licensed in internal medicine, and they also offer referrals to other hospitals in serious cases such as cancer or terminal illnesses. Patients thus often combine treatments from both the Tenshin Clinics and other (mainstream) medical institutions. The injections are said to cure a wide variety of ailments from physical to mental illnesses. This practice briefly caused controversy in the mid-1960s when the Department of Health investigated their administration of injections without a license. They subsequently applied for and received a license for the Yamatoura Clinic (now Tenshin Clinic) as a result of this incident (see Watanabe and Igeta 1991).

LEADERSHIP/ORGANIZATION

Tenshinseikyō leadership has followed primogeniture in succession, and is currently led by the third leader, Shimada Kōichirō, who is known as the Third Master and is the eldest son of the second leader, Shimada Haruyuki, known as the Second Master. Shimada Haruyuki, in turn, was the eldest son of the founder, Shimada Seiichi, who is referred to as the First Master.

The organization consists of lay members and full-time clergy. While the elder brother of Shimada Seiichi was the first to encounter the revered deity Tenshin Ōmikami and served as a vessel for automatic writing and miracle working for the deity, he is not revered as a founder of the organization.

Organizational structure consists of the current Third Master as the head of the organization operating out of the headquarters in Tokyo, and full-time clergy called Priests (kyōshi) who run the day-to-day rituals and offer consultation for members. At the Tokyo main temple there are at least four priests who alternate officiating the daily services, and priests-in-training serve as assistants. Training for the priesthood requires becoming a full-time employee of the organization and completing several years of training with senior priests. Priests are often second or third-generation members. The priests live in private residences, and there is no cloistered housing. The organization also has other full-time staff who manage the properties, publishing, finances, and audiovisual productions.

Membership is based on individuals paying a membership fee and purchasing the main sacred texts, and thus it is not hereditary. Joining requires the recommendation of a current member. The organization discourages open proselytizing and does not participate in door-to-door or public proselytizing activities. Rather, they encourage word-of-mouth proselytizing among relatives, friends, and coworkers. They also do not permit unaccompanied guests to enter the premises of their temples; instead, interested visitors must make arrangements with staff beforehand or be accompanied by a member. Membership estimates are vague. Watanabe and Igeta (1991) put the number around 40,000, while in 2009 some members suggested that the number was perhaps around 10,000 or fewer nationwide, including around 100 priests, though this is also unclear. In addition to their main temple (honbu seidō) in Tokyo and the holy site of the founder’s family home in Saitama , they currently have three “churches” (kyōkai ) in Shizuoka, Osaka, and Nagasaki, six “worship halls” (reihaidō) in Yamagata, Sendai, Mie, Kagawa, Oita, and Hakodate.

ISSUES/CHALLENGES

Tenshinseikyō is not well known, and there is little reportage about the organization or its activities. Little research has been done on the organization, and thus far it has not gained much attention from the media or scholars (see the few exceptions of Inoue et al 1996; Watanabe and Igeta 1991). Their most visible public activity to date was the construction of their Tokyo headquarters, which seems to have been met with no resistance or negative reception by local residents. However, there is moderate chatter regarding aggressive proselytizing and expensive membership fees on Japanese-language anti-cult websites, such as on anonymous bulletin board systems (BBS) such as 2ch. Most comments refer to family members who the anonymous BBS contributors feel are paying too much money to the organization; other complaints decry overly zealous proselytizing methods among some members.

The organization’s use of “divine water” (go-shinsui) to cure illnesses briefly caused interest in the group by non-members seeking its cures in the mid-1960s. According to Watanabe and Igeta (1991), the Department of Health issued a warning to the group when they began administering injections to non-members who came to the Tokyo temple for treatment. In response to the Department of Health investigation, the group legally established the Tenshin Clinic. Its divine water was reported to have been tested by scientists at The University of Tokyo (most likely at the request of the Department of Health), only to find that it was merely water; this was taken by members as a sign of the miraculous nature of the water which defies scientific reasoning.

As a relatively small organization that has grown primarily by word-of-mouth, it has expanded only gradually, but some members express worry about the organization becoming too large and losing its close-knit characte. Leaders encourage proselytization through word-of-mouth by asking members to bring friends, coworkers, and family members to meetings. However, some members, particularly younger members who view the organization more like a personal “household religion” (i.e., a religion that is their families’ private tradition), seem somewhat conflicted about having the community grow much larger. As the current number of members is rather small in each district, members expressed a feeling of comfort in knowing everyone in their community and in knowing each other’s extended families due to the multi-generational character of the community. Furthermore, as they generally believe that all religions are aspects of the same ultimate truth and emanate from the same ultimate deity, there is little palpable fervor in terms of gaining new members and promoting the righteousness of their own religion among others, at least among the general membership. As of the early 2010s, they also expressed no plans for overseas expansion and do not actively proselytize among non-Japanese in Japan. Their future growth pattern and plans remain to be seen.

IMAGES

Image #1: A photograph of the iconic bronze door in the Tokyo headquarters. The door resembles the “Stations of the Cross” in that each panel tells one part of the history of Tenshinseikyo. This panel shows the first appearance of Tenshin Ōmikami (天心大御神).

Image #2: A photograph of the main columns in front of the entrance to the main hall of worship at the headquarters in Tokyo.

Image #3: A photograph of an artistic casting of the sun, the symbol of Tenshin Ōmikami (天心大御神) at their headquarters in Tokyo.

Image #4: A photograph of the cover of the sacred text in its English translation.

Image #5: A photograph of the front of the Tenshin Clinic, which is across the street from the Tokyo headquarters.

REFERENCES*

* This profile is based primarily on the author’s fieldwork in the group along with personal communications with its members, and in part also on the author’s PhD dissertation “Private Religion and Public Morality: Understanding Cultural Secularism in Contemporary Japan” (Yale University, Department of Anthropology, 2013).

Inoue, Nobutaka. Komoto Mitsugi, Tsushima Michihito, Nakamaki Hirochika, and Nishiyama Shigeru. 1996. Shin-sh ūkyō Kyōdan / Jinbutsu Jiten (The Encyclopedia of New Religious Organizations and Major Figures). Tokyo: Kobundo.

Tenshinseikyō Official Website. 2010. Accessed from http://www.tenshin-seikyo.or.jp/en/ on 20 May 2016.

Watanabe, Masako and Igeta Midori. 1991[1989]. “Healing in the New Religions: Charisma and `Holy Water’.” Contemporary Papers on Japanese Religion 2. Tokyo: Institute for Japanese Culture and Classics, Kokugakuin University.

Author:
Isaac Gagné

Post Date:
24 May 2016

 

Share

Risshō Kōseikai

RISSHŌ KŌSEIKAI

RISSHŌ KŌSEIKAI TIMELINE

1889 (December 25):  Naganuma Myōkō was born as Naganuma Masa in Saitama.

1906 (November 15):  Niwano Nikkyō was born as Niwano Shikazō in Suganuma, Niigata.

1925:  Niwano Nikkyō left his home village for Tokyo. There he met Ishihara Yoshitarō, who introduced him to the study of divination techniques.

1932:  Niwano became an apprentice of Tsunaki Umeno, a shamaness devoted to Tengu Fūdō.

1934:  Niwano joined Reyūkai.

1938 (March 5):  Niwano and Naganuma left Reiyūkai to found Dai Nippon Risshō Kōseikai. They changed their names in Nikkyō and Myōkō.

1938 (March 20):  Niwano Nichikō was born as Niwano Kōichi.

1940:  The movement was formally registered under the Religious Organisations Law (Shūkyō dantai hō).

1942:  The first headquarters in Suginami were completed.

1943:  Niwano and Naganuma were arrested by Tokyo Metropolitan Police and interrogated about their proselytization activities.

1947:  Risshō Kōseikai founded its first church outside Tokyo metropolitan area, in Ibaraki prefecture.

1949:  The movement opened a day care centre, Kōsei Ikujien (Kōsei Nursery).

1951:  Risshō Kōseikai was one of the founding members of the Federation of New Religious Organizations of Japan (Shinshūkyō Dantai Rengōkai, in short Shinshūren). The following year the federation was admitted to the Japanese Association for Religions Organisation (Nisshūren, at present known as JAORO).

1952 (February 4):  NHK radio reported the case of the suicide of a housewife from the village of Zōshiki and her son. Risshō Kōseikai was accused of having instigated the woman to commit suicide through divination (Zōshiki jiken).

1952:  Kōsei Byōin (Kōsei General Hospital) was founded in Suginami.

1954:  The organisation opened a library, Kōsei Toshokan. In the same year, Kōsei Ikujien was expanded with the addition of middle and high education facilities and reconstituted as Kōsei Gakuen (Kōsei School Complex).

1956 (January 26):  The Yomiuri shinbun reported the accusation of illegal land purchase against Risshō Kōseikai. It was the beginning of a media campaign against the movement known as the “Yomiuri incident” (Yomiuri jiken).

1956 (April 30):  Niwano was summoned to the House of Representatives to respond to accusations that Risshō Kōseikai committed human rights violations through its proselytization activities.

1956 (June):  Risshō Kōseikai began the publication of the daily newspaper, Kōsei Shinbun.

1957 (September 10):  Naganuma Myōkō died at the age of 67.

1958 (January):  In the Kōsei shinbun , Niwano announced the Age of the Manifestation of Truth, inaugurating a phase of doctrinal systematization and organisational consolidation.

1958 (June):  Niwano’s first trip to Brazil marked the beginning of Risshō Kōseikai’s missionary activities outside Japan.

1960:  Risshō Kōseikai underwent organisational reforms with the implementation of the “national block system” (zenkoku burokku seido) and the introduction of a “system of local units” (shikuchōsō tan’i). The name of the organisation was changed to include the character 佼 from the name of Myōkō. The leadership announced that Niwano’s eldest son, Kōichi, would succeed him as the next president of Kōseikai. He assumed the sacred name of Nichikō in 1970.

1963:  Niwano took part in an international mission for nuclear disarmament together with a delegation of eighteen Japanese religious leaders.

1964 (May):  The Great Sacred Hall was completed.

1964(November):  Niwano visited India at the invitation of the Maha Bodhi Society.

1965 (September):  Pope Paul VI invited Niwano to attend the Second Vatican Council.

1966:  The organisation founded its publishing company, Kōsei Shuppansha (Kōsei Publishing).

1968:  Kōseikai opened a nursing school, Kōsei Kango Senmon Gakkō.

1968:  Niwano attended the Conference for Peace organised by the American Unitarian Church.

1969 (April):  Risshō Kōseikai launched the Brighter Society Movement.

1969 (July):  Kōseikai joined the International Association for Religious Freedom (IARF).

1970:  A second large-scale ceremonial hall, called the Fumonkan, “Hall of the Open Gate,” was completed in the vicinity of the headquarters and the Daiseidō.

1970 (October):  The first World Religion and Peace Conference (WRPC) was held in Kyoto.

1974:  The Youth Division initiated the “Donate a Meal Campaign” (Ichijiki sasageru undō), later adopted by the entire organisation.

1974:  The Second Conference for Religion and Peace took place in Louvain, Belgium.

1978:  Niwano announced the beginning of a new phase labelled “Age of Unlimited Compassion.”

1978:  Risshō Kōseikai instituted the Niwano Peace Foundation.

1979:  Risshō Kōseikai began its cooperation with Unicef on the occasion of the International Year of the Child.

1984 (December):  The movement launched the “Campaign for Sharing Blankets with Africa.”

1991 (November 15):  Niwano Nikkyō handed over the presidency to his eldest son Nichikō

1994:  Niwano Nichikō appointed his eldest daughter Kōshō as the next president of the organisation.

1995:  The World Conference of Religions for Peace (WCRP) was granted the status of consultative NGO by the Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) of the United Nations.

1999:  Kōseikai reformed the configuration of its social activities by introducing the position of “the person responsible for social welfare” (shakai fukushi tantōsha) in its local churches.

1999 (October 4):  Niwano Nikkyō died at the age of ninety-two.

2009:  The Social Contribution Group (Shakai Kōken Gurūpu) within Risshō Kōseikai presented a series of measures in response to the issue of the aging society (Ten Year Plan for social welfare initiatives in a super-aging society).

2011 (March):  In the wake of the earthquake, tsunami and nuclear incident that struck north-east Japan on March 11, 2011, Kōseikai launched a series of disaster relief activities via the “United in One Heart Project” (Kokoro wa hitotsu ni purojekuto).

FOUNDER/GROUP HISTORY

Risshō Kōseikai is a lay Buddhist organisation primarily focused on the Lotus Sutra (Hokekyō). Originally emerging within the tradition of Nichiren Buddhism, in its subsequent development the movement progressively distanced itself from the Nichiren School. It was founded in 1938 by Niwano Nikkyō (1906-1999, [Image at right] born Niwano Shikazō) and Naganuma Myōkō (1889-1957, born Naganuma Masa).The two founders jointly led the organisation until the death of Naganuma in 1957, when Niwano assumed sole leadership of Kōseikai. In 1991, he resigned from his position and handed the presidency to his eldest son, Niwano Nichikō (1938-, born Niwano Kōichi). Niwano Kōshō (1968-) the eldest of Nichikō’s four daughters, has been chosen to succeed her father as the third president of the organisation.

Niwano Nikkyō was born in Suganuma, a small rural village in Niigata prefecture, from a modest family affiliated to Sōtō Zen Buddhism. After working some years on the farm owned by his family, he decided to leave to seek his fortune in Tokyo, where he arrived only a couple of days before the Great Kantō Earthquake on September, 1923. Forced by the circumstances to return to his family, he spent two more years in his home village, also in order to take care of his sick mother. After her death in 1925, he left again for Tokyo where he engaged in several jobs before finding employment in the charcoal trade (Niwano 1978:36-47).

His employer, Ishihara Yoshitarō, was a member of Wagakuni Shintoku-kai, an organisation focused on the study and practice of the Chinese divination techniques known as the rokuryō and shichinin systems (Guthrie 1988:19; Matsuno 1984:439). It was through Ishihara that Niwano originally came in contact with fortune-telling. Although initially sceptical, he gradually became interested in the subject and learnt various techniques (Niwano 1978:48-50).

In 1926, he was conscripted into the Navy. The training period and the three years of service represented a crucial experience for him, according to his autobiography (Niwano 1978:51-63). Although initially embarrassed by his lack of education, he recounts how he succeeded in being acknowledged for his skills, hard work and enthusiasm; and at the end of the training managed to get one of the best rankings of his cohort. In general, the account of Niwano’s military experience portrays the image of a substantially ordinary man, who through his dedication and efforts managed to accomplish outstanding results. This represents a recurrent theme in his narrative as a religious leader, as well as in the ones of other founders of new religious movements (e.g. Agonshū, Sōka Gakkai. See Reader 1988 McLaughlin 2009). A further outcome of the military experience, according to Niwano, was the reinforcement of his philosophy of non-violence, which would become an integral component of his religious leader’s persona.

After being discharged, he returned to his former master, who in the meantime had sold the charcoal business and opened a pickles (tsukemono) shop. Niwano later married a cousin from his home village, and started his own pickles-making business in Nakano, Tokyo. They had a daughter, but shortly after birth she developed a serious ear infection. Niwano was advised to consult Tsunaki Umeno, a shamaness devoted to the worship of Tengu Fudō (a syncretic figure combining the Buddhist guardian figure Fudō with the mountain crow demon tengu from the folk religious tradition), Shugendō practices, elements of the esoteric Buddhist tradition and faith healing. The rapid improvement of his daughter’s health encouraged him to start an apprenticeship under the shamaness until he rose to the position of assistant and began to perform healing rituals himself. The shamaness offered to open a centre for ascetic practices together with Niwano, but he eventually refused. In the meantime, he had begun to study oenomancy, a form of divination based on the interpretation of a person’s name (Niwano 1978:74).

In 1934, Niwano was visited by a missionary from Reiyūkai, who warned him that he would experience some misfortune if he failed to convert to the movement. Reiyūkai is a lay Buddhist organisation founded in 1925 by Kubo Kakutarō and Kotani Kimi, his sister-in-law. The movement is rooted in the Nichiren tradition, and focuses in particular on ancestor veneration, claiming that inadequate performance of memorial rites represents the main root of personal and social problems. Reiyūkai’s main religious innovation was to transform ancestor veneration, traditionally overseen by ordained clerics (usually Buddhist priests), into an individual act carried out by ordinary people. It was especially successful in providing urban migrants, who had lost contact with their local temples, with the means to perform such memorial rites. Ancestor veneration was combined with ascetic practices, elements of faith-healing and spirit mediumship (Hardacre 1984).

Shortly after the visit, Niwano’s second daughter fell ill and he decided to join Reiyūkai. Under the guidance of the district leader Arai Sukenobu, Niwano became a faithful member, and his enthusiasm further grew when both his daughters were healed. In particular, he was enthusiast about Arai’s lectures on the Lotus Sutra. He found that, compared to the divination techniques and ascetic practices he had learnt until that point, the teaching of the Lotus Sutra provided a more coherent system consistent with reason (Matsuno 1985:43). Niwano’s earnest dedication to readings of the sutra and missionary activities caused his pickles business to suffer, until he decided to abandon it in favour of an occupation which would leave him more time to devote to religious practice and that would also put him in contact with as many people as possible (Niwano 1978:81). He opened a milk shop, and made use of his profession to conduct missionary activities, by spreading the teachings of Reiyūkai among his customers. This is also how he came in contact with Naganuma Myōkō.

The life history of Naganuma Myōkō [Image at right] presents several commonalities with the narratives of other female founders of new religious movements (e.g. Tenrikyō, Ōmoto). It reproduces a pattern of suffering and misfortunes (poverty, illnesses, social exclusion) culminating in an experience of divine revelation, which results in a spiritual awakening accompanied by a mission to spread the truth among humankind. Born in an impoverished samurai family, Naganuma lost her mother at the age of six and had to start working to earn a livelihood. She was later adopted by an older sister, who was a zealous follower of Tenrikyō and introduced her to the teachings of the movement. At the age of  sixteen, she left for Tokyo and found employment in an ammunition factory. The tough working conditions severely affected her health. Returning to her home village, she married a man who indulged in women and drinking and who mistreated her. They had only one daughter, who died very young. After divorcing her husband, she left on her own for Tokyo, where she remarried and opened an ice and sweet potato shop with her second husband (Inoue 1996:523-524; Kisala 1999:102; Matsuno 1985:439-40).

The years of hardships had left her with serious health problems. By the time she met Niwano she had already sought comfort in various religions, since she could not afford conventional medical treatments, but she had failed to obtain any significant results. Niwano, who in the meantime had been promoted to the position of vice-branch leader of the Arai branch of Reiyūkai, persuaded her to convert to the movement. Although at the beginning Naganuma was not particularly committed, after Niwano had her ancestor registered at the regional headquarters and her health condition improved, she became a fervent member devoted wholeheartedly to religious practice and missionary activities (Niwano 1968:92-94). Within Reiyūkai, she found she possessed spiritual powers and underwent a special training (called hatsuon ) to increase her spiritual ability to fall into trance and to be possessed by spirits. As Naganuma developed her shamanistic abilities, Niwano devoted himself to improving his skills as the interpreter of the revelations received by Myōkō. Within Reiyūkai, thus, the two engaged in a paired activity that combined divine messages and their interpretation, a functional division of roles that would be later reproduced in Risshō Kōseikai (Kisala 1999:102-04; Morioka 1979:245).

In 1938, Niwano and Naganuma decided to abandon Reiyūkai to start their own moment. The decision was caused by the pressure exercised by the leadership of Reiyūkai regarding proselytization activities, together with doctrinal clashes within the organisation. Reiyūkai incorporated two main perspectives: the founder Kubo Kakutarō regarded the Lotus Sutra as the primary doctrinal focus, and argued that its study, recitation and propagation should represent the core of religious practice; the co-founder Kotani Kimi, instead, placed more emphasis on the veneration of ancestors, and believed that memorial rites should have priority over the study of the sutra. Niwano shared with his branch leader Arai a strong belief in the centrality of the Lotus Sutra, and, as the tension within the movements grew (in parallel with Kotani’s hostility towards the teaching of the Lotus Sutra), he decided to leave the movement together with Naganuma and thirty more members.

The new organisation was initially established as Dai Nippon Risshō Kōseikai (Great Japanese Society to Establish Righteousness and Foster Fellowship), a title probably influenced by the increasingly nationalistic atmosphere of the 1930s. On founding the movement Niwano and Naganuma [Image at right] adopted their new names, as a sign of absolute dedication to their religious mission. Initially, the headquarters were established on the first floor of Niwano’s milk shop, and then in 1942 moved to their present location in Suginami, Tokyo.

In its early years, Kōseikai presented a rather eclectic doctrine, a recurrent feature in Japanese new religious movements. The newly founded movement incorporated the teachings of the Lotus Sutra and of Nichiren combined with ancestor veneration, divination techniques, elements of faith-healing, ascetic practices and spirit possession. Both Naganuma and Niwano contributed to enrich this heterogeneous landscape through their past training and experience.

In this first stage, faith-healing and counselling activities played a pivotal role. The majority of those approaching the movement in this phase were people suffering from serious illnesses who could not afford conventional medical treatment. Niwano would later explain the strong reliance on faith-healing and spiritual guidance which characterised the first years of the life of Kōseikai as a “practical approach” dictated by the urgency of the times. In a context marked by war, poverty, and increasingly serious threats to people’s health, they felt the responsibility to respond to the “pressing needs” of the time.” Helping sick people in particular was considered as a divine mission (Niwano 1978:95-99). This concept was used to justify the initial lack of interest in doctrinal development, with Niwano arguing that the harsh time that Japanese people were experiencing did not leave space for “lengthy, careful doctrinal presentations,” but called instead for practical interventions directed at relieving suffering. Only after the condition of immediate need was resolved, would people be ready to receive the Law (Niwano 1978:106-07).

In 1940, the movement was formally registered under the Religious Organisations Law (Shūkyō dantai hō). This period was marked by an increasingly strict surveillance on religious activities. Religious organisations which failed to conform to the orthodoxy fostered by the government faced the risk of state repression. The risk was stronger for new religions, which because of their marginal status were particular targets of state control. By comparison with other religious movements, which suffered severe government persecution (e.g. Ōmoto, see Stalker 2008), Risshō Kōseikai can be said to have not experienced major conflicts with the authorities, apart from a minor incident in 1943, when Niwano and Naganuma were arrested under the Peace Preservation Law (Chian iji hō). They were accused of “confusing people’s minds” with Myōkō’s spiritual guidance (Niwano 1978:116), interrogated and released after two and three weeks respectively.

Although the incident caused a decline in membership, Risshō Kōseikai managed to overcome it relatively unscathed. However, the episode still had some effects on the movement. Firstly, it strengthened the leadership’s perception of Niwano’s family as a hindrance to his development as a religious leader. In 1944, he separated again from his wife and children in order to devote himself exclusively to religious practice and the study of the Lotus Sutra . This time, they remained separated for ten years. Secondly, some of the chapter leaders began to question Naganuma’s proselytization methods and her position within the movement, encouraging Niwano to lower her status to that of ordinary member. He refused, however, defending her role as co-founder and vice-president (Niwano 1978:120).

In this first stage, Risshō Kōseikai was structured around a dual-leadership balance or “dual-sensei system” (Morioka 1994:304), based on a functional division of roles between the founders. Naganuma performed spirit possessions and faith-healing, while Niwano devoted himself to the study of divination techniques and Buddhist teachings, and used them to interpret Naganuma’s visions. However, since the beginning this structure harboured the potential for conflict between the two leaders, in particular due to Niwano’s refusal to convey any revelation that was in contrast with the Lotus (Niwano 1978:134).

Moreover, in time it gradually led to an unbalanced leadership structure, mainly due to Naganuma’s charisma. She came to be revered as a living Buddha (Inoue 1996:525; Niwano 1978:125), and successfully attracted new members through her divine revelations and the performance of faith-healing. A further reason behind Myōkō’s success among Kōseikai members was her tendency to convey the teachings in extremely simple terms. In contrast with Niwano, whose doctrinal explanations abundantly employed complex Buddhist notions, Naganuma delivered down-to-earth talks based on her personal experience as a woman. She had encountered several misfortunes and thus deeply understood the suffering of the movement’s followers, who were mainly housewives belonging to the lower socio-economic strata of the population (Inoue 1996:525; Morioka 1979:250). By virtue of her personal charisma, she gradually emerged as the central figure of Kōseikai, thus assuming a predominant position compared to Niwano. This power imbalance progressively worsened during the 1950s due to the rapid expansion of the movement and the outbreak of a series of controversies with society and the media.

The end of World War II was followed by a period of rapid expansion of new religious movements in Japan, especially in urban areas. The socio-economical context can be said to have played a major role in fostering this development: Japan had emerged from the war materially and spiritually devastated, and many of those who experienced a condition of impoverishment, illness, social isolation, or anomie sought comfort in religion. New religious movements proved particularly successful in addressing such issues, providing solutions for everyday problems, solidarity networks and an emotional place of belonging to those who had broken ties with their native community.

A further factor that significantly contributed to the growth of these movements was the reform of religious legislation. Firstly, in 1947 religious freedom was legally recognized by the new constitution, and later the Religious Corporation Law (Shūkyō hōjin hō), promulgated in 1951, defined the rights of religious institutions as juridical persons and granted them tax breaks. Parallel to the development of new organisations, existing ones increased their membership and also widened the scope of their activities. Like many other new religions, Risshō Kōseikai experienced a rapid increase in its membership, and established its first churches outside Tokyo metropolitan area.

The startling expansion of new religions, and especially their active involvement in the social and political life of the country, attracted growing criticism from the media. These movements were criticised for their aggressive methods of proselytization, accused of encouraging superstitions and irrational thought, criminal activities (sex scandals, drug abuse, money laundering), financial exploitation of members, and violations of social norms of behaviour (On new religions and media in postwar Japan see Dorman 2012). Risshō Kōseikai had started to attract media attention since the beginning of the 1950s, due to its significant expansion and to its connection with Reiyūkai (which had already faced various scandals and legal charges), and it eventually became involved in a series of controversies culminating in the “ Yomiuri affair.”

On February 4, 1952, an NHK radio program reported the case of the double suicide of a housewife from the village of Zōshiki and her son. Apparently, shortly before her death the woman had come in contact with a member of Kōseikai, who had divined that her son would die once he reached the age of fourteen. The movement was thus deemed responsible for the double suicide and sued by the husband for violation of human rights. In the following years (1953-1954) Risshō Kōseikai received wide media coverage, and from 1954 was also involved in a legal action initiated by Shiraishi Shigeru, a former reporter of the Yomiuri Shinbun who had recently converted to the group. He accused Risshō Kōseikai of violation of the Religious Corporation Law because of the inaccuracy of its teachings and the financial exploitation of members through fortune telling, and he asked for the legal dissolution of the organisation (Morioka 1994:283-85). In the same period, the movement experienced further legal controversies regarding the purchase of a piece of land in the Suginami area, near the headquarters, which led to investigations by the Tokyo Metropolitan Police Department.

The charges of illegal purchase can be said to have triggered the so-called Yomiuri affair (Yomiuri jiken), a critical campaign against Risshō Kōseikai launched by the Yomiuri Shinbun , one of the leading Japanese newspapers, on January 26, 1956, with a long article regarding the land purchase issue. During the following months, the newspaper published a significant number of articles addressing Risshō Kōseikai, which focused on two main criticisms. Firstly, it questioned the financial aspects of Risshō Kōseikai. The group was accused of being a bogus religion (inchiki shūkyō) Tthat made a profit out of its members and resorted to all possible means in order to exhort donations, including threats of “divine punishment” (tenbatsu). Secondly, Kōseikai was accused of violation of human rights on the basis of its religious practice and missionary activities, in particular for the use of divination for proselytization purposes and faith-healing practices.

As the legal proceedings and the media attacks went on, the case increasingly assumed a political dimension, with the launch of several investigations by the Diet concerning Risshō Kōseikai’s missionary activities and religious practices. Niwano, together with some representative members, was summoned by the Ministry of Justice to respond to the accusations in front of the House of Representatives (Morioka 1994:292-93; Murō 1979:241).

The parliamentary investigations went on for several months, but eventually found no material evidence of violations of human rights, and also the legal procedures in the Suginami purchase came to an end. The conflict with Shiraishi Shigeru was also approaching a settlement, reached when Kōseikai agreed to the institution of an advisory board to monitor the movement’s activities and discuss the conformity of its teachings to the contents of the Lotus Sutra. Consequently, media interest in Kōseikai progressively weakened, and the Yomiuri significantly reduced its reports in the latter half of 1956 (For a detailed account of the Yomiuri Affair and the charges of these years see Morioka 1994).

The tensions produced by the many challenges Kōseikai faced in these years greatly affected the movement’s internal dynamics.  In particular, the incident further aggravated the power imbalance that had emerged in the formerly egalitarian relationship between the two leaders, resulting in an increasing marginalisation of Niwano. The discontent within the leadership eventually found expression in the so-called renpanjō jiken (joint proposal affair). The chapter leaders issued a joint statement attacking Niwano for the lack of firmness shown in his response to the Yomiuri affair and the Shiraishi suit while praising Myōkō (Morioka 1994:303-05; Niwano 1978:153-55).

The episode is representative of a general trend within Kōseikai leadership, leaning toward the concentration of all religious and administrative authority in the person of Myōkō. Niwano’s administrative authority had already been transferred to the new position of Chairman of the Board, and Myōkō’s nephew, Naganuma Motoyuki, was appointed to that role (Morioka 1979:251). The joint proposal sought to name Myōkō as the founder of Kōseikai, and the originator of its teachings, but Niwano refused on the ground that Shakyamuni Buddha was the true source of the movement’s doctrine. Moreover, since he was the one who guided Myōkō toward the teachings, she was to be considered his “child in the Law” (Niwano 1978:156-57). When the attempt to create a Myōkō-centred structure failed, her supporters began preparations to set up an independent movement. Such a development, though, was prevented by a sudden worsening in Naganuma’s health condition, followed by her death in 1957.

The years 1954-1957 marked a threshold in the history of Risshō Kōseikai. In these years, the movement was faced with a number of challenges, including legal charges, media criticism, decline of membership, the threat of legal dissolution and internal instability. However, these trials eventually proved beneficial, in that they triggered a set of radical transformations that allowed Kōseikai to successfully overcome the delicate phase of institutionalisation and to emerge as a consolidated movement with more coherent teachings and a stable organisational configuration (See Morioka 1979, 1989, 1994).

The first step in this sense was the concentration of religious authority in the hands of Niwano, which after Myōkō’s demise came as a forced choice for Kōseikai leadership, and which resolved the power imbalance that had emerged within the movement in the previous years. The reunification of the power structure under Niwano found its major expression in the Manifestation of Truth, a radical doctrinal reform announced in 1958, which brought about a significant rationalisation and systematisation of Kōseikai’s doctrine. The reform responded to Kōseikai’s need to reaffirm its character as a lay Buddhist movement rooted in the Lotus Sutra, as well as to counter accusations of irrationality made by Shiraishi and the Yomiuri Shinbun.

Niwano explained this transition by citing a fundamental concept of Mahayana Buddhism, the notion of “skilful means” (hōben), which refers to the various expedients or “provisional teachings” that can be used to guide people towards the truth. He justified the use of faith-healing, divine revelations and fortune-telling in the early years of Kōseikai as expedients directed at bringing members closer to the truth. The death of Naganuma, which deprived Risshō Kōseikai of “the medium to hear the voice of gods,” was to be interpreted as a sign that the phase of “skilful means” was over, opening a new age focused on the propagation of the ultimate teachings of the Lotus Sutra (Niwano 1978:160-62). This transition was also marked by the establishment of the Eternal Buddha (honbutsu, embodied by a golden statue placed in the Great Sacred Hall in Tokyo) as the gohonzon (true object of faith), replacing the mandala written by Nichiren. The reorganisation of the teaching was accompanied by the launch of a wide range of doctrinal education initiatives, including training seminars addressing young members and the publication of textbooks (Morioka 1979:253; Niwano 1978:162).

As for organisational reforms, in the latter half of the 1950s Risshō Kōseikai had already started to reorganise its legal structure by incorporating subordinate bodies, and had assumed a more efficient configuration constituted by many local chapters under a central headquarters. As with other new religious movements (see Morioka 1979; Watanabe 2011), its rapid development, both in terms of an increase of membership and geographical expansion, encouraged a transition from a vertical structure centred on proselyzation ties resulting from missionary activities (oyako kankei, lit. “parent-child relationship”), to a more efficient horizontal configuration of local branches based on propinquity. The “national block system” (zenkoku burokku sei) was implemented in 1960, and further organisational reforms followed shortly after, with the introduction of a system of local units (shikuchōsō tan’i). These shifts were accompanied also by radical changes in the proselytization system (Inoue 1996:314; Matsuno 1985:440; Morioka 1979:259-60; Niwano 1978:162). The movement’s reorganisation in geographical units was also related to a progressive broadening of the focus of missionary activities to the local community, the wider society and ultimately the world. This renewed attitude was officialised and explained in doctrinal terms in 1978, when Niwano announced the beginning of the Age of the Unlimited Compassion. In this new phase, Kōseikai members were encouraged to aim for the salvation of all mankind, in compliance with the ideal of the Bodhisattva, whose unlimited compassion translates into a mission to save all sentient being from suffering.

This renewed approach to proselytisation undoubtedly encouraged the movement’s subsequent developments. The following decades were marked by a progressive broadening of the scope of Risshō Kōseikai’s activities on a local, national and international scale, which was manifest in a number of different dimensions: political engagement, international interreligious cooperation and peace work, and social services on a local scale.

Interfaith dialogue and peace activities have come to be regarded as constitutive traits of the identity of Risshō Kōseikai, establishing a public image of a “peace” religion at present widespread in the movement’s publications, media representations and in some scholastic portraits of the movement. During recent decades, such a commitment has been retroactively explained in the light of Buddhist concepts and the personal convictions of the founder Niwano Nikkyō in connection with the general widening of Kōseikai’s social and political engagement during the 1960s and 1970s, and especially of its increasing international exposure. However, the launch of peace and interreligious activities was part of a more articulated process whose departing point can be detected in the foundation of the Shinshūren, (abbreviation for Shin Nihon Shūkyō Dantai Rengōkai, the Federation of the New Religious Organisations of Japan), which marked the beginning of Kōseikai’s political engagement.

While several studies have discussed the political activities of Sōka Gakkai and its controversial relationship with Kōmeitō (see Ehrhardt et al 2014), Kōseikai’s political engagement has been substantially ignored by non-Japanese scholarship. Such a lack of interest may be connected with the fact that, compared with Gakkai’s patent involvement in party politics, Kōseikai chose to adopt more subtle forms of participation. Although it never instituted its own political organisation, the movement has been taking actively part in electoral dynamics since 1947 Tokyo Metropolitan Government elections (Nakano 2003:145). However, rather than as an individual movement, it was through trans-sectarian organisations, and especially through Shinshūren, that its political participation was articulated. Kōseikai played a fundamental role in the foundation of the federation, and throughout the following decades remained one of its leading members, playing a key role in shaping its political orientation.

As mentioned above, the changes in religious legislation operated by the Allied Occupation fuelled an impressive expansion of new religious movements, but also facilitated their engagement in secular activities, including politics (On the religious policy of the Allied Occupation and the relation between religion and politics in postwar Japan see Murō 1979; Nakano 2003; Thomas 2014). The Shinshūren was created in October 1951 from the fusion of two previous networks as a federation for new religious movements, and in 1952 became a member of Nisshūren (Nihon Shūkyō Renmei, at present commonly referred to as Japanese Association of Religious Organisations, JAORO). Although its constitution was later justified by the desire to create a platform for ecumenical dialogue directed at the promotion of peace and religious freedom (Niwano 1978:229), in origin it had a distinctive political purpose. Shinshūren was instituted to provide new religious movements with a solid platform for political representation as well as a common front against media criticism (Dorman 2012:204), which, as was subsequently shown by the Yomiuri Affair, was not uncommon in these years.

Other major factors encouraging new religions to seek political influence were experiences of governmental persecution suffered by some of these movements and fears of a possible comeback of State Shinto and prewar restrictions. In fact, the emergence of reactionary tendencies in the political landscape from the closing years of the Allied Occupation can be identified as one of the two fundamental elements shaping the political dynamics of the postwar Japanese religious landscape. The reactionary tendencies originated in a movement for the revival of State Shinto, which from the latter half of the 1960s came to be represented by the debate around state support of the Yasukuni Shrine. This trend also affected the religious landscape, resulting in the emergence of a right-wing current led by Seichō no Ie, which eventually abandoned Shinshūren in 1957. The opposite faction revolved around Risshō Kōseikai, which with the defection of Seichō no Ie (its main rival in terms of size and influence) had consolidated its leadership within the federation.

The rise of Sōka Gakkai can be identified as the second main factor shaping the political orientation of Japanese religious organisations during the 1950s and the 1960s. Following the impressive growth of its membership, Gakkai began to engage in political activities from 1954. Its political success stirred a sense of danger in other religious institutions, encouraging them to constitute an anti-Sōka Gakkai front: while until this moment Shinshūren and other organisations had mainly supported independent candidates in the elections, they began to side with conservative political forces, in particular with the Liberal-Democratic Party (Jiyū Minshūtō, in short Jimintō), in order to create a more solid base of political representation and to contrast with Kōmeitō, which adopted a progressive orientation (Murō 1979:53-56; Nakano 2003:146-54).

In short, from the 1950s onwards, the political scene saw the interaction of three main religious factions: the right-wing current led by Seichō no Ie, close to the more radical wing of political right; a moderate front centred on Risshō Kōseikai and Shinshūren, mainly supporting moderate conservative candidates from Jimintō; and finally Sōka Gakkai, which in allegiance with Kōmeitō formed a faction on its own. In the following decades, Risshō Kōseikai has carried on its political engagement along the same lines, prominently through electoral support for candidates from the moderate conservative area and acting in its capacity as the leading member of Shinshūren.

It was under the aegis of the federation that Kōseikai began its involvement in interreligious cooperation and peace efforts on an international level. The 1963 anti-nuclear campaign organised by Shinshūren can be regarded as the departing point of Kōseikai’s international engagement. Niwano, together with a delegation of eighteen Japanese religious representatives, travelled in Europe and the United States to circulate a petition against nuclear armaments, meeting several religious leaders and politicians (Niwano 1978:191). The following year, he was invited to India by the Maha Bodhi Society, an Indian Buddhist organisation, which also presented him with relics of the Buddha. The experience held great symbolic relevance for Niwano, who saw pilgrimage to the places were Shakyamuni was believed to have preached and attained enlightenment as an opportunity to reconnect with the roots of Buddhism, and who was filled with a strong sense of Kōseikai’s mission to protect and spread the Dharma (Niwano 1979:209-218). Alongside the interpretation offered by Niwano, it can be argued that the visit to India, and in particular the donation of Buddha’s relics, provided an important source of legitimation for Risshō Kōseikai’s Buddhist identity in the eyes of the Buddhist world community. Kōseikai’s need to secure recognition as a legitimate Buddhist organisation might be also related to the progressive worsening of its relationship with other Nichiren-oriented movements, and especially with Nichirenshū, the major clerical organisation of Nichiren Buddhism. This deterioration is shown, for example, by the failure of Niwano’s attempt to initiate an ecumenical discourse with other Nichiren-oriented organisations due to doctrinal divergences (Niwano 1978:228-29).

In 1965, Niwano was invited by Pope Paul VI to attend the Second Vatican Council in Rome (Niwano 1978:219). [Image at right] In the following years, Risshō Kōseikai established contact with the American Unitarian Universalists, became a member of the Buddhist Council for World Federation, and joined the International Association for Religious Freedom (IARF). The movement’s increasing engagement in interreligious dialogue culminated with the organisation of the first World Conference on Religion and Peace (WCRP), in which Niwano, at the time chairman of Shinshūren, played a major role. The conference, held in Kyoto in 1970, reunited world religious leaders with the purpose of discussing the role of religion in the promotion of peace. [Image at right] A second conference took place in Louvain in Belgium in 1974, and the WCRP continues to meet still today every four of five years. Local versions have developed, such as the Asian Conference on Religion and Peace (ACRP), which resulted from an initiative of Risshō Kōseikai (Inoue 1996:314; Kisala 1999:106-07; Matsuno 1985:445. For a comprehensive outline of Risshō Kōseikai’s initiatives for interreligious cooperation see the Risshō Kōseikai website).

From the 1970s, Risshō Kōseikai has been increasingly active also in the areas of international aid and peace work. Among the initiatives sponsored by the movement, we can mention the opening of a course for the training of volunteers to work in local social welfare institutions in 1971, and the organization, since 1973, of boat trips for its Youth Association visiting Hong Kong, Manila, and Okinawa to pray for the war dead of all the countries in Asia and to foster cultural exchange and personal interaction. In 1974, Risshō Kōseikai’s Youth Division initiated the “Donate A Meal Campaign,” which consists in skipping a meal twice a month and donating the price of the food to the Fund for Peace. Donations collected through the campaign are invested in projects for disarmament, human rights, refugee aid, human resource development, preventive diplomacy, emergency relief in Japan and abroad. The projects sponsored by the movement include relief activities for Vietnamese refugees (1977) and the Campaign for Sharing Blankets with Africa started in 1981, a reforestation project in Ethiopia, and a program for the preservation of Buddhist cultural heritage in Cambodia. In 1978, Kōseikai instituted the Niwano Peace Foundation, which the following year created the Niwano Peace Prize (awarded annually from 1983). [Image at right] Apart from its own initiatives, in the same years, the movement has also been involved in collaborations with a number of national and international organisations, including the UN. For example, it had been supporting UNICEF activities since the International Year of the Child in 1979. It also cooperated with many NGOs and became a member of JEN (Japan Emergency NGOs) a group of Japanese NGOs working in emergency aid, mainly helping refugees and victims of disasters and conflicts all over the world. In 1996, the movement took part in the creation of the “72 hours network,” a national version of JEN, together with Shinnyo-en and non-religious organizations, whose aim was to create a disaster relief network able to intervene within seventy-two hours from the outbreak of a disaster (Inoue 1996:314-15; Kisala 1999:106; Stone 2003:73; Watanabe 2011:83).

This increasing engagement in interreligious dialogue and peace work can be seen as representative of a broader attitude of “internationalisation” of the movement, expressed in other areas as well. In terms of media production, it should be mentioned that between the late 1960s and the 1970s Kōseikai published the first English translations of Niwano’s works (Niwano 1968, 1969b, 1976, 1978) and launched its first English-language magazine (Dharma World). Moreover, the organisation also intensified its proselytization activities outside Japan, with the opening of branches in Brazil and the United States (On Risshō Kōseikai’s propagation outside Japan see also Watanabe 2008).

In parallel with this increasing engagement in international cooperation and peace work, the same years saw also a progressive expansion of Risshō Kōseikai’s social commitment on a local scale. The organisational and proselytization system changes brought about by the Manifestation of Truth reforms played a significant role in encouraging both developments. On a local scale, the shift of the focus of missionary activities translated into renewed efforts by local churches to establish channels of interaction and cooperation with their surrounding communities. The major expression of this attitude may be found in the launch of the Movement for a Brighter Society (Akarui Shakai-zukuri Undō), a volunteering initiative aimed at benefitting local communities, in 1969 (Matsuno 1985:445; Mukhopadhyāya 2005:193-94, 202-05).

Even though the 1960s and the 1970s saw a significant expansion of Kōseikai’s engagement in social activities at local levels, it should be noted that the first steps in this sense can be traced back to the end of the Pacific War. Since its early years, the movement had expressed concern for the pressing social issues of the time, and attempted to offer solutions to everyday problems, as shown by its focus on faith-healing and counselling, labelled by Niwano as a “practical approach” (Niwano 1978:99-100). In the postwar years, Kōseikai’s concern for the practical problems of everyday life translated into the institution of a series of social welfare facilities, most of which are still operating today. This new trend was inaugurated by the foundation of Kōsei Ikujien (Kōsei Childcare Centre) in 1949. In 1953, it was expanded with the inclusion of junior and senior high school education facilities and reconstituted as Kōsei Gakuen (Kōsei School Complex). Kōsei General Hospital (Kōsei Byōin) was instituted in 1952, followed some years later by a nursing school (Kōsei Kango Senmon Gakkō). In 1958, Kōsei founded an elderly care facility, originally called Yōrōen. The institute recently underwent a substantial renovation and was reopened in 2007 as “Saitama Myōkōen,” in memory of the co-foundress of the movement (Inoue 1996:314; Matsuno 1985:446-47; Niwano 1968:122).

The institutions founded during the 1950s still reflected a concern for the practical social issues of the time, and in this phase the services provided were primarily directed at Kōseikai members. However, the changes that occurred in the 1960s encouraged a shift from a concern for the wellbeing of the people within the organisation to a more generalised commitment to the improvement of the surrounding society. This transition firstly manifested in the activities of the Youth Division, which from the 1960s started to embark on various projects aimed at reaching out to people outside the movement, including social services for local communities and interreligious cooperation activities, and shortly after resulted in the foundation of the Brighter Society Movement.

The Brighter Society Movement (Akarui Shakai-zukuri Undō, known in short as Meisha) [Image at right] started in 1969 as a cooperation initiative between Kōseikai’s churches, social welfare facilities, civic movements and local administrations with the common aim of building a “brighter” society, on the basis of the maxim “brighten your corner” (ichigu wo terasu) contained in the writings of Saichō (the eighth century founder of Tendai Buddhism in Japan). The initiative was directly related to Risshō Kōseikai’s international undertakings not only in that it manifested the same intent of broadening the confines of the organisation’s engagement, but also in a more practical sense. As declared by Niwano in his inaugural speeches and writings, one of the key purposes of Meisha was to select and train people that could adequately represent Japan in the first WRPC to be held in Kyoto the following year (Mukhopadhyāya 2005; Niwano 1978; Risshō Kōseikai 1983).

Started as a loose network of different actors getting together in order to carry out various kinds of activities on a local scale, during the following years Meisha developed a more stable organisational structure and eventually acquired the status of NPO in 2001. On a national level, the organisation carries out mainly activities of support, information exchange, coordination, research on social welfare, publications and media production, and especially training courses to develop social workers, volunteers and counsellors. However, it is on the local scale that the vast majority of Meisha’s activities are actually planned and implemented. Local branches present a high degree of heterogeneity in terms of size, degree of formalisation and content of the activities (which can include donation campaigns, community volunteering, environmental activities, blood donation campaigns, social welfare activities, cultural activities, international aid and peace work). The activities are devised and planned in relation to community needs and available resources, and are often carried out in cooperation with other local realities such as volunteer associations, welfare facilities, and city councils, NPOs and NGOs involved in civic activities and social contributions.

Regarding the relationship between Risshō Kōseikai and Meisha, the two organisations are nominally independent. Representatives and members of both tend to stress how, although the movement undoubtedly started as an initiative of Niwano, and still today Kōseikai remains one of its leading sponsors, they should be regarded as two distinct organisations. In particular, there is a tendency to emphasise the “non-religious” character of Meisha, in which Kōseikai members are said to take part not specifically because they are members of a religious organisation, but rather as ordinary Japanese citizens. The relationship between the two was articulated in the same terms by Niwano, who defined Meisha as a strictly civic undertaking, with Kōseikai as only one its several supporters (Niwano 1978:252-53).

Nevertheless, the strict connection between the two realities cannot be denied: Kōseikai members account for the vast majority of the volunteers involved in Meisha’s activities, and the movement makes use of the facilities of the religious organisation (Kisala 1999:106; Mukhopadhyāya 2005:206-07), while the basic principles on which the movement articulates its social commitment reproduce some of the fundamental teachings of Risshō Kōseikai, as the idea of “Bodhisattva way” and “One vehicle” (On Meisha and the social ethics of Kōseikai see Kisala 1992, 1994; Mukhopadhyāya 2005; Dharma World 2007 34:1, 2015 42:2).

In parallel with the expansion of social activities through the development of Meisha on a national scale, Risshō Kōseikai also embarked on a series of training initiatives in the areas of social welfare and counselling, primarily directed at leaders and administrative personnel (kanbu). The most representative example is probably the Course for Social Welfare (shakai fukushi kōza), inaugurated in 1972.

In 1990, Niwano Nikkyō ceded the chair of President to his eldest son Nichikō, [Image at right] a few years before his death in 1998. In 1994, Niwano Nichikō appointed the eldest of his four daughters, Kōshō, as the next president of the organisation.

As the new leader of the organisation, Nichikō has carried on his father’s commitment to interreligious dialogue and international aid and peace activities. The movement continues to sponsor most of the campaigns and collaborations initiated under Niwano Nikkyō.

The World Conference on Religion and Peace remains one of the most privileged venues for interreligious dialogue. The Conference, which in 1995 obtained the status of consultative NGO with the Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) of the United Nations, has assumed a more institutionalised form under the name of Religions for Peace, an interfaith network involved in several projects in cooperation with the UN and other international organisations. The initiatives sponsored by the organisation cover different areas, including conflict resolution, poverty relief, climate change and environmental crisis. Regarding the latter, we could mention the campaign “Faiths for Earth,” a petition advanced by global religious leaders aiming at realising 100 percent of renewable energies. In recent years, environmental issues have come to occupy a central place in Risshō Kōseikai’s agenda, [Image at right] also in terms of political engagement and social activities. Environmental activities constitute a substantial part of the undertakings of local branches of Meisha, many of which carry out cleaning of beaches and forests, reforestation projects and other activities related to environment protection. On the level of national politics, the issue has been tackled in relation to the debate on energy policies aroused by the incident at Fukushima Daichi nuclear plant in 2011.

In terms of more general issues of political participation, Kōseikai’s involvement continues nearly along the same lines as before, predominantly under the aegis of Shinshūren. In addition, Kōseikai actively takes part in public debates regarding controversial political issues. Besides the above-mentioned environmentalism, the debates on state patronage of the Yasukuni shrine and the principle of separation between state and religion remain core issues of Kōseikai’s political agenda. In addition, the movement has taken a position in several other areas, such as, for example, nuclear disarmament, bioethics, and peace. The movement has recently taken a stance against the revision of the Security Law (Anzen hoshō hō, in short Anpō) and the possibility of a revision of Article 9 of the Constitution.

Risshō Kōseikai’s system of social welfare activities on a local scale, underwent significant changes at the end of the 1990s, mostly in terms of a decentralisation of human resources development and activities. Until then training events and courses had been managed on a national level and directed primarily at leaders and administrative personnel, but from 1999 it was decided that formation was to be carried on locally. New courses were introduced to be conducted at regional levels, often in conjunction with training activities within branches of Meisha. In similar fashion, the responsibility for planning and implementation of social activities was formally attributed to local churches with the institution of the position of “responsible of social welfare” (shakai fukushi senmon tantōsha) in order to make the system more responsive to the specific social needs of the local community.

DOCTRINES/BELIEFS

The doctrine of Risshō Kōseikai is primarily based on the Lotus Sutra, and in particular on the teaching of the One Vehicle (ichijō), the core of Mahayana Buddhism. Compared to other Nichiren-oriented Buddhist movements such as Sōka Gakkai, Kōseikai has lowered the position of Nichiren in favour of the historical Buddha Shakyamuni, an attitude expressed by the decision to replace, as its main object of worship (gohonzon), the calligraphy of the daimoku (title of Lotus Sutra) inscribed by Nichiren with a golden statue of the Eternal Buddha [Image at right] enshrined in the Great Sacred Hall (Daiseidō) in Suginami. Risshō Kōseikai conceives itself as representing the true message of the Buddha in succession to Nichiren. Similarly to Nichiren, who is seen as having revitalised the teachings of the historical Buddha after that they had become corrupted with the passing of centuries, Niwano is regarded as the one who embarked in the same task in the modern era, giving life to the true form of contemporary Buddhism, which is a lay Buddhism (zaike bukkyō) as demanded by Shakyamuni (Niwano 1978:133; Dehn 2011:229).

The Lotus Sutra is regarded in Risshō Kōseikai as Buddha’s ultimate teaching, containing the highest truth of the universe, which consists in the interconnectedness of all existence and in the nature of the eternal Buddha as the universal life force (uchū daiseimei) animating the cosmos. All living beings exist as part of this life force, which represents their true essence (hontai). Therefore, the innate nature of all beings is oneness with the Buddha (or Buddha-nature, busshō) (Shimazono 2011:48-49). Niwano (1978:79) referred to his encounter with the Lotus Sutra as “two openings” where he came in contact with two fundamental teachings: the notion of unlimited compassion embedded in the “way of the Bodhisattva,” understood as a mission to relieve the suffering of all human beings, and the ability of lay believers to attain salvation and to guide others towards it. The figure of the Bodhisattva in particular is assumed as a fundamental behavioural model for Kōseikai members. They are exhorted to “follow the Bodhisattva Way” (bosatsugyō), which is intended as a twofold path comprising doctrine and practice (gyōgaku nidō, Matsuno 1985:441) that aims at the goals of self-perfection and the salvation of all sentient beings.

With the doctrinal systematisation and rationalisation that occurred after the Yomiuri jiken, the movement’s doctrine was purged of its earlier focus on shamanic elements and spirit possession, and firmly repositioned within a Buddhist framework. The teachings of the Lotus Sutra were incorporated along with elements of “Fundamental Buddhism” (konpon bukkyō), such as the Four Noble Truths, the Eightfold Path, the Law of the Twelve Causes and the Six Perfections (Guthrie 1988:22-23; Matsuno 1985:441; Niwano 1966).

As a group originally developed from Reiyūkai, ancestor veneration has always been a core element in Risshō Kōseikai’s teaching and practices, and it continues to hold a relevant place today. Ancestor beliefs in Kōseikai are interpreted in relation to the idea of interconnectedness of all existence. Spirits of the dead are believed to be part of the same life stream as all other living beings, ultimately originating from the Eternal Buddha. This idea is explained though the image of an “eternal stream of life” (eien naru inochi no nagare): life flows from ancestors to those who are living in the present day, and who will eventually pass this life to their descendants and join their ancestors and ultimately the original Buddha.

Within Risshō Kōseikai, the definition of ancestors is no longer limited to the biological family, but encompasses all the movement’s ancestors, as in a “corporate family” (Dehn 2011:228). When joining the organization, every member has his ancestors registered in the “records of the past” (kakochō). They will receive an individual posthumous name (kaimyō), but also become part of a collective entity embraced by a general posthumous name (sōkaimyō). Both names, inscribed on wooden tablets, are to be enshrined in the hōzen, a family altar for the veneration of ancestors that every member’s household should have. The hōzen closely resembles the traditional butsudan (traditional Buddhist altar) and, along with the kaimyō, it contains the kaikochō, a reproduction of the gohonzon and offerings for the dead (See also Guthrie 1988:120-23). The altar allows the members to pray for the deceased at home as an alternative to attending memorial rites celebrated in temples, and it also embodies the connection with the sangha, the Buddhist community. Ancestor veneration in Risshō Kōseikai is also understood as a way to access the Dharma. Niwano has explained how memorial rites can be regarded as hōben or skilful means in that they allow the practitioner to experience the interconnectedness of all existence, and thus to awaken to the fundamental truth that all life is one and that it originates from the Eternal Buddha (Niwano 1976:31; Shinozaki 2007).

The significance accorded to memorial rites for the ancestors, however, does not imply that Kōseikai holds a substantial interest in life after death. Indeed, like many other new religious movements, Risshō Kōseikai conceives salvation in primarily this-worldly terms (see Tsushima et al. 1979; Shimazono 1992). Salvation is understood as a state of happiness, fullness and extinction of suffering which can be attained in this life through religious practice. The saved state is achieved through the realization of the true nature of all human beings as the Eternal Buddha. When realizing the fundamental truth that all living beings are inextricably interconnected and all part of one, universal life-force, the individual will spontaneously abandon his/her ego and be freed from all illusions and suffering. Suffering is understood in a pragmatic sense, and linked to everyday life problems and misfortunes (Niwano 1976:205; Shimazono 2011:48-52).

This vitalistic cosmology also influences Kōseikai’s understanding of karmic beliefs, which are reinterpreted in relation to ideas of mutual origin and interconnectedness. Since all phenomena are interrelated, each personal action produces some effect on the overall reality, resulting in a collective karmic responsibility (Kisala, 1994). The idea that we all share both the responsibility and the effects of the same karma is mentioned as one of the reasons why in Risshō Kōseikai ancestor veneration is not circumscribed to one’s direct ancestors but also extends to the unrelated dead (Shinozaki 2007). Although our life is influenced by the actions of all living beings, this influence is believed to be particularly strong in the case of one’s ancestors. Bad karma inherited from ancestors may manifest itself as suffering or misfortunes, and can be eradicated by performing memorial rites, which will transfer positive karma to the ancestor and ultimately allow him/her to attain Buddhahood, and also through the performance of good deeds and adherence to Kōseikai’s “everyday ethics” (seikatsu rinri) (Niwano 1976:104, 188, 204-06; Kisala 1994). In general, karma is interpreted in a relatively positive light in Kōseikai teachings: Niwano stressed how it was to be intended as something to encourage us to actively work for our self-improvement and for the construction of a brighter future for humanity. Misfortune and illness are commonly understood as an expression of Buddha’s compassion, in that through trials (otameshi) we are able to become aware of our shortcomings, improve ourselves and understand the Truth. Suffering itself can be seen as part of one’s religious training, and therefore something to be grateful for (Matsuno 1985:442-44). Similarly, the concept of the impermanence of all things assumes a positive connotation, in that it allows us to realize the preciousness of the gift of life, and to nurture a sentiment of thankfulness towards those from whom we derived life: parents, ancestors and ultimately the Eternal Buddha (Shinozaki 2007).

The idea of the interconnectedness of all existence is also derived from a common worldview that Risshō Kōseikai shares with many other new religious movements, and which emerged from the popularization of Neo-Confucian principles in the eighteenth century (See Bellah 1985). Reality is seen as an interconnected whole where activity on one level will result in transformations on all other levels. Consequently, changes on the level of the self, as for example self-repentance or the performance of virtue, are believed to bring about transformation on all other interrelated dimensions of family, surrounding society, and ultimately cosmos (Hardacre 1986:11-14; Kisala 1999:3-4). Since inner spiritual activity is identified as a powerful source of change, such a worldview in many new religions translates into emphasis on moral self-cultivation, as expressed by Kōseikai’s notion of “perfection of the character” (jinkaku kansei or kokoro no kaizō) discussed in the next section.

RITUALS/PRACTICES

Daily sutra recitation (gokuyō) and group counselling sessions (hōza, Dharma meetings) can be regarded as the two core forms of practice. Both can be practised at home as well as at Kōseikai centres, in which case the two are ritually combined. Gokuyō can be also referred to as tsutome (service) and primarily consists in a ritual to be performed twice a day in front of the altar (hōzen) including repeated chanting of the daimoku, recitation of Kōseikai creed, and readings from Kyōten, a collection of extracts of the Lotus Sutra for ceremonial purposes firstly compiled in conjunction with the doctrinal and organisational reforms of the Manifestation of Truth, and which represents an essential component of Kōseikai’s canon together with the works of the founder Niwano.

The expression kuyō is commonly used to refer to memorial rites for the ancestors, and in Risshō Kōseikai’s practice the daily service also incorporates functions of ancestor devotion (senzo kuyō). The dead are memorialised as a collective entity (comprising all the ancestors within Risshō Kōseikai) within the daily ritual service, but are also an object of individual veneration rites on the anniversary of their death. This memorialisation practice is known as meichi kuyō , where meichi (written as “life” 命 and “day” 日) indicates the anniversary of the ancestor’s death, but also the day when believers have the opportunity to bring into their life the legacy of that person, his/her teachings and good deeds. Furthermore, meichi also refers to some set days of observance established by local churches and by the organisation as a whole. There are four main recurrences celebrated monthly by Risshō Kōseikai: the first day of the month (tsuitachi mairi, a day of practice devoted to “cleansing the defiled mind” according to the Buddhist notion uposadha, in Japanese fusatsu), the fourth day (commemoration of Niwano Nikkyō), the tenth (commemoration of Naganuma Myōkō), and the fifteenth (commemoration of Shakyamuni Buddha).

In addition to gokuyō as memorialisation of the dead and reverence for the Buddha and the founders, the expression can be used also to refer to a more general act of prayer (kigan kuyō). The notion of gokuyō , however, is not restricted to daily sutra recitation, prayers and memorial rites for the dead, but encompasses also other kinds of religious practices. Specifically, gokuyō is intended as a threefold practice comprising the daily service (keikuyō, related to the expression of respect and gratitude to the three treasures of Buddha, Dharma and Sangha), the act of giving (rikuyō, indicating offerings to the altar, donations to churches or contributions to organisations devoted to the diffusion of Buddhist teachings or the improvement of society), and religious discipline (gyōkuyō, including all forms of religious training, service or ascetic practice directed at the diffusion of Buddhist teachings, the development of Sangha or the perfection of one’s character).

As mentioned above, the second pillar of Kōseikai practice is represented by hōza. Hōza (Dharma meetings) are counselling sessions usually held weekly, with participants ranging from twelve to twenty in number. The meeting is led by a shūnin or hōzashu, who listens to the members’ accounts of daily life problems, helps them interpret their experiences in the light of the teachings, so as to detect the root of their troubles, and gives them advice to overcome them. This practice of guidance is referred to as musubi, and can be carried on by anyone who has undergone an appropriate doctrinal training (Risshō Kōseikai 1966:114).

Core concepts employed in the counselling sessions are the principle of the interconnectedness of all things, and the Four Noble Truths taught by the historical Buddha. Other participants are free to intervene in the discussions, offering suggestions or sharing their own experiences. It is common for members who have faced suffering and trials and managed to overcome them through the movement’s doctrine and practice to recount their personal narratives ( taikendan, testimonials) in order to help fellow members solve their own problems. By framing their individual experience in the context of doctrine, they present other members with possible conversion models or behavioural paths to address everyday problems in accordance with the teachings (Shimazono 2011:42-44; Watanabe 2011:77-78. See also Hardacre 1986 ). Particularly significant testimonials that have emerged from hōza might later be reported in larger meetings and even published in one of the movement’s magazines, such as Dharma World .

Hōza is also intended as a place for repentance, zange (Matsuno 1985:443). By recounting their experiences and being guided by the hōza leader through the interpretation of those experiences in the light of the teachings, people are meant to realize the fault within their actions and to repent. As expressed by the formula zange wa zenbu jibun, a central idea is that the responsibility for suffering primarily lies within oneself, even when others seem to be at fault. This approach reflects the idea that “others are mirrors,” indicating that one’s attitude is directly reflected in the actions of others (Hardacre 1986:21-22). In fact, a central message in many Kōseikai testimonials is that every change originates from the individual (Kisala 1999:138).

The attitude of self-reflection and repentance emerging from hōza is representative of another key aspect of Kōseikai’s practice, namely moral cultivation through the practice of virtue, which is referred to as jinkaku kansei (perfection of the character), kokoro no kaizō (renewal of the heart), or hito zukuri (creating the person). Perfection of character is understood as another aspect of the Bodhisattva Way, and is carried out through constant reflection on one’s attitude and behaviour, which can be often found in hōza, and adherence to a set of ethical values defined by the movement as “daily ethics” (seikatsu rinri), including virtues such as gratitude, sincerity and harmony (Kisala, 1999:135).

Religious practice in Kōseikai encompasses also “guidance” (tedori or michibiki), which embraces all the activities directed at spreading or deepening knowledge of the teachings, thus comprising both missionary activities directed at non-believers and religious training for members directed at strengthening their faith (Watanabe 2011:80). Apart from hōza, which might be regarded as the primary place for guidance, church and chapter leaders might also offer guidance through home visits to members (e.g. for those unable to visit the centre because of sickness or disability), or through large-scale proselytization  events such as preaching meetings (seppōkai) and doctrinal training events (kyōgaku kenshū kai), held periodically across Japan (Matsuno 1985:441).

Finally, although aspects of folk religiosity that characterised Kōseikai’s early doctrine were expurgated as part of the process of systematisation and rationalisation of doctrine implemented with the Manifestation of Truth, some of these elements continue to be informally practiced, in particular fortune telling, divination practices and some forms of ascetic training.

ORGANIZATION/LEADERSHIP

Risshō Kōseikai claims a membership of about 1,200,000 households, which would make it the second largest Japanese new religious movement after Sōka Gakkai, and one of the most significant organisations within the Japanese contemporary religious landscape. However, it should be specified that it is problematic to formulate reliable estimates of new religions’ membership, since government surveys rely on self-declared figures (and most new religions tend to overestimate their following), and most scholarly estimates appear quite dated (e.g. Inoue 1996:313, reporting approximately 6,000,000 followers for Kōseikai).

The headquarters of the organisations are located in Suginami, Tokyo, close to the Great Sacred Hall (daiseidō), the centre of Risshō Kōseikai’s religious practice. [Image at right] The Daiseidō, consecrated in 1964, harbours the golden statue of the Buddha Shakyamuni (gohonzon), which contains a copy of the Lotus Sutra handwritten by Niwano Nikkyō. The building was devised as an architectural manifestation of Kōseikai’s teachings. In particular, its circular shape serves to represent the perfection of the Lotus (Niwano, 1978:200). Although the Daiseidō represents the most important place of devotion for Kōseikai members, who are expected to visit it at least once in their lifetime, it was not conceived as exclusively for members, but rather as a place of global significance, a “sanctuary for the salvation of mankind”, where everybody can attain enlightenment (Niwano 1978:204). The headquarters’ complex includes several other buildings, as the Fumonkan (Hall of the Open Gate), a second large-scale ceremonial hall with a capacity of around 5000 people; the Niwano Memorial Museum; the headquarters of Kōsei publishing company (Kōsei Shuppansha); Kōsei Cemetery, offices, and accommodation for visitors.

The organization is structured as a network of local units under a central administration. Such a configuration emerged from the reforms implemented since the end of the 1950s, which produced a shift in the basic organisational principle from proselytisation ties (oyako kankei) to geographical proximity, resulting in a more horizontal configuration. Nevertheless, the overall organisational structure remains quite centralised. The local branches throughout Japan are subordinated to the control of central headquarters. The president is ultimately responsible for  both doctrinal guidance and organisational leadership of the organization; he is responsible for the appointment of his successor and for most of the leading managerial roles. Most decisional and administrative functions are fulfilled by the president together with a board of directors and a limited amount of functionaries (Matsuno 1985:446; Murō 1979:244-45). Churches (kyōkai) are further subdivided into branches (shibu) and districts (chiku). Branches outside Japan are organised in a similar fashion, under the administration of a few major regional centres. Local branches have their own place dedicated to religious practice ( dōjō ), usually one large room containing an altar and a copy of the gohonzon, used for sūtra recitation, hōza sessions, and other ceremonies.

Risshō Kōseikai manages several related institutions, including educational and social welfare facilities, healthcare facilities, research centres, business ventures, cultural associations, foundations, as listed below:

Kōsei Ikujien (Kōsei Daycare Centre)
Kōsei Gakuen (Kōsei School District, including primary, middle, high school)
Hōju Josei Gakuin Jōhō Kokusai Senmon Gakkō (Women International Vocational School)
Kōsei Toshokan (Kōsei Library)
Chuō Gakujutsu Kenkyūjo (Chuō Academic Research Institute)
Kōsei Kaunseringu Kenkyūjo (Research Institute on Counselling)
Kyōikusha Kyōiku Kenkyūjo (Research Institite on Educators Training)
Niwano Kyōiku Kenkyūjo (Niwano Research Institute on Education)
Fuchū Kōsei Yōchien (Fuchū Kōsei Kindergarden)
Fukui Kōsei Yōchien (Fukui Kōsei Kindergarden)
Aikyōen (Social care facility for elderly and disabled)
Gakurin (Kōsei Seminar)
Kōsei General Hospital (Kōsei Byōin)
Kōsei Kango Senmon Gakkō (Kōsei Nursing School)
Niwano Heiwa Zaidan (Niwano Peace Foundation)
Kōsei Bunka Kyōkai (Kōsei Cultural Association)
Tachibana Corporation
Kōsei Lifeplan (which includes the elderly care facility Saitama Myōkōen)
Kōsei Cemetery
Kōsei Shuppansha (Kōsei Publishing)

Kōsei Shuppansha, the publishing company of the movement, publishes a significant range of magazines and books. A prominent role in the company portfolio is occupied by publications authored by the founder Niwano Nikkyō and the current president Niwano Nichikō, most of which are also available in English translation. The magazines include generic publications such as the monthly magazine Kōsei (firstly published in 1950) and the newspaper Kōsei Shinbun (since 1956) and the English-language quarterly Dharma World, as well as editorial products directed at specific sections of the movement, such as Yakushin, which was created in 1963 and primarily addresses the Youth Division, and Mamīru, a monthly women’s magazine (Matsuno 1985:445-46). In terms of media production, Rishō Kōseikai shows also a rather established online presence based on a double web site (Japanese and international version), dedicated websites for the main initiatives and related institutions (such as Meisha, Donate a Meal Movement, and Religions for Peace), social media profiles and a Youtube channel.


ISSUES/CHALLENGES

At present second generation (or even third/fourth generation) members account for a substantial share of the membership of Risshō Kōseikai, a problem common to other new religions, as for example Sōka Gakkai (See McLaughlin 2009 and his profile of Sōka Gakkai on this website ). In the near future, the organisation might be faced with the need to devise new strategies to attract new members as well as to keep alive the commitment of those already in the movement. In this respect, social commitment and international activism might be effective factors of attraction and promotion both inside and outside the movement.

Regarding religious authority, the succession of Niwano Kōshō, eldest daughter of Niwano Nichikō, as the third president of the organisation might represent a relevant challenge. Considering that in the case of Myōkō leadership was shared with Niwano, it will be the first time for the organisation to have a female president as the sole leader. It might be interesting to see whether this shift will produce any substantial change within the organisation, for example in its attitude toward gender roles and social norms of behaviour. (On the issue of gender in religious leadership see also the profile on this website of God Light Association (GLA) by Christal Whelan, who discussed the difficulties faced by the daughter of the founder when she succeeded her father as new spiritual leader of the organisation).

In terms of social activism, in the last years the movement has shown an increasing concern for the issues of aging and elderly care, as shown by a document presented in 2009 by the Social Contribute Group (Shakai Kōken Gurūpu) within Risshō Kōseikai (“Ten Year Plan for social welfare initiatives in a super-aging society,” See also Dharma World 2014 Vol 41:1). It might be interesting to see what kind of response the movement is offering to one of the most pressing social problems of Japan.

In the aftermath of the triple disaster of March 11, 2011, Risshō Kōseikai, like many other new religious institutions, actively took part in the relief efforts, under the slogan “United in One Heart” (Kokoro wa hitotsu ni purojekutto). Besides the relief activities directed at tackling the emergency, the organisation promoted also long-term projects aimed at the rebuilding of local communities and providing emotional and spiritual support to the victims of the disaster (e.g. Kokoro no sōdanshitsu, “Counselling Room of the Heart”). The future developments of these projects, as well as their effects on the disaster areas and on the movement itself (in terms of social and religious commitment, public image), are undoubtedly something worth looking at.

IMAGES

Image #1: Photograph of Niwano Nikkyō, founder of Risshō Kōseikai .

Image #2: Photograph of Naganuma Myōkō, partner with Niwano Nikkyō in the development of Risshō Kōseikai.

Image #3: Photograph of Niwano and Naganuma on the occasion of the foundation Dai Nippon Risshōkōseikai.

Image #4: Photograph of Niwano meeting Pope Paul VI at the Second Vatican Council in Rome.

Image #5: Photograph of Niwano delivering a speech at the UN as representative of the WRPC.

Image #6: Photograph of the awarding of the Niwano Peace Prize.

Image #7: Logo of the Akarui Shakai-zukuri Undō (Brighter Society Movement).

Image #8: Photograph of Niwano Nikkyō handing the presidency to Nichikō.

Image #9: Photograph of Niwano Nichikō’s speech at Religions for Peace.

Image #10: Statue of the Eternal Buddha (gohonzon) enshrined in the Daiseidō.

Image #10: Photograph of Daiseidō (Great Sacred Hall).

REFERENCES

Note: In addition to the references listed below, this entry is partly based on information gathered through interviews of members by the author and material produced by the movement.

Bellah, Robert. 1985. Tokugawa Religion: The Cultural Roots of Modern Japan. London: Collier MacMillan.

Dehn, Ulrich 2011. “Risshō Kōseikai.” Pp. 221-38 in Establishing the Revolutionary: An Introduction to New Religions in Japan, edited by Birgit Staemmler and Ulrich Dehn. Berlin: LIT.

Dorman, Benjamin. 2012. Celebrity Gods: New Religions, Media and Authority in Occupied Japan. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.

Ehrhardt, George, Levi McLaughlin and Steven Reed. 2014. Kōmeitō: Politics and Religion in Japan. Berkeley: Institute of East Asian Studies, University of California

Guthrie, Stewart. 1988. A Japanese New Religion: Risshō Kōsei-kai in a Mountain Hamlet. Ann Arbor: Center for Japanese Studies, the University of Michigan.

Hardacre, Helen. 1984. Lay Buddhism in Contemporary Japan: Reiyūkai Kyōdan. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Hardacre, Helen. 1986. Kurozumikyō and the New Religions of Japan. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Inoue Nobutaka et al., eds. 1996. Shinshūkyō kyōdan, jinbutsu jiten. Tokyo: Kōbundō.

Kisala, Robert. 1999. Prophets of Peace: Pacifism and Cultural Identity in Japan’s New Religions. Honolulu: Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.

Kisala, Robert. 1994. “Contemporary Karma: Interpretations of Karma in Tenrikyō and Risshō Kōseikai.” Japanese Journal of Religious Studies 21:73-91.

Kisala, Robert. 1992. Gendai shūkyō to shakai rinri: Tenrikyō to Risshō Kōseikai no fukushi katsudō wo chūshin ni. Tōkyō: Seikyūsha.

Matsuno Junkō. 1985. Shinshūkyō jiten. Tokyo: Tōkyōdō.

McLaughlin, Levi. 2009. Sōka Gakkai in Japan. PhD Dissertation. Department of Religion, Princeton University.

Morioka, Kiyomi. 1994. “Attacks on the New Religions: Risshō Kōseikai and the ‘Yomiuri Affair’.” Japanese Journal of Religious Studies 21:281-310.

Morioka Kiyomi. 1989. Shinshūkyō undō no tenkai katei: Kyōdan raifu saikuru no shiten kara. Tokyo: Sōbunsha.

Morioka, Kiyomi. 1979. “The Institutionalization of a New Religious Movement.” Japanese Journal of Religious Studies 6:239-80.

Mukhopadhyāya, Ranjana. 2005. Nihon no shakai sanka Bukkyō: Hōonji to Risshō Kōseikai no shakai katsudō to shakai rinri. Tōkyō: Tōshindō.

Murō Tadashi. 1979. Sōka Gakkai, Risshō Kōseikai: Shinkō shūkyō no uchimaku. Tōkyō: San’ichi Shobō.

Nakano Tsuyoshi. 2003. Sengo Nihon no shūkyō to seiji. Tokyo: Taimeidō.

Niwano Nikkyō. 1979. Niwano Nikkyō hōwa senshū. Tokyo: Kōsei Publishing.

Niwano, Nikkyō. 1978. Lifetime Beginner. Tokyo: Kōsei Publishing.

Niwano, Nikkyō. 1976. Buddhism for Today: A Modern Interpretation of the Threefold Lotus Sutra. Tokyo: Kōsei Publishing.

Nikkyō, Nikkyō. 1969a. Bukkyō no inochi no hokekyō. Tokyo: Kōsei Publishing.

Nikkyō, Nikkyō. 1969b. Honzon, the Object of Worship of Rissō Kōseikai. Tokyo: Kōsei Publishing.

Niwano, Nikkyō. 1968. Travel to Infinity. Tokyo: Kōsei Publishing.

Niwano, Nikkyō. 1966. Risshō Kōsei-kai. Tokyo: Kōsei Publishing.

Oshima Hiroyuki. 1975. “Risshō Kōsei-kai ron: Hōza, Akarui Shakai-zukuri Undō, Sekai Shūkyōsha Heiwa Kaigi wo chūshin toshite.” Gendai Shukyo 2:231-32.

Reader, Ian. 1988. “The Rise of a Japanese ‘New New Religion’: Themes in the Development of Agonshu.” Japanese Journal of Religious Studies 15:235-61.

Risshō Kōseikai. 1983. Risshō Kōseikai shi. Tokyo: Kōsei Publishing.

Risshō Kōseikai. 1966. Risshō Kōseikai. Tokyo: Kōsei Publishing.

Shimazono, Susumu. 2011. “New Religions – The Concept of Salvation.” Pp. 41-67 in Establishing the Revolutionary: An Introduction to New Religions in Japan, edited by Birgit Staemmler and Ulrich Dehn. Berlin: LIT.

Shimazono Susumu. 1992. Gendai kyūsai shūkyōron. Tokyo: Seikyūsha.

Shinozaki, Michio. 2007. “A Theological Interpretation of the Veneration of Ancestors in Rissho Koseikai.” Dharma World . Accessed from http://www.rkworld.org/dharmaworld/dw_2007jstheological.aspx on 20 July 2016.

Stalker, Nancy. 2008. Prophet Motive: Deguchi Onisaburo, Oomoto and the Rise of New Religions in Imperial Japan. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.

Stone, Jacqueline. 2003. “Nichiren’s Activist Heirs.” Pp. 63-94 in Action Dharma: New Studies in Engaged Buddhism, edited by Christopher Queen, Damien Keown and Charles Prebish. London: Routledge Curzon.

Thomas, Joylon. 2014. Japan’s Preoccupation with Religious Freedom. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Tsushima, Michihito, Nishiyama Shigeru, Shimazono Susumu and Shiramizu Hiroko. 1979. “The Vitalistic Concept of Salvation in Japanese New Religions.” Japanese Journal of Religious Studies 6: 139-61.

Watanabe, Masako. 2011. “New Religions – A Sociological Approach.” Pp. 69-88 in Establishing the Revolutionary: An Introduction to New Religions in Japan, edited by Birgit Staemmler and Ulrich Dehn. Berlin: LIT.

Watanabe, Masako. 2008. “The Development of Japanese New Religions in Brazil and Their Propagation in a Foreign Culture.” Japanese Journal of Religious Studies 35:115-44.

Author:
Aura Di Febo

Post Date:
20 July 2016

https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/gq9sW8fXCzH_0AC4uzim9s_Yyvq8FM4hT4XfEb5MdU9kGROPKXVR8z3dNjlW32tSYxVr6Xxa-ZWMaKdR1EaNXxe0IQtYDn_bscT--YD-IKSGImnijN7dnOcOsky0HkwGZmUaFpCAW4Db6QbqNg

#10 Niwano Nichikō

https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/IUswHG7AHxx0VMQkiVfrHHZn0M3hJmPxwmlAYyyc7K6eRxYbw3E1dux2qc30XWuXwEW4LQIZh8usEV0mvJpVpvaCCR2ktS--hiD8yRCEM5tHa6_4Qsdj5p1chmHY96cX4ArEQtx2yNEFs0vEgw

# 11 Niwano Kōshō

 

https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/OCo7RtL6q1dzT1mX_zziRfA9wY8Ey0cm--Lfd3zZQwrUbNC08Zjobbt6pPgOGskXf0reM7QItMs7C28s7EDKtQCyo6zJuVfgAVqIB1GQS0j0mjDxx3Y9E-xEaP6pKWKiS98oi4F0kqsQYjjqTg

#13 Delegation of religious leaders meet the French president Holland for the initiative “Faiths for Earth”

Share

God Light Association

GOD LIGHT ASSOCIATION TIMELINE

1945:  Takahashi returned from Burma after the Pacific War to a defeated Japan and moved from Nagano to Tokyo.

1960s:  Takahashi initiated the Saturday Association (Doyō Kai ), informal meetings based on his spiritual experiences held on Saturday evenings in his home in the Minato Ward of Tokyo.

1968 (November):  Takahashi experiences a full awakening of his spiritual self. He changed the name of the group to Divine Principle Association (Shinri no Kai ), but the increasing number of participants made it difficult for Takahashi to continue holding the meetings in his home.

1969 (April 8):  The group moved into the Yaoki Building in Asakusa district of downtown Tokyo and changed its name to the Great Universe God Light Association (Dai Uchū Shinkō-Kai ).

1970:  Takahashi changed the religion’s name yet again, opting for an English name for the group, God Light Association or GLA (pronounced G-L-A), to reflect the aspirations that the religion to spread beyond Japan.

1971:  Takahashi visited a temple of Zuihōkai, (one of several offshoots of the new religion Reiy ū kai) in Higashi Osaka. Zuihōkai merged with GLA and the new entity was called “GLA Kansai.” Zuihōkai’s leader abandoned his religion for GLA and then turned over its temple to GLA which became the Osaka headquarters of the group.

1971:  Several books by Takahashi Shinji were published: Discovery of the Heart, Science Collection (Kokoro no hakken: kagaku-hen), Discovery of the Heart, Divine Principle Collection (Kokoro no hakken: shinri-hen), and Discourse on the Heart Sutra: Identifying the Inherent Wisdom (Gensetsu hannya shingyō : naizai sareta eichi no kyūmei ), all published by Sampoh Publishing Co., GLA’s publishing house.

1973 (28 March):  GLA received recognition under the Japanese law as a Religious Juridical Person (shūkyōhōji).

1973:  Takahashi published The Way of Hungry Ghosts (Gaki-dō). Origin of the Heart (Kokoro no genten), Discovery of the Heart: Actual Proof Collection (Kokoro no hakken: genshō-hen), Human Beings/Shakyamuni Buddha: The Greatest Enlightenment (Ningen shaka idai naru satori) also were published.

1974:  Sampoh published Takahashi Shinji’s Guide for the Heart (Kokoro no shishin) and Gaining Insight (Shingan wo hiraku).

1976 (March):  At the GLA workshop in Shirohama, Wakayama Prefecture, Takahashi, Shinji acknowledged his eldest daughter Keiko to have been the guiding spirit throughout his life and designated her his spiritual heir.

1976 (June 25):  Takahashi Shinji died at age forty eight of kidney and liver disease, although members were quick to claim his actual death resulted from “death from overwork” (karōshi ). Two decades previously, he had also prophesied that he would die at age forty eight and announced this to his wife-to-be when he proposed to her.

1976 (July 10):  At the Gratitude and Pledge Ceremony in Tokyo, Takahashi Keiko made a pledge to carry on her father’s work and build a utopia on earth.

1977:  The nineteen year-old Takahashi Keiko, a student of philosophy at Nihon University, succeeded her father as the spiritual leader of GLA.

1977:  GLA Kansai, refused to recognize Keiko as the spiritual heir of GLA, split from the group, and named one of Takahashi Shinji’s former disciples, Kishida Mamoro, its spiritual leader.

1980:  Takahashi Keiko introduced the foundation of her original teachings through the concept of Three Theories: Foundation Theory, (Kiban-ron), Theory of Individual Mission (Jigo-ron), and Theory of Resonant Collaboration (Kyōdō-ron).

1993-2000: Takahashi Keiko developed many spiritual techniques to help members become bodhisattva such as the soul compass (bonnōmap), the personality map (jinsei chizu), and the perception-response-reality (juhatsushiki).

1999: Path of Prayer, now GLA’s sacred text, was published.

2001-present: Takahashi Keiko introduced numerous new techniques and projects: Genesis Project, Reestablishing the Bond with the Big Cross, Overcoming the Bonnō, and Excavating the Bodaishin (the inherent Buddha-mind found in all sentient beings).

FOUNDER/GROUP HISTORY

Takahashi Shinji (1927-1976), born Takahashi Haruo, was born in the city of Saku, Nagano Prefecture, Japan, on September 21, 1927. Since around the age of 10, Takahashi began to have out-of-body experiences that left him with a sense that he possessed an alternate self or astral body (mo hitori no watashi ) as distinct from his physical body. In his attempt to understand more deeply this sense of an alternate or spiritual self, Takahashi began to frequent the Hakusa Shrine, a small Shinto sanctuary near his home, in order to meditate. Although the Takahashi family was officially registered with a Sōtō Zen Buddhist temple, their affiliation remained but a formal association. In spite of these early spiritual experiences, Takahashi Shinji’s pursuits remained primarily scientific. He attended a military high school and was drafted as an aerial navigator. After World War II, which he spent in Burma, he studied electrical engineering in the College of Science and Technology at Nihon University in Tokyo; he did not graduate.

Takashashi later founded the Koden Industry Co., Ltd., a medium-sized enterprise that manufactured electronic parts. By the late 1960s, Takahashi claimed to be in communication with spirits and ultimately to have achieved an enlightened state through the guidance of these same spirits who eventually revealed themselves to him as Christ and Moses. Takahashi then launched his career as a religious leader writing about his experiences and drawing many to him through his books, dynamic lectures, and charismatic personality.

Takashashi became renowned for his exorcisms of turbulent and malevolent spirits with whom he spoke gently and sent on their way. He called his teachings Divine Principle (shinri ) and True Law (shōhō ) and taught in a way that he believed had once existed during the lifetimes of Moses, Jesus Christ, and the Buddha, all of whom performed miraculous deeds or actual proof (genshō ). Aside from wondrous healings, fundamentally Takahashi taught the Buddhist Eightfold Path (hasshōdō) to his followers combined with a form of Naikan or self-reflective meditation. In traditional Naikan, the practitioner spends a week in an isolated and structured meditation (from 6:30 a.m. to 9 p.m.) that focuses on just three questions in relation to their mother, then father: What did I receive? What did I give back? and What trouble did I cause? As the meditator will inevitably find him/herself in a debtor’s position, Naikan is a sure method of fostering gratitude. Takahashi found the practice invaluable, but the week-long stretch was too long for most people and even dangerous for novices. Thus, he created an abbreviated form of Naikan still based on the cultivation of gratitude.

As a religious innovator, Takahashi also did not believe that religions should seek to be revenue producing. Therefore, throughout his life Takahashi remained employed as the corporate manager of Koden Industry from which he earned his livelihood and supported his wife and two daughters, and sometimes even GLA.

At age forty, when Takahashi Shinji came to realize that the home of his alternate self was a spiritual realm that existed beyond the world of the senses, he initiated the “Saturday Association” (Doyō-Kai ). This took place in his home in the Minato ward of Tokyo where people interested in spiritual development could learn directly from his experiences. This informal gathering gained momentum and developed into the Divine Principle Association (Shinri no Kai) by November, 1968. To accommodate the growing numbers of followers, in 1969 the group moved into the third floor of a building in the Asakusa district of downtown Tokyo and changed their name to the Great Universe God Light Association (Dai Uchū Shinkō-Kai). In 1970, Takahashi changed the association’s name once again to reflect the universality of his message and its globalizing intention by opting for an English name, God Light Association. However, members usually refer to their religion by the acronym GLA, pronounced G-L-A. In 1971, when the second-generation leader of the new religion Zuihōkai, Nakatani Yoshio, encountered Takahashi Shinji in Osaka, he was so convinced of Takahashi’s spiritual authority that he decided to abandon Zuihōkai, to become Takahashi’s disciple, and to follow GLA. He then gave the Zuihōkai temple in Higashi Osaka to GLA to become the religion’s center in Kansai. Since March, 1973, GLA has been designated a legally recognized religion (shūkyōhōjin) protected under Japanese law.

In 1976, Shinji died of kidney and liver failure, although GLA members are quick to affirm that he actually died of “death by overwork” (karōshi ). As the leader of a growing religious organization, a prolific author of books on spiritual topics, the manager of the electronics company he founded, a spiritual guide and exorcist to members of GLA, Takahashi had neglected himself and slept only three to four hours a night. At the time of his death, the membership of GLA numbered some 8,700 persons with particularly strong followings in Tokyo (Kantō) and Osaka (Kansai). Prior to his death, Takahashi had predicted the year of his passing and had therefore been in search of his successor during the last year of his life.

Although he considered the Archangel Michael to be his legitimate successor, he did not know who among his GLA followers possessed this particular identity. However, during a workshop in Shirohama, Wakayama Prefecture (an incident referred to as the “Shirohama Legend”), Takahashi is said to have realized that his eldest daughter Keiko’s soul had been guiding his own soul throughout his life and prior to his birth, and that she had been the Archangel Michael in a past life. They both came to realize this in Shirohama where a soul-to-soul transmission from father to daughter occurred.

After Takahashi’s death, Keiko, then aged nineteen, publicly assumed her identity as the Archangel Michael during a transitional era in GLA known as the Michael Movement. At that time, Keiko often appeared on stage in a long white robe as the archangel and claimed to have been sent by God. Her self-presentation as a spiritual leader and the heir of GLA, which was conducted in the manner of a pop-star promotion, alienated many members at this time and was the source of numerous defections. However, at this time the famous science-fiction writer Hirai Kazumasa joined GLA and wrote the twenty volume Great Magic War (Genma Taisen) in which Keiko served as the model character.

As often happens in religions after the death of their founder, acute tension gives way to an actual crisis as contention arises over the true spiritual heir of the religion. GLA presents a prime example of this phenomenon. Although Takahashi had named his daughter Keiko as his heir in Wakayama, some male disciples who had been close to Takahashi Shinji (Hota Wase, Haba Taketsugu, and Kishida Mamoro) felt that Takahashi had selected Keiko as his heir in a state of diminished health and therefore poor judgment. They considered themselves the legitimate spiritual heirs of GLA. Chino Yūko, who later founded Chino Shōhō/Pana Wave Laboratory, apparently had many visions after Takahashi’s death that convinced her that she was Takahashi’s spiritual successor. Chino’s mother, who was a GLA member in Osaka, approached GLA officials about this prospect but was ridiculed for the suggestion. Chino then went on to found her own organization. Thus, Keiko’s authority and authenticity had been contested on several fronts. GLA consequently experienced a rupture over the successorship of the religion. Kishida Mamoro eventually became the head of GLA Kansai, the only former GLA affiliate that has remained separate from Takahashi Keiko, and continued to focus exclusively on the teachings of Takahashi Shinji. GLA Kansai also continued the practice of past-life glossolalia that Takahashi had commenced in which members spoke in tongues that were believed to be actual ancient languages, mostly of Egypt, Israel, India, and Greece. When Takahashi was alive he would carry on conversations in these past-life tongues with his members.

Tokyo GLA, headed by Takahashi Keiko, faltered during the Michael years and only began to pick up as Keiko found her own style and established her own authority, phasing out some of the practices associated with the former GLA, such as past-life glossolalia. GLA has since grown and changed under Keiko’s leadership and now constitutes a highly organized religious body of some 23,000 members (still one of Japan’s smaller new religions) divided into five age and/or occupational cohorts for whom customized annual seminars and events are regular occurrences. GLA keeps eight major regional centers; they are located in Hokkaido, Tohoku, Okinawa, Hokuriku, Chukyo, Kinki (Osaka, Kyoto, Shiga), Chugoku-Shikoku, and Kyushu. There are sixty-five other centers throughout Japan. The main headquarters (sōgō-honbu ) remains in Asakusa in Tokyo. It now has an active international division that coordinates translations of Takahashi Keiko’s books and fosters limited overseas activity. GLA also owns a retreat center in Yatsugatake, Yamanashi Prefecture, which serves as a summer youth camp for members.

Takahashi Keiko has remained prolific throughout her tenure as GLA’s spiritual leader. Among her titles published by Sampoh Publishing are: The Margins of Life: For Noble Minds Now and Forever (Seimei no yohaku ni: per nobilem mentem et nunc et semper) (1982), Book of Revelation: For the Sake of Eternal Life (Shinsōseiki, mokushi-hen: eien no seimei ni itaru tame ni ) (1992), True Genesis, Book of Heaven: The Whole Truth is Here (Shinsōseiki, tenjo-hen: subete no shinjitsu, ima koko ni ) (1993), Discovery: Approaching the Actuality of the World (Disukabarii: sekai no jissō he no sekkin) (1996), The Path of Prayer (Inori no michi) (1999), The Grand Challenge (Gurando charenji ) (2000), True Genesis, Book of Hell: Now, The Truth Revealed About Souls (Shinsōseiki, jikoku-hen: ima akaraka sareta tamashi no shinjitsu) (2002), Silent Calling: The Shock of the 21st Century (Sairentokōringu: 21 seiki shōdō ) (2002), What you Most Want to know about Life: Toward the Era of the Big Cross (Jinsei de ichiban shiritakatta koto: biggu kurosu no jidai he) (2003), The New Human Force: The Declaration – “I Will Change Myself” (Atarashii chikara: watashi ha kawarimasu sengen) (2003).

DOCTRINES/BELIEFS

Takahashi Shinji’s beliefs and doctrines began with a formidable critique of contemporary Japanese society as one of rampant materialism. He did not limit his critique to “things” but in sermons often critiqued Japan’s obsession with “study” (benkyō). Knowledge and learning were not the object of his critique, but rather the pursuit of knowledge in order to achieve entrance to one of the country’s elite universities that guaranteed a lucrative career upon graduation. For Takahashi, this obsession with education had wrongly placed the emphasis on the acquisition of knowledge as a product among many others in a system infused with greed. As for the religious options available in such a society, namely, Buddhism and Christianity, he considered them to have become formalized and academic, the product of countless scholarly ruminations. As a result, both religions had lost their substance and sustenance, a fact that Takahashi aimed to restore through his True Law (shōhō).

Above all, Takahashi Shinji claimed that each person possessed within themselves eternal life as a reincarnating soul. He saw his mission as one in which to help people make contact with this hidden dimension within their hearts/minds. He taught that after death a person’s soul would enter the world that corresponded most closely with their character as they had lived on earth measured by the amount of light the soul produced; the greater the light the greater the harmony with God. In ascending order, these worlds were: Hell, Astral, Spirit, God, Bodhisattva, and Tathagata. As methods for developing the soul to be harmonious with the laws of nature, he taught the Noble Eightfold Path (hasshōdō) that the Buddha had taught and a form of abbreviated Naikan meditation for both self-reflection and to receive God’s light into the soul.

Takahashi believed that what he called Divine Principle (shinri) or the laws of nature, were ordained by God. These were exactly the same in the times of Jesus Christ, the Buddha, and Moses, the three religious figures on whom Takahashi most focused.

In the sutra that he wrote, Heart Sutra (Shingyō), the universe in which we live is controlled by a Great Divine Spirit (Dai Uchū or Dai Shinrei ) that harmonizes all things. This consciousness is God and the universe is the body of God. Within the universe our planet is but a cell in a larger body, but is considered a great temple of the Spirit that functions as a training ground for souls. All calibers and levels of the spirit reside on earth and move through endless cycles of transmigration through past, present, and future. This transmigration exists so that the souls can perfect themselves. He taught that we live in the material or phenomenal world. When we die we return to the real world. He believed in the soul’s growth through samsara or the trials the soul meets during the course of its life, it rises progressively towards harmony through the development of compassion and love. The ultimate goal of all of this movement is to build a utopia or Buddhaland in accordance with the Great Divine Spirit. Enlightenment then is the harmonization of our microcosm with the macrocosm.

In contrast to her father’s brief seven-year mission, Takahashi Keiko has led GLA now for nearly four decades. During this time she has built on her father’s Buddhistic foundation and further developed the Christian notion of an individual soul with its unique mission. Takahashi Keiko teaches that every soul has a mission at its core that represents its deepest wish or aspiration to fulfill. This desire for fulfillment is what drives the soul to keep transmigrating over many lifetimes. Takahashi Keiko has developed numerous psychological and therapeutic techniques such as the “perception–response–reality” (juhatsushiki ) (ju-hatsu-shiki ), a model of how a person relates to the world which is based on the Buddhist doctrine of “cause–environmental conditions–result” (in-en-kahō ) in which the in is the direct cause of an event, the en is the indirect or environmental condition and kahō is the reality that results. The “perception” (ju) represents the way in which people absorb information through their personal filters. The “response” (hatsu) is the act or expression in the external world based on the person’s partial perceptions. The “reality” (shikii) is a Buddhist term that expresses the reality that follows from the perception and response. People generally have no awareness of their own juhatsushiki , for it is not created anew in each instance but is rather the product of an accumulation of past experiences in both this life and previous lives. The result of strong patterns long reinforced have since solidified into orientations and automatic unconscious responses. Hence, for Takahashi Keiko, because the soul is eternal, it is not a “blank slate” at birth but is already colored in some way. It is important for each person to discover the “color” of his or her own soul. This is the initial work that Keiko sets out to have her members accomplish.

All human actions are the result of the interplay between the inner and outer worlds through the medium of each person’s unique juhatsushiki. Because certain juhatsushiki patterns are consistent they have given rise to four basic personality types or “false selves”: the Over-Confident, the Resentful-Victim, the Self-Deprecating, the Self-Satisfied. Keiko has long used slogans such as: “I will change myself” or “Change myself, and change the world.” Most of the activities she has designed, such as the Shikan Sheets and the Wisdom Sheets, both techniques for written reflections, seek the answer to every problem in relation to that self.

RITUALS/PRACTICES

In the current GLA under Takahashi Keiko, members attend seminars in their local area, study groups, and engage individually in activities such as copying prayers from GLA’s sacred text, Inori no Michi/Path of Prayer. Before meetings or encounters, members fill out Shikan Sheets or Wisdom Sheets as ways to reflect on the spiritual state in which they enter a situation and what outcome they hope to shape.

There are five special days during the year when members congregate in large numbers:

New Year’s Assembly (Shinnen no tsudoi) – held on January 1, is the day when members affirm their souls’ aspirations.

Fellowship Assembly (Zenyu no tsudoi) – held in April, celebrates the founding of GLA.

Prayer Assembly (Inori no tsudoi) – held on June 25, commemorates the death of GLA founder, Takahashi Shinji.

Birthday Assembly (Gotanjō no tsudoi) commemorates Takahashi Keiko’s birthday on October 24.

Thanksgiving Assembly (Kansha no tsudoi) – held in December, is the day to reflect on the year past and to recall with gratitude what one has received.

ORGANIZATION/LEADERSHIP

Takahashi Keiko is the current spiritual leader of GLA. Being born in 1956, just a few years after the American Occupation of Japan (1945-1952), when the country was inundated with Western, particularly American, culture has influenced Keiko profoundly. Through her this Western influence has stamped GLA. A graduate of Nihon University in philosophy, most of Keiko’s cultural heroes (with the exception of Mahatma Gandhi and Albert Schweitzer) are secular: Florence Nightingale, Henri Dunant, Rachel Carson, Helen Keller, Copernicus, Heinrich Schliemann, Thomas Edison, Oswald Spengler, Arnold Toynbee, and Andrew Carnegie. In her publications, she has introduced numerous English words in katakana, not easily accessible to older members, but they have given to GLA a modern and international flair.

Takahashi Keiko now presides over an organization divided into five cohorts with events customized according to the age and gender of the members:

University of the Full Heart/Mind (Hosshin Daigaku) is for people sixty years-old and above. These seminars are held at comfortable hotels in various parts of the country.

Frontier College (Furonchia Kareji ) is for men from ages thirty to fifty nine and also working women of those ages.

Youth Academy (Seinen Juku) is for young adults from middle school to age thirty five. This group gathers four times a year.

Mindful Caregiver’s School (Kokoro no Kango Gakkō) is for women ages thirty to fifty nine, or mothers, daughters and wives, all whom identify as caregivers.

Kakehashi Seminar is for boys and girls from third grade to juniors in high school.

Additionally, Keiko launched the Total Human Life Lectures (TL Ningen Kōza) in 1992. These have focused on seven professional areas (business, medicine, education, science, law, art, and drama) with various study groups. As of 2005, some 350,000 members had participated in the series, with multiple repeaters.

Takahashi Keiko is constantly generating new projects or giving old concepts a new life with a novel twist. The official reason is to provide followers with techniques that they find valuable for resolving personal and professional conflicts and that render their lives more meaningful.

ISSUES/CHALLENGES

Takahashi Shinji had a huge impact on the generation of new religions that arose in the seventies in Japan. Part of his appeal was the frequent use of scientific language and technological metaphors for articulating complex spiritual phenomena. One of his favorite metaphors for the reincarnating soul was “the soul as a videotape” that a person could make contact with and replay. But above all, Takahashi insisted on the experiential dimension of the spiritual world. Miracles were not something that had happened only in the remote past but were anticipated as the signs of a genuine spiritual life in the present. Takahashi’s access to these realms made him both an awesome leader and a beloved teacher. Ōkawa Ryūhō, for instance, founder and spiritual leader of Happy Science, published the Collection of Takahashi Shinji’s Sayings (Takahashi Shinji reigenshū) after Takahashi’s death, claiming to be channeling the spirit of the recently deceased master. Ōkawa initially derived much of his doctrine from GLA. Chino Yūko, founder and spiritual leader of Chino Shōhō/Pana Wave Laboratory, thought herself a reasonable candidate as Takahashi’s successor and derived much of her cosmology and True Law (shōhō) directly from his teachings.

Takahashi Shinji taught his shōhō within a dynamic and open forum that included past-life glossolalia, exorcisms, healings, and lectures. Furthermore, he subsidized GLA by using profits of Koden Co. in his role as corporate manager to fund missionary activities and never sought to be a full-time religious professional.

The GLA under Takahashi Keiko has operated under a different premise. This GLA has sought to create a religion that is self-sustaining and economically productive in order to maintain a staff of professionals, an international office, and a full-time religious leader. Hence, GLA has adopted a corporate model, and adherents are literally card-carrying members. As the religion eschews any overt religious symbolism, GLA buildings look like office high rises though a chapel will be located in some room within the building with photo-portraits of Takahashi Shinji (black-and-white) and Takahashi Keiko (in technicolor).

Joining GLA is easy to do, but becoming a member merely lets one through the door. Once inside, the novice cannot easily be passive without obtrusively drawing attention. There is considerable pressure to become more actively involved, which requires a continuing, and not small, investment of both time and money. Initially, just to learn the fundamentals requires a two-part training course each of which costs 15,000 yen (approximately $150). Seminars then cost from 45,000 to 56,000 yen ($450-560). To attend the professional seminars, engage in mentoring, and demonstrate the proper attitude by volunteering at one of the many GLA offices or events, will require more emotional, financial, and social investment. In this sense, the GLA quickly becomes for a member a total care system.

The GLA has progressively adapted itself to accommodate a secular sensibility chiefly through therapeutic appeals: personality typing, workshops, techniques to connect the interior life to the workplace or home environment. These can produce powerful motivations and perseverance in the face of difficulties. However, this constant micromanagement of a person’s life will not appeal to people who seek more variety and open-endedness in their lives. For GLA leaves no space for a life outside of the institution. An old friendship will no longer be pursued unless the friend is introduced to GLA and represents a potential member.

Whereas Shinji was never more than an arm’s length away, Takahashi Keiko is an onstage presence before several thousand observers. She has the aura of any celebrity along with the full apparatus of bodyguards and a bureaucracy that makes any direct contact implausible. In this sense, she has become untouchable while her teachings are increasingly experienced in video or DVD format to be viewed in the many GLA centers across Japan when one is not actually at one of the mass meetings over which she presides.

But perhaps the greatest risk that the group faces is in its fundamental approach to problem solving. To seek the reason for any conflict within oneself and in this way to discover one’s true self suggests an adaptation to the status quo rather than a more flexible and socially engaged dialogue. Withdrawal and finding the self always responsible rather than seeking changes where they might be most needed, in institutions or the society at large, ultimately represents a highly conservative response. In effect, this softly authoritarian organization makes GLA a hard sell in the West where it easily can appear cult-like in spite of its cultivation of a strongly secular appearance and seemingly pragmatic techniques and methods.

REFERENCES*

* This profile is based on the author’s PhD thesis. See Whelan, Christal. 2007. Religious Responses to Globalization in Japan: The Case of The God Light Association. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts.

ADDITIONAL RESOURCES

Numata Ken’ya. 1991. “Shinshūkyō no kyōjin: Takahashi Shinji no sugao.” Gekkan Asahi 3:13:50-55.

Ōmura Eishō and Nishiyama Shigeru. 1988. Gendaijin no shūkyō. Tokyo: Yuhikaku.

Ozawa-de Silva, Chikako. 2006. Psychotherapy and Religion in Japan: The Japanese Introspection Practice of Naikan. New York: Routledge.

Whelan, Christal. 2011. “Metaphorical and Metonymical Science: Constructing Authority in a Japanese New Religion.” Pp. 165-83 in Religion and The Authority of Science, edited by James R. Lewis and Olav Hammer. Leiden: Brill Publications.

Whelan, Christal. 2007. “Religious Responses to Globalization in Japan: The Case of The God Light Association.” Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts.

Whelan, Christal. 2006. “Shifting Paradigms and Mediating Media: Redefining a New Religion as “Rational” in Contemporary Society.” Nova Religio 10:3:54-72.

Wieczorek, Iris. 2002. Neue religiöse Bewegungen in Japan. Hamburg: Institut für Asienkunde.

Winter, Franz. 2012. Hermes und Buddha: Die Neureligiöse Bewegung Kōfuku No Kagaku in Japan. Berlin: LIT Verlag.

Yamaori Tetsuo. “Reikon tenshō no higi – GLA Kyōdan no baai.” Pp. 126-48 in Rei to nikutai. Tokyo: Tokyo Daigaku Shuppan-kai.

Post Date:
15 May 2015

 

 

 

Share

Hikari No Wa (ひかりの 輪)

HIKARI NO WA TIMELINE

1962 (December 17):  Jōyū Fumihiro born in Kurume, Fukuoka prefecture, Japan.

1978:  Jōyū Fumihiro entered Waseda University.

1987:  Jōyū Fumihiro left his job at the National Space Development Agency and joined Aum Shinrikyō.

1993:  Jōyū sent to Russia as co-representative of Aum Shinrikyō’s Russian branch.

1995 (March 20):  A sarin attack in a Tokyo subway killed thirteen people and injured thousands.

1995 (March 22 onwards):  Police investigations of Aum were conducted, and leaders, including Asahara, were arrested.

1995 (October):  Aum’s status as religious organization was revoked.

1995 (October):  Jōyū Fumihiro was arrested on charges of perjury and forgery; he was sentenced to three years in prison.

1996 (April 24):  Asahara’s trial started.

1999 (December):  Jōyū Fumihiro was released from prison and returned to Aum Shinriky ō.

1999:  Two new laws, the Victims Compensation Law (Higaisha kyūsaihō) and the Organizational Control Law (dantai kiseihō) were introduced to place Aum Shinriky ō under strict surveillance.

2000 (February):  Aum Shinrikyō changed its name to Aleph.

2002 (January):  Jōyū Fumihiro became Aleph’s representative.

2004:  Asahara was sentenced to death for murder and conspiracy to murder.

2004:  A minority group led by Jōyū Fumihiro started to form inside Aleph.

2007 (March):  Jōyū Fumihiro left Aleph.

2007 (May):  Jōyū Fumihiro and his supporters founded Hikari no Wa.

2010:  Hikari no Wa started the offline meetings (off kai).

2011: (November):  The Supreme Court rejected Endō Seiichi’s appeal against his death sentence bringing to an end the numerous Aum-related trials that had been going on since 1995. 189 people were tried and thirteen were sentenced to death.

2011 (December 17):  The Hikari no Wa Outsider Audit Committee (Hikari no Wa gaibu kansa iinkai) was established.

2011 (December 31):  Aum member Hirata Makoto surrendered after being on the run for sixteen years.

2012 (June 3):  Naoko Kikuchi was arrested after seventeen years on the run.

2012 (June 15):  Police arrested the last Aum fugitive, Katsuya Takahashi.

2014 (January 16):  Hirata Makoto’s trial opened.

FOUNDER/GROUP HISTORY

Jōyū Fumihiro was born on December 17, 1962 in the city of Kurume in Fukuoka Prefecture on the southern island of Kyushu. His father was a bank employee and his mother a former teacher. His family later moved to Tokyo, and, after his parents separated, he stayed with his mother. Jōyū attended the private Waseda High School and then the prestigious Waseda University in Tokyo, where he graduated from its Faculty of Science and Technology. In 1987, he received a Masters degree from the Waseda University Graduate School of Science and Engineering. In April, 1987, he started working for the National Space Development Agency as a scientist.

Jōyū first joined the group Aum Shinsen no Kai (later Aum Shinrikyō) during the summer of 1986 at the age of twenty-three (Reader 2000). According to his autobiographical account (Jōyū 2012) he was attracted to the group because of his interest in paranormal phenomena, supernatural powers, and yoga practice. He was an avid reader of magazines on “supernatural phenomena” that gained some popularity in Japan from the 1970s onwards, and he became interested in yoga and Zen Buddhism during high school.

According to his account, he read an article on Aum’s founder, Asahara Shōkō, in a magazine devoted to topics related to the “spiritual world” (seishin sekai). He decided to visit his training centre in Shibuya (Tokyo) and, subsequently, to start practicing yoga. Aum’s doctrine at the time focused on the acquisition of supernatural powers, such as the ability to levitate or acquire clairvoyance, through yoga and breath and mind concentration exercises.

Shortly after joining the group, he was encouraged to attend a seminar. At Aum training centres two types of seminars were offered, one focusing on the teaching of “liberation” (gedatsu) and the other on supernatural powers. Despite his interest in the latter, he decided, following other members’ recommendation, to join the seminar on “liberation”. A guest teacher from India attended the seminar and Jōyū was asked to act as an interpreter, because of his ability to speak English. This, he believes, meant that he received special treatment from Asahara from the very beginning (Jōyū 2012:35). Later, Jōyū started practicing yoga and attending intensive seminars and moved to Setagaya ward in Tokyo to be closer to the training centre.

In May, 1987, he decided to became a renunciant (shukkesha) and live a communal life with other Aum members and, as a result, he quit his job at the National Space Development Agency. In July, 1987, he engaged in very strict ascetic training practices for three months during which, according to his own account, he underwent several mystical experiences (Jōyū 2012:38-39). After the training, he received the sacred name of Maitreya and became one of Asahara’s most prominent disciples. Aum Shinrikyō was based in a rigid hierarchical structure, including ten ranks for shukkesha and, below them, ordinary lay members (Reader 2000:86). At the top of the hierarchy was Asahara himself who was referred to as the “ultimately liberated one” (saishū gedatsusha) (Reader 2000:10), as “ guru” and “honourable teacher” (sonshi). The second rank included only five members with the title of “sacred grand teacher: (seitaishi): Ishii Hisako, Tomoko (Asahara’s wife), Achari (Asahara’s third daughter), Murai Hideo and Jōyū.

In the fall of 1987 Jōyū was sent to the United States to open a new branch of Aum in New York, and then, i n the fall of 1993, Asahara sent Jōyū to Russia as Aum’s representative there. Jōyū did not return to Japan until after the sarin gas attack in March, 1995, when he became Aum’s spokesperson. In October, 1995, Jōyū was arrested on charge of perjury and forgery in relation to acontroversial land deal in 1990 at Namino in the southern Japanese island of Kyushu. He was released from prison in December, 1999. On January 18, 2000, Jōyū Fumihiro and Muraoka Tatsuko announced that an organisation called “Aleph” would replace Aum and would be represented by Jōyū and Muraoka. They also announced changes in the doctrine and asserted that they were to retain practices of yoga and meditation but would discontinue teachings considered “dangerous” (Jōyū n.d.).

In 2004, a minority group led by Jōyū started developing inside Aleph. The group was called “daihyōha” (literally, group of the representative, daihyō , representative/delegate, the name used by members to refer to Jōyū). The other faction called itself “seitōha” (legitimate group, Jōyū 2012: 209). For a while the two factions shared the same facilities but organised different seminars and other activities. In March, 2007, Jōyū and around 200 members left Aleph and set up a new religious organisation called Hikari no Wa (literally, “Circle of Light,” officially “The Circle of Rainbow Light”).

The name Hikari no Wa was chosen, according to the group’s website, for a variety of reasons:

• In the group’s narratives, the decision to finally leave Aleph and to found a new group is linked to the interpretation of a series of “signs” (mostly connected to vision of rainbows) experienced by members in sacred and natural places around Japan. In particular, Jōyū is reported to have seen a circle of rainbow light around the sun (a sun halo) after having had a revelatory experience about the new group;
• The wheel symbolized the idea of equality between all beings (which is one of the main teachings of Hikari no Wa);
• ‘Wa’ also stands for “Japanese spirit,” expressing Hikari no Wa’s new interest in Japanese cultural and religious traditions;
• The wheel as sacred symbol is common to many religions around the world, indicating that Hikari no Wa sees itself as equal, rather than superior, to other traditions.
• The light doesn’t simply mean physical light, but also the light of wisdom, spiritual light (“Message” n.d.).

The symbol represents a rainbow around the sun, and the Dharma wheel symbolizes Buddha and his teachings. The background represents the blue sky with radiating light from the middle of the Dharma Wheel.

DOCTRINES/BELIEFS

Hikari no Wa’s website and printed material present the group not as a religion, but as “a place of learning for a new spiritual wisdom” (atarashii seishintekina chie no manabi no ba de aru), a “centre for learning religion,” and a “spirituality academy.” According to a textbook distributed to participants at Hikari no Wa’s summer seminar in August, 2010 (Hikari no Wa 2010), religion in the twentieth century has been characterized by several problems, including blind beliefs, fanaticism, and conflict with society and among religious groups. Hikari no Wa proposes a “reformation of religion for the 21st century” (21seki no tame no shūkyō no kakushin) that will be accomplished through a threefold path: rejection of blind beliefs (mōshin wo koeru) (Hikari no Wa 2010:37); overcoming of dualism and the struggle between good and evil (zenaku nigenron to tōsō wo koeru) (Hikari no Wa 2010:39); and, finally, the overcoming the barrier between the religious community and society (kyōdan to shakai no kabe wo koeru) (Hikari no Wa 2010:41; Baffelli 2012:37). More recently, the group has started presenting itself as a “religious philosophy” ( shūkyō tetsugaku , Hikari no Wa 2013). Hikari no Wa claims that their doctrine introduces a new idea of faith and god and that it is not necessary to believe in any particular faith or god in order to be saved.

Members, it is claimed, do not believe in a transcendental being or in an absolute leader. Instead, the focus is on cultivating the “sacred consciousness” (shinseina ishiki) in each individual and in particular the “love of a million people and things,” compassion and benevolence. God itself is seen as a symbol of the individual “sacred consciousness.” Special people, such as Buddha, Jesus and Mohammed, are external symbols of the deity. Symbols may differ, but the sacred consciousness is unique and remains constant . The idea of a “guru” or absolute leader, therefore, is rejected and peace and equality among religions is advocated. By cultivating the “sacred” in every individual the group stresses the idea that all beings are equal and that members are not considered spiritually superior to non-members (“Basic Principles” n.d.).

According to the 2010 textbook, the group will henceforth incorporate several “sacred symbols” and practices from different religious traditions. Although the new organisation will have, at least at the beginning, a stronger “Buddhist flavour,” it aims to include teaching and practices from other Japanese religious traditions, including Shintō. In particular, the group emphasises that their references to Buddhism will not be limited to the historical Buddha Shakyamuni, but will include more aspects related to the Japanese Buddhist tradition and its connection to Shinto and a vaguely defined “natural religion.” During the last seven years, Hikari no Wa’s teachings have progressively changed towards including more elements from Japanese Buddhism (in particular references to Shōtoku Taishi, the sixth/seventh century semi-legendary regent who is portrayed as having played a major role in promoting Buddhism in Japan) and reducing references to Tibetan Buddhism. Ichnographically, the images of Buddhas and Bodhisattvas (mainly relating to the esoteric tradition) have been gradually replaced with images of natural landscapes and Japanese sacred sites (both Buddhist temples and Shinto shrines). At the same time, Hikari no Wa has rejected some of the central tenets of Aum’s doctrines and practices, such as extreme asceticism, the idea that one can acquire supernatural powers through yoga practice, beliefs in the end of the world and prophecies, and beliefs that were influential in Aum’s use of violence.(On Aum Shinriky ō’s teachings and doctrinal justifications of violence see Reader 2000 and Reader 2013).

RITUALS/PRACTICES

Hikari no Wa has also been introducing new practices in an attempt to distance itself from Aum Shinrikyō, while retaining aspectsof Aum’s teaching and practices that still appeal to members. Hikari no Wa’s activities and practices can be divided into three groups. First of all, there are training activities performed at the dōjō. Different training methods are used, such as yoga, qigong, healing techniques, Buddhist meditation, and Esoteric Buddhism practices. A variety of objects and techniques are used during meditation (such as music and sounds, incense, Buddhist images, Buddhist statues, ritual paraphernalia, “holy” water from sacred places (gojinzui, seizui), astrology). Members are free to choose any of these practices, but they are discouraged from engaging in extreme asceticism. Counseling sections with Jōyū and other representatives are also offered at the centres.

Furthermore, Jōyū’s preaching lectures (seppōkai) are held approximately every month, and intensive seminars are held three times a year (in May, August and at the end of the year). In 2012, a well-known Japanese therapeutic practice of self-reflection called introspection (naikan) has been introduced. Some members took part in the rigorous version of naikan which is practised over a week. However, in Hikari no Wa it is usually performed as a one-day practice during which members are isolated in a small room that is divided into enclosed sections, and they are guided (by a non-member expert) through different stages of their life. Members are invited to reflect on what they have received from others, what they have given, and what troubles they have caused to their family and others. The aim is to learn how to deal with the painful past and reinterpret it as a learning process through which negative experiences can be turned into positive ones for the future.

Initially the chanting of sutras during rituals and ceremonies was based on the same Sanskrit sutras used by Aum. They have gradually been replaced by a new original sutra in Japanese, the sanbutsu shingyō , written by Jōyū, who use d the popular Heart Sutra as a model. The sutra is now considered the main text for Hikari no Wa’s practices and it reads as follows:

Banbutsu onkei, banbutsu kansha 万物恩恵、万物感謝

Banbutsu hotoke, banbutsu sonchō 万物仏、万物尊重

Banbutsu ittai, Banbutsu aisu 万物一体、万物愛す

That, following the explanation given in Hikari no Wa’s text and website, could be translated as:

See all things as blessed, be thankful to all things.

See all things as Buddha, be thankful to all things.

See all things as one, love all things (“Texts and Lectures” n.d.).

CDs, DVDs, self-published texts, Buddhist ritual paraphernalia and healings goods are also available for sale at the centres and online.

Other activities are organized outside the group facilities and include Jōyū’s talk shows and meeting at public centres (some of those meetings are organized via Internet and called off kai, offline meetings). The group also organizes regular pilgrimages to sacred places around Japan.

Generally, the image the group is trying to construct is centred on its desire to separate itself from Aum. Hikari no Wa promotes itself as being very open, it does not require formal membership, and all activities and ceremonies are explained in detail on the website and on social networking services. Furthermore a counselling service has been set up to actively encourage Aleph’s members to leave that group (and potentially, but not necessarily, join Hikari no Wa).

New practices are introduced regularly, while previous practices are discontinued or modified. In the process of distancing itself from Aum, several practices needed to be reconsidered or abandoned, but, at the same time, Hikari no Wa is attempting to find a new and original identity.

ORGANIZATION/LEADERSHIP

In 2012, Hikari no Wa declared that the group had twenty seven “staff” members permanently living in the group’s facilities (Jōyū
2012:250). The number has now decreased. As of January, 2014, the group is claiming that only eight people are in charge of the centres, and so Hikari no Wa only has about ten full time staff. The use of the word renunciant (shukke) to indicate members living communal lives (and which was previously also used by Aum) has been discontinued in favour of the more neutral term full-time staff (senjū sutaffu). The group has also established a public relations department (jōhōbu) that deals with issues related to requests from media, relationships with local communities and contacts with scholars. Finally, full-time staff are also in charge of the consultation service aimed at persuading Aleph’s members to leave the group.

The estimated number of members too has been decreased from 180 (Jōyū 2012:250) to 150 members (“For Beginners” n.d.). There is a formal membership system, but most of activities and meetings are open to non-members. Usually a significant number of those participating in pilgrimages and other activities (especially Jōyū’s talks at the centres) are non-members. Participants to off-kai, that is offline meetings organized at public halls in order to allow people interested in Jōyū who contacted him via the Internet to meet him and ask him and other Hikari no Wa’s members questions, are predominantly non-members.

Hikari no Wa’s headquarters is located in Tokyo and currently seven centres called classrooms (kyōshitsu) have been established around the country (Nagoya, Osaka, Fukuoka, Nagano, Chiba, Yokohama and Sendai). In addition, study sessions are regularly held in Sapporo and Okayama. Most of the centres are very small, just consisting of a few rooms in rented apartments. Usually one or two full-staff members are in charge of the centres and their activities. In each dōjō, preaching meetings (seppōkai) are held regularly (more or less monthly) by Jōyū, in addition to study sessions about Mahayana Buddhism, yoga, qigong practices, and counselling services. Each branch offers a “free trial” to visitors. One can meet local representatives (members in charge of the branches) and try out various Hikari no Wa practices, including yoga and qigong . There is also an online classroom, called Net Dojō (Netto Dōjō) to allow online learning and it includes videos of lectures and other learning material (“Net-Dojo” n.d.). A Net shop has been opened that sells CDs and DVDs produced by the group and items for Buddhist rituals (“Hikari no Wa Net Shop” n.d.).

Jōyū Fumihiro is indicated as the representative (daihyō) of the group, and the website clearly states that although he is a guide and a teacher for the members, he is not considered an absolute leader and that he is seen as an imperfect human being (Overview n.d.). This idea of a leadership as based on experience and guidance and not necessarily on charisma has been stressed by Jōyū from the very beginning of the new group. The main aim is to assert that the new leader should not be seen as the new Asahara and that the leader-members relationship that was highly problematic in Aum is not going to be replicated in Hikari no Wa. Despite this intent, however, Jōyū’s leadership had to be legitimized by his previous role in Aum. It was his high status of seitaishi achieved in Aum that allowed him to become the guide for the new group. Furthermore, Jōyū acquired a form of celebrity status after the sarin gas attack in Tokyo, when he became Aum’s spokesperson and the Japanese mass media started reporting about his ability to reply sharply and promptly when questioned about Aum’s crimes. This raised his public profile, and his status has been recently replicated online, where his accounts on social networking sites (especially Mixi and Twitter) received the attention of several users who were intrigued by his personality. The found a way where they could approach him (anonymously) via the Internet and ask him disparate questions about his personal life and Aum’s activities (on Hikari no Wa’s use of Internet and social networking see Baffelli 2010, 2012). As a consequence, although Jōyū may not be seen anymore as an absolute leader by Hikari no Wa’s members and sympathizers, it is thanks to his previous status that Hikari no Wa is receiving some attention from the public and the media. At the moment, it would be difficult for the group to survive without his leadership.

ISSUES/CHALLENGES

Despite Hikari no Wa’s efforts to detach itself from Asahara and Aum, the Public Security Intelligence Agency (Kōan Chōsachō, thereafter PSIA) decided that group will remain under strict surveillance and that the new laws introduced in 1999 to control Aleph, namely the Victims Compensation Law (Higaisha kyūsaihō) and the Organizational Control Law (dantai kiseihō), will be apply to Hikari no Wa as well. The surveillance was extended for another three years in 2012, and the last report of the PSIA (2014) still shows a mistrust of Hikari no Wa, claiming that the members are still devoted to Asahara. In response to the suspicions expressed by the PSIA and the Anti-Aum movements and victims’ organizations, Hikari no Wa has created a section on its website stating its differences with Aleph and outlining the problems related to Aleph’s leadership and teachings(“Aleph” n.d.). Furthermore, in late 2011 Hikari no Wa established a committee of “external observers” (gaibu kansa iinkai) that includes, among others, one individual who has previously been involved in anti-Aum movements and victims’ organizations. The aim of the committee is to observe and report on Hikari no Wa’s activities in a neutral and objective way (PSIA reports are considered by Hikari no Wa biased and false).

Recently the group has been attracting some media attention and interviews with Jōyū have been published in various magazines, allowing the group to achieve some more visibility in the printed media. However, Hikari no Wa and its leader are still regarded suspiciously by the PSIA and the society at large, and their biggest challenge still remains that of persuading the public that they are no longer dangerous and that they have cut their ties with Aum’s violent past.

REFERENCES

“Aleph.” n.d. Accessed from http://alephmondaitaisaku.blog.fc2.com/ on 7 March 2014.

Baffelli, Erica. 2012. “Hikari no Wa: A New Religion Recovering from Disaster.” Japanese Journal of Religious Studies 39:29–49.

Baffelli, Erica. 2010. “Charismatic Blogger? Authority and New Religions on the Web 2.0.” Pp. 118-35 in Japanese Religions on the Internet: Innovation, Representation, and Authority, edited by Erica Baffelli, Ian Reader and Birgit Staemmler. New York: Routledge.

Baffelli, Erica and Ian Reader. 2012. “Impact and Ramifications: The Aftermath of the Aum Affair in the Japanese Religious Context.” Japanese Journal of Religious Studies 39:1–28.

Baffelli, Erica and Birgit Staemmler. 2011. “Aum Shinrikyō, Aleph, Hikari no Wa.” Pp. 276-93 in Establishing the Revolutionary: An Introduction to New Religious in Japan, edited by Ulrich Dehn and Birgit Staemmler. Münster-Hamburg-Berlin-Wien-London-Zürich: LIT.

“Basic principles.” n.d. Accessed from http://www.joyus.jp/hikarinowa/overview/05/0006.html on 7 March 2014.

“Hikari no Wa Net Shop.” n.d. Accessed from http://hikarinowa.shop-pro.jp/ on 7 March 2014.

Jōyū, Fumihiro . n .d. “Hikari no wa” no kihontekina seikaku. Accessed from
http:// ww.joyus.jp/hikarinowa/overview/05/0006.html on 15 November 2012.

Jōyū, Fumihiro. 2012. Aum jiken 17nenme no kokuhaku. Tokyo: Fusosha.

Jōyū Fumihiro. n.d. “Outlook on the Aum-related Incidents.” Published on the English version of Aleph’s public relations’ website. Accessed from http://english.aleph.to/pr/01.html on 7 March 2014.

Jōyū, Fumihiro, and Ōta Toshihiro. 2012. “Aum Shinrikyō o chōkoku: sono miryoku to kansei o megutte.” At purasu 13:4-34.

Maekawa, Michiko. 2001. “When Prophecy Fails: The Response of Aum Members to the Crisis.” Pp. 179-210 in Religion and Social Crisis in Japan: Understanding Japanese Society through the Aum Affair, edited by Robert J. Kisala and Mark R. Mullins. New York: Palgrave.

“Message.” n.d. Accessed from http://www.joyu.jp/message/ on 7 March 2014.

Munakata Makiko, 2010. Nijūsai kara nijūnenkan: “Aum no seishun” to iu makyō wo koete. Tokyo: Sangokan.

“Net-Dojo.” n.d. Accessed from http://net-dojo.hikarinowa.net/home.html on 7 March 2014.

“For Beginners.” n.d. Accessed from http://www.joyu.jp/hikarinowa/overview/00_1/0030.html on 7 March 2014.

“Overview.” n.d. Accessed from http://www.joyu.jp/hikarinowa/overview/ on 7 March 2014.

Public Security Intelligence Agency. 2014. Annual Report 2013. Accessed from http://www.moj.go.jp/content/000117998.pdf on 2 October 2013.

Public Security Intelligence Agency. 2012. Annual Report 2011. Accessed from http://www.moj.go.jp/content/000096470.pdf on 8 October 2013.

Public Security Intelligence Agency. 2011. Annual Report 2010 . Accessed from http://www.moj.go.jp/content/000072886.pdf on 15 November 2012.

Reader, Ian. 2013. “ Aum Shinrikyō. Accessed from http://www.has.vcu.edu/wrs/profiles/AumShinrikyo.htm on 10 March 2014.

Reader, Ian. 2000. Religious Violence in Contemporary Japan: The Case of Aum Shinrikyō . Richmond and Honolulu: Curzon Press and University of Hawai‘i Press.

“Texts and Lectures.” n.d. Accessed from http://www.joyu.jp/lecturetext/012010/0041_1.html on 7 March 2014.

ADDITIONAL RESOURCES: Hikari no Wa texts

(Booklets produced by the group and distributed during intensive seminars in December/January, May, August or during pilgrimages):

2008, Bukkyō kōgi , satori no d ōtei.

2009a Gendaijin no tameno ichigen no hōsoku. (End of the Year Seminar).

2009b Naikan, yuishiki, engi no essensu. (Golden Week Seminar).

2009c Daijōbukkyō, rokubutsu no oshie. (February Pilgrimage Seminar).

2010a Chūdo no oshie , hikutsu to ikari no ch ōestsu , Nijūisseki no atarashii shinkō no arikata. (End of the Year Seminar).

2010b Sanbutsu no ichigenhōsoku, bodaishin to rokuharamitsu: Nijūisseki no shūkyō no kakushin . (Summer Seminar).

2010c Ichigen no hōsoku to sono satori no d ōtei , kong ō bōsatsu no naisei sh ugyō.

2011a Sanbutsushingyō no oshie, kansha to sonchō to ai no jiseen. (End of the Year Seminar).

2011b Wa no shisō to tadashii shūkyō no shinkō no arikata . (Summer Seminar).

2011c Hikari no Wa to Nihon to “wa no shisō (Golden Week Seminar).

2012a Hōsoku no taitoku, shisaku no sh ugyō. Sanbutsu no hōsoku no shisaku to meisō. (End of the Year Seminar)

2012b Sanbutsu shingyō no oshie to gendai no shomondai . (Summer Seminar).

2012c Sanbutsu shingyō no shūchū no sh ugyō. Dokyō meisō no shōsetsu (Golden Week Seminar)

2013a Wa no hō to mezame no oshie. Butsumo no meisō, nikyoku no chōwa. (End of the Year Seminar).

2013b Gendai wo ikiru chie, wa no shisō to saishinkagaku. (Summer Seminar).

2013c Gense kōfuku to satori no hō. Satori no shūchū sh ugyō. (Golden Week Seminar).


Post Date:
10 March 2014

 

Share

Covert Shin Buddhists

COVERT SHIN BUDDHISTS TIMELINE

1263:  Shinran, the reputed founder of Shin Buddhism, died.

1499:  Rennyo died. Although critical of secret teaching in his pastoral letters, he purportedly entrusted the “true” secret teachings to the laity rather than priests.

1722:  Tsukiji, a Shin Buddhist temple, issued an edict that prohibits the practices of covert Shin Buddhists.

1754:  Yamazaki Mokuzaemon was executed for teaching secret Shin doctrine in northern Japan.

1755:  Covert Shin Buddhists were infiltrated and exposed by Shin Buddhist clergy.

1846:  Ten people who were arrested in northern Japan for covert Shin activities were sent to prison for six months and were required to pay fines.

1879:  Around this year, D.T. Suzuki, who became popular in the West for his works on Zen, was brought by his mother to participate in a covert Shin initiation. He was about nine years old.

1936:  Kida Kohan published a book critical of covert Shin Buddhists in which he claimed they were increasing in popularity in all regions of Japan.

1938 (March 25):  A newspaper article in Yomiuri Shinbun stated that police were instructed to find and expose covert Shin groups.

1956:  Takahashi Bonsen, a professor at Tōyō University in Tokyo, published a major study on covert Shin Buddhists in northern Japan.

1957 (February):  The Asahi Shinbun newspaper reported that the leader of a covert Shin group in Iwate Prefecture lost in a court of law his case for libel against the researcher Takahashi Bonsen.

1959:  Children in southern Kyushu refused to eat a school lunch with chicken meat. Later it was discovered that they were from families of a particular covert Shin Buddhist lineage in which it was taboo to eat chicken.

1971 (January):  Leaders of a covert Shin group in southern Kyushu refused to cooperate with a research team from Ryukoku University after the researchers sent them a letter with documentation on two secret texts.

1995:  After Aum Shirikyō released poisonous gas in a Tokyo subway, a covert Shin leader went to local authorities to explain that his group was not involved in any illegal activities.

2001:  A leader of Kirishimakō, a secretive Shin group in southern Kyushu that identified itself as Shinto, reported to a researcher that the size of his group had declined to about 700 members, about half of what it was in the 1960s.

2008:  A covert Shin Buddhist leader in central Japan told a researcher than there has been a drastic decline in the numbers of members in his group over the past fifty years.

BACKGROUND/FOUNDER/GROUP HISTORY

Because “Covert Shin Buddhism” covers a range of religious traditions that, unlike most delineated religions , do not have clear institutional structures or formal organizations that are legally or publically recognized, a few words of introduction on its varieties and relationship with non-secretive forms of Shin Buddhism are in order before focusing on a particular covert Shin tradition referred to as Urahōmon.

Shin Buddhism, also known as “True Pure Land Buddhism,” has been one of the most popular forms of Buddhism in Japan for the past several hundred years. The vast majority of Shin Buddhists believe that Shin, with its emphasis on trust in Amida Buddha, is a tradition without secrecy – unlike some other Japanese Buddhist sectarian traditions such as Shingon and Tendai Buddhism. Yet we have evidence that shows that over the past 700 years there have been Shin Buddhists who practiced their religion in secrecy and have claimed knowledge of secret teachings.

Among the different covert Shin Buddhists groups that have formed since the thirteenth century, we find the following similarities: they conceal their existence from the public; they do not have a professional clergy; and, although they accept the basic doctrines, texts, and practices of mainstream Shin as valid, they have additional distinctive teachings and practices that temple Shin clergy see as not valid.

Beyond these similarities, however, there is diversity among the dozens of different lineages of covert Shin groups in terms of their histories, specific practices, doctrines and social organizations. The greatest diversity exists between two basic types. The first and most numerous type has existed in many regions of Japan and consists of groups that claim secrecy has always been a part of their tradition. The second type consists of groups located in the southern Japanese island of Kyushu that originally went into hiding when Shin Buddhism was prohibited there from the late sixteenth century until 1875. The covert Shin Buddhists of the second type are similar to Japan’s covert Christians (Kakure Kirishitan also known as ‘hidden Christians’), who went into hiding in the early seventeenth century, in so far as they also stayed in hiding even after the ban on their religion was removed in the 1870s.

Both types of covert Shin have been secretive so as to avoid outside interference and because over many generations secrecy has become a customary protocol that is part of their identity. Only the first type claims its secrecy is to protect teachings that contain ultimate truths unknown to outsiders. The rationale they give for their secrecy is primarily to protect these teaching s from corruption. In particular, they fear that if the teachings were made public Shin priests would want to use them to make money and in the process corrupt them. Neither type of covert Shin Buddhism over at least the past 130 years has been secretive due to involvement with antinomian or illegal behavior or anything that the wider public would find especially nefarious. What causes the most suspicion is the act of concealment itself, not what is being concealed.

Below is an overview of one lineage of the first type of covert Shin. It is located in central Japan and claims to preserve the ultimate Shin teachings. They call themselves shinjingyōja (practitioners of the entrusting heart) and their form of Shin “Urahōmon” (Hidden Teachings). Unlike many religious groups labeled as “esoteric” that advertise the existence of secret knowledge and use it to allure new members, the shinjingyōja are covert in that they hide the very existence of their religion. To protect what they regard as the ultimate teachings from those who would corrupt them, they conceal from the public the existence of such teaching s and where someone might go to learn them. The existence of their Shin Buddhism is only revealed to those that their leaders deem worthy. The teachings are orally transmitted, and mostly passed along family lines. Occasionally close friends are introduced to an Urahōmon leader (zenchishiki), who then decides whether to reveal the existence of secret Shin teachings to them. For Urahōmon’s leaders, protecting the purity of the teachings takes precedence over increasing the number of shinjingyōja .

This overview is based on published sources, which were written either by outsiders who infiltrated a group to expose it, or ethnographers, who through various means were able to do fieldwork on an Urahōmon group. For more in-depth information on covert Shin Buddhists and our sources of information on them, see Chilson 2014.

The existence of secrecy and the problems it caused in Shin can be traced back to when Jishin (a.k.a., Zenran) upset his father, Shinran, for claiming knowledge of secret teachings. Shinran (1173–1263), who all Shin Buddhists venerated as their founder, became so displeased with his son for claiming knowledge of secret teachings, that in a letter believed to have been written in 1256, he disowned him saying, “I no longer consider you my son.” Shinran, to assure his disciples in a distant province that he had not given his son a secret teaching, wrote the following in a letter:

I have never instructed Jishin alone, whether day or night, in a special teaching, concealing it from other people. If, while having told Jishin these things, I now lie and conceal it, or if I have taught him without letting others know, then may the punishment, first, of the Three Treasures, and of all the devas and benevolent gods in the three realms of existence, of the naga-gods and the rest of the eight kinds of transmundane beings in the four quarters, and of the deities of the realm of Yama, the ruler of the world of death—all be visited on me, Shinran. (Hirota 1997, vol. 1:575–76)

Yet the idea that there were secret teachings did not die with Jishin. Shinran’s great-grandson Kakunyo tells us in the fourteenth century about Shin Buddhists holding secret rituals in the middle of the night. Then in the fifteen century, Rennyo (1415–1499), the most prominent figure in Shin history after Shinran, repeatedly criticized those who claimed knowledge of secret teachings. In one of his pastoral letters in 1474 he wrote “The secret teachings (hiji bōmon) that are widespread in Echizen province are certainly not the Buddha-dharma; they are deplorable, outer (non-Buddhist) teachings. Relying on them is futile; it creates karma through which one sinks for a long time into the hell of incessant pain” (Ofumi 2.14; translated in Rogers and Rogers 1991).

In the Edo Period (1603–1868), those who claimed knowledge of secret Shin teachings were not just criticized by Shin leaders but were subject to persecution by local authorities who saw them as a practicing an illegal religion. Documents from the eighteenth century mention covert Shin Buddhists being fined or sent into exile or into prisons. One of the most extreme cases of persecution occurred in 1754 in northeastern Japan where twenty four covert Shin Buddhists were convicted and punished. Most were sent into exile, one was decapitated, and two others were tied to a pole and killed by repeated stabbings in the torso.

Leaders of the shinjingyōja, called zenchishiki, are aware of the early criticisms of secret teachings by Shinran and Rennyo, but are not bothered by them because they claim those criticisms were not about the secret teachings given to them and their ancestors. What Shinran’s son was teaching was indeed, they say, illegitimate.Shinran did not give his ultimate teachings that they have possessed to Jishin but rather to Nyoshin, Shinran’s grandson. These secret, ultimate teachings were then transmitted among the head priests of the temple Honganji up to the time of Rennyo. According to the zenchishiki, Rennyo decided to pass these authentic secret teachings (not the false secret teachings he criticized), to nine laymen because he felt that Shin priests could not be trusted with them. Among these nine laymen was a doctor of Chinese medicine named Yoshimasu Hanshō, back to whom the zenchishiki of Urahōmon trace their lineage.

The zenchishiki seem less aware or concerned with the persecutions that occurred during the Edo (1603-1868) Period. The zenchishiki do not describe episodes of persecution in their sermons or characterize covert Shin Buddhists as victims of misunderstanding; nor do they use stories of persecution to vilify Shin priests or to warn their followers of the importance of secrecy. Surprisingly, the persecution that earlier generations of covert Shin Buddhists suffered are not talked about and victimhood is not part of their identity.

After the Edo period, in the 1880s one prominent leader of Urahōmon named Ōno Hansuke, formed a relationship with the Kūyadō, a Tendai temple in Kyoto that had connections to both social pariahs (hinin) and the imperial family. The Kūyadō helped Ōno and his disciples avoid suspicion because , when large gatherings met at his home or elsewhere, they could tell outsiders they were members of the Kūyadō; but it also led to some Shin priests investigating why members of a Tendai temple did practices that were most closely associated with Shin Buddhism. A strong relationship with the Kūyadō continued into the 1990s but began to wane in the 2000s and is now largely, although not entirely, non-existent.

Shinjingyōja fear that if their secrecy is discovered they will be regarded as dangerous. This so concerned one Urahōmon leader that after the Aum Shinrikyō poisonous gas attack on a Tokyo subway in 1995 (see the profile on Aum Shinrikyō on this site) , he went to the local authorities to explain that he and his disciples were not involved in any nefarious activities. Although the authorities did not seriously investigate him or cause his group trouble, other Urahōmon leaders chose not to expose themselves and continued to conceal their religion.

DOCTRINES/BELIEFS

The shinjingyōja say there are two types of Shin Buddhism: overt and covert (or omote and ura in Japanese). Overt Shin is found at
Shin temples and in publications on Shin Buddhism. Its most basic authoritative texts are the three Pure Land sutras and the writings of Shinran and Rennyo. Prominent among its teachings is dependence on the other power of Amida Buddha rather than self-power. Amida brings those who have a heart that trusts him (i.e., shinjin) to his Pure Land, which is a paradise from which its occupants all eventually enter nirvana. The most common overt Shin practice is the nenbutsu, which is the recitation of “na-mu A-mi-da bu-tsu” to show gratitude to Amida.

Shinjingyōja agree with and follow overt Shin’s basic texts, teachings, and practices. They see them as correct but incomplete. In addition to Shin’s public scriptures, they say Shinran passed on orally the ultimate Shin teachings in secret. These ultimate teachings were at some point encapsulated in a secret text called the Gosho, which only a zenchishiki (i.e., a Urahōmon leader) can possess and read. To protect its contents, it is concealed even from all other shinjingyōja who are not zenchishiki .

Although the Gosho can only be understood by zenchishiki who were trained by other zenchishiki , there are two basic teachings that are taught to all initiates that clearly diverge from mainstream Shin. First is that the shinjin (i.e., the entrusting heart) can be received from Amida in a ritual in which a person asks for it. The zenchishiki teach that the overt Shin clergy do not know this because they are ignorant of the true meaning of the word tanomu, which appears in the writings of Shinran and Rennyo. Urahōmon teachers say that tanomu does not simply mean to “rely on” as overt Shin clergy preach, but “to ask,” particularly to ask Amida to save them.

Second, initiates are taught that once they receive the shinjin from Amida, they are ontologically equivalent to a buddha. Therefore no other types of religious practice are necessary. Shinjingyōja may go to other temples and participate in other religious activities, but there is no need to do so because there is nothing they can get from them that is greater than what they already received from Amida.


RITUALS/PRACTICES

Urahōmon groups hold religious services one to five times a month. These regular services last for three or more hours, from late morning into the afternoon. They commonly include recitation of the Amidakyō (i.e., the Smaller Sukhāvatī-vyūha Sutra), lunch, and several sermons, one by the zenchishiki, and others by his assistants on non-secret teachings.

Similar to overt Shin clergy, shinjingyōja perform an annual hōonkō (memorial service honoring Shinran) and eitaikyō (memorial services for ancestors). The hōonkō includes recitations of scripture (e.g., Shōshinge and Amidakyō ) and sermons on Shin history and on the life of Shinran. The eitaikyō are done several times a year to honor familial ancestors and express gratitude to them. During these services the same scriptures are recited as in the hōonkō, and incense offerings are made.

The practices most important to Urahōmon and which distinguish it from overt Shin are the ten initiation rites. Before the first initiation rite, an introductory religious service is held during which the existence of a secret Shin tradition is taught. After this service the person will typically be invited to start the initiation process. The first initiation is called ichinen kimyō (literally, “one-thought moment of entrusting”). This is the most important of the initiation rites because it is the one in which the initiate receives the shinjin from Amida. During it, the initiates first listen to sermons on Rennyo’s letters (Ofumi ). Later they are instructed to get on their knees in front of an image of Amida in a darkened room, and bow up and down over and over again while reciting tasuketamae, tasuketamae, tasuketamae (“save me, save me, save me”). This may go on for a few minutes or as long as an hour. The zenchishiki observes the person; then at some stage he says “ yoshi ” (good), indicating that he has discerned that Amida has bestowed the shinjin on the initiate. The receiving of the shinjin often happens on the first attempt, but not always; so some people have to do the rite more than once. After the initiate has done the ritual, he or she is reminded not to tell non- shinjingyōja anything about it.

After having received the shinjin, the person is ontologically ready to understand the secret teachings of Shinran. The next five initiation rites are primarily didactic. These are typically done in order but do not have to be. Because most of them take more than a couple of hours, they are done on separate days, often weeks or months apart. The last three initiation rites are shorter festive ones of celebration that are done in the springtime. All three may be done on the same day. To keep track of where an initiate is in the initiation process, a list of all ten rites are listed on a sheet of paper, and after each rite is complete, the zenchishiki puts a stamp in red ink next to the name of the rite.

ORGANIZATION/LEADERSHIP

Urahōmon is made up of a network of independent groups headed by a leader called a zenchishiki, who is commonly referred to as sensei (teacher). To become a zenchishiki, one must be chosen and trained by a zenchishiki, who instructs the trainee in the most secret of doctrines. The training is orally based and typically involves extensive memorization over a period of years. Writing down instructions or recording them in any way has been forbidden. The memorization is said to be better for remembering the teachings with the body rather than just knowing them with the mind. Those chosen to be a zenchishiki are always men and almost always over the age of fifty when their training starts. It is considered undesirable for a zenchishiki to choose one of his sons to train as a zenchishiki; it is preferable and expected that he will chose a non-relative. A man becomes a full zenchishiki after receiving a copy of the Gosho. Because custom mandates that the zenchishiki not transmit more than three copies of the Gosho , he is limited in the number of men he can make zenchishiki.

No one has authority over the zenchishiki. There is neither a headquarters nor a central place or organization that regulates them or Urahōmon more generally. A group led by a zenchishiki is an independent entity. Different groups are related to each other only through social networks. Two or more zenchishiki of two different groups, for example, may have had the same zenchishiki train them. Zenchishiki might also meet zenchishiki who were trained by their teacher’s teacher. So there is knowledge of and some interaction between the cell-like groups. When shinjingyōja moves to a new area, a zenchishiki, depending on his social connections among other zenchishiki, may be able to introduce a person to another covert Shin group.

What regulates zenchishiki is custom and social obligation. Those who are chosen to become zenchishiki and who give extensive time over the years to becoming one are almost always very committed to the traditions and customary protocols of Urahōmon. They also see themselves as part of a lineage that they are obligated to protect. To act radically different from their teachers would be disrespectful and regarded as dishonorable among shinjingyōja, particularly among older ones who remember previous zenchishiki .

A zenchishiki commonly has assistants who help him with running his group, which may have anywhere from a couple of dozen to a couple of hundred members. The tasks of the assistants may involve giving sermons, managing donations given to the organization, preparing altars by lighting candles, arranging food offerings, and helping clean the area of worship, which is commonly in the home of a zenchishiki or at a privately owned building. Assistants require no special training and include men and women, although the men in this role far outnumber the women.

To become a member of an Urahōmon group, a member needs to introduce the person to a zenchishiki, who then needs to consent to the person joining. Because most new members are born into Urahōmon families, consent is usually given. A simple initiatory rite is often done for newborns and a more extensive initiation rite is done later when the child is mature enough to understand it, which may not be until early adulthood. On occasion other friends or relatives might be introduced to a zenchishiki. After a discussion with this person, the zenchishiki may invite him or her to come back to attend sermons or start the initiation process. One becomes a full shinjingyōja and able to introduce new people to a zenchishiki only after having completed the initiation process, which often takes about a year.

It is hard to know the exact number of Urahōmon members. Among all the lineages of covert Shin there are probably tens of thousands of initiates today, but all the evidence suggests that the numbers have decreased dramatically since the 1960s, in part due to urbanization and the weakening of social ties in local communities. The decline also reflects a general decrease throughout Japan in recent years in participation in Buddhist organizations (Reader 2011, 2012; Nelson 2012). An estimate of several thousand Urahōmon initiates in central (Chūbu) Japan today is reasonable, but the current number may be less than ten percent of what it was fifty years ago.

ISSUES/CHALLENGES

Many of the issues and challenges that shinjingyōja face are, and have been, directly related to their secrecy. Thus they are suggestive more generally of how secrecy not only results in benefits for those in covert organizations but can also cause problems as well. The issues that shinjingyōja have grappled with show that in a particular situation secrecy can have multiple consequences: some intended, some not, some complementary, and others contradictory.

One problem that secrecy has led to is suspicion by outsiders. Although the shinjingyōja have not faced persecution or even attracted much criticism from Shin clergy since the 1940s, they fear that if a group is discovered, its secrecy will make them appear suspicious, as if they are hiding something vile. Secrecy can help avoid interference, but it can also lead to suspicion that has the exact opposite consequence, namely attracting unwanted attention that leads to interference. For the shinjingyōja secrecy has protected them from intrusion by keeping outsiders ignorant of their existence, but it has also incited outsiders who discover a group’s existence to investigate it to see what it was hiding.

A second problem secrecy has caused shinjingyōja is the preclusion of a public defense of themselves. When Shin clergy have criticized them by saying they were teaching a heresy or were ignorant, they could not publically challenge those criticism by, for example, providing evidence that would counter them because their tradition mandates that they not openly talk about their religion and because it would risk revealing some things about their religion that they want to keep secret.

A third problem secrecy causes shinjingyōja relates to a dilemma that secrecy causes. To preserve a secret, those who know it must refrain from telling it to others; but if they do not tell it to others, the secret will die with the last person who knows it, and thus not be preserved. So shinjingyōja must both conceal and reveal their secrets to preserve them as secrets. To protect their tradition, and the purity of their doctrines and practices, which they claim are based on the ultimate teachings of Shinran, they must hide them. But if they do not also reveal them to new people, their tradition will not survive and what they see as the ultimate Buddhist teachings will be lost forever. In response to this dilemma, the shinjingyōja try to minimize the scope of people who need to negotiate the conflicting obligations to both conceal and reveal, by only giving their top leaders, the zenchishiki, the authority to reveal; all other shinjingyōja must only conceal.

A fourth problem secrecy causes is that it limits shinjingyōja ‘s abilities to proselytize when their tradition is threatened with extinction, as it currently is. Today the numbers of shinjingyōja is dangerously low and within a few generations Urahōmon may be extinct. Because the tradition must be kept secret, the shinjingyōja , including the zenchishiki, cannot advertise their meetings or openly recruit new members. It is important to find trustworthy people to whom to reveal the secrets so that they may stay alive, but this has become more difficult because families of shinjingyōja, who were the main sources of new members, are now drifting away from Urahōmon. For secretive religions that do not hide their existence (e.g., Theosophy, Scientology, Candomblé), secrecy might help allure new members. But the allure of secrecy to attract outsiders is very limited for shinjingyōja because they are required to conceal the fact that there is a secretive Shin tradition. The diminishing numbers of adherents has had a snowball effect: as numbers of members diminish, so proportionately do the number of people who can find and introduce new trustworthy people to the zenchishiki, to whom he can then reveal the secret teachings.

A fifth and final issue worth mentioning relates to finding and training new zenchishiki to replace those that are dying off. To become a zenchishiki requires an extensive commitment of years to memorize lengthy texts and to receive proper instruction of the secrets in the Gosho. As there are fewer shinjingyōja than in the past, there are also fewer who are willing to give this commitment. This problem also relates directly to Urahōmon’s secrecy. Because secrecy discourages the writing down of instructions and interpretations of texts, it makes the training process more arduous as instruction has to take place in person and with oral verbatim memorization. If things could be written down in words or in illustrations, it would be easier to teach and learn the material that needs to be mastered, and more might be willing to pursue becoming zenchishiki. The current decline in zenchishiki is what most threatens the future of Urahōmon because without them there will be no one who knows or be able to convey what shinjingyōja see as the ultimate teachings.

* Due to attempts by covert Shin Buddhists to conceal their existence and activities from outsiders, knowledge of events in their history has remained limited and largely undocumented. The timeline in this profile includes some of the small number of events and episodes over a long period of history during which covert Shin Buddhists were brought into public view.

REFERENCES

Chiba Jōryu. 1996. “Orthodox and Herterodoxy in Early Modern Shinshū: Kakushi nenbutsu and Kakure nenbutsu.” Pp. 463-96 in The Pure Land Tradition: History and Development, edited by James Foard, Michael Solomon, and Richard K. Payne. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Chilson, Clark. 2014. Secrecy’s Power: Covert Shin Buddhists in Japan and Contradictions of Concealment. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.

Chilson, Clark. 2012. “Preaching as Performance: Notes on a Secretive Shin Buddhist Sermon.” Pp. 142-53 in Studying Buddhism in Practice, edited by John Harding. London: Routledge.

Dobbins, James. 1989 Jōdo Shinshū: Shin Buddhism in Medieval Japan. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Hirota, Dennis, translator. 1997. The Collected Works of Shinran, 2 vols. Kyoto: Jōdo Shinshū Hongwanji-ha.

Nelson, John. 2012. “Japanese Secularities and the Decline of Temple Buddhism.” Journal of Religion in Japan 1:37–60.

Reader, Ian. 2012. “Secularisation, R.I.P.? Nonsense! The ‘Rush Hour Away from the Gods’ and the Decline of Religion in Contemporary Japan.” Journal of Religion in Japan 1:7–36.

Reader, Ian. 2011. “Buddhism in Crisis? Institutional Decline in Modern Japan.” Buddhist Studies Review 28:233–63.

Rogers, Minor and Ann Rogers. 1991. Rennyo: The Second Founder of Shin Buddhism. Berkeley: Asian Humanities Press.

Suzuki, D. T. 1986. “An Autobiographical Account.” Pp. 13-26 in A Zen Life: D. T. Suzuki Remembered, edited by Masao Abe. New York: Weatherhill.

Post Date:
2 September 2015

 

Share